Preoperative pudendal block with liposomal and plain bupivacaine reduces pain associated with posterior colporrhaphy: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Pudendal Block at the Time of Transvaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IMPORTANCE

The utility of pudendal nerve blocks (PNBs) at the time of transvaginal surgery is mixed in the literature. No published study has evaluated the efficacy of PNB since the widespread adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if PNB, in addition to ERAS measures, at the time of vaginal reconstructive surgery reduces opioid use in the immediate postoperative period.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized, blinded, controlled trial, women scheduled for transvaginal multicompartment prolapse repair were randomized to bilateral PNB before incision with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine versus usual care. Primary outcome was opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for the first 24 hours. The study was powered to detect a 5.57-MME difference in opioid use in the first 24 hours between groups.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were randomized from January 2020 to April 2022. The PNB and control groups were well matched in demographic and surgical data. There was no difference in opioid use in first 24 hours between the control and PNB groups (8 [0-20] vs 6.7 [0-15]; P = 0.8). Median pain scores at 24 and 48 hours did not differ between groups (4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 3; P = 0.44) and 90% of participants were satisfied with pain control across both groups. Time to return to normal activities (median, 10 days) was also not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Because pain satisfaction after transvaginal surgery in the era of ERAS is high, with overall low opioid requirements, PNB provides no additional benefit.

Pudendal Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension

IMPORTANCE

Pudendal nerve block has been frequently used as a pain management modality for vaginal prolapse surgery. However, studies investigating its efficacy and the type of anesthetic used have had conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative pudendal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine on postoperative pain after sacrospinous ligament suspension surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 83 women undergoing sacrospinous ligament suspension were randomized to receive either intraoperative pudendal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine or no block. Participants recorded their pain level on postoperative days (PODs) 1-3 and 7, the number of pain medication pills consumed, and the quality of their recovery using a validated questionnaire.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in pain scores between the groups on POD 1 and POD 3: 5 (2-6.25) versus 5.5 (4-8; P = 0.058) and 4 (1-6) versus 5 (2-7; P = 0.146), respectively. On POD 2, the overall pain score was statistically different between the groups, with the block group having lower interquartile ranges. This difference, however, was not clinically significant: 5 (1.75-5) versus 5 (3.25-7.75; P = 0.023). In the subset of participants who underwent a concomitant midurethral sling procedure, POD 2 and POD3 pain scores were significantly lower in those who received the block: 3 (1-5) versus 6 (5-8; P = 0.006) for POD 2 and 3 (1-5) versus 5 (3.250-7; P = 0.042) for POD 3. There were no significant differences in pain medication consumption or the quality of recovery scores.

CONCLUSION

Pudendal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine did not result in significant differences in postoperative pain after sacrospinous ligament suspension, except in those participants who underwent a concomitant midurethral sling procedure.

Pudendal Nerve Block Analgesia at the Time of Vaginal Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial

IMPORTANCE

Effective opioid-sparing postoperative analgesia requires a multimodal approach. Regional nerve blocks augment pain control in many surgical fields and may be applied to pelvic floor reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pudendal nerve block on postoperative pain control and opioid consumption after vaginal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, we enrolled women undergoing pelvic reconstruction, excluding patients with chronic pelvic pain or contraindications to nonnarcotic analgesia. Patients were randomized to transvaginal pudendal nerve block (9 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 mL 40 mg/mL triamcinolone) or sham injection (10 mL normal saline). Primary outcomes were pain scores and opioid requirements. Sixty patients were required to show a 20-mm difference on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

We randomized 71 patients: 36 pudendal block and 35 sham. Groups were well matched in baseline characteristics and surgery type. Prolapse repairs were most common (n = 63 [87.5%]), and there was no difference in anesthetic dose or operative time. Pain scores were equivalent in the postanesthesia care unit (mean VAS, 53.1 [block] vs 56.4 [sham]; P = 0.517) and on postoperative day 4 (mean VAS, 26.7 [block] vs 35.5 [sham]; P = 0.131). On postoperative day 1, the intervention group reported less pain, but this did not meet our 20 mm goal for clinical significance (mean VAS, 29.2 vs 42.5; P = 0.047). A pudendal block was associated with lower opioid consumption at all time points, but this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon-administered pudendal nerve block at the time of vaginal surgery may not significantly improve postoperative pain control or decrease opioid use.

The postoperative analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus long-acting local anaesthetics for peripheral nerve and field blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis, with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Liposomal bupivacaine is claimed by the manufacturer to provide analgesia for up to 72 h postoperatively.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus long-acting local anaesthetics for peripheral nerve or field blocks.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science, among others, up to June 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We retrieved randomised controlled trials comparing liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine, levobupivacaine or ropivacaine for peripheral nerve and field blocks after all types of surgery. Our primary endpoint was rest pain score (analogue scale 0 to 10) at 24 h. Secondary endpoints included rest pain score at 48 and 72 h, and morphine consumption at 24, 48 and 72 h.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven trials including 2122 patients were identified. Rest pain scores at 24 h were significantly reduced by liposomal bupivacaine with a mean difference (95% CI) of -0.9 (-1.4 to -0.4), I2  = 87%, P  < 0.001. This reduction in pain scores persisted at 48 h and 72 h with mean differences (95% CI) of -0.7 (-1.1 to -0.3), I2  = 82%, P  = 0.001 and -0.7 (-1.1 to -0.3), I2  = 80%, P  < 0.001, respectively. There were no differences in interval morphine consumption at 24 h ( P  = 0.15), 48 h ( P  = 0.15) and 72 h ( P  = 0.07). The quality of evidence was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate level evidence that liposomal bupivacaine reduces rest pain scores by 0.9 out of 10 units, when compared with long-acting local anaesthetics at 24 hours after surgery, and by 0.7 up to 72 hours after surgery.

AUGS-IUGA Joint Clinical Consensus Statement on Enhanced Recovery After Urogynecologic Surgery: Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the International Urogynecological Association and the American Urogynecologic Society. Individual writing group members are noted in the Acknowledgements section

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care can lead to improvements in clinical outcomes and cost savings. This article aims to present consensus recommendations for the optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing urogynecological surgery.

METHODS

A review of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, large nonrandomized studies, and review articles was conducted via PubMed and other databases for ERAS and urogynecological surgery. ERAS protocol components were established, and then quality of the evidence was both graded and used to form consensus recommendations for each topic. These recommendations were developed and endorsed by the writing group, which is comprised of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association members.

RESULTS

All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. The components of ERAS with a high level of evidence to support their use include fasting for 6 h and taking clear fluids up to 2 h preoperatively, euvolemia, normothermia, surgical site preparation, antibiotic and antithrombotic prophylaxis, strong antiemetics and dexamethasone to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, multimodal analgesia and restrictive use of opiates, use of chewing gum to reduce ileus, removal of catheter as soon as feasible after surgery and avoiding systematic use of drains/vaginal packs.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence base and recommendations for a urogynecology-relevant ERAS perioperative care pathway are presented in this consensus review. There are several elements of ERAS with strong evidence of benefit in urogynecological surgery.

Preemptive Infiltration of Local Anesthetics During Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IMPORTANCE

Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is the preferred route of choice for women desiring hysterectomy to treat uterine pathology, including premalignant conditions and fibroids.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of preemptive local analgesia (LA) on postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes for women undergoing VH.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov ) was performed for articles published up to January 2021. All randomized controlled trials that presented outcomes of patients who underwent VH due to pelvic floor disorders or other benign gynecological disorders and received local infiltration analgesia were finally included.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies with 277 women (138 LA group vs 199 no-LA group) who underwent a VH were included in the present meta-analysis. Mean pain scores at both 30 minutes to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (220 patients: mean difference [MD], -1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.77 to -0.74; P = 0.0007; and 220 patients: MD, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.28 to 1.09; P < 0.00001, respectively). Morphine/narcotic opioid-based consumption up to 24 hours postoperatively was significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (197 patients MD, -9.47 mg; 95% CI, -16.51 to -2.43; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of preemptive LA during VH seems to be beneficial especially with regard to short-term postoperative pain and opioid use. However, further studies are needed to identify the optimal anesthetic regimen, the dosage, and sites of application aiming to achieve the optimal benefit in the postoperative management.