Current status of preventive cardiology training among United States cardiology fellowships and comparison to training guidelines

[Manejo de la cesación tabáquica entre residentes de cardiología de Iberoamérica]

Introducción y objetivos:

Si bien los cardiólogos asisten cotidianamente a pacientes que sufren daño por el tabaquismo, no se conoce el grado de formación que reciben sobre esta problemática durante su residencia. Debido a ello nos propusimos evaluar las preferencias y prácticas de los residentes de cardiología para la cesación tabáquica de los pacientes que asisten.

Materiales y métodos:

Encuesta cerrada, prefijada, voluntaria y anónima entre médicos que realizaban la especialidad de cardiología en cinco países de Latinoamérica y España.

Resultados:

Se encuestaron 716 residentes: un 62.4% de Argentina, un 19% de México, un 6.8% de España, un 6.7% de Chile, un 3.2% de Uruguay y un 1.9% de Paraguay. Con respecto a la importancia que asignaban a esta problemática (empleando una escala de 1-10), el 85.8% le asignó a esta pregunta una puntuación de 8 o mayor. Mientras el 80.5% de los participantes expresó dar consejo breve antitabáquico sistemáticamente, solamente un 27.7% empleaban terapia farmacológica con este fin. Entre quienes no empleaban terapia farmacológica, el 58.3% manifestó que el motivo era no encontrarse familiarizados con los tratamientos. El 62.9% de los encuestados dijo no haber recibido ningún tipo de formación en esta problemática. Aquellos residentes que recibieron algún tipo de formación manifestaron sentirse más preparados (p < 0.0001).

Conclusión:

Encontramos un bajo conocimiento sobre el tratamiento farmacológico y relativamente poca seguridad por parte de los residentes de cardiología para brindar asistencia en cesación tabáquica. Consideramos esencial incluir este tópico en la formación de los futuros cardiólogos a fin de lograr una prevención cardiovascular más integral.

Permission to prescribe: do cardiologists need permission to prescribe diabetes medications that afford cardiovascular benefit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antihyperglycemic therapies including sodium glucose contransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have been demonstrated to confer significant cardiovascular benefit and reduce future events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, despite positive data from cardiovascular outcome trials, these therapies remain underutilized in a large proportion of patients who have clinical indications and meet coverage guidelines for their initiation. One of the causes of the observed gap between scientific evidence and clinical cardiology practice is therapeutic hesitancy (otherwise known as therapeutic inertia). The purpose of this review is to discuss the contributors to therapeutic hesitancy in the implementation of these evidence-based therapies and, more importantly, provide pragmatic solutions to address these barriers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that clinicians may not initiate cardiovascular protective therapies due to a reluctance to overstep perceived interdisciplinary boundaries, concerns about causing harm due to medication side effects, and a sense of unfamiliarity with the optimal choice of therapy amidst a rapidly evolving landscape of T2DM therapies.

SUMMARY

Herein, we describe a multifaceted approach aimed at creating a 'permission to prescribe' culture, developing integrated multidisciplinary models of care, enhancing trainees' experiences in cardiovascular disease prevention, and utilizing technology to motivate change. Taken together, these interventions should increase the implementation of evidence-based therapies and improve the quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes of individuals with T2DM.

Cardiovascular disease prevention career pathways: The status quo and future directions

Cardiovascular disease prevention is a complicated field requiring similar resource allocation and training as any other subspecialty in cardiology. To highlight the increasing need for primordial, primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention at a population level, it is necessary to have a clear vision for not only adequate training in the field but also sample career trajectories that today’s fellows-intraining (FIT) and early career (EC) physicians can use as a reference. However due to less centralized training, reduced exposure to the discipline and no clear institutional champions, direct access to “role model” careers in cardiovascular disease prevention may be lacking for today’s generation of trainees. These trends may change with more formalized recognition and more visibility of career trajectories in the field. In the current short report, we propose career pathways in cardiovascular disease prevention that can serve as a board resource roadmap for today’s FIT/EC physicians to design their careers in cardiovascular disease prevention. We explore three types of preventive cardiologists prototypes including; “the researcher”, “the clinician” and “the academic” preventive cardiologist models. These models are based on experiences gained in separate preventive cardiology training fellowships in addition to general cardiology training. Further, with advances in the scientific technologies, we highlight the future trajectory in the field. Preventive cardiology, although currently not the most desired path for FIT/EC physicians to pursue today, has the potential to be seen as the lucrative and essential training field in the future.

Preventive cardiology as a dedicated clinical service: The past, the present, and the (Magnificent) future

•

Ischemic cardiovascular disease continues to be most common cause of death after age 55 everywhere in the world.

•

As the average person is exposed over life to a variety of artery-damaging insults it is easy to predict that this trend will continue for decades.

•

We face an unprecedented opportunity to consolidate, strengthen, and broaden the effort to prevent cardiovascular events, both ischemic and non ischemic.

•

This effort requires professional lifestyle counseling, dietary interventions, use of natural supplements, pharmacotherapy, and efficient cross-referral strategies.

•

The nascent subspecialty of preventive cardiology must reach uniformity in protocols of care, and must develop a system of training and certification for the next generation of expert providers.

Smoking cessation after hospitalization for myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery: Assessing patient interest, confidence, and physician prescribing practices

Background

Prioritizing and managing multiple behavior changes following a cardiac hospitalization can be difficult, particularly among smokers who must also overcome a serious addiction.

Hypothesis

Hospitalized smokers will report a strong interest in smoking cessation (SC) but will receive little assistance from their physicians.

Methods

We asked current smokers hospitalized for an acute cardiac event to prioritize their health behavior priorities, and inquired about their attitude toward SC therapies. We also assessed SC cessation prescriptions provided by their physicians.

Results

Of the 105 patients approached, 81 (77%) completed the survey. Of these, 72.5% ranked SC as their greatest health change priority, surpassing all other behavior changes, including: taking medications, attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR), dieting, losing weight, and attending doctor appointments. Patients felt that SCM (44%), CR (41%), and starting exercise (35%) would increase their likelihood for SC. While most patients agreed that smoking was harmful, 16% strongly disagreed that smoking was related to their hospitalization. At discharge, medication was prescribed to ~32% of patients, with equal frequency among patients who reported interest and those who reported no interest in using medications.

Conclusion

The majority of hospitalized smokers with cardiac disease want to quit smoking, desire help in doing so, and overwhelmingly rate cessation as their highest health behavior priority, although some believe smoking is unrelated to their disease. The period following an acute cardiac event appears to be a time of great receptivity to SC interventions; however, rates of providing tailored, evidence‐based interventions are disappointingly low.

Medical Nutrition Education, Training, and Competencies to Advance Guideline-Based Diet Counseling by Physicians: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association

Growing scientific evidence of the benefits of heart-healthy dietary patterns and of the massive public health and economic burdens attributed to obesity and poor diet quality have triggered national calls to increase diet counseling in outpatients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or risk factors. However, despite evidence that physicians are willing to undertake this task and are viewed as credible sources of diet information, they engage patients in diet counseling at less than desirable rates and cite insufficient knowledge and training as barriers. These data align with evidence of large and persistent gaps in medical nutrition education and training in the United States. Now, major reforms in undergraduate and graduate medical education designed to incorporate advances in the science of learning and to better prepare physicians for 21st century healthcare delivery are providing a new impetus and novel ways to expand medical nutrition education and training. This science advisory reviews gaps in undergraduate and graduate medical education in nutrition in the United States, summarizes reforms that support and facilitate more robust nutrition education and training, and outlines new opportunities for accomplishing this goal via multidimensional curricula, pedagogies, technologies, and competency-based assessments. Real-world examples of efforts to improve undergraduate and graduate medical education in nutrition by integrating formal learning with practical, experiential, inquiry-driven, interprofessional, and population health management activities are provided. The authors conclude that enhancing physician education and training in nutrition, as well as increasing collaborative nutrition care delivery by 21st century health systems, will reduce the health and economic burdens from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to a degree not previously realized.

Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Training Opportunities, the Challenges, and Future Directions

PURPOSE

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating major efforts in prevention. This review summarizes the currently available training opportunities in CVD prevention for fellows-in-training (FITs) and residents. We also highlight the challenges and future directions for CVD prevention as a field and propose a structure for an inclusive CVD prevention training program.

RECENT FINDINGS

At present, there is a lack of centralized training resources for FITs and residents interested in pursuing a career in CVD prevention. Training in CVD prevention is not an accredited subspecialty fellowship by the American Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Although there are several independent training programs under the broad umbrella of CVD prevention focusing on different aspects of prevention, there is no unified curriculum or training. More collaborative efforts are needed to identify CVD prevention as an ACGME-accredited subspecialty fellowship. Providing more resources can encourage and produce more leaders in this essential field.

A Deficiency of Nutrition Education and Practice in Cardiology

BACKGROUND

Nutrition is one of the foundations of cardiovascular guidelines for risk reduction and treatment. However, little is known about whether cardiologists, cardiology fellows-in-training, and cardiovascular team members have the nutrition education and knowledge necessary to implement these guidelines. The aim of this study was to describe the educational experiences, attitudes, and practices relating to nutrition among cardiovascular professionals.

METHODS

Surveys completed by cardiologists, fellows-in-training, and cardiovascular team members inquired about their personal dietary habits, history of nutrition education, and attitudes regarding nutrition interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 930 surveys were completed. Among cardiologists, 90% reported receiving no or minimal nutrition education during fellowship training, 59% reported no nutrition education during internal medicine training, and 31% reported receiving no nutrition education in medical school. Among cardiologists, 8% described themselves as having "expert" nutrition knowledge. Nevertheless, fully 95% of cardiologists believe that their role includes personally providing patients with at least basic nutrition information. The percentage of respondents who ate ≥5 servings of vegetables and fruits per day was: 20% (cardiologists), 21% (fellows-in-training), and 26% (cardiovascular team members).

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of cardiovascular specialists have received minimal medical education and training in nutrition, and current trainees continue to experience significant education and training gaps.

Current and future status of adult congenital training in North America

Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) presents a unique and growing patient population, but there are no data to suggest there are sufficient training programs available to train specialists to meet the needs of this population. The objective of this national survey was to determine the current status of ACHD fellowship curricula and training. An online questionnaire was provided to adult and pediatric cardiology fellowship programs to determine program demographics, status, duration, faculty teaching responsibilities, volume or patient exposure, and institutional obstacles. Of the 225 programs surveyed, 81 responded (36%). Nearly all were university affiliated (93%) with <1/3 (29%) reporting an ACHD fellowship program. Most offered either a 1- (42%) or a 2-year (47%) fellowship. ACHD fellowship funding was provided by hospital budget (68%). Half reported an increase in applicants to their fellowship. Applicants were more likely to have had previous training in adult cardiovascular medicine (56%). Respondents ranked "Volume of Outpatients/Year" and "Lack of Institutional Support" as the most important aspect of an ACHD program to applicants and greatest obstacle to ACHD training, respectively. After training, ACHD fellows obtained adult cardiology/ACHD positions (47%) and were within an academic center (88%). In conclusion, the results demonstrate a deficiency in the number of currently available ACHD fellowship programs. Measures should be taken to strengthen and standardize ACHD training to meet the increasing workforce requirements of this population.

Residency and specialties training in nutrition: a call for action

Despite evidence that nutrition interventions reduce morbidity and mortality, malnutrition, including obesity, remains highly prevalent in hospitals and plays a major role in nearly every major chronic disease that afflicts patients. Physicians recognize that they lack the education and training in medical nutrition needed to counsel their patients and to ensure continuity of nutrition care in collaboration with other health care professionals. Nutrition education and training in specialty and subspecialty areas are inadequate, physician nutrition specialists are not recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties, and nutrition care coverage by third payers remains woefully limited. This article focuses on residency and fellowship education and training in the United States and provides recommendations for improving medical nutrition education and practice.

Subspecialty training in preventive cardiology: the current status and discoverable fellowship programs

BACKGROUND

Preventive cardiology is currently not an American Board of Medical Specialties-recognized subspecialty. However, several programs offer non-accredited fellowships throughout the country. No source currently exists listing all available programs, and finding programs requires time-intensive search strategies. Our aim was to find all current preventive cardiology fellowships in the United States and describe their basic structure, duties, and faculty.

METHODS

We searched the Internet, contacted national organizations, and networked through any institution thought likely to have a fellowship.

RESULTS

We found 15 programs currently offering subspecialty training in preventive cardiology but with considerably different styles, structures, duties, clinical time, lengths, and hosting departments.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided a list of these programs and discussed the implications for the future of formal subspecialty preventive cardiology education.