Bronchial thermoplasty for severe uncontrolled asthma in Japan

Efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty in a patient panel with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an approved procedure to manage uncontrolled severe persistent asthma. Many insurance providers are reluctant to pay for BT without proven benefit among their specific patient panel.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if BT is effective in a panel patient panel with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an unblinded prospective study of adult subjects with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma who underwent BT. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and then 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-months post-BT. The primary metric was an improved Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score. Other metrics included improved Asthma Control Test (ACT), peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), spirometry, fractional excretion of nitric oxide (FeNO), number of unscheduled medical visits, and lost days of work/activity. Respiratory adverse events were assessed during the BT treatment period and at each post-BT visit.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects completed the study; the median interquartile range (IQR) age was 47 (42-61), and the majority were female (69%), white (93%), and non-Hispanic (90%). After BT, mean (±std) AQLQ scores improved by 1.6(±1.1) at 3 months (p < 0.0001), 1.6(±1.2) at 6 months (p < 0.0001), 1.4(±1.0) at 12 months (p < 0.0001), 1.8(±1.1) at 18 months (p < 0.0001), and 1.6 (±1.5) at 24 months (p < 0.0001). There were significant improvements in ACT, PEFR, unscheduled medical visits and lost days of work and activity. Spirometry and FeNO metrics were unchanged. The average cost for subjects completing all 3 BT procedures was approximately $15,000.

CONCLUSION

BT is an effective adjunctive therapeutic modality in subjects with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma.

Safety and efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty in refractory asthma with severe obstructive respiratory dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a recently developed non-pharmacological therapy for refractory bronchial asthma. Although increasing evidence has suggested that BT is effective for various phenotypes of severe asthma, its safety and efficacy in patients with severe irreversible impaired lung function are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of BT in patients with refractory asthma, including patients with a severely impaired forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).

DESIGN

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 patients with refractory asthma (Global Initiative for Asthma step 4 or 5), including patients with severely impaired airflow limitation (% predicted pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <60%), who had undergone BT between June 2016 and January 2022. We analyzed the efficacy (change in asthma symptoms, exacerbation rate, pulmonary function, asthma medication, and serum inflammatory chemokine/cytokines before and after BT) and complications in all patients. We compared these data between patients with severe obstructive lung dysfunction [group 1(G1)] and patients with FEV1 ⩾ 60% [group 2 (G2)].

RESULTS

Six patients were in G1 and nine were in G2. Clinical characteristics, T2 inflammation, and concurrent treatment were equivalent in both groups. BT significantly improved asthma-related symptoms (measured using the Asthma Control Test and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores) in both groups. FEV1 was significantly improved in G1 but not in G2. Four patients in G2, but none in G1, experienced asthma exacerbation requiring additional systemic corticosteroids (including two requiring prolonged hospitalization) after BT. Long-term responders (patients who reduced systemic or inhaled corticosteroid without newly adding biologics in a follow-up > 2 years) of BT were identified in G1 and G2 (n = 2, 33.3% and n = 4, 44.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

BT in patients with refractory asthma and severe airflow limitation is equally safe and efficacious as that in patients with moderate airflow limitation.

Effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty for severe persistent bronchial asthma accompanied by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a type of bronchoscopic treatment specifically used for patients with severe asthma. Most severe asthmatics receive systemic steroids and are at risk of being immunocompromised. This raises the clinical question of whether or not BT can be effectively and safely performed in such patients. Herein, we report a case highlighting the effectiveness and safety of BT in a patient with severe persistent bronchial asthma and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. We performed BT on a 46-year-old woman undergoing treatment for severe persistent asthma with inhaled steroids and 20 mg prednisolone orally. Although she was deemed to be infection-free before the procedure, culture of endobronchial secretions obtained during the first BT procedure grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa. After the first BT, she was given clarithromycin 400 mg orally daily. The amount of sputum decreased with each BT session, and sputum culture for Pseudomonas aeruginosa turned negative by the third BT session. Respiratory function tests showed 23.7% improvement in % post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s (%FEV_1.0) and the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) score increased by 2.41 points after the third BT. Bronchial wall thickness decreased and infiltrative shadows on CT disappeared after the three BT sessions, along with decrease in the amount of purulent sputum. Improvement in her asthma symptoms, after three BT sessions allowed decrease in the prednisolone dose.

We report the effectiveness of BT and infection control in a severe asthmatic with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

•

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a type of bronchoscopic treatment specifically used for patients with severe asthma.

•

There is a clinical question that whether we can perform the BT effectively and safely on immunocompromised patients.

•

We report the effectiveness of BT and infection control in a severe asthmatic with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

A case report of aspergillosis accompanied by saccular bronchodilation after bronchial thermoplasty in a 19-year-old woman

BACKGROUND

Fungal infections are rarely reported as a complication of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in patients without immunosuppressive comorbidity.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 19-year-old woman college student was admitted to our hospital owing to uncontrolled severe asthma despite using the maximum dose of steroid inhalation. She experienced asthmatic attacks more frequently while cheerleading, which is an extracurricular activity. She received BT because she wanted to continue cheerleading. After the second BT session, she developed more sputum and cough. During the third session, white secretion and saccular bronchodilation appeared in the left lower bronchus. Aspergillus fumigatus was detected in the culture of the bronchial lavage sample, and saccular bronchodilation in the affected bronchus was observed on computed tomography (CT). Five months after the start of oral itraconazole, her subjective symptoms as well as her CT findings improved. Her asthma condition improved enough for the patient to continue cheerleading without exacerbation.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to consider the possibility of respiratory tract infections including fungal infections after BT. Detailed observations of the entire bronchus and sample collection for microbial culture are highly recommended.

Challenges faced in managing adult asthma: A perspective from Asian countries

Asthma imposes a significant burden on the health system and patients' quality of life. Within Asia, there is large variability in several cultural, social and economic factors ultimately influencing the management of asthma. Differences in risk factors and asthma management practices across Asia make asthma a truly 'mixed-bag' phenomenon. With the advent of biological agents and the consequent emphasis on asthma phenotyping and endotyping, it is more important than ever to understand the diverse nature of asthma as a disease. This is a collaborative review within Asia to highlight the differences in management of adult asthma, and the local modifications that are made to international guidelines. This review paves the way for a future Asian collaborative network in asthma epidemiological research.

Bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma: A position statement of the Indian chest society

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an interventional bronchoscopic treatment for severe asthma. There is a need to define patient selection criteria to guide clinicians in offering the appropriate treatment options to patients with severe asthma.

METHODOLOGY

An expert group formed this statement under the aegis of the Indian Chest Society. We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to extract evidence on patient selection and the technical performance of BT.

RESULTS

The experts agreed that the appropriate selection of patients is crucial and proposed identification of the asthma phenotype, a screening algorithm, and inclusion/exclusion criteria for BT. In the presence of atypical clinical or chest radiograph features, there should be a low threshold for obtaining a thoracic computed tomography scan before BT. The patient should not have had an asthma exacerbation in the preceding two weeks from the day of the procedure. A 5-day course of glucocorticoid should be administered, beginning three days before the procedure day, and continued until the day following the procedure. General Anesthesia (total intravenous anesthesia with a neuromuscular blocker) provides ideal conditions for performing BT. A thin bronchoscope with a 2.0 mm working channel is preferable. An attempt should be made to deliver the maximum radiofrequency activations. Middle lobe treatment is not recommended. Following the procedure, overnight observation in the hospital, and a follow-up visit, a week following each treatment session, is desirable.

CONCLUSION

This position statement provides practical guidance regarding patient selection and the technical performance of BT for severe asthma.

Treatment for intractable asthma: bronchial thermoplasty

Bronchial Thermoplasty (BT) is an epoch-making treatment that reduces bronchial smooth muscle by using a bronchoscope to reach the basket catheter to the bronchus and directing high-frequency current directly into the bronchi. In GINA Guidelines 2019, BT is considered to be additional treatment at Step V (the most severe), and the evidence level is B. The Japanese guidelines (JGL) also added BT as a treatment for Step 4, but it is reserved because there are still unclear points regarding long-term efficacy and safety. In Japan, as of April 1, 2019, 672 treatments were performed at 123 institutions nationwide. The average age of patients was 54.1 years, but 84 cases were over 70 years old. The average value of %FEV1 was 78.2%, but there were 94 cases less than 60%. There were 32 cases that underwent BT treatment at our institution. Of them, 12 cases with progress up to one year later could be observed. The average age was 56.1 years old, and each of 6 men and women had a %FEV1 of 70.5%. One year later, AQLQ and %FEV1 improved, and the number of exacerbations decreased, but exhaled NO values increased. %FEV1 improvement might be due to poorer lung function (70.5% vs. 77.8%) and more BT activation (average 1.28 times AIR2) compared to the AIR2 trial. In terms of improvement in %FEV1, patients with moderate obstructive disorder from 50 to 80% responded well after BT treatment. In the near future, various new antibody preparations such as IL-4 / 13 antibody and anti-TSLP antibody are expected to be promoted. Therefore, we first consider whether these antibody preparations can be applied to patients with refractory asthma. We consider that BT is indicated only when there is no indication or no expected effect of antibody preparations. In other words, BT treatment is the last resort of intractable asthma, and it is the duty of medical professionals involved in BT treatment to be able to advocate when it is best to give BT to such patients.

Recent Developments In Bronchial Thermoplasty For Severe Asthma

PURPOSE

Bronchial thermoplasty is approved in many countries worldwide as a non-pharmacological treatment for severe asthma. This review summarizes recent publications on the selection of patients with severe asthma for bronchial thermoplasty, predictors of a beneficial response and developments in the procedure and discusses specific issues about bronchial thermoplasty including effectiveness in clinical practice, mechanism of action, cost-effectiveness, and place in management.

RESULTS

Bronchial thermoplasty is a treatment option for patients with severe asthma after assessment and management of causes of difficult-to-control asthma, such as nonadherence, poor inhaler technique, comorbidities, under treatment, and other behavioral factors. Patients treated with bronchial thermoplasty in clinical practice have worse baseline characteristics and comparable clinical outcomes to clinical trial data. Bronchial thermoplasty causes a reduction in airway smooth muscle mass although it is uncertain whether this effect explains its efficacy since other mechanisms of action may be relevant, such as alterations in airway epithelial, gland, and/or nerve function; improvements in small airway function; or a placebo effect. The cost-effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty is greater in countries where the costs of hospitalization and emergency department are high. The place of bronchial thermoplasty in the management of severe asthma is not certain, although some experts propose that bronchial thermoplasty should be considered for patients with severe asthma associated with non-type 2 inflammation or who fail to respond favorably to biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Bronchial thermoplasty is a modestly effective treatment for severe asthma after assessment and management of causes of difficult-to-control asthma. Asthma morbidity increases during and shortly after treatment. Follow-up studies provide reassurance on the long-term safety of the procedure. Uncertainties remain about predictors of response, mechanism(s) of action, and place in management of severe asthma.

Can the Number of Radiofrequency Activations Predict Serious Adverse Events after Bronchial Thermoplasty? A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Introduction

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure that involves the delivery of thermal radiofrequency energy to the bronchial wall for treating severe asthma. It has been suggested that too many radiofrequency activations could induce serious adverse events (SAEs) at an early stage. We aimed to examine the number of radiofrequency activations at each session and early lung function changes from baseline to determine whether these are related to SAEs.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 13 consecutive patients who underwent three sessions each of BT for severe asthma from February 2015 to January 2016. Lung function tests were performed on the day before and after each BT procedure. Since we compared the number of activations and lung function changes from baseline after each session, a total of 39 sessions were reviewed. The relationship between the number of radiofrequency activations and each lung function change from baseline was also examined by linear regression analysis.

Results

A total of 10 SAEs (4 of pneumonia, 3 of atelectasis, 2 of bronchial asthma exacerbation and 1 of hemoptysis) were observed following the 39 BT sessions. When we compared sessions with and without SAEs, there were no differences in the number of activations (mean ± SD, 71.5 ± 28.6 times in sessions with SAEs; 66.5 ± 25.1 times in sessions without SAEs; p = 0.772) and lung function changes (mean changes in FVC/%FVC/FEV₁/%FEV₁/%PEF from baseline; − 0.49 l/− 14.2%/− 0.36 l/− 11.7%/− 9.6% in sessions with SAEs; − 0.43 l/− 13.3%/− 0.34 l/− 12.1%/− 9.4% in sessions without SAEs; p > 0.05 for all the above). Increase in the number of activations correlated with decreased FEV₁ (R² = 0.17, p = 0.0088) and %FEV₁ (R² = 0.11, p = 0.0357).

Conclusions

Increase in the number of radiofrequency activations during BT is related to a decrease in FEV₁ and %FEV₁ from baseline. The number of radiofrequency activations, however, is not associated with SAEs after BT.

A case of Aspergillus and Nocardia infections after bronchial thermoplasty

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic treatment for severe asthma. A 35-year-old woman with uncontrolled severe asthma despite maximal pharmacological treatment underwent BT and started coughing after the first procedure. One month later, during the second BT procedure, there were white ulcerous lesions on the right B9 bronchus. Culture of the bronchial brushing specimen showed Aspergillus fumigatus, for which voriconazole was started for treatment. On the third BT procedure, endobronchial mucus sampling demonstrated Nocardia spp., for which trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was given for three months. Seven months after the third BT procedure, no particular endobronchial lesions were found, and no abnormal pathogens were obtained by culture. The resulting bronchial infection in this case may be attributed to the use of systemic steroids, which rendered the patient immunocompromised, and to tissue fragility that was caused by the thermal energy from the BT procedure. Culture of endobronchial mucus should be considered during BT.

Evaluation of expiratory capacity with severe asthma following bronchial thermoplasty

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic treatment to reduce the amount of smooth muscle in the bronchial wall in patients with severe asthma. Reducing smooth muscle in the airway wall reportedly alleviates air trapping and decreases expiratory volume. In the current study, expiratory computed tomography (CT) was performed in 10 patients who underwent BT at our facility, and their expiratory volume was evaluated. We observed an improvement in the expiratory volume on CT in nine of the 10 patients. Total expiratory lung volume decreased from 1693 ± 907 to 1426 ± 853 mL, indicating an improvement of approximately 15%. Use of CT for evaluation of expiratory volume may be a method for assessing the effectiveness of BT.

Bronchial thermoplasty as a treatment for severe asthma: controversies, progress and uncertainties

INTRODUCTION

Bronchial thermoplasty is a licensed non-pharmacological treatment for severe asthma. Area covered: This article considers evidence for the efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty from clinical trials and observational studies in clinical practice. Its place in the management of severe asthma, predictors of response and mechanisms of action are reviewed. Expert commentary: Bronchial thermoplasty improves quality of life and reduces exacerbations in moderate to severe asthma. Morbidity from asthma is increased during treatment. Overall, patients treated in clinical practice have worse baseline characteristics and comparable clinical outcomes to trial data. Follow-up studies provide reassurance on long-term safety. Despite some progress, future research needs to investigate uncertainties about predictors of response, mechanism of action and place in management of asthma.

A case of pulmonary cyst and pneumothorax after bronchial thermoplasty

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic treatment for severe asthma using thermal energy to reduce smooth muscle in the bronchial wall. A 47‐year‐old man underwent BT for uncontrolled severe asthma despite maximal pharmacological treatment. After a third procedure, he experienced hypoxaemia because of complete bilateral upper lobe atelectasis. A pulmonary cyst suddenly emerged in to the right middle lobe, associated with the pneumothorax on postoperative day 6, and a chest drainage tube was inserted. As atelectasis of the right upper lung suddenly improved on postoperative day 12, pneumothorax and the cyst improved. Excess stress on the middle lobe due to upper lobe collapse, and check valve due to airway oedema and phlegm, might be related to pulmonary cyst formation. Tissue fragility related to systemic steroid usage and pressure load during pulmonary function testing might influence the occurrence of pneumothorax. Severe adverse events under complete atelectasis after BT require careful attention.