1
|
Sieger ML, Morin JC, Budris LM, Sienna M, Ostfeld-Johns S, Hart L, Morosky C. A Comparison of Two Statewide Datasets to Understand Population Prevalence of Substance Use in Pregnancy: Findings and Considerations for Policy & Research. Matern Child Health J 2024; 28:1121-1131. [PMID: 38539033 PMCID: PMC11060901 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-024-03914-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Mental health conditions including substance use disorder are the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. Unfortunately, fears of child protective services' involvement interfere with maternal self-disclosure of substance use in pregnancy. Seeking to identify more mothers with substance use disorder in pregnancy or at delivery, and responsive to changes to the federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), Connecticut requires hospital personnel to submit a deidentified notification to CPS for all newborns with prenatal substance exposure. However, it is unknown whether this approach aligns with maternal self-report on substance use. For the present study, we compared population parameters derived from CAPTA notifications submitted between March-December 2019 with parameters derived from self-report data on substance use in pregnancy from mothers who gave birth during the same timeframe. Results revealed that three times as many mothers self-reported any alcohol or drug use in pregnancy compared to the rate measured with CAPTA notifications. Compared to mothers who self-reported drug use in the third trimester, CAPTA notifications were made for statistically similar rates of Black mothers but half the self-reported rate of White and Hispanic mothers. This disparity reflects that CAPTA notifications were made for twice as many Black mothers as White or Hispanic. Although CAPTA notifications are not punitive in nature, this disparity reveals that the public health aims of this policy are not yet achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Lloyd Sieger
- School of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA.
- School of Social Work, University of Connecticut, 38 Prospect Street, Room 310, Hartford, CT, 06105, USA.
| | | | - Lisa M Budris
- Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Melissa Sienna
- CT Department of Children and Families, UCONN Health, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Sharon Ostfeld-Johns
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hospital Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lou Hart
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hospital Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kiefer MK, Cowen J, Hinely KA, Rood KM. Prolonged detection of urine norfentanyl in individuals enrolled in a medication for opioid use disorder in pregnancy and postpartum program: a case series. AJOG GLOBAL REPORTS 2024; 4:100313. [PMID: 38524188 PMCID: PMC10957421 DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although urine drug testing can have vast legal and social ramifications, its interpretation during pregnancy and after birth remains not well understood. Fentanyl metabolism is altered by an individual's genetics, history of opioid use, and liver function. However, little is known about the clearance of fentanyl or its primary metabolite, norfentanyl, in the peripartum period. OBJECTIVE We sought to identify and describe cases of delayed urine norfentanyl clearance in the pregnancy and postpartum period within our institution. STUDY DESIGN This study described 3 cases of delayed urine norfentanyl clearance in pregnant and postpartum individuals in a colocated obstetrics, postpartum, and addiction medicine program. This program included prescriptions for medication for opioid use disorder and weekly urine drug testing with fentanyl immunoassay with reflex confirmation testing with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for positive results with a limit of detection of 2.5 ng/mL. RESULTS Low levels of norfentanyl (<16.3 ng/mL) were detected in urine 294 days, 126 days, and 231 days after the last fentanyl use. Patient self-reported abstinence was supported by consistently negative urine fentanyl levels throughout the collection period, compliant weekly urine drug tests that were otherwise only positive for buprenorphine, and negative fentanyl and norfentanyl in umbilical cord toxicology. CONCLUSION Despite compliance in a medication for opioid use disorder program, the presence of norfentanyl in urine has significant consequences on the maternal-child dyad in the postpartum period. Caution should be used when using low levels of norfentanyl to determine an individual's abstinence, as it can lead to further discrimination against women in medication for opioid use disorder programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda K. Kiefer
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (Dr Kiefer, Ms Hinely, and Dr Rood)
| | - Jamie Cowen
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (Ms Cowen)
| | - Katherine A. Hinely
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (Dr Kiefer, Ms Hinely, and Dr Rood)
| | - Kara M. Rood
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (Dr Kiefer, Ms Hinely, and Dr Rood)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gould EE, Ganesh SS, Nguyen RM, Breton CV, Bastain TM, Dunton GF, Ceasar RC. The unseen patient: competing priorities between patients and providers when cannabis is used in pregnancy, a qualitative study. Front Glob Womens Health 2024; 5:1355375. [PMID: 38699460 PMCID: PMC11063236 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1355375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to explore competing priorities when cannabis is used during pregnancy from the perspective of providers and Black and Latina people. Maternal cannabis use is increasingly common, but patients and providers alike struggle to navigate it. Methods This pilot used qualitative, constructivist ground theory methods to conduct semi-structured, remote interviews between 16 November 2021, and 7 February 2022 with 7 Black and Latina people who used cannabis during pregnancy, and 10 providers between 15 March 2022, and 6 April 2022, all of who were in Southern California, U.S. Results We identified three main findings: (1) Providers reported barriers to caregiving and relationship building with patients due to maternal cannabis use stigma, (2) Providers prioritized the fetus despite patients' current health system challenges that drove cannabis use, and (3) Both patients and providers engaged in personal research beyond the healthcare system to better understand maternal cannabis use. Discussion Our findings indicate that challenges exist between people who use cannabis during pregnancy and providers. Both groups need accurate, sociocultural sensitive information about maternal cannabis use via a harm reduction lens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E. Gould
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lijewski VA, Aldrich H, Straub HL. The Impact of Social Vulnerability on Substance Use Detection Practices in Pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 2024. [PMID: 38503303 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to synthesize current literature regarding the impact of social vulnerability on pregnancy-related substance use detection in the United States and highlight disparities in substance use detection practices. Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, PubMed (includes MEDLINE), and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): (["pregnancy" or "prenatal"] AND ["substance use screening" or "urine toxicology testing" or "toxicology testing" or "urine drug screening" or "CRAFFT" or "4P's" or "4P's Plus" or "NIDA Quick Screen" or "DAST-10" or "SURP-P" or "WIDUS"], AND ("bias" or "disparities" or "social vulnerability"]). The search included systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies, randomized controlled trials, case studies, and qualitative and quantitative research from January 2014 through November 2023. Selected literature was limited to studies published in English, which included a study population of either pregnant individuals or pregnancy health care providers in the United States, and that were focused on inequities in pregnancy substance use detection. Using Covidence, three authors screened abstracts, and two screened full articles for inclusion. The included studies were evaluated for quality of evidence using the mixed methods appraisal tool. The search yielded 4,188 manuscripts; 37 were eligible for full review. A total of 18 manuscripts were included based on the relevancy of the topic. The most common social vulnerability domain identified was minority status (17/18), followed by socioeconomic status (11/18), household characteristics (8/18), and housing type (1/18). Social vulnerability plays a role in substance use detection among pregnant individuals. Most notably, race and ethnicity, age, and public insurance lead to increased rates of detection, though most individual factors need to be studied in greater depth. This study was registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO ID CRD42022352598), the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. KEY POINTS: · Socially vulnerable pregnant individuals are more likely to receive substance use screening or urine toxicology testing.. · Race, ethnicity, age, and insurance influence substance use detection disparities.. · More research is needed to understand how other characteristics influence disparities in substance use detection..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia A Lijewski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Heather Aldrich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Heather L Straub
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnson A, Swenson KS, Dillner E, Klie KA, Duncan R, Brandspigel S, Breen K. Addressing Perinatal Substance Use: A Triad Approach Led by the Colorado Perinatal Care Quality Collaborative. J Midwifery Womens Health 2024. [PMID: 38339840 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Unintentional overdose is a leading driver of maternal death in Colorado. The high volume of maternal deaths from preventable causes lends questions to failures in our clinical and community-based care for pregnant and postpartum people. The Colorado Maternal Mortality Review Committee identified 3 main contributors including stigma in the community and health care system, fragmentation of the health care system, and the need for more clinician training. The Colorado Perinatal Care Quality Collaborative led a 3-pronged intervention to address these challenges and improve perinatal care. The first intervention, the Colorado Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health Substance Use Disorder quality improvement initiative, partnered with birthing hospitals statewide to institute universal screening and timely referral for individuals at risk of substance use disorder (SUD) and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. The second intervention, the Improve Perinatal Access, Coordination, and Treatment for Behavioral Health initiative, established a perinatal support network within communities. This program assists individuals with SUD, perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, or social needs to navigate the perinatal period. The third intervention, the Colorado Maternal Overdose Matters Plus program, has enhanced in-hospital access to pharmacotherapy for pregnant and postpartum individuals with SUD through training and technical support. These collaborative initiatives aim to minimize barriers to care by integrating inpatient screening, treatment referrals, pharmacotherapy access, and community care support to mitigate maternal mortality in Colorado.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Johnson
- Colorado Perinatal Care Quality Collaborative, Denver, Colorado
| | - Karli S Swenson
- Colorado Perinatal Care Quality Collaborative, Denver, Colorado
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Elena Dillner
- Colorado Perinatal Care Quality Collaborative, Denver, Colorado
| | - Kaylin A Klie
- The Naloxone Project, Denver, Colorado
- Departments of Family Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - Katie Breen
- Colorado Perinatal Care Quality Collaborative, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Does MB, Adams SR, Kline-Simon AH, Marino C, Charvat-Aguilar N, Weisner CM, Rubinstein AL, Ghadiali M, Cowan P, Young-Wolff KC, Campbell CI. A patient activation intervention in primary care for patients with chronic pain on long term opioid therapy: results from a randomized control trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:112. [PMID: 38254073 PMCID: PMC10802020 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10558-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given significant risks associated with long-term prescription opioid use, there is a need for non-pharmacological interventions for treating chronic pain. Activating patients to manage chronic pain has the potential to improve health outcomes. The ACTIVATE study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a 4-session patient activation intervention in primary care for patients on long-term opioid therapy. METHODS The two-arm, pragmatic, randomized trial was conducted in two primary care clinics in an integrated health system from June 2015-August 2018. Consenting participants were randomized to the intervention (n = 189) or usual care (n = 187). Participants completed online and interviewer-administered surveys at baseline, 6- and 12- months follow-up. Prescription opioid use was extracted from the EHR. The primary outcome was patient activation assessed by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Secondary outcomes included mood, function, overall health, non-pharmacologic pain management strategies, and patient portal use. We conducted a repeated measure analysis and reported between-group differences at 12 months. RESULTS At 12 months, the intervention and usual care arms had similar PAM scores. However, compared to usual care at 12 months, the intervention arm demonstrated: less moderate/severe depression (odds ratio [OR] = 0.40, 95%CI 0.18-0.87); higher overall health (OR = 3.14, 95%CI 1.64-6.01); greater use of the patient portal's health/wellness resources (OR = 2.50, 95%CI 1.42-4.40) and lab/immunization history (OR = 2.70, 95%CI 1.29-5.65); and greater use of meditation (OR = 2.72; 95%CI 1.61-4.58) and exercise/physical therapy (OR = 2.24, 95%CI 1.29-3.88). At 12 months, the intervention arm had a higher physical health measure (mean difference 1.63; 95%CI: 0.27-2.98). CONCLUSION This trial evaluated the effectiveness of a primary care intervention in improving patient activation and patient-reported outcomes among adults with chronic pain on long-term opioid therapy. Despite a lack of improvement in patient activation, a brief intervention in primary care can improve outcomes such as depression, overall health, non-pharmacologic pain management, and engagement with the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered on 10/27/14 on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02290223).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique B Does
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA.
| | - Sara R Adams
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
| | - Andrea H Kline-Simon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
| | - Catherine Marino
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Charvat-Aguilar
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
| | - Constance M Weisner
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrea L Rubinstein
- Department of Pain Medicine, The Permanente Medical Group, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | - Murtuza Ghadiali
- Addiction Medicine and Recovery Services, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Penney Cowan
- American Chronic Pain Association, Rocklin, CA, USA
| | - Kelly C Young-Wolff
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia I Campbell
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612-2403, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deutsch AR, Jalali MS, Stout S, Frerichs L. Equitable Policies Need Equitable Practices: Alcohol- and Substance-Exposed Pregnancy as a Case Study. Health Promot Pract 2024; 25:17-21. [PMID: 35778898 PMCID: PMC10071566 DOI: 10.1177/15248399221107605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
There is clear need for more effective public health policies. Coupled with calls for more effective policies, increasing demand to address public health disparities experienced by systemically marginalized and historically oppressed groups emphasizes the long-standing need for policies that improve public health equity. Such need is highlighted when examining public health issues such as alcohol- and substance-exposed pregnancy (ASEP): Current policies are ineffective at reducing ASEP, and marginalized groups experience disproportionately lower benefits and higher negative consequences as a result of such policies. Powerful strategies to develop more effective policies that can account for the complexity of such issues, such as systems science methods (SSMs), are becoming popular. However, current best practices for such methods often do not emphasize the additional efforts that will be required to develop equitable, not just effective policies. Using ASEP as an example of a crucial complex issue requiring new policy, we suggest additional steps to include in SSM projects for developing more effective policies that will also help stakeholders determine high-equity policies to reduce health disparities. These steps include modeling structural differences experienced by marginalized groups via systemic racism and oppression, incorporating existing cultural and community sources of strength and resilience as key areas for policy development, and evaluating the sustainability of policies as a dimension of efficacy. We also discuss using community-based participatory approaches as a framework for all SSM processes to ensure that policy development itself is grounded in equitable shared decision-making for marginalized individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle R Deutsch
- Avera Health, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
- University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA
| | - Mohammad S Jalali
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Leah Frerichs
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Green VR, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Saloner B, Bandara S. Substance use and treatment characteristics among pregnant and non-pregnant females, 2015-2019. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 254:111041. [PMID: 38043227 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the United States (US), pregnant females who use substances face increased morbidity and mortality risks compared to non-pregnant females. This study provides a national snapshot of substance use and treatment characteristics among US reproductive-aged females, including those who are pregnant. METHODS Our sample included females aged 15-44 years (n=97,830) from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data. We calculated weighted percentages of past-month alcohol or drug use and past-year substance use disorder (SUD), stratified by pregnancy status. We also calculated weighted percentages of past-year treatment setting and payer. Pearson chi-square tests were conducted to determine if percentages were statistically significantly different. RESULTS Compared to non-pregnant females, pregnant females had lower prevalence of past-month illicit drug use excluding cannabis (1.6% vs. 4.3%, p<0.01), cannabis use (5.3% vs. 12.5%, p<0.01), binge drinking (4.5% vs. 29.3%, p<0.01) and past-year SUD (7.1 vs. 8.8%, p<0.01). Less than 13% of females with SUD received treatment regardless of pregnancy status, but treatment use was higher among pregnant females compared to non-pregnant females (12.8% vs. 10.5%). However, there were no statistically significant differences in past-year treatment use, setting, or treatment payer. DISCUSSION The prevalence of substance use and SUD was lower among pregnant females compared to non-pregnant females in 2015-2019. Low uptake of substance use treatment suggests that barriers exist to treatment-seeking among reproductive-aged women. Further exploration of stigma, payment, and access to treatment, and how they differ by pregnancy status, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria R Green
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Alene Kennedy-Hendricks
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Brendan Saloner
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Sachini Bandara
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reese SE, Glover A, Fitch S, Salyer J, Lofgren V, McCracken Iii CT. Early Insights into Implementation of Universal Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Perinatal Substance Use. Matern Child Health J 2023; 27:58-66. [PMID: 37975996 PMCID: PMC10692260 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03842-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Perinatal substance use is a growing concern across the United States. Universal screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is one systems-level approach to addressing perinatal substance use. The objective of this study is to assess early efforts to implement SBIRT in an outpatient obstetric clinic. METHODS The research team implemented universal screening with the 5 P's screening tool. Providers then engaged patients in a brief intervention and referred to a care manager who then worked with patients via tele-health to connect patients with needed services. Feasibility was measured through the collection of aggregate data describing frequency of universal screening and referral to treatment. The implementation team met bi-weekly to reflect on implementation barriers and facilitators. RESULTS In the first year of implementation, 48.5% of patients receiving care in the clinic completed the 5 P's screener at least once during the perinatal period. Screening occurred in a little over a quarter (26.5%) of eligible visits. Of the 463 patients that completed the 5 P's at least once during the perinatal period, 195 (42%) unique patients screened positive (answered yes to at least one question). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE Early implementation efforts suggest this approach is feasible in this obstetric setting. Similar implementation studies should consider implementing universal screening for substance use and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders simultaneously; guide efforts using an implementation framework; invest resources in more intensive training and ongoing coaching for providers; and adopt strategies to track frequency and fidelity of brief intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Reese
- Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Corbin Hall, Room 52, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
- Center for Population Health Research, University of Montana, Skaggs Building, Room 173, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
- School of Social Work, University of Montana, Jeanette Rankin Hall 026, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
| | - Annie Glover
- Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Corbin Hall, Room 52, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA
| | - Stephanie Fitch
- Billings Clinic, 801 North 29th Street, Billings, MT, 59101, USA
| | - Joe Salyer
- Billings Clinic, 801 North 29th Street, Billings, MT, 59101, USA
| | - Valerie Lofgren
- Billings Clinic, 801 North 29th Street, Billings, MT, 59101, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stritzel H. Substance Use-Associated Infant Maltreatment Report Rates in the Context of Complex Prenatal Substance Use Policy Environments. CHILD MALTREATMENT 2023:10775595231213404. [PMID: 37955183 DOI: 10.1177/10775595231213404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
State responses to substance use during pregnancy have included policies designed to increase access to substance use treatment as well as punish such substance use. Prior research has found that punitive policies are associated with increased rates of child maltreatment reporting, but it is unclear if the presence of punitive-promoting policies also moderate the association between access-promoting polices and maltreatment reports. Using data from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and state-level fixed effects models, this study investigates how interactions between access-promoting and punitive prenatal substance use policies are associated with rates of substance use-associated maltreatment reports among infants. In states with punitive policies, access-promoting policies were associated with smaller decreases in these reports than in states without punitive policies. In some cases, access-promoting policies were associated with greater increases in these reports when punitive policies were also present than when only one type of policy was adopted. Interactions between prenatal substance use policies may result in unintended and counterproductive consequences for maternal and child health and the child welfare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley Stritzel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kurtz T, Smid MC. Office-Based Management of Perinatal Substance Use and Substance Use Disorder for the General Obstetrician-Gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2023; 50:609-627. [PMID: 37500220 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
This is a review of substance use and substance use disorder in pregnancy, intended for the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist. Herein, the authors discuss legal considerations, outline definitions, review screening tools, introduce special considerations and harm reduction, caution the use of urinary toxicology testing, and touch on the screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment model. Furthermore, the authors provide a brief overview of the prevalence, maternal and neonatal risks, and treatment approaches for commonly used substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Kurtz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, 30 North 1900 East #2B200 SOM, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| | - Marcela C Smid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, 30 North 1900 East #2B200 SOM, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Board A, D’Angelo DV, von Essen BS, Denny CH, Miele K, Dunkley J, Park Y, Bauman B, Kim SY. The Postpartum Period: An Opportunity for Alcohol Screening and Counseling to Reduce Adverse Health Impacts. J Addict Med 2023; 17:528-535. [PMID: 37788605 PMCID: PMC10585373 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The postpartum period presents an opportunity to engage in discussions about alcohol consumption and related health harms. This study examined the prevalence of alcohol consumption among a sample of postpartum persons with a recent live birth and screening and brief intervention (alcohol SBI) or counseling by their providers. METHODS We analyzed 2019 data from a telephone survey conducted 9 to 10 months postpartum among individuals who responded to the standard Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey in 6 states. Weighted prevalence estimates were calculated for alcohol consumption and alcohol SBI after birth through up to 10 months postpartum. RESULTS Among 1790 respondents, 53.1% reported consuming alcohol postpartum. Among those who drank postpartum, 70.8% reported being asked about alcohol use by a healthcare provider. Slightly more than half of respondents who drank postpartum and were trying to get pregnant (52.4%) or were not using birth control at the time of the survey (59.8%) reported being asked about alcohol use. Approximately 25% of respondents who drank alcohol postpartum were advised about risky alcohol levels by a healthcare provider. Small proportions of individuals who drank alcohol postpartum and were pregnant or trying to get pregnant at the time of the survey were advised to reduce or stop drinking alcohol (10.6% and 2.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest missed opportunities to promote health and prevent adverse alcohol-related health outcomes during the postpartum period through evidence-based tools such as alcohol SBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Board
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Denise V. D’Angelo
- Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Beatriz Salvesen von Essen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
- CDC Foundation, Atlanta, GA
| | - Clark H. Denny
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kathryn Miele
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Janae Dunkley
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN
| | - Youngjoo Park
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN
| | - Brenda Bauman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Shin Y. Kim
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wolfson L, Poole N. Supportive alcohol policy as a key element of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder prevention. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 19:17455057231151838. [PMID: 36718116 PMCID: PMC9893348 DOI: 10.1177/17455057231151838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
In Canada, a Four-Part Model of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) Prevention has been developed that describes a continuum of multi-sectoral efforts, including broad awareness campaigns, safe and respectful conversations around pregnancy and alcohol use, and holistic and wraparound support services for pregnant and postpartum women with alcohol, and other health and social concerns. Supportive alcohol policy is at the centre of the four mutually reinforcing levels of prevention. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe alcohol policies related to specific levels of FASD prevention, and to consider the implications of alcohol policies on FASD prevention and women's and fetal health. The majority of the evidence focused on alcohol in pregnancy guidelines, alcohol warning labels, and knowledge and uptake of national or regional alcohol and pregnancy guidelines. Several US studies described shifts in alcohol and pregnancy policy over the 7-year period, including moves to punitive approaches that criminalize women's substance use or prompt child apprehension. This review indicates that more attention could be paid to the role of alcohol policy in FASD prevention and in promoting women's and fetal health, and that policy actions and advocacy could be important catalysts for both FASD prevention and women's health promotion. Moving forward, it is essential that alcohol policies are rooted in evidence; attend to and promote women's health including health during pregnancy; and are collaborative in order to prompt a higher standard of care, and more holistically respond to the factors that contribute to women's alcohol use during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Wolfson
- Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Canada FASD Research Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Lindsay Wolfson, Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, E209-4500 Oak Street Box 48, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
| | - Nancy Poole
- Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Canada FASD Research Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Luong J, Board A, Gosdin L, Dunkley J, Thierry JM, Pitasi M, Kim SY. Alcohol Use, Screening, and Brief Intervention Among Pregnant Persons - 24 U.S. Jurisdictions, 2017 and 2019. MMWR. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2023; 72:55-62. [PMID: 36656783 PMCID: PMC9869740 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7203a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol use during pregnancy is a major preventable cause of adverse alcohol-related outcomes, including birth defects and developmental disabilities.* Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) is an evidence-based primary care tool that has been shown to prevent or reduce alcohol consumption during pregnancy; interventions have resulted in an increase in the proportion of pregnant women reporting abstinence (odds ratio = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.43-3.56) (1). Previous national estimates have not characterized ASBI in populations of pregnant persons. Using 2017 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, CDC examined prevalence of ASBI and characteristics of pregnant persons and nonpregnant women aged 18-49 years (reproductive-aged women) residing in jurisdictions that participated in the BRFSS ASBI module. During their most recent health care visit within the past 2 years, approximately 80% of pregnant persons reported being asked about their alcohol use; however, only 16% of pregnant persons who self-reported current drinking at the time of the survey (at least one alcoholic beverage in the past 30 days) were advised by a health care provider to quit drinking or reduce their alcohol use. Further, the prevalence of screening among pregnant persons who did not graduate from high school was lower than that among those who did graduate from high school or had at least some college education. This gap between screening and brief intervention, along with disparities in screening based on educational level, indicate missed opportunities to reduce alcohol use during pregnancy. Strategies to enhance ASBI during pregnancy include integrating screenings into electronic health records, increasing reimbursement for ASBI services, developing additional tools, including electronic ASBI, that can be implemented in a variety of settings (2,3).
Collapse
|
15
|
Sieger ML, Nichols C, Chen S, Sienna M, Sanders M. Novel Implementation of State Reporting Policy for Substance-Exposed Infants. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:841-848. [PMID: 36093638 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act's provisions concerning hospitalist and child protective services response to infants with prenatal substance exposure (IPSE) were revised in 2016 to address the impact of the opioid epidemic. In 2019, Connecticut unveiled a statewide hospital reporting infrastructure to divert IPSE without safety concerns from CPS using a deidentified notification to CPS and a plan of safe care (POSC). Connecticut is the first state to implement a separate, deidentified notification system. METHODS We used notification and birth data to determine rates per 1000 births. We employed multinomial logistic regression to understand factors associated with 3 mutually exclusive outcomes: (1) diversion with POSC, (2) report with POSC, or (3) report without POSC. RESULTS During the first 28 months of policy implementation, hospitalists submitted over 4700 notifications (8% of total Connecticut births). Over three-quarters (79%) of notifications included marijuana exposure, and 21% included opioid exposure. Fewer than 3% included alcohol exposure. Black mothers were disproportionally overrepresented among notifications compared with the state population, and all other race groups underrepresented. Over half of identified IPSE were diverted. Type of substance exposure was the strongest predictor of outcome, controlling for maternal age and race group. CONCLUSIONS Connecticut Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act diverted IPSE without provider safety concerns away from child protective services. Substance exposure type was associated with the dyad's outcome at hospital discharge. Nonuniversal screening practices may contribute to racial disproportionality in implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cynthia Nichols
- University of Connecticut, School of Social Work, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Shiyi Chen
- University of Connecticut, School of Social Work, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Melissa Sienna
- UCONN Health, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Marilyn Sanders
- UCONN School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Farmington, Connecticut Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stritzel H. State-level changes in health insurance coverage and parental substance use-associated foster care entry. Soc Sci Med 2022; 305:115042. [PMID: 35649299 PMCID: PMC10168186 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
For many families whose children are placed in foster care, initial contact with the child welfare system occurs due to interactions with the healthcare system, particularly in the context of the opioid epidemic and increased attention to prenatal drug exposure. In the last decade, many previously uninsured families have gained Medicaid health coverage, which has implications for their access to healthcare services and visibility to mandatory reporters. Using administrative foster care case data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System Foster Care Files and health insurance data from the American Community Survey, this study analyzes the associations between state-level health insurance coverage and rates of foster care entry due to parental substance use between 2009 and 2019. State-level fixed effects models revealed that public, but not private, health insurance rates were positively associated with rates of foster care entry due to parental substance use. These results support the hypothesis that health insurance coverage may promote greater contact with mandatory reporters among low-income parents with substance use disorders. Furthermore, this study illustrates how healthcare policy may have unintended consequences for the child welfare system.
Collapse
|
17
|
Weber A, Miskle B, Lynch A, Arndt S, Acion L. Substance Use in Pregnancy: Identifying Stigma and Improving Care. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2021; 12:105-121. [PMID: 34849047 PMCID: PMC8627324 DOI: 10.2147/sar.s319180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This review examines the impact of stigma on pregnant people who use substances. Stigma towards people who use drugs is pervasive and negatively impacts the care of substance-using people by characterizing addiction as a weakness and fostering beliefs that undermine the personal resources needed to access treatment and recover from addiction, including self-efficacy, help seeking and belief that they deserve care. Stigma acts on multiple levels by blaming people for having a problem and then making it difficult for them to get help, but in spite of this, most pregnant people who use substances reduce or stop using when they learn they are pregnant. Language, beliefs about gender roles, and attitudes regarding fitness for parenting are social factors that can express and perpetuate stigma while facilitating punitive rather than therapeutic approaches. Because of stigmatizing attitudes that a person who uses substances is unfit to parent, pregnant people who use substances are at heightened risk of being screened for substance use, referred to child welfare services, and having their parental rights taken away; these outcomes are even more likely for people of color. Various treatment options can successfully support recovery in substance-using pregnant populations, but treatment is underutilized in all populations including pregnant people, and more knowledge is needed on how to sustain engagement in treatment and recovery activities. To combat stigma when working with substance-using pregnant people throughout the peripartum period, caregivers should utilize a trauma-informed approach that incorporates harm reduction and motivational interviewing with a focus on building trust, enhancing self-efficacy, and strengthening the personal skills and resources needed to optimize health of the parent-baby dyad.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Weber
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Benjamin Miskle
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Alison Lynch
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Stephan Arndt
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Laura Acion
- Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Instituto de Cálculo, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|