Impact of Clopidogrel loading dose in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

P2Y12 Antiplatelet Choice for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aims to evaluate potentially appropriate antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease. A systematic analysis was conducted to identify the clinical outcomes of available antiplatelet therapy regimens with enhanced platelet inhibition activity (intervention of 5 regimens) over the standard dose of clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with renal insufficiency. An electronic keyword search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library per PRISMA guidelines. We performed a prespecified net clinical benefit analysis (a composite of the rates of all-cause or cardiac-related death, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac outcomes, and minor and major bleeding), and included 12 studies. The intervention substantially lowered the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 0.67; p = 0.003), major adverse cardiac outcomes (RR 0.79; p < 0.00001), and myocardial infarction (RR 0.28; p = 0.00007) without major bleeding (RR 1.14; p = 0.33) in patients with renal insufficiency, but no significant differences were noticed with cardiac-related mortality and stent thrombosis. The subgroup analysis revealed substantially elevated bleeding risk in patients with severe renal insufficiency or on hemodialysis (RR 1.68; p = 0.002). Our study confirmed that the intervention considerably enhances clinical outcomes in patients with renal insufficiency, however, a standard dose of clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy is favorable in patients with severe renal insufficiency.

Outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after acute myocardial infarction stratified by renal function

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyse outcomes of ticagrelor and clopidogrel stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in a large unselected cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

We used follow-up data in MI survivors discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel enrolled in the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies registry. The association between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and the primary composite outcome of death, MI or stroke and the secondary outcome rehospitalisation with bleeding diagnosis at 1 year, was studied using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, stratifying after eGFR levels.

RESULTS

In total, 45 206 patients with MI discharged on clopidogrel (n=33 472) or ticagrelor (n=11 734) were included. The unadjusted 1-year event rate for the composite endpoint of death, MI or stroke was 7.0%, 18.0% and 48.0% for ticagrelor treatment and 11.0%, 33.0% and 64.0% for clopidogrel treatment in patients with eGFR_>60 (n=33 668), eGFR_30-60 (n=9803) and eGFR_<30 (n=1735), respectively. After adjustment, ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel was associated with a lower 1-year risk of the composite outcome (eGFR_>60: HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 99, eGFR_30-60: 0.82 (0.70 to 0.97), eGFR_<30: 0.95 (0.69 to 1.29), P for interaction=0.55) and a higher risk of bleeding (eGFR_>60: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.35, eGFR_30-60: 1.13 (0.84 to 1.51), eGFR_<30: 1.79 (1.00 to 3.21), P for interaction=0.30) across the eGFR strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel in patients with MI was associated with lower risk for the composite of death, MI or stroke and a higher bleeding risk across all strata of eGFR. Of caution, bleeding events were more abundant in patients with eGFR_<30.

Bleeding in advanced CKD patients on antithrombotic medication - A critical appraisal

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at an increased risk of bleeding, especially in the context of the complex therapeutic schemes of coronary artery disease (CAD) (from stable angina to acute coronary syndromes), atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. The bleeding issue increases morbidity and mortality, a serious problem in daily medical practice. However, these patients are largely excluded from major randomized clinical trials, which results in the lack of medical evidence-based foundation for specific recommendations regarding antithrombotic treatment in a high bleeding risk setting. Within this framework, the clinician does not benefit from a clear set of algorithms and measures in the exploration and balancing of bleeding and thrombosis risks. We discuss a diversity of scenarios, encompassing all categories of advanced CKD patients with CAD or/and atrial fibrillation, and with various combinations of drugs, such as antiplatelet therapy or/and oral anticoagulation. Our review highlights the most recent research as well as existing gaps in the recommendations of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. We evaluate the existence or lack of assessment tools for the bleeding risk, strength, reliability and usefulness of the bleeding risk scores. Also, we identify all the measures recommended after risk evaluation, including specific plans, dose adjustments and particular therapeutic approaches. Finally, we provide with suggestions for improving the management of this patient population.

The scientific achievements of the decades in Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

The Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) was the first nationwide registry data collection designed to track outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These studies reflect the current therapeutic approaches and management for AMI in Korea. The results of KAMIR could help clinicians to predict the prognosis of their patients and identify better diagnostic and treatment tools to improve the quality of care. The KAMIR score was proposed to be a predictor of the prognosis of AMI patients. Triple antiplatelet therapy, consisting of aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol, was effective at preventing major adverse clinical outcomes. Drug-eluting stents were effective and safe in AMI patients with no increased risk of stent thrombosis. Statin therapy was effective in Korean AMI patients, including those with very low levels of low density cholesterol. The present review summarizes the 10-year scientific achievements of KAMIR from admission to outpatient care during long-term clinical follow-up.