Efficacy of a short pretreatment with omalizumab in children with anaphylaxis to hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: A report of three cases

Hymenoptera venom allergy in children and adolescents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will identify and summarize the published existing data pertaining specifically to Hymenoptera venom allergy in children and adolescents, highlighting the major studies currently available on venom immunotherapy (VIT) and its prognosis in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current review covers the incidence and prevalence of Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) in children, factors influencing occurrence and severity of reactions (age, sex, comorbidities, etc.), indications to perform diagnostic tests and start VIT in children, different existing VIT protocols and their safety and efficacy.

SUMMARY

Hymenoptera venom allergy is the second most common cause of anaphylaxis in children and it considerably affects quality of life. Cutaneous reactions are the most prevalent clinical presentation in children who usually have a more favourable prognosis than adult patients. However, studies on HVA in children and adolescents are still limited. Currently VIT is the only treatment able to modify the natural history of HVA in adults as well as in children, and to protect patients from systemic reactions after subsequent stings.

Updates and Recent Advances on Venom Immunotherapy

Purpose of Review

Venom immunotherapy has been utilized to treat Hymenoptera venom allergy since the 1920s. Over the last century, significant advances in the fields of immunology and genetics have led to improvements in the practice of venom immunotherapy. This review encompasses recent advances in the use of venom immunotherapy to provide precise, patient-centered care.

Recent Findings

Research about the mechanism of action of venom immunotherapy continues to highlight the modification of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. Molecular techniques have allowed for the identification of specific venom allergens to improve the diagnostic accuracy and safety of venom immunotherapy. Research continues to support the safety of accelerated schedules which can impact the cost, adherence, and quality of life for patients receiving this treatment modality. Finally, significant advances have led to the elucidation of risk factors that place patients at risk for reactions during and after venom immunotherapy. Creation of risk profiles for venom-allergic patients can thus inform the process of immunotherapy in order to provide personalized and precise care.

Summary

Significant progress in the use of venom immunotherapy makes the practice a dynamic and active field for continued research. Future research needs to build on these recent advances to continue to optimize and enhance this life-saving treatment.

Anaphylaxis From Ethylene Oxide-Sterilized Dialysis Tubing and Needles: A Case Report

Hypersensitivity reactions to ethylene oxide-sterilized dialyzers have been well described. Although ethylene oxide is no longer used to sterilize most dialyzers, it is used on other pieces of dialysis equipment. We present a case of a 78-year-old man who experienced dialysis-related anaphylaxis attributed to an IgE-mediated allergy to dialysis tubing and needles sterilized with ethylene oxide. Shortly after transitioning from a tunneled catheter to an arteriovenous fistula, he developed multiple episodes of intradialytic hypotension and syncope within minutes of starting dialysis. Laboratory evaluation revealed marked leukocytosis, eosinophilia, and elevated anti-ethylene oxide IgE antibody. After pretreatment with corticosteroids and antihistamines, the rinsing of dialysis tubing, and transition of access back to a tunneled catheter, he tolerated subsequent dialysis treatments. Review of his history revealed chronic eosinophilia since the time of hemodialysis initiation. We hypothesize his eosinophilia and mast cell degranulation began upon initial exposure to ethylene oxide and hemodialysis equipment. When use of the arteriovenous fistula was resumed, he was exposed to a higher "dose" of ethylene oxide due to the use of needles. The higher antigenic stimuli triggered a memory immune response, leading to mast cell degranulation and repeated anaphylactic episodes that were overcome by minimization of ethylene oxide-sterilized equipment, corticosteroid pretreatment, and the anti-IgE Fc monoclonal omalizumab.