The impact of peak and duration of maternal intrapartum fever on perinatal outcomes

Clinical chorioamnionitis at term: definition, pathogenesis, microbiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Clinical chorioamnionitis, the most common infection-related diagnosis in labor and delivery units, is an antecedent of puerperal infection and neonatal sepsis. The condition is suspected when intrapartum fever is associated with two other maternal and fetal signs of local or systemic inflammation (eg, maternal tachycardia, uterine tenderness, maternal leukocytosis, malodorous vaginal discharge or amniotic fluid, and fetal tachycardia). Clinical chorioamnionitis is a syndrome caused by intraamniotic infection, sterile intraamniotic inflammation (inflammation without bacteria), or systemic maternal inflammation induced by epidural analgesia. In cases of uncertainty, a definitive diagnosis can be made by analyzing amniotic fluid with methods to detect bacteria (Gram stain, culture, or microbial nucleic acid) and inflammation (white blood cell count, glucose concentration, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, matrix metalloproteinase-8). The most common microorganisms are Ureaplasma species, and polymicrobial infections occur in 70% of cases. The fetal attack rate is low, and the rate of positive neonatal blood cultures ranges between 0.2% and 4%. Intrapartum antibiotic administration is the standard treatment to reduce neonatal sepsis. Treatment with ampicillin and gentamicin have been recommended by professional societies, although other antibiotic regimens, eg, cephalosporins, have been used. Given the importance of Ureaplasma species as a cause of intraamniotic infection, consideration needs to be given to the administration of antimicrobial agents effective against these microorganisms such as azithromycin or clarithromycin. We have used the combination of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole, which has been shown to eradicate intraamniotic infection with microbiologic studies. Routine testing of neonates born to affected mothers for genital mycoplasmas could improve the detection of neonatal sepsis. Clinical chorioamnionitis is associated with decreased uterine activity, failure to progress in labor, and postpartum hemorrhage; however, clinical chorioamnionitis by itself is not an indication for cesarean delivery. Oxytocin is often administered for labor augmentation, and it is prudent to have uterotonic agents at hand to manage postpartum hemorrhage. Infants born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis near term are at risk for early-onset neonatal sepsis and for long-term disability such as cerebral palsy. A frontier is the noninvasive assessment of amniotic fluid to diagnose intraamniotic inflammation with a transcervical amniotic fluid collector and a rapid bedside test for IL-8 for patients with ruptured membranes. This approach promises to improve diagnostic accuracy and to provide a basis for antimicrobial administration.

Perinatal outcomes and risk factors for epidural analgesia-associated intrapartum maternal fever: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia (EA) increases the risks of maternal fever during labor, which is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, while the risk factors for epidural-associated fever and strategies for minimizing these effects remain limited.

METHODS

A total of 325 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed who had attended our hospital for a vaginal in-hospital delivery, including 208 who voluntarily accepted EA and 117 who did not receive EA. During labor, 208 EA women were allocated to a fever group (n = 42, a tympanic temperature ≥37.5 °C during labor), and a no fever group (n = 166). The outcome measures included main maternal and neonatal outcomes, labor times, duration of EA and the total EA dosage administered.

RESULTS

42 out of 208 women given EA exhibited fever temperatures during labor, which were higher than in women who did not receive EA (20.19% vs. 0.85%). Maternal fever had an increased risks for conversion to surgery (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 4.05; 95% CI, 1.44-11.39) and neonatal infections (5.13; 1.98-13.29) compared to the no fever group. While maternal fever did not increase the risks for assisted vaginal delivery, fetal distress or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), it was predominantly associated with primiparity and lesser times of gravity. Frequent cervical examinations, the duration of first stage and total labor, and the duration of EA and its total dosage were positively correlated with the incidence of fever. Furthermore, after stratifying risk factors into subgroups, we found that more frequent cervical examinations (≥7 times) and longer duration of first stage (≥442.5 min), total labor time (≥490 min), EA (≥610.0 min) increased the risk for epidural-associated fever after adjustment for potential confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

EA increased the risk of intrapartum epidural-associated fever, which was correlated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Nulliparity, less times of gravidity, ≥7 cervical examinations, increased volume of the EA dosage, prolonged duration of EA and total labor time were risk factors for epidural-associated fever. The findings provide clinicians with insights and strategies to prevent epidural-associated fever more safely and effectively.

Maternal fever in labor: etiologies, consequences, and clinical management

Intrapartum fever is common and presents diagnostic and treatment dilemmas for the clinician. True maternal sepsis is rare; only an estimated 1.4% of women with clinical chorioamnionitis at term develop severe sepsis. However, the combination of inflammation and hyperthermia adversely impacts uterine contractility and, in turn, increases the risk for cesarean delivery and postpartum hemorrhage by 2- to 3-fold. For the neonate, the rates of encephalopathy or the need for therapeutic hypothermia have been reported to be higher with a maternal fever >39°C when compared with a temperature of 38°C to 39°C (1.1 vs 4.4%; P<.01). In a large cohort study, the combination of intrapartum fever and fetal acidosis was particularly detrimental. This suggests that intrapartum fever may lower the threshold for fetal hypoxic brain injury. Because fetal hypoxia is often difficult to predict or prevent, every effort should be made to reduce the risk for intrapartum fever. The duration of exposure to epidural analgesia and the length of labor in unmedicated women remain significant risk factors for intrapartum fever. Therefore, paying careful attention to maintaining labor progress can potentially reduce the rates of intrapartum fever and the risk for cesarean delivery if fever does occur. A recent, double-blind randomized trial of nulliparas at >36 weeks' gestation demonstrated that a high-dose oxytocin regimen (6×6 mU/min) when compared with a low-dose oxytocin regimen (2×2 mU/min) led to clinically meaningful reductions in the rate of intrapartum fever (10.4% vs 15.6%; risk rate, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.92). When fever does occur, antibiotic treatment should be initiated promptly; acetaminophen may not be effective in reducing the maternal temperature. There is no evidence that reducing the duration of fetal exposure to intrapartum fever prevents known adverse neonatal outcomes. Therefore, intrapartum fever is not an indication for cesarean delivery to interrupt labor with the purpose of improving neonatal outcome. Finally, clinicians should be ready for the increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage and have uterotonic agents on hand at delivery to prevent delays in treatment.

Construction of a nomogram model for predicting infectious intrapartum fever

OBJECTIVES

To investigate influencing factors of intrapartum fever during vaginal delivery and to construct a prediction model for infectious intrapartum fever.

METHODS

A total of 444 patients with intrapartum fever admitted in Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. The clinical data and laboratory findings were compared between patients with infectious intrapartum fever and non-infectious intrapartum fever, and the factors associated with intrapartum fever were analyzed with a multivariate logistic regression model. A prediction nomogram model was constructed based on the factors of intrapartum fever and its predictive efficiency was evaluated by correction curve and receiver operator characteristic curve.

RESULTS

In the 444 cases, 182 (41.0%) had definite intrauterine infection and 262 (59.0%) had no infectious intrapartum fever. Univariate analysis showed that the length of hospital stay before induced labor, the time of induced abortion, misoprostol administration, autoimmune diseases, white blood cell count (WBC) and hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were significantly different between the two groups (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that misoprostol administration and autoimmune diseases were protective factors (OR=0.31 and 0.36, both P<0.05) for infectious intrapartum fever, while high WBC and hs-CRP were risk factors (OR=1.20 and 1.09, both P<0.05). The area under the curve of nomogram model for predicting infectious intrapartum fever was 0.823, and the calibration curve validation showed that the predicted and measured values were in general agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple factors cause intrapartum fever. The nomogram model constructed in this study has good predictive accuracy for infectious intrapartum fever.

Retrospective study of intrapartum fever in term pregnancies and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes

Background

Intrapartum fever is a well-known predisposing factor for severe perinatal outcomes. Herein, we explored the intrapartum features, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes in relation to the extent of intrapartum fever via three group analyses.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis consisting of 575 term, singleton live births in one medical center from January 1st to December 31st, 2020 was carried out. Parturients who had experienced a maximal intrapartum fever of <38.0 °C were compared with two sub-groups of parturients who had experienced respective maximal fevers of 38.0-38.9 °C and ≥39.0 °C. We computed the adjusted risks for adverse perinatal outcomes via multiple logistic regression models to control for confounders.

Results

There were statistically remarkable differences among the three groups in 13 items including body mass index, epidural, and WBC before delivery (p < 0.05). In contrast with intrapartum fevers of 37.5-37.9 °C, intrapartum fevers of 38.0-38.9 °C were linked to an elevated risk of neonatal sepsis and neonatal intensive care unit admission with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.28 (95% CI 2.162-8.479) and 1.73 (95% CI 1.125-2.666), nonetheless, the relationship was remarkably higher for intrapartum fever ≥39.0 °C, with an OR of 6.40 (95% CI 2.450-16.725) and 2.23 (95% CI 1.021-4.854). Additionally, intrapartum fevers of 38.0-38.9 °C and ≥39.0 °C were related to remarkably higher risk for operative deliveries (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.373-3.648; OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.398-9.226; respectively) and histological chorioamnionitis (OR 3.77, 95% CI 2.261-6.271; OR 19.24, 95% CI 7.385-50.111, respectively).

Conclusions

Intrapartum fever is an important indicator of adverse perinatal outcomes. The higher the temperature, the higher risk of histological chorioamnionitis, as well as the risk of neonatal sepsis and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

Severity of intrapartum fever and neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

The few studies that have addressed the relationship between severity of intrapartum fever and neonatal and maternal morbidity have had mixed results. The impact of the duration between reaching maximum intrapartum temperature and delivery on neonatal outcomes remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To test the association of severity of intrapartum fever and duration from reaching maximum temperature to delivery with neonatal and maternal morbidity.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of term, singleton patients admitted for induction of labor or spontaneous labor who had intrapartum fever (≥38°C). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to maximum temperature during labor: afebrile (<38°C), mild fever (38°C-39°C), and severe fever (>39°C). The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity (umbilical artery pH <7.1, mechanical ventilation, respiratory distress, meconium aspiration with pulmonary hypertension, hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and Apgar <7 at 5 minutes). Secondary outcomes were composite neonatal neurologic morbidity (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, hypothermia treatment, and seizures) and composite maternal morbidity (postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, and maternal packed red blood cell transfusion). Outcomes were compared between the maximum temperature groups using multivariable logistic regression. Cox proportional-hazards regression modeling accounted for the duration between reaching maximum intrapartum temperature and delivery.

RESULTS

Of the 8132 patients included, 278 (3.4%) had a mild fever and 74 (0.9%) had a severe fever. The incidence of composite neonatal morbidity increased with intrapartum fever severity (afebrile 5.4% vs mild 18.0% vs severe 29.7%; P<.01). After adjusting for confounders, there were increased odds of composite neonatal morbidity with severe fever compared with mild fever (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.48]). Severe fevers remained associated with composite neonatal morbidity compared with mild fevers after accounting for the duration between reaching maximum intrapartum temperature and delivery (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.43]). Composite neonatal neurologic morbidity and composite maternal morbidity were not different between patients with mild and patients with severe fevers.

CONCLUSION

Composite neonatal morbidity correlated with intrapartum fever severity in a potentially dose-dependent fashion. This correlation was independent of the duration from reaching maximum intrapartum temperature to delivery, suggesting that clinical management of intrapartum fever, in terms of timing or mode of delivery, should not be affected by this duration.