Ground Same Intratransport Efficacy as Air for Acute Aortic Diseases

Role of Helicopter Transfer and Cloud-Type Imaging for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

 This study explored if long-distance transfer was safe for patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) and also analyzed the effectiveness of helicopter transfer and cloud-type imaging transfer systems for such patients in northern Hokkaido, Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

 The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgical treatment for AADA from April 2014 to September 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to the location of referral source hospitals: the Asahikawa city group (group A, n = 49) and the out-of-the-city group (group O, n = 63). Use of helicopter transfer (n = 13) and cloud-type telemedicine (n = 20) in group O were reviewed as subanalyses.Transfer distance differed between groups (4.2 ± 3.5 km in group A vs 107.3 ± 69.2 km in group O; p = 0.0001), but 30-day mortality (10.2% in group A vs 7.9% in group O; p = 0.676) and hospital mortality (12.2% in group A vs 9.5% in group O; p = 0.687) did not differ. Operative outcomes did not differ with or without helicopter and cloud-type telemedicine, but diagnosis-to-operation time was shorter with helicopter (240.0 ± 70.8 vs 320.0 ± 78.5 minutes; p = 0.031) and telemedicine (242.0 ± 75.2 vs 319.0 ± 83.8 minutes; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

 We found that long-distance transfer did not impair surgical outcomes in AADA patients, and both helicopter transfer and cloud-type telemedicine system could contribute to the reduction of diagnosis-to-operation time in the large Hokkaido area. Further studies are mandatory to investigate if both the systems will improve clinical outcomes.

Patient care during interfacility transport: a narrative review of managing diverse disease states

BACKGROUND

When critically ill patients require specialized treatment that exceeds the capability of the index hospitals, patients are frequently transferred to a tertiary or quaternary hospital for a higher level of care. Therefore, appropriate and efficient care for patients during the process of transport between two hospitals (interfacility transfer) is an essential part of patient care. While medical adverse events may occur during the interfacility transfer process, there have not been evidence-based guidelines regarding the equipment or the practice for patient care during transport.

METHODS

We conducted searches from the PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and Scopus databases up to June 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts for eligibility. Studies that were not in the English language and did not involve critically ill patients were excluded.

RESULTS

The search identified 75 articles, and we included 48 studies for our narrative review. Most studies were observational studies.

CONCLUSION

The review provided the current evidence-based management of diverse disease states during the interfacility transfer process, such as proning positioning for respiratory failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), obstetric emergencies, and hypertensive emergencies (aortic dissection and spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage).

Management of Acute Aortic Dissection During Critical Care Air Medical Transport

Acute aortic dissection is a time-critical emergency that air medical teams must be capable of transporting. Aortic dissections can manifest a myriad of complications in which prompt recognition and tailored treatments may mitigate additional physiological burden and limit dissection flap propagation. The purpose of this review is to discuss specific critical scenarios that air medical providers may be faced with and to equip them with a pathophysiological understanding of the disease and best practices for the management of acute aortic dissections.

Transport Blood Pressures and Outcomes in Stroke Patients Requiring Thrombectomy

OBJECTIVE

Mechanical thrombectomy is the treatment of choice for acute ischemic strokes from large vessel occlusions. Absolute blood pressure and blood pressure variability (BPV) may affect patients' outcome. We hypothesized that patients' outcomes were not associated with BPV during transport between hospitals in the era of effective thrombectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational review of adult patients admitted to our comprehensive stroke center who underwent mechanical thrombectomy between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018. Data were collected from our stroke registry and transportation records. Outcomes were defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 and any acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization.

RESULTS

We analyzed 134 eligible patients. The mean age was 66 years (standard deviation = 14 years). Forty percent achieved mRS ≤2, and 16% had an AKI. BPV and maximum systolic blood pressures during transport were examined as variables to determine outcome. We found BPV was similar between patients with good and bad functional independence. Furthermore, the maximum systolic blood pressure during transport (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99; P = .038), not BPV, was associated with a lower likelihood of mRS ≤2. No similar correlation of analyzed blood pressure variables could be found for AKI as an outcome.

CONCLUSION

The maximum systolic blood pressure was associated with worse functional outcomes in stroke patients transported for thrombectomy. Prehospital clinicians should be cognizant of high blood pressure among patients with acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion during transport and treat accordingly.