Usefulness of implantable loop recorders in office-based practice for evaluation of syncope in patients with and without structural heart disease

Implantable loop recorders in patients with heart disease: comparison between patients with and without syncope

OBJECTIVE

Patients with heart disease are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Guidelines recommend an implantable loop recorder (ILR) for symptomatic patients when symptoms are sporadic and possibly arrhythmia-related. In clinical practice, an ILR is mainly used in patients with unexplained syncope. We aimed to compare the clinical value of an ILR in patients with heart disease and a history of syncope versus those with non-syncopal symptoms.

METHODS

In this observational single-centre study, we included symptomatic patients with heart disease who received an ILR. The primary endpoint was an actionable event which was defined as an arrhythmic event leading to a change in clinical management. The secondary endpoint was an event leading to device implantation.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients (mean age 47±17 years, 49% men) were included. The underlying disease substrate was inherited cardiomyopathy (31%), congenital heart disease (28%), channelopathy (23%) and other (18%). Group A consisted of 43 patients with prior syncope and group B consisted of 77 patients with palpitations and/or near-syncope. The median follow-up duration was 19 months (IQR 8-36). The 3-year cumulative event rate was similar between groups with regard to the primary endpoint (38% vs 39% for group A and B, respectively, logrank p=0.54). There was also no difference in the 3-year cumulative rate of device implantation (21% vs 13% for group A and B, respectively, logrank p=0.65).

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients with heart disease, there is no difference in the yield of an ILR in patients presenting with or without syncope.

Holter Monitoring and Loop Recorders: From Research to Clinical Practice

Holter monitors are tools of proven efficacy in diagnosing and monitoring cardiac arrhythmias. Despite the fact their use is widely prescribed by general practitioners, little is known about their evolving role in the management of patients with cryptogenic stroke, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unexplained recurrent syncope and risk stratification in implantable cardioverter defibrillator or pacemaker candidates. New Holter monitoring technologies and loop recorders allow prolonged monitoring of heart rhythm for periods from a few days to several months, making it possible to detect infrequent arrhythmias in patients of all ages. This review discusses the advances in this area of arrhythmology and how Holter monitors have improved the clinical management of patients with suspected cardiac rhythm diseases.

Cardiovascular assessment of falls in older people

Falls in older people can be caused by underlying cardiovascular disorders, either because of balance instability in persons with background gait and balance disorders, or because of amnesia for loss of consciousness during unwitnessed syncope. Pertinent investigations include a detailed history, 12-lead electrocardiography, lying and standing blood pressure, carotid sinus massage (CSM), head-up tilt, cardiac electrophysiological tests, and ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate monitoring, which includes external and internal cardiac monitoring. The presence of structural heart disease predicts an underlying cardiac cause. Conversely, the absence of either indicates that neurally mediated etiology is likely. CSM and tilt-table testing should be considered in patients with unexplained and recurrent falls. Holter monitoring over 24 hours has a low diagnostic yield. Early use of an implantable loop recorder may be more cost-effective. A dedicated investigation unit increases the likelihood of achieving positive diagnoses and significantly reduces hospital stay and health expenditure.

[Implantable "loop recorder"--a new diagnostic tool for syncope of unknown cause]

INTRODUCTION

The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a new diagnostic tool in cardiology for establishing the causes of unexplained syncope in patients where standard conventional tests, invasive tests included, have failed. The device is a diagnostic "pacemaker," surgically implanted underneath the skin of the chest, with leads attached to the case of the device, not requiring endovenous lead implantation. Heart rhythm is monitored continuously on the basis of an endless loop, up to a maximum period of 14 months. Recording is carried out either by applying an outside activator whenever symptoms occur, or automatically, according to a pre-set algorithm for bradycardia, tachycardia, and/or asystolic detection.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present this new diagnostic method as well as our first experiences with its implementation.

METHOD

We followed 5 patients (3 male, 2 female, mean age: 46.4 +/- 19) who had ILRs ("Reveal Plus," Medtronic Inc., USA) implanted at our centre, over a period of 14 months (7.6 +/- 5.5), concentrating on their clinical course, symptom occurrence, and electronically monitored heart rhythm at the time of ILR auto activation and/or recordings triggered by outside activation whenever a patient's symptoms were discernible.

RESULTS

In three patients, the ILR revealed syncope aetiology by documenting heart rhythm at the time of its occurrence. In one patient, involving a lethal outcome, the ILR was not explanted, so that the rhythm at the time of the fatal syncope, although assumed, remained undocumented. In one, most recently implanted patient, follow-up is still in progress.

CONCLUSION

The implantable loop recorder represents an important innovation and a step forward in establishing the causes of recurrent syncope, which cannot be determined by standard invasive and non-invasive testing.

Increased sensitivity of electrophysiological study by isoproterenol infusion in unexplained syncope

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the interests of electrophysiologic study (EPS) after infusion of isoproterenol in patients with syncope and negative EPS in control state.

METHODS

1350 patients were consecutively admitted for syncope and EPS. Patients were included if they had no history of tachycardia, a normal Holter monitoring, a negative EPS in control state. EPS was repeated after infusion of 2-4 mug/kg of isoproterenol.

RESULTS

256 patients, 35 with exercise-related syncope and 105 with heart disease (HD), were recruited. After isoproterenol, an arrhythmia was identified as the sign associated with syncope in 102 patients (40%): SVT in 32 patients, VT in 36 patients, infrahisian 2nd or 3rd degree AV block in three patients and vasovagal reaction in 31 patients. Arrhythmias were more frequent in patients with HD (50/105) than in those without HD (52/151) (p<0.05); SVT tended to be more frequent in patients without HD (n=23) than in those with HD (n=9) (p<0.1); VT was more frequent in patients with HD (n=26) than in those without HD (n=10) (p<0.001). There was no relationship between a positive isoproterenol testing and occurrence of syncope at exercise (19/35 vs 81/221) (p<0.1).

CONCLUSION

isoproterenol infusion increased the sensitivity of EPS in patients with syncope, related or not to exercise, and with negative study in control state, but principally in those with HD. However, SVT was diagnosed in patients without HD and EPS associated with isoproterenol infusion remained an important and rapid tool to establish this diagnosis.

Significance of Tilt Table Testing in Patients with Suspected Arrhythmic Syncope and Negative Electrophysiologic Study

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic significance of a tilt table test (TTT) in patients with a suspected arrhythmic etiology for syncope and negative electrophysiologic study (EPS) has not been previously assessed comparing the TTT results with the findings of prolonged monitoring using an implantable loop recorder (ILR). We sought to assess the diagnostic yielding of TTT in patients with suspected arrhythmic syncope and negative EPS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 81 patients with suspected arrhythmic etiology for syncope and negative EPS, TTT was performed and an ILR implanted regardless the results of TTT. TTT was positive in 38 patients. During follow-up, syncope or presyncope recurred in 32 patients (39.5%). No differences were found in recurrence rates in patients with positive and negative TTT (31.5% vs 46.5%, P = ns). According to rhythm registered during ILR activation, mechanisms of syncopal events were classified as: arrhythmic (atrioventricular [AV] block and ventricular tachycardia; n = 18), neurally mediated (sinus bradycardia and sinus pause; n = 9), and indeterminate (normal sinus rhythm; n = 5). There was no statistical association between the results of TTT and the mechanism of syncope.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a suspected arrhythmic etiology for syncope and a negative EPS, TTT is of little value to predict the mechanism of syncope and the ILR implantation seems to be a useful and safe diagnostic strategy.

Insertable loop recorder use for detection of intermittent arrhythmias

The advent of prolonged monitoring with the implanted loop recorders has revolutionized the quest for detection of elusive infrequent arrhythmias in patients with unexplained syncope. The capability of prolonged monitoring has permitted us to obtain symptom rhythm correlation in the majority of patients suspected to have underlying infrequent arrhythmia. The implanted loop recorder is easily implanted in the left pectoral region with a minimally invasive procedure, providing at least 14 months of continuous monitoring that is both patient and automatically activated. Several recent studies suggest that it plays a major role in patients with infrequent symptoms and suspected arrhythmia, including patients with syncope and conduction disturbances, mild to moderate underlying heart disease, and atypical epilepsy. In a randomized trial, the device was found to be cost-effective and improved diagnostic yield compared to conventional tilt and electrophysiological testing. Wider application of prolonged monitoring is ongoing, including assessment of ventricular arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, and conduction disturbances. The implantable loop recorder is most useful in patients with infrequent unexplained syncope when noninvasive testing is negative.