Real-time imaging as visual biofeedback in active second stage of labor among nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial

Neonatal head circumference to maternal mid-transverse pelvic distance ratio as a key anatomical predictor for dystocia: Retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine maternal and neonatal factors in cesarean deliveries due to dystocia, including cephalopelvic disproportion, latent-phase prolongation, and fetal malposition or malpresentation. Additionally, we sought to compare the differences between the dystocia subgroups.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This retrospective case-control study included women who delivered between January 2010 and June 2021 after 37 weeks of pregnancy and underwent abdominal-pelvic CT scans within 5 years before and after delivery. Neonatal factors were extracted from medical charts immediately after delivery.

RESULTS

Among the 292 women studied, those with cesarean deliveries for dystocia were older (mean ± SD, 34.2 ± 4.27 vs. 32.2 ± 3.8, p-value = 0.002), had higher pre-pregnancy BMI (22.7 ± 3.67 vs. 21.4 ± 3.48, p-value = 0.012) and term-BMI (27.4 ± 3.72 vs. 25.9 ± 3.66, p-value = 0.010), shorter interspinous distance (ISD, the distance between ischial spine) (10.8 ± 0.76 vs. 11.2 ± 0.85 cm, p-value = 0.003), and longer head circumference (HC) (35 ± 1.47 vs. 34.4 ± 1.36 cm, p-value = 0.003) compared to those who had vaginal deliveries. Univariate logistic regression for dystocia revealed associations between HC/maternal height and HC/ISD ratios (OR, 2.02 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.4 ~ 2.92], 12.13 [3.2 ~ 46.04], respectively). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that maternal age, ISD, and HC were significant factors for dystocia (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.01 ~ 1.21], 0.49 [0.26 ~ 0.91], 1.53 [1.07 ~ 2.19], respectively). The subgroup with latent-phase prolongation exhibited the lowest birthweight/term-BMI ratio (124 ± 18.8 vs. 113 ± 10.3 vs. 134 ± 19.1, p-value = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The HC/ISD ratio emerged as a crucial predictor of dystocia, suggesting that reducing term-BMI could potentially mitigate latent-phase prolongation. Further research assessing the maternal mid-pelvis during pregnancy and labor is warranted, along with efforts to reduce BMI during pregnancy.

Electric massage chairs reduce labor pain in nulliparous patients: a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Labor pain varies significantly among pregnant women, ranging from mild to extremely distressing. Nonpharmacologic pain relief methods during vaginal birth are increasingly popular, either as a complement to pharmacologic agents or, at times, as the primary method of pain relief. Multiple trials have reported that manual or by-hand massage reduces labor pain. The effectiveness of full-body mechanical massage using electric massage chairs on labor pain remains unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate mechanical massage using an electric massage chair on labor pain in nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized counterbalanced crossover trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from August 2022 to February 2023. Eligible nulliparas in labor with a minimum labor pain score of 5 (0-10 numerical rating scale) were enrolled. Participants were randomized to 30 minutes on the massage chair with mechanical massage followed by 30 minutes on the massage chair without mechanical massage or the other way around in the massage sequence. The primary outcome was a change in pain score comparing pain with and without mechanical massage as a paired comparison for the entire trial participants. The secondary outcomes were across arms analyses of maternal and neonatal outcomes. The paired t test, t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used as appropriate for the data.

RESULTS

Overall, 208 women were randomized: 104 to each intervention. Data were available from 204 participants (103 randomized to massage first and 101 to no massage first). The primary outcomes of change in labor pain scores (0-10 numerical rating scale) after massage and no massage (all participants included after crossover, paired t test analysis) were 4.51±2.30 and 5.38±2.10, respectively (mean difference, -0.87; 95% confidence interval, -1.14 to -0.59; P<.001), a significant reduction in pain score after electric chair mechanical massage compared with no massage. On the across randomized arms secondary analyses, labor pain scores after their first massage chair session were 4.35±2.52 (randomized to massage first, received massage as initial intervention) and 5.66±1.73 (randomized to no massage first, received no massage as initial intervention) (mean difference, -1.31; 95% confidence interval, -1.91 to -0.748; P<.001), a significant reduction after mechanical massage. Other distal maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, labor analgesia, duration of labor, and maternal agreement that mechanical massage is effective for labor pain) and neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, cord artery blood pH and base excess, and neonatal admission) were not different across randomized arms.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical massage using an electric massage chair significantly reduced labor pain, offering a potential nonpharmacologic pain management option during labor.