|
1
|
Bumbasirevic U, Petrovic M, Zekovic M, Coric V, Milojevic B, Lisicic N, Obucina D, Vasilic N, Bulat P, Zivkovic M, Cekerevac M, Bojanic N, Janicic A. Multifocality in Testicular Cancer: Clinicopathological Correlations and Prognostic Implications. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:257. [PMID: 38398766 PMCID: PMC10890071 DOI: 10.3390/life14020257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
There are limited data regarding the significance of multifocality in testicular cancer patients. This study evaluated the relationship between multifocality and clinicopathological features determined at the time of radical orchiectomy. The study involved 280 consecutive patients who underwent radical orchiectomy between 2018 and 2023. Multifocality was defined as a distinct tumor focus characterized by a group of malignant cells > 1 mm, clearly differentiated from the primary tumor mass. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate the association between multifocality and histopathological parameters along with potential risk factors for clinical stages II + III. Multifocality was identified in 44 (15.7%) patients. Significantly smaller primary tumors were observed in subjects with multifocality (20.0 mm vs. 30.0 mm, p = 0.0001), while those exhibiting monofocality presented a markedly elevated rate of tumors exceeding 4 cm (40.3% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.005). Furthermore, multifocality was associated with a significantly higher rate of primary tumors < 2 cm (52.3% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.003). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed a substantial decrease in the likelihood of multifocality occurrence in seminoma patients with tumors > 4 cm (OR = 0.38, p = 0.017). Meanwhile, in multivariate logistic regression, multifocality did not emerge as a significant risk factor for clinical stages II + III in either seminoma (p = 0.381) or non-seminoma (p = 0.672) cases. Our study suggests that multifocality holds no substantial prognostic relevance for clinically advanced disease in testicular cancer patients. The findings indicate that multifocality is associated with smaller primary tumors, particularly those measuring less than 2 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uros Bumbasirevic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Milos Petrovic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
| | - Milica Zekovic
- Centre of Research Excellence in Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Vesna Coric
- Institute of Medical and Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
- Center of Excellence for Redox Medicine, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Bogomir Milojevic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Nikola Lisicic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
| | - David Obucina
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
| | - Nenad Vasilic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
| | - Petar Bulat
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
| | - Marko Zivkovic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
| | - Milica Cekerevac
- Department of Pathology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Nebojsa Bojanic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Aleksandar Janicic
- Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (M.P.); (B.M.); (N.L.); (D.O.); (N.V.); (P.B.); (M.Z.); (N.B.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Ghorbani H, Emadi Torghabeh A, Farzadnia M, Golshan A, Rabiei P. Renal vein thrombosis due to metastatic germ cell tumor, report of a case with a very rare clinical scenario. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 6:e1910. [PMID: 37807242 PMCID: PMC10728514 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal metastasis is a rare manifestation of germ cell tumors. Extension of malignant lesions into the renal vein can complicate the scenario. CASE This report presents a 35-year-old man with primary stage IS NSGCT. Fourteen months after radical orchiectomy he presented with metastasis in the lung, kidney, and para-aortic lymph nodes. He received multiple lines of salvage treatments including chemotherapy and surgery. Intraoperative exploration during radical nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy revealed intra-renal vein involvement with a prominent teratomatous component. CONCLUSION Defining the exact extent of malignant lesions, especially endovascular lesions, is very important to clarify how advanced the malignant lesions are. The surgeons must be aware of the risk factors that predict vascular involvement, and therefore, providing intraoperative access to vascular surgery procedures when needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamidreza Ghorbani
- Kidney Transplantation Complications Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | | | - Mahdi Farzadnia
- Department of PathologyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | - Alireza Golshan
- Kidney Transplantation Complications Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | - Parisa Rabiei
- Cancer Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Rohozneanu EF, Deac C, Căinap CI. A Systematic Review Investigating the Difference between 1 Cycle versus 2 Cycles of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage I Testicular Germ Cell Cancers. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:916. [PMID: 37241148 PMCID: PMC10223662 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Standard care for stage I testicular germ cell cancers (seminomatous-STC or non-seminomatous-NSTC) is orchiectomy followed by active surveillance, 1 or 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery or radiotherapy. The decision on the adjuvant therapeutic approach is guided by the associated risk factors of the patient and the potential related toxicity of the treatment. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the optimal number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles. Although in terms of overall survival, there is no proven inconsistency regarding the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, and the rate of relapse may vary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuiela Florentina Rohozneanu
- Department of Oncology, The Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă” Cluj-Napoca, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Oncology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ciprian Deac
- Department of Oncology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Călin Ioan Căinap
- Department of Oncology, The Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă” Cluj-Napoca, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Oncology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|