1
|
Lok C, van Trommel N, Braicu EI, Planchamp F, Berkowitz R, Seckl M. Practical Guidelines for the Treatment of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Collaboration of the European Organisation for the Treatment of Trophoblastic Disease (EOTTD)-European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO)-Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG)-International Society for the Study of Trophoblastic Diseases (ISSTD). J Clin Oncol 2025:JCO2402326. [PMID: 40359461 DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-02326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Gestational trophoblastic diseases (GTDs) are a group of pregnancy-related premalignant and malignant diseases with generally a favorable prognosis when treated adequately. Many different treatment protocols exist worldwide. To our knowledge, this is the first set of global consensus-based guidelines for GTD. Four international organizations (European Organisation for the Treatment of Trophoblastic Diseases, European Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup, and International Society for the Study of Trophoblastic Diseases) delegated 53 expert GTD clinicians from 31 countries who formulated nine consensus-based definitions and the minimum criteria required to be a GTD center. Furthermore, 18 flow diagrams were developed to diagnose, treat, and follow up all forms of primary or recurrent GTD. The definitions and flow diagrams were drafted and adapted in consecutive (online) meetings until consensus was reached followed by an external review process. Here, the final guidelines are presented together with the available supporting evidence from the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke van Trommel
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, Center of Oncological Surgery, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ross Berkowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Seckl
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Charing Cross Hospital Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Center, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Braga A, Paiva G, Alevato R, Saldanha P, Elias KM, Horowitz NS, Berkowitz RS. Treatment of High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:1245-1258. [PMID: 39322460 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
High-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia encompasses patients with high volumes of disease or diffuse metastatic involvement who are unlikely to achieve remission with single-agent chemotherapy. Etoposide-based multi-drug regimens form the core of high-risk therapy. Second-line therapy includes platinum-based regimens. Increasingly, third-line therapy uses immunotherapy. Surgical intervention may be required to resect foci of resistant disease or manage complications. Treatment should continue until the hCG is less that the reference range for normal, followed by at least 3 cycles of consolidation therapy. At least 2 years of hCG surveillance are advisable for most patients requiring multiagent therapy to encompass 95% of relapses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Braga
- Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Rua Ataíde Parreiras, 100, Bairro de Fátima, Niterói, RJ, 24070-090, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rua Laranjeiras, 180, Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22240-003, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences, Vassouras University, Av. Expedicionário Osvaldo de Almeida Ramos, 250, Bloco 03, 2 andar, Centro, Vassouras, RJ, 27700-000, Brazil.
| | - Gabriela Paiva
- Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Rua Ataíde Parreiras, 100, Bairro de Fátima, Niterói, RJ, 24070-090, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Raphael Alevato
- Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Rua Ataíde Parreiras, 100, Bairro de Fátima, Niterói, RJ, 24070-090, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Penélope Saldanha
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rua Laranjeiras, 180, Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22240-003, Brazil
| | - Kevin M Elias
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ross S Berkowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alimena S, Elias KM, Horowitz NS, Berkowitz RS. Initial Diagnosis and Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:1233-1244. [PMID: 39327132 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare form of cancer that is treated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) risk score, which predicts responsiveness to single-agent chemotherapy. Patients with WHO risk scores ≤6 have low-risk GTN, for which cure rates near 100%. Most women with low-risk GTN will respond to single-agent chemotherapy, which is given with either methotrexate or dactinomycin, and allows women to retain their fertility. This article also discusses less common treatment paradigms including second dilation and curettage and hysterectomy, as well as the emerging role of immunotherapy in managing low-risk GTN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Alimena
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Kevin M Elias
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ross S Berkowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xue W, Cang W, Zhao J, Feng F, Wan X, Ren T, Qiu L, Yang J, Xiang Y. Effect of actinomycin D on ovarian reserve in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1222-1226. [PMID: 37290904 PMCID: PMC10423527 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the single-agent chemotherapy actinomycin D on ovarian reserve by measuring the anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels before, during, and after chemotherapy. METHODS This study recruited premenopausal women aged 15 to 45 with a newly diagnosed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia needing actinomycin D. AMH was measured at baseline, during chemotherapy, and 1, 3, and 6 months after the last chemotherapy. The reproductive outcomes were also documented. RESULTS Of the 42 women recruited, we analyzed 37 (median: 29 years; range 19-45) with a complete dataset. The follow-up was 36 months (range 34-39). Actinomycin D significantly decreased AMH concentrations during treatment, from 2.38±0.92 ng/mL to 1.02±0.96 ng/mL (p<0.05). Partial recovery was seen at 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Full recovery was reached 6 months after treatment among patients younger than 35 years. The only factor correlated with the extent of AMH reduction at 3 months was age (r=0.447, p<0.05). Notably, the number of courses of actinomycin D was not associated with the extent of AMH reduction. A total of 18 (90%) of 20 patients who had a desire to conceive had live births with no adverse pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION Actinomycin D has a transient and minor effect on ovarian function. Age is the only factor that impacts the patient's rate of recovery. Patients will achieve favorable reproductive outcomes after actinomycin D treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Xue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Cang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Fengzhi Feng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Xirun Wan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Tong Ren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Ling Qiu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Junjun Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Xiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Braga A, Balthar E, Souza LCS, Samora M, Rech M, Madi JM, Junior JA, Filho JR, Elias KM, Horowitz NS, Sun SY, Berkowitz RS. Immunotherapy in the treatment of chemoresistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia - systematic review with a presentation of the first 4 Brazilian cases. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2023; 78:100260. [PMID: 37523979 PMCID: PMC10404605 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy for GTN treatment after methotrexate-resistance or in cases of multiresistant disease, through a systematic review, as well as to present the first 4 Brazilian cases of immunotherapy for GTN treatment. METHODS Three independent researchers searched five electronic databases (EMBASE, LILACS, Medline, CENTRAL and Web of Science), for relevant articles up to February/2023 (PROSPERO CRD42023401453). The quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale for case series and case reports. The primary outcome of this study was the occurrence of complete remission. The presentation of the case reports was approved by the Institutional Review Board. RESULTS Of the 4 cases presented, the first was a low-risk GTN with methotrexate resistance unsuccessfully treated with avelumab, which achieved remission with sequential multiagent chemotherapy. The remaining 3 cases were high-risk multiagent-resistant GTN that were successfully treated with pembrolizumab, among which there were two subsequent gestations, one of them with normal pregnancy and healthy conceptus. Regarding the systematic review, 12 studies were included, only one of them on avelumab, showing a 46.7% complete remission rate. The remaining 11 studies were on pembrolizumab, showing an 86.7% complete remission rate, regardless of tumor histology. Both immunotherapies showed good tolerability, with two healthy pregnancies being recorded: one after avelumb and another after pembrolizumab. CONCLUSION Immunotherapy showed effectiveness for GTN treatment and may be especially useful in cases of high-risk disease, where pembrolizumab achieves a high therapeutic response, regardless of the histological type, and despite prior chemoresistance to multiple lines of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Braga
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro da Universidade Federal Fluminense, RJ, Niterói, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculdade de Medicina, Maternidade Escola da, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, RJ, Niterói, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences, Universidade de Vassouras, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Young Leadership Physicians Program, Academia Nacional de Medicina, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Elaine Balthar
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro da Universidade Federal Fluminense, RJ, Niterói, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculdade de Medicina, Maternidade Escola da, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense, RJ, Niterói, Brazil
| | - Laís Cristhine Santos Souza
- Departament of Obstetrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Michelle Samora
- Departament of Obstetrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Matheus Rech
- Caxias do Sul Trophoblastic Disease Center, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), RS, Caxias do Sul, Brazil
| | - José Mauro Madi
- Caxias do Sul Trophoblastic Disease Center, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), RS, Caxias do Sul, Brazil
| | - Joffre Amim Junior
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro da Universidade Federal Fluminense, RJ, Niterói, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculdade de Medicina, Maternidade Escola da, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Jorge Rezende Filho
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro da Universidade Federal Fluminense, RJ, Niterói, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculdade de Medicina, Maternidade Escola da, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Kevin M Elias
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Sue Yazaki Sun
- Departament of Obstetrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ross S Berkowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deleuze A, Massard C, Le Du F, You B, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Bolze PA, de la Motte Rouge T. Management of trophoblastic tumors : review of evidence, current practice, and future directions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:699-708. [PMID: 37198729 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2215438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a group of rare tumors characterized by abnormal trophoblastic proliferation following pregnancy including invasive moles, choriocarcinomas, and intermediate trophoblastic tumors (ITT). Although the treatment and follow-up of GTN has been heterogeneous, globally the emergence of expert networks has helped to harmonize its management. AREAS COVERED We provide an overview of the current knowledge, diagnosis, and management strategies in GTN and discuss innovative therapeutic options under investigation. While chemotherapy has been the historical backbone of GTN treatment, promising drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently being investigated remodeling the therapeutical landscape of trophoblastic tumors. EXPERT OPINION Chemotherapy regimens for GTN have potential long-term effects on fertility and quality of life, making innovative and less toxic therapeutic approaches necessary. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise in reversing immune tolerance in GTN and have been evaluated in several trials. However, immunotherapy is associated with rare but life-threatening adverse events and evidence of immune-related infertility in mice, highlighting the need for further research and careful consideration of its use. Innovative biomarkers could help personalize GTN treatments and reduce chemotherapy burden in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Deleuze
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | | | - Fanny Le Du
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Benoit You
- Department of Gynecological Oncological, and Obstetrics Department, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- French Reference Center for Trophoblastic Diseases, University Hospital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
- Institute of Cancerology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CITOHL, Lyon, UR, France
| | | | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Department of Gynecological Oncological, and Obstetrics Department, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Institute of Cancerology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CITOHL, Lyon, UR, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han E, Seifer DB. Oocyte Cryopreservation for Medical and Planned Indications: A Practical Guide and Overview. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103542. [PMID: 37240648 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Oocyte cryopreservation (OC) is the process in which ovarian follicles are stimulated, the follicular fluid is retrieved, and mature oocytes are isolated and vitrified. Since the first successful pregnancy utilizing previously cryopreserved oocytes in 1986, OC has become increasingly utilized as an option for future biologic children in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies, such as for the treatment of cancer. Planned OC, also termed elective OC, is growing in popularity as a means to circumvent age-related fertility decline. In this narrative review, we describe both medically indicated and planned OC, focusing on the physiology of ovarian follicular loss, OC technique and risks, timing of when OC should be performed, associated financial considerations, and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Han
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - David B Seifer
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Braga A, Andrade T, do Carmo Borges de Souza M, Campos V, Freitas F, Maestá I, Sun SY, Pedrotti LG, Bessel M, Junior JA, Filho JR, Elias KM, Horowitz NS, Berkowitz RS. Presentation, medical complications and development of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia of hydatidiform mole after intracytoplasmic sperm injection as compared to hydatidiform mole after spontaneous conception - a retrospective cohort study and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:179-185. [PMID: 36706644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the natural history of hydatidiform mole (HM) after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), emphasizing the clinical and oncological outcomes, as compared to patients who had HM after spontaneous conception (SC). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective historical cohort study of patients with HM followed at the Rio de Janeiro Federal University, from January 1st 2000-December 31st 2020. RESULTS Comparing singleton HM after SC to those following ICSI there were differences in terms of maternal age (24 vs 34 years, p < 0.01), gestational age at diagnosis (10 vs 7 weeks, p < 0.01), preevacuation human chorionic gonadotropin levels (200,000 vs 99,000 IU/L, p < 0.01), occurrence of genital bleeding (60.5 vs 26.9%, p < 0.01) and hyperemesis (23 vs 3.9%, p = 0.02) at presentation, and time to remission (12 vs 5 weeks, p < 0.01), respectively. There were no differences observed in the cases of twin mole, regardless of the form of fertilization that gave rise to HM, except molar histology with greater occurrence of partial hydatidiform mole (10.7 vs 40.0%, p = 0.01) following ICSI. Univariate logistic regression for occurrence of postmolar GTN after ICSI identified no predictor variable for this outcome. However, after adjusting for maternal age and complete hydatidiform mole histology, multivariable logistic regression showed the risk of GTN with HM after ICSI had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.22 (95%CI:0.05-0.93, p = 0.04), suggesting a possible protective effect when compared to HM after SC. CONCLUSIONS Singleton HM after ICSI are diagnosed earlier in gestation, present with fewer medical complications, and may be less likely to develop GTN when compared with HM after SC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Braga
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University), Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences, Vassouras University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; National Academy of Medicine, Young Leadership Physicians Program, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
| | - Taiane Andrade
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University), Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Maria do Carmo Borges de Souza
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University), Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Vanessa Campos
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University), Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Freitas
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University), Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
| | - Izildinha Maestá
- Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center of the Clinical Hospital of Botucatu Medical School, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - Sue Yazaki Sun
- Departament of Obstetrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Joffre Amim Junior
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University), Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Jorge Rezende Filho
- Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center (Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University), Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Kevin M Elias
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ross S Berkowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Braga A, Paiva G, Cattai CJ, Elias KM, Horowitz NS, Berkowitz RS. Current chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:245-258. [PMID: 36399723 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2150075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare tumor that arises from trophoblastic tissues with high remission rates after chemotherapy treatment. GTN can develop from any gestational events, such as miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and preterm/term pregnancy, but is more frequent after hydatidiform mole. The sensitivity of this tumor to chemotherapy and the presence of an exceptional tumor marker allow high remission rates, especially when patients are treated in referral centers. AREAS COVERED Observational, retrospective, prospective, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis studies focusing on GTN treatment. We searched PubMed, Medline, and the Library of Congress from January 1965 to May 2022. EXPERT OPINION Early GTN diagnosis allows low-toxic and highly effective treatment. Even multimetastatic disease has high rates of remission with multiagent regimen chemotherapy. Surgery is reserved for uterine disease in patients who have completed childbearing, in cases of chemoresistance to multiagent regimens or in the rare cases of placental site trophoblastic tumor or epithelioid trophoblastic tumor. While resistance is managed by salvage chemotherapy, cases with limited clinical response to sequential regimens have been successfully treated with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Braga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,, Department of Maternal Child, Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.,Department of Medicine, Vassouras Medical School, Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences, Vassouras University, Vassouras, RJ, Brazil.,National Academy of Medicine, Young Leadership Physician Program, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Paiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,, Department of Maternal Child, Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
| | - Cassia Juliana Cattai
- , Department of Maternal Child, Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Antonio Pedro University Hospital of Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
| | - Kevin M Elias
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ross S Berkowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|