Interventions to decrease complications after shoulder dystocia: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

A critical evaluation of the external and internal maneuvers for resolution of shoulder dystocia

In the management of shoulder dystocia, it is often recommended to start with external maneuvers, such as the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure, followed by internal maneuvers including rotation and posterior arm delivery. However, this sequence is not based on scientific evidence of its success rates, the technical simplicity, or the related complication rates. Hence, this review critically evaluates the success rate, technique, and safety of different maneuvers. Retrospective reviews showed that posterior arm delivery has consistently higher success rates (86.1%) than rotational methods (62.4%) and external maneuvers (56.0%). McRoberts maneuver was thought to be a simple method, however, its mechanism is not clear. Furthermore, McRoberts position still requires subsequent traction on the fetal neck, which presents a risk for brachial plexus injury. The 2 internal maneuvers have anatomic rationales with the aim of rotating the shoulders to the wider oblique pelvic dimension or reducing the shoulder width. The techniques are not more sophisticated and requires the accoucher to insert the correct hand (according to fetal face direction) through the more spacious sacro-posterior region and deep enough to reach the fetal chest or posterior forearm. The performance of rotation and posterior arm delivery can also be integrated and performed using the same hand. Retrospective studies may give a biased view that the internal maneuvers are riskier. First, a less severely impacted shoulder dystocia is more likely to have been managed by external maneuvers, subjecting more difficult cases to internal maneuvers. Second, neonatal injuries were not necessarily caused by the internal maneuvers that led to delivery but could have been caused by the preceding unsuccessful external maneuvers. The procedural safety is not primarily related to the nature of the maneuvers, but to how properly these maneuvers are performed. When all these maneuvers have failed, it is important to consider the reasons for failure otherwise repetition of the maneuver cycle is just a random trial and error. If the posterior axilla is just above the pelvic outlet and reachable, posterior axilla traction using either the accoucher fingers or a sling is a feasible alternative. Its mechanism is not just outward traction but also rotation of the shoulders to the wider oblique pelvic dimension. If the posterior axilla is at a higher sacral level, a sling may be formed with the assistance of a long right-angle forceps, otherwise, more invasive methods such as Zavanelli maneuver, abdominal rescue, or symphysiotomy are the last resorts.

Prescriptive and proscriptive lessons for managing shoulder dystocia: a technical and videographical tutorial

This tutorial of the intrapartum management of shoulder dystocia uses drawings and videos of simulated and actual deliveries to illustrate the biomechanical principles of specialized delivery maneuvers and examine missteps associated with brachial plexus injury. It is intended to complement haptic, mannequin-based simulation training. Demonstrative explication of each maneuver is accompanied by specific examples of what not to do. Positive (prescriptive) instruction prioritizes early use of direct fetal manipulation and stresses the importance of determining the alignment of the fetal shoulders by direct palpation, and that the biacromial width should be manually adjusted to an oblique orientation within the pelvis-before application of traction to the fetal head, the biacromial width is manually adjusted to an oblique orientation within the pelvis. Negative (proscriptive) instructions includes the following: to avoid more than usual and/or laterally directed traction, to use episiotomy only as a means to gain access to the posterior shoulder and arm, and to use a 2-step procedure in which a 60-second hands-off period ("do not do anything") is inserted between the emergence of the head and any initial attempts at downward traction to allow for spontaneous rotation of the fetal shoulders. The tutorial presents a stepwise approach focused on the delivering clinician's tasks while including the role of assistive techniques, including McRoberts, Gaskin, and Sims positioning, suprapubic pressure, and episiotomy. Video footage of actual deliveries involving shoulder dystocia and permanent brachial plexus injury demonstrates ambiguities in making the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia, risks of improper traction and torsion of the head, and overreliance on repeating maneuvers that prove initially unsuccessful.

The impact of birth settings on pregnancy outcomes in the United States

In the United States, 98.3% of patients give birth in hospitals, 1.1% give birth at home, and 0.5% give birth in freestanding birth centers. This review investigated the impact of birth settings on birth outcomes in the United States. Presently, there are insufficient data to evaluate levels of maternal mortality and severe morbidity according to place of birth. Out-of-hospital births are associated with fewer interventions such as episiotomies, epidural anesthesia, operative deliveries, and cesarean deliveries. When compared with hospital births, there are increased rates of avoidable adverse perinatal outcomes in out-of-hospital births in the United States, both for those with and without risk factors. In one recent study, the neonatal mortality rates were significantly elevated for all planned home births: 13.66 per 10,000 live births (242/177,156; odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 3.62-4.84; P<.0001) vs 3.27 per 10,000 live births for in-hospital Certified Nurse-Midwife-attended births (745/2,280,044; odds ratio, 1). These differences increased further when patients were stratified by recognized risk factors such as breech presentation, multiple gestations, nulliparity, advanced maternal age, and postterm pregnancy. Causes of the increased perinatal morbidity and mortality include deliveries of patients with increased risks, absence of standardized criteria to exclude high-risk deliveries, and that most midwives attending out-of-hospital births in the United States do not meet the gold standard for midwifery regulation, the International Confederation of Midwives' Global Standards for Midwifery Education. As part of the informed consent process, pregnant patients interested in out-of-hospital births should be informed of its increased perinatal risks. Hospital births should be supported for all patients, especially those with increased risks.

Shoulder Dystocia: Challenging Basic Assumptions

Most of our knowledge pertaining to this obstetric emergency has emanated from case reports and retrospective studies that have subsequently resulted in empirical management protocols. This article has identified the existence of large gaps in our clinical knowledge base regarding the prevention and resolution of shoulder dystocia, as well as its long-term sequelae. We have attempted to challenge current recommendations regarding whether prophylactic cesarean delivery should be performed based on estimated fetal weight alone or a prior history of shoulder dystocia, shoulder dystocia management techniques, what defines "excessive" traction, and the role of simulation training for all clinicians.

Impact of simulation training on the management of shoulder dystocia and incidence of permanent brachial plexus birth injury: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of shoulder dystocia (SD) simulation training on the management of SD and the incidence of permanent brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Helsinki University Women's Hospital, Finland.

SAMPLE

Deliveries with SD.

METHODS

Multi-professional, regular and systematic simulation training for obstetric emergencies began in 2015, and SD was one of the main themes. A study was conducted to assess changes in SD management and the incidence of permanent BPBI. The study period was from 2010 to 2019; years 2010-2014 were considered the pre-training period and years 2015-2019 were considered the post-training period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the incidence of permanent BPBI after the implementation of systematic simulation training. Changes in the management of SD were also analysed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 113 085 vertex deliveries were recorded. The incidence of major SD risk factors (gestational diabetes, induction of labour, vacuum extraction) increased and was significantly higher for each of these factors during the post-training period (p < 0.001). The incidence of SD also increased significantly (0.01% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001) during the study period, but the number of children with permanent BPBI decreased by 55% after the implementation of systematic simulation training (0.05% vs 0.02%, p < 0.001). The most significant change in the management of SD was the increased incidence of successful delivery of the posterior arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic simulation-based training of midwives and doctors can translate into improved individual and team performance and can significantly reduce the incidence of permanent BPBI.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, March 2022

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of systemic racism and its effect on maternal health in the United States and commentaries on reviews focused on barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination and delayed cord clamping in preterm infants.

Simulation in neonatal care: towards a change in traditional training?

Simulation has traditionally been used in neonatal medicine for educational purposes which include training of novice learners, maintaining competency of health care providers, and training of multidisciplinary teams to handle crisis situations such as neonatal resuscitation. Current guidelines recommend the use of simulation as an education tool in neonatal practice. The place of simulation-based education has gradually expanded, including in limited resource settings, and is starting to show its impact on improving patient outcomes on a global basis. Over the past years, simulation has become a cornerstone in clinical settings with the goal of establishing high quality, safe, reliable systems. The aim of this review is to describe neonatal simulation training as an effective tool to improve quality of care and patient outcomes, and to encourage the use of simulation-based training in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for not only education, but equally for team building, risk management and quality improvement.

CONCLUSION

Simulation is a promising tool to improve patient safety, team performance, and ultimately patient outcomes, but scarcity of data on clinically relevant outcomes makes it difficult to estimate its real impact. The integration of simulation into the clinical reality with a goal of establishing high quality, safe, reliable, and robust systems to improve patient safety and patient outcomes in neonatology must be a priority.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Simulation-based education has traditionally focused on procedural and technical skills. • Simulation-based training is effective in teaching non-technical skills such as communication, leadership, and teamwork, and is recommended in neonatal resuscitation.

WHAT IS NEW

• There is emerging evidence for the impact of simulation-based training on patient outcomes in neonatal care, but data on clinically relevant outcomes are scarce. • Simulation is a promising tool for establishing high quality, safe, reliable, and robust systems to improve patient safety and patient outcomes.