Serial intravascular ultrasound comparison of the extent and distribution of intimal hyperplasia six months after stent implantation for de novo versus in-stent restenosis lesions

Sutureless proximal anastomosis using the PAS-Port system: six-month patency and five-year follow-up in "all-comers"

BACKGROUND

The PAS-Port system (Cardica, Inc, Redwood City, CA) was used routinely for patients undergoing coronary surgery with at least one venous graft. Graft patency and clinical results were evaluated, respectively, at 6 months and 5 years after surgery.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients (82 males, 18 females; mean age 68.9 ± 12 years) underwent coronary bypass surgery with at least one PAS-Port anastomosis (total number of PAS-Port implants: n = 117). At 6 months after surgery all patients were followed up clinically and 86 patients with 101 PAS-Port implants underwent either a multidetector computed tomographic scan or coronary angiography. Actuarial freedom from MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events) was assessed at 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Six-month PAS-Port patency was 88%. The inner diameter of the graft at the implant site (measured in 26 patients) did not reveal any pathologic narrowing (mean inner diameter 3.1 ± 0.6 mm). At 5 years, freedom from overall MACCE was 79% ± 5% and freedom from PAS-Port target vessel revascularization was 94% ± 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of PAS-Port was associated with good vein graft patency at 6 months and a low incidence of MACCE at 5 years after surgery. No evidence of implant-related graft stenosis was detected.

Impact of different re-stenting strategies on expansion of a drug-eluting stent implanted to treat bare-metal stent restenosis

We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to compare the expansion of drug-eluting stents (DES) implanted to treat bare-metal stent (BMS) restenosis after 3 common re-stenting strategies. A total of 80 consecutive BMS restenotic targets were re-stented either directly (n = 30, group 1) or after low-pressure (<8 atm) pre-dilation with an undersize regular balloon (n = 16, group 2) or after high-pressure (>12 atm) pre-dilation with a semicompliant balloon the same or greater diameter as the original BMS diameter (n = 34, group 3). More patients from groups 2 and 3 had diabetes mellitus. The targets in group 1 were more proximal and focal. Lesions from groups 2 and 3 were more severe. The size and deployment pressure of the DESs and the achieved angiographic results were all similar. The post-intervention minimum stent area and the percentage of expansion of DES (minimum stent area/distal reference lumen area x 100%) were, however, both significantly larger in group 3 (6.4 +/- 1.5 mm(2) in group 3 vs 5.6 +/- 1.6 mm(2) in group 1 vs 4.4 +/- 1.4 mm(2) in group 2, p <0.001; and 88 +/- 30% in group 3 vs 74 +/- 14% in group 1 vs 73 +/- 23% in group 2, p = 0.021). A post-intervention minimum stent area <5.0 mm(2) was seen in only 3 lesions in group 3 (8.8%) versus 14 in group 1 (46.7%) and 11 in group 2 (68.8%; adjusted odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 0.38, p <0.001). Overall, the acute lumen gain was mainly from BMS re-expansion; however, the BMS volume increased the most in group 3 (p <0.001). In conclusion, high-pressure pre-dilation leads to superior post-intervention expansion of DESs implanted to treat BMS restenosis, regardless of the original expansion because of the greater BMS re-expansion.

Biocompatibility of tetramethylpyrazine-eluting stents in normal porcine coronary arteries

OBJECTIVE

Drug-eluting stents have been used to markedly decrease in-stent restenosis in 6 months, but they are noticed due to the late thrombogenicity. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of Tetramethylpyrazine-eluting stents by investigating the intimal response and thrombogenicity in normal porcine coronary arteries by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and histomorphometry.

METHODS

Bare metal stents (BMS) were uniformly spray-coated with Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP 200 microg) and prepared for TMP-eluting stents (TES). Fourteen coronary arteries in 14 pigs underwent stent implantation. Seven TES were implanted in 7 pigs and 7 BMS in other 7 pigs. The stents were deployed with a stent-to-artery ratio of 1.1-1.2/1.0 in order to induce vascular wall injury. QCA and IVUS were performed before and immediately after the implantations and at 28 days (end time point). The analysis on blood cell count, biochemical parameters, status of behavior of pigs were evaluated before the implantation and at the time of 1 and 28 days. Stented-coronary arteries, stented-coronary arteries related ventricular wall, lung, liver and kidney were harvested after euthanasia of animals at the endpoint. Histopathology and histomorphometry had been done to assess the local toxicity of TES to these organs.

RESULTS

All the stents were successfully implanted, however, 4 pigs died of cardiac tamponade or anesthesia. No bone marrow depression and hemolysis was seen. No damage to the function and metabolism of liver and kidney was discovered. No thrombosis was found in control and test groups. Few inflammatory cells were found in the stented-coronary artery walls at each endpoint in both groups. No damage to stented-coronary arteries related ventricular wall, lung, liver and kidney was detected due to TES implantation. Compared with the control group, the neointimal area was significantly reduced in the TES group (60.2+/-23.5% vs 10.0+/-2.1%, P=0.01) by IVUS analysis, but the lumen area in the TES group was increased (4.34+/-0. 93 mm(2) vs 1.29+/-1.02 mm(2), P=0.011), the neointimal area was reduced markedly (1.51+/-0.45 mm(2) vs 4.60+/-1.39 mm(2), P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The biocompatibility of TES in porcine model at 28 days seems to be good and acceptable. Biocompatibility can be evaluated by IVUS and histopathology in a porcine restenosis model.

Surgical Endovascular Neuroradiology in the 21st Century: What Lies Ahead?

FEW COULD HAVE imagined the tremendous growth of endovascular surgery over the past 40 years. Endovascular therapy has greatly enhanced the care of the patient in neurosurgery, spine surgery, and head and neck surgery. Progress in technology and techniques continue to push forward the boundaries of what is deemed “treatable,” assuming acceptable risk. This article will briefly review the current state of endovascular surgery and speculate about what its role will be in the near and far future. Endovascular therapy provides a minimally invasive approach to the central nervous system and other systems via natural and, at times, highly selective pathways. Maximizing the accessibility of these routes to highly specific regions of the central nervous system provides an elegant and minimalist approach to treating diseases of the central nervous system with almost no “footprints” of ever having accessed the region. In the future, safe, efficient and intelligent delivery systems that may enhance or alter the tissue's response may result in successful treatment of cerebrovascular diseases, as well as other diseases of the craniospinal axis. The growth of nanotechnology, metallurgy, synthetic polymers, imaging, and training will all combine to help grow the technology and the science that is surgical endovascular neuroradiology.