Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting global left ventricular functional recovery after anterior wall acute myocardial infarction

Left ventricular muscle and fluid mechanics in acute myocardial infarction

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling is characterized by the formation of intraventricular rotational bodies of fluid (termed "vortex rings") that optimize the efficiency of LV ejection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the morphology and dynamics of LV diastolic vortex ring formation early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), in relation to LV diastolic function and infarct size. A total of 94 patients with a first ST-segment elevation AMI (59 ± 11 years; 78% men) were included. All patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. After 48 hours, the following examinations were performed: 2-dimensional echocardiography with speckle-tracking analysis to assess the LV systolic and diastolic function, the vortex formation time (VFT, a dimensionless index for characterizing vortex formation), and the LV untwisting rate; contrast echocardiography to assess LV vortex morphology; and myocardial contrast echocardiography to identify the infarct size. Patients with a large infarct size (≥ 3 LV segments) had a significantly lower VFT (p <0.001) and vortex sphericity index (p <0.001). On univariate analysis, several variables were significantly related to the VFT, including anterior AMI, LV end-systolic volume, LV ejection fraction, grade of diastolic dysfunction, LV untwisting rate, and infarct size. On multivariate analysis, the LV untwisting rate (β = -0.43, p <0.001) and infarct size (β = -0.33, p = 0.005) were independently associated with VFT. In conclusion, early in AMI, both the LV infarct size and the mechanical sequence of diastolic restoration play key roles in modulating the morphology and dynamics of early diastolic vortex ring formation.

Impact of left ventricular dyssynchrony early on left ventricular function after first acute myocardial infarction

The impact of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on LV ejection fraction (EF) is unknown. One hundred twenty-nine patients with a first ST-elevation AMI (58 + or - 11 years, 78% men) and QRS duration <120 ms were included. All patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography were performed to assess LV function, LV dyssynchrony, and infarct size. LV dyssynchrony was defined as the SD of the time to reach the minimum systolic volume for 16 LV segments, expressed in percent cardiac cycle (systolic dyssynchrony index [SDI]). Myocardial perfusion at myocardial contrast echocardiography was scored (1 = normal/homogenous; 2 = decreased/patchy; 3 = minimal/absent) using a 16-segment model; a myocardial perfusion index, expressing infarct size, was derived by summing segmental contrast scores and dividing by the number of segments. SDI in patients with AMI was 5.24 + or - 2.23% compared to 2.02 + or - 0.70% of controls (p <0.001). Patients with AMI and LVEF <45% had significantly higher SDI compared to patients with LVEF > or = 45% (4.29 + or - 1.44 vs 6.95 + or - 2.40, p <0.001). At multivariate analysis, SDI was independently related to LVEF; in addition, the impact of SDI on LV systolic function was incremental to infarct size and anterior location of AMI (F change 16.9, p <0.001). In conclusion, LV synchronicity is significantly impaired soon after AMI. LV dyssynchrony is related to LVEF and has an additional detrimental effect on LV function, beyond infarct size and the anterior location of AMI.

Prognostic value of myocardial viability detected by myocardial contrast echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether residual myocardial viability determined by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can predict hard cardiac events.

BACKGROUND

Myocardial viability detected by MCE has been shown to predict recovery of left ventricular (LV) function in patients with AMI. However, to date no study has shown its value in predicting major adverse outcomes in AMI patients after thrombolysis.

METHODS

Accordingly, 99 stable patients underwent low-power MCE at 7 +/- 2 days after AMI. Contrast defect index (CDI) was obtained by adding contrast scores (1 = homogenous; 2 = reduced; 3 = minimal/absent opacification) in all 16 LV segments divided by 16. At discharge, 65 (68%) patients had either undergone or were scheduled for revascularization independent of the MCE result. The patients were subsequently followed up for cardiac death and nonfatal AMI.

RESULTS

Of the 99 patients, 95 were available for follow-up. Of these, 86 (87%) underwent thrombolysis. During the follow-up time of 46 +/- 16 months, there were 15 (16%) events (8 cardiac deaths and 7 nonfatal AMIs). Among the clinical, biochemical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and coronary arteriographic markers of prognosis, the extent of residual myocardial viability was an independent predictor of cardiac death (p = 0.01) and cardiac death or AMI (p = 0.002). A CDI of < or = 1.86 and < or = 1.67 predicted survival and survival or absence of recurrent AMI in 99% and 95% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of residual myocardial viability predicted by MCE is a powerful independent predictor of hard cardiac events in patients after AMI.

Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting late mortality in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction

We investigated whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) performed soon after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves risk stratification for late mortality. MCE after AMI identifies microvascular "no-reflow" and predicts early outcomes; however, the predictive value of MCE for late mortality is unknown. One hundred sixty-seven patients with anterior AMI and left ventricular dysfunction underwent MCE 2 days after admission, and a perfusion score index (PSI) was calculated. Long-term follow-up (mean 39 months) was available for all patients. Patients with normal and abnormal perfusion had similar baseline characteristics. Myocardial contrast echocardiographic PSI was a predictor of mortality as a continuous variable (odds ratio 3.2 for each 1.0 increase in PSI, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 9.7, p = 0.04). In a logistic regression model, age (odds ratio 2.6 per decade, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 4.4, p = 0.0002) and PSI (odds ratio 4.5 for each 1.0 increase in PSI, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 15.4, p = 0.02) were the only significant predictors of mortality. In a subanalysis comparing patients >70 years old with abnormal PSI with all other patients, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a marked difference in survival over a mean follow-up of 39 months (24% vs 4% mortality, p = 0.0002). In conclusion, MCE refines risk stratification soon after anterior AMI in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Patients at very high and very low risk of mortality can be identified, and myocardial contrast echocardiographic data are incrementally useful compared with existing clinical and angiographic variables.

Myocardial Contrast Echocardiographic Estimates of Infarct Size Predict Likelihood of Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the utility of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in predicting left ventricular (LV) remodeling (LVR) in patients with a recent anterior wall myocardial infarction and residual regional LV akinesis.

BACKGROUND

Although recent studies have shown that MCE predicts recovery of regional and global LV systolic function after myocardial infarction, the relationship between myocardial perfusion patterns and likelihood of subsequent LVR has not been extensively studied.

METHODS

In all, 50 patients (mean age 62 years) underwent contrast-enhanced echocardiography for determination of LV volumes and ejection fraction, and MCE, 2 days after admission, with follow-up contrast-enhanced echocardiography 6 months later. LVR was defined as greater than 15% increase in LV end-diastolic volume index at follow-up.

RESULTS

LVR occurred in 19 patients (38%) (group 1), with stable LV volumes in 31 patients (62%) (group 2). Routine clinical and angiographic variables did not differ between groups 1 and 2. Both transmural extent of infarction and number of abnormally perfused myocardial segments (assessed by MCE) predicted LVR. LVR occurred in 55% of patients with transmural perfusion defects, and was less common in those with subendocardial perfusion defects or normal perfusion (31% and 21%, respectively). The mean percent increase in LV size was significantly greater for transmural infarcts (15 +/- 7%) versus subendocardial infarcts or normal perfusion (-1 +/- 8 and 8 +/- 8, respectively). When more than 5 myocardial segments were abnormally perfused, remodeling always occurred and was extensive.

CONCLUSIONS

MCE markers of infarct size are useful in predicting subsequent risk of LVR after myocardial infarction. Routine performance of MCE studies in select patients early after infarction may be helpful in further refining risk stratification.