Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon versus conventional radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Effects of Inflammatory Cell Death Caused by Catheter Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a serious healthcare burden on society due to its high morbidity and the resulting serious complications such as thrombosis and heart failure. The principle of catheter ablation is to achieve electrical isolation by linear destruction of cardiac tissue, which makes AF a curable disease. Currently, catheter ablation does not have a high long-term success rate. The current academic consensus is that inflammation and fibrosis are central mechanisms in the progression of AF. However, artificially caused inflammatory cell death by catheter ablation may have a significant impact on structural and electrical remodeling, which may affect the long-term prognosis. This review first focused on the inflammatory response induced by apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis and their interaction with arrhythmia. Then, we compared the differences in cell death induced by radiofrequency ablation, cryoballoon ablation and pulsed-field ablation. Finally, we discussed the structural and electrical remodeling caused by inflammation and the association between inflammation and the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation. Collectively, pulsed-field ablation will be a revolutionary innovation with faster, safer, better tissue selectivity and less inflammatory response induced by apoptosis-dominated cell death.

Cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with atypical right pulmonary vein anatomy

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is widely used for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. There are no data regarding the clinical efficacy of cryoballoon ablation in patients with atypical right pulmonary vein anatomy.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the impact of right pulmonary vein anatomy on the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation.

METHODS

Patients referred for cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were enrolled prospectively. Left atrial computed tomography was performed before cryoballoon ablation to determine whether the right pulmonary vein anatomy was "normal" or "atypical". For patients with atypical anatomy, cryoballoon ablation was only performed for right superior and right inferior pulmonary veins, neglecting accessory pulmonary veins.

RESULTS

Overall, 303 patients were included: 254 (83.8%) with normal and 49 (16.2%) with atypical right pulmonary vein anatomy. First-freeze isolation for right superior and right inferior pulmonary veins occurred in 44 (89.8%) and 37 (75.5%) patients with atypical pulmonary vein anatomy, and in 218 (85.8%) and 217 (85.4%) patients with typical pulmonary vein anatomy, respectively (P not significant). Phrenic nerve palsies were only observed in patients with normal anatomy (0 vs. 26 [8.6%]; P=0.039). Mid-term survival free from atrial arrhythmia was similar, regardless of right pulmonary vein anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of patients have atypical right pulmonary vein anatomy. Procedural characteristics, acute pulmonary vein isolation success and mid-term procedural efficacy were similar, regardless of right pulmonary vein anatomy. In addition to left-side pulmonary vein isolation, cryoballoon ablation of right superior and right inferior pulmonary veins only, neglecting accessory pulmonary veins, is sufficient to obtain acute right-side pulmonary vein isolation and mid-term sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with atypical anatomy.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency as First Ablation Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Radiofrequency (RF) represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation, whereas cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as a valid alternative. The aim of our meta-analysis was to explore the efficacy and safety of CB compared with RF as first ablation procedure for AF. We searched the literature for studies that investigated this issue. The primary efficacy outcome was AF recurrence. The safety outcomes were: pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, phrenic nerve palsy, vascular complications, and major bleedings. Fourteen randomized controlled studies and 34 observational studies were included in the analysis. A total of 7,951 patients underwent CB ablation, whereas 9,641 received RF ablation. Mean follow-up was 14 ± 7 months. Overall, CB reduced the incidence of AF recurrence compared with RF ablation (relative risk [RR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 0.94; p = 0.001), and this result was consistent across different study design and AF type. CB had a significantly higher rate of phrenic nerve palsy, whereas it was related to a lower incidence of pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.88; p = 0.011) and vascular complications (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77; p <0.001) compared with RF. There was no significant difference in major bleedings between the 2 strategies. CB ablation had a shorter procedural time compared with RF (mean difference -20.76 minutes; p <0.001). In conclusion, considered its efficacy/safety profile and short procedural time, CB ablation represents the preferable option for first AF ablation procedure.

Positioning an ECG electrode to the dorsal side can record higher amplitude of CMAPs during cryoballoon ablation

PURPOSE

Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is one of the important complications during cryoballoon (CB) ablation. Recording diaphragmatic compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) during CB ablation can predict PNI. CMAP monitoring may be inaccurate when CMAP amplitudes are low. We examined the effect of positioning an electrocardiography (ECG) electrode at the dorsal side.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 197 consecutive patients who underwent CB ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (April 2016 to December 2018) at our institution. CMAP amplitudes were monitored using two recording methods just before cryoapplication. (a) Conventional method: right-arm ECG electrode positioned 5 cm above the xiphoid on the ventral side; left-arm ECG electrode positioned along the costal margin. (b) Our original method: right-arm electrode positioned 5 cm above the xiphoid on the dorsal side; left-arm electrode positioned along the costal margin.

RESULTS

The CMAP amplitude during right phrenic nerve pacing was significantly higher at the dorsal side than the ventral side (0.80 ± 0.31 mV vs 0.66 ± 0.29 mV, P < .01). Similarly, the CMAP amplitude during left phrenic nerve pacing was significantly higher at the dorsal side than the ventral side (0.92 ± 0.39 mV, 0.73 ± 0.37 mV, P < .01). PNI occurred in six patients (3.0%); three patients experienced transient PNI, another three patients experienced persistent PNI, and none developed permanent PNI.

CONCLUSIONS

CMAP amplitudes were significantly high at the dorsal side compared to the ventral side. Monitoring phrenic nerve function using an ECG electrode at the dorsal side is a simple and easy procedure.

Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ablation therapy is the treatment of choice in antiarrhythmic drugrefractory atrial fibrillation (AF). It is performed by either cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or radiofrequency ablation. CBA is gaining popularity due to simplicity with similar efficacy and complication rate compared with RFA. In this meta-analysis, we compare the recurrence rate of AF and the complications from CBA versus RFA for the treatment of AF.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed for the articles that compared the outcome of interest. The primary outcome was to compare the recurrence rate of AF between CBA and RFA. We also included subgroup analysis with complications of pericardial effusion, phrenic nerve palsy and cerebral microemboli following ablation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies with 3527 patients met our predefined inclusion criteria. Recurrence of AF after CBA or RFA was similar in both groups (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.07; I2=48%, Cochrane p=0.16). In subgroup analysis, heterogeneity was less in paroxysmal AF (I2=0%, Cochrane p=0.46) compared to mixed AF (I2=72%, Cochrane p=0.003). Procedure and fluoroscopy time was less by 26.37 and 5.94 minutes respectively in CBA compared to RFA. Complications, pericardial effusion, and silent cerebral microemboli, were not different between the two groups, however, phrenic nerve palsy was exclusively present only in CBA group.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the effectiveness of CBA is similar to RFA in the treatment of AF with the added advantages of shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times.

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Cryoballoon Ablation versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the treatment with cryoballoon (CB) compared to the standard treatment with traditional irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Methods

A decision tree model was developed to graphically depict the probabilities, utilities and costs of CB compared to RF therapy. Data from a conducted systematic literature review and meta-analysis of only RCTs were used to evaluate clinical outcomes of CB and RF treatments, including success rates after one year, complications and recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

Results

The cost-utility analysis estimated that, CB therapy had £1,747 higher cost, and 0.0114 more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to standard RF treatment over a one-year time horizon. The incremental cost per QALY of CB ablation compared to RF ablation was estimated to be £152,836/QALY.

Conclusions

Based on current evidence, CB ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with pAF is costeffective compared to RF if decision makers are willing to pay £152,836 or higher for a QALY.

Early repolarization pattern as a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Early repolarization patterns (ERP) have been found to be associated with poor cardiovascular end points. We aimed to evaluate the ERP prevalence among patients with structurally normal hearts undergoing radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and its association with the AF recurrence.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent RF-PVI as index procedure for paroxysmal AF in our center were evaluated.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

structural heart disease, ongoing use of Class I/III antiarrhythmics, complete-bundle-branch-block. Lateral (I, aVL, V₅ -V₆ ), inferior (II, III, aVF), or infero-lateral (both) ERP were defined in baseline ECG as horizontal/downsloping J-point elevation ≥1 mm in two consecutive leads with QRS slurring/notching. Documented episodes of AF lasting ≥30 s were considered recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 701 cases, 434 patients (305 males, 58 ± 11 years) were included for analysis. ERP observed in 67 patients (15.4%) (Infero-lateral n = 26, inferior n = 23, lateral n = 18) which were significantly younger, demonstrating longer PR-interval and lower heart rates. At a mean follow-up of 22.1 ± 9.7 months, AF recurrences were found in 107 patients (24.6%). In middle-aged patients (≥40-<60 years; n = 206, 79% male), those with an infero-lateral ERP had higher recurrence compared with the ones without (56.3% vs. 19%; p = 0.002). Infero-lateral ERP was significantly predicting recurrence (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.21-4.82; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Early repolarization patterns was more prevalent in our AF population than in the general population. Infero-lateral ERP in baseline ECG might predict AF recurrence in the follow-up after RF-PVI in middle-aged patients.

Inguinal vascular complications after ablation of atrial fibrillation: an economic impact assessment

Aims

Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is recommended in the guidelines as a Class Ia/IIa indication. However, associated complications should not be dismissed; specifically, inguinal vascular complications (IVC). Although IVCs are generally considered trivial, they represent an economic burden for the procedure-performing hospital and the patient. Therefore, the ability to monitor and ultimately minimize potential complications is of considerable interest.

Methods and results

An economic model was developed to calculate the economic impact for certain IVC-types from a large German single-centre perspective in 2015 and 2016. Twenty-nine of 1040 (2.79%) and 48 of 1152 (4.17%) AF-ablation patients had documented IVC in 2015 and 2016 (P = 0.08), respectively. Inguinal vascular complications that required invasive treatment (thrombin, intervention, surgery) occurred in 0.58% of the 2015 and in 0.87% of the 2016 AF-ablation cases. The expected excess costs (incorporating direct costs, benefit lost adjusted for reimbursement) per patient treated with AF-ablation were 139.54€ and 153.31€ in 2015 and 2016, respectively. This was mostly driven by opportunity costs, which could reach 15 544.71€ for certain IVC. Sensitivity analysis revealed the probability of occurrence, length of stay of certain IVC types, and the revenue per day influenced the expected costs per AF-ablation patient.

Conclusion

Even relatively benign complications such as IVC can result in considerable cost increases. Therefore, measures to reduce them should be established and implemented.

Reduction of radiation exposure in cryoballoon ablation procedures: a single-centre study applying intracardiac echocardiography and other radioprotective measures

Aims

The population treated with cryoballoon (CB) ablation is relatively young, and radiation protection is of major importance. We aimed to demonstrate that radiation exposure can be markedly reduced by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and optimized settings of the X-ray system.

Methods and results

We analysed 100 patients undergoing CB pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In 50 consecutive patients (25 male, 59 ± 13 years; Group 1), we used ICE, skipped PV angiography prior to CB inflation, and avoided fluoroscopy whenever possible. Furthermore, we reduced the frame rate, minimized distance between patient and detector, and consequently applied collimation. These patients were compared with 50 similar preceding patients in Group 2 (29 male, 61 ± 12 years). Total fluoroscopy time was reduced from 18 ± 6 min in Group 2 to 12 ± 5 min in Group 1 (P < 0.001). Moreover, the dose area product was significantly lower (1555 ± 1219 vs. 4935 ± 2094 cGycm2, P < 0.001), total freezing time was significantly shortened (1855 ± 399 vs. 2121 ± 756 s, P = 0.031), and contrast media use was significantly reduced (66 ± 25 vs. 109 ± 27 mL, P < 0.001). At the same time, total procedure duration and complication rates did not differ significantly between both groups. After a 12 months follow-up, a similar percentage of patients was free from recurrences (74% in Group 1 vs. 78% in Group 2, P = 0.640).

Conclusion

Radiation exposure in CB PVI can be markedly reduced without prolonging procedure times, affecting the outcome or complication rates. Moreover, ICE seems to shorten total freezing time.

The Role of Echocardiography in Determining the Method of Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Literature Review

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting approximately 1 out of every 250 people. It is associated with thrombus formation in the left atrium, decreased cardiac output, and deterioration of the myocardium. There are multiple treatments available for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. This literature review will assess the benefits, risks, and complications associated with radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation, which utilize heat and freezing mechanisms, respectively. The review will also assess the role of echocardiography in determining which treatment, if any, is appropriate for atrial fibrillation.

Important reduction of the radiation dose for pulmonary vein isolation using a multimodal approach

Aims

The number of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation procedures is steadily increasing worldwide resulting in a substantial radiation exposure to patients and operators. The aim of our study was to reduce radiation exposure during these procedures to a critical amount without compromising patient safety.

Methods and results

First, we assessed radiation exposure for primary PVI procedures over time (2005-2015) at the University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen. Second, we prospectively evaluated in 52 patients, the efficacy and safety of a novel radiation reduction program (particularly applying an enhanced fluoroscopy pulse dose-reduction and optimized 3D-mapping system use). In 2035 primary PVI procedures, radiation exposure, assessed as estimated effective dose (eED in mSv, dose area product * 0.002 * conversion factor for females), fluoroscopy-time, and procedure-time decreased significantly from 2005 to 2015 (e.g. eED decreased from 9.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 6.4-13.4) mSv to 0.9 (IQR 0.5-1.6) mSv, p for trend <0.001). Importantly, application of the enhanced radiation reduction program further reduced eED to 0.4 mSv (IQR 0.3-0.6, P < 0.001 vs. control), a value not significantly different from slow-pathway ablation procedures (P = 0.41). Multiple linear regression analysis identified the radiation reduction program as the only independent variable associated with a decrease in radiation exposure.

Conclusion

Radiation exposure during PVI decreased over the last decade and can further be reduced significantly by the implementation of an enhanced radiation reduction program.

The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation currently referred for catheter ablation is increasing. However, the number of trained operators and the capacity of many electrophysiology labs are limited. Accordingly, a steeper learning curve and technical advances for efficient and safe ablation are desirable. During the last decades several catheter-based ablation devices have been developed and adapted to improve not only lesion durability, but also safety profiles, to shorten procedure time and to reduce radiation exposure. The goal of this review is to summarise the reported incidence of complications, considering device-related specific aspects for point-by-point, multi-electrode and balloon-based devices for pulmonary vein isolation. Recent technical and procedural developments aimed at reducing procedural risks and complications rates will be reviewed. In addition, the impact of technical advances on procedural outcome, procedural length and radiation exposure will be discussed.

Cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation: Advantages and drawbacks

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation ablation and is effective for preventing arrhythmias recurrences, especially in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. During the last years, cryoballoon ablation has emerged as an unquestionable alternative approach to radiofrequency ablation. Many non-randomized and randomized trials have proven undoubtedly that cryoballoon ablation displays similar efficacy and overall safety profile, when compared to radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. These results have been obtained in all types of pulmonary veins anatomical subsets, which confirms that there is no need to select patients according to the latter. The value of cryoablation in the setting of short persistent atrial fibrillation still needs more evidence. Importantly, cryoballoon ablation seems to be less operator-dependent and more reproducible than radiofrequency for the isolation of pulmonary veins.

Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis

Introduction

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) are the main treatments for drug-refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF).

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety between CBA and RFCA for the treatment of AF.

Material and methods

We searched the Embase and Medline databases for clinical studies published up to December 2016. Studies that satisfied our predefined inclusion criteria were included.

Results

After searching through the literature in the two major databases, 20 studies with a total of 9,141 patients were included in our study. The CBA had a significantly shorter procedure time (weighted mean difference (WMD) –30.38 min; 95% CI: –46.43 to –14.33, p = 0.0002) and non-significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (WMD –3.18 min; 95% CI: –6.43 to 0.07, p = 0.06) compared with RFCA. There was no difference in freedom from AF between CBA and RFCA (CBA 78.55% vs. RFCA 83.13%, OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.95–1.39, p = 0.14). The CBA was associated with a high risk of procedure-related complications (CBA 9.02% vs. RFCA 6.56%, OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05–2.31, p = 0.03), especially phrenic nerve paralysis (PNP, OR = 10.72, 95% CI: 5.59–20.55, p < 0.00001). The risk of pericardial effusions/cardiac tamponade was low in the CBA group (CBA 1.05% vs. RFCA 1.86%, OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41–0.93, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

For AF, CBA was as effective as RFCA. However, CBA had a shorter procedure time and a non-significantly shorter fluoroscopy time, a significantly high risk of PNP and a low incidence of pericardial effusions/cardiac tamponade compared with RFCA.

Comparative efficacy and safety of contact force-sensing catheter and second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of the contact force (CF)-sensing catheter and second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Six controlled clinical trials comparing ablation for AF using a CF-sensing catheter or second-generation CB were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The procedure duration was significantly lower in the CB group compared with that in the CF group [mean difference (MD)=29.4; 95%CI=17.84–40.96; P=0.01], whereas there was no difference between the groups for fluoroscopy duration (MD=0.59; 95%CI=–4.48–5.66; P=0.82). Moreover, there was no difference in the incidence of non-lethal complications (embolic event, tamponade, femoral/subclavian hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis, phrenic nerve palsy, and esophageal injury) between the CB and the CF groups (8.38 vs 5.35%; RR=0.66; 95%CI=0.37–1.17; P=0.15). Transient phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 17 of 326 patients (5.2%) of the CB group vs none in the CF group (RR=0.12; 95%CI=0.03–0.43; P=0.001). A comparable proportion of patients in CF and CB groups suffered from AF recurrence during the 12-month follow-up after a single ablation procedure [risk ratio (RR)=1.03; 95%CI=0.78–1.35; P=0.84]. AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters and second-generation CB showed comparable fluoroscopy duration and efficacy (during a 12-month follow-up), with shorter procedure duration and different complications in the CB group.

The quest for durable lesions in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation - technological advances in radiofrequency catheters and balloon devices

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and represents a growing clinical, social and economic challenge. Catheter ablation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation has evolved from an experimental procedure into a widespread therapy and offers a safe and effective treatment option. A prerequisite for durable PVI are transmural and contiguous circumferential lesions around the pulmonary veins. However, electrical reconnection of initially isolated pulmonary veins remains a primary concern and is a dominant factor for arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow up. Areas covered: This article discusses the physiology of lesion formation using radiofrequency-, cryo- or laser- energy for pulmonary vein isolation and provides a detailed review of recent technological advancements in the field of radiofrequency catheters and balloon devices. Finally, future directions and upcoming developments for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are discussed. Expert commentary: Durable conduction block across deployed myocardial lesions is mandatory not only for PVI but for any other cardiac ablation strategy as well. A major improvement urgently expected is the intraprocedural real-time distinction of durable lesions from interposed gaps with only transiently impaired electrical conduction. Furthermore, a simplification of ablation tools used for PVI is required to reduce the high technical complexity of the procedure.

Cryoballoon vs. open irrigated radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: long-term FreezeAF outcomes

Background

Effective treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential for reducing the risk of stroke and heart failure. Cryoballoon (CB) ablation has been developed as an alternative to the use of radiofrequency (RF) energy for electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins. Herein, we provide long-term data regarding the efficacy of CB ablation in comparison to RF.

Methods

FreezeAF was a randomised non-inferiority study comparing CB ablation with RF ablation for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Procedural success for the long-term follow-up (30 months) was defined as freedom from AF with an absence of persistent complications.

Results

Of the 315 patients that were randomised and received catheter ablation, 292 (92.7%) completed the 30-month follow-up (147 in the RF group and 145 in the CB group). The baseline characteristics of the RF and CB groups were similar. Single-procedure success was achieved by 40% of patients in the RF group and 42% of the CB group (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). When including re-do procedures in the analysis, the multiple procedure success rate was 72% in the RF group and 76% in the CB group.

Conclusion

The data provide long-term evidence that CB ablation is non-inferior to RF ablation, with high proportions of patients reporting freedom from AF 30 months after the index procedure.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00774566; first registered October 16, 2008; first patient included October 20, 2008.

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials

Introduction: We aimed to study the procedural characteristics, efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to clinical trials comparing CBA and RFA for AF. Outcomes were evaluated for efficacy, procedure characteristics and safety. For each study, odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for endpoints for both approaches. Results: We analyzed a total of 9,957 participants (3,369 in the CBA and 6,588 in RFA group) enrolled in 16 clinical trials. No significant difference was observed between CBA and RFA with regards to freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12-months, recurrent atrial arrhythmias or repeat catheter ablation. CBA group had a significantly higher transient phrenic nerve injury (OR 14.19, 95% CI: 6.92-29.10; p<0.001) and persistent phrenic nerve injury (OR 4.62, 95% CI: 1.97-10.81; p<0.001); and a significantly lower pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.72; p=0.001), and groin site complications (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.93; p=0.02). No significant difference was observed in overall complications, stroke/thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and minor bleeding. Conclusion: CBA was non-inferior to RFA for catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. RF ablation was associated with a higher groin complications and pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, whereas CBA was associated with higher rates of transient and persistent phrenic nerve injury.

A multicenter study of the need of additional freezing for cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: The AD-Balloon study

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), and balloon-based ablation has been recently performed worldwide. Ablation using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) (Arctic Front Advance^TM, Medtronic, MN, USA) is useful for PVI; however, there is some debate concerning the optimal freezing time and number of cycles after PVI is achieved.

Methods

The AD-Balloon study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the optimal strategy (freezing cycles) of CB2 ablation (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000020130). The main objective of this study is to investigate the need for an additional freezing cycle after PVI in patients treated with CB2 ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with additional freezing (AD group) or without additional freezing (non-AD group). In the AD group, 3 min of additional freezing time will be applied in all pulmonary veins after PVI is confirmed at the previous freezing cycle. In the non-AD group, no additional freezing will be applied in all pulmonary veins after PVI is confirmed. The primary endpoint of this study is the occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias within a 1-year follow-up period. We will enroll 110 consecutive patients with PAF. We will also investigate the usefulness of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging to assess the ablation lesions caused by CB2 ablation.

Results

The results of this study are currently under investigation.

Conclusion

The AD-Balloon study would assess the need for an additional freezing cycle after PVI is achieved. Our findings may contribute to further improvement of the CB2 ablation procedure.

Repeat ablation and hospitalization following cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation at a single tertiary medical center

Cryoablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has rapidly become a mainstream treatment for AF. In this report, 163 patients who had undergone a cryoablation procedure at one clinical center were contacted by telephone 33.1 ± 3.3 months after the procedure. All patients had received cryoablation of the pulmonary vein ostia, although concomitant procedures were performed at the same time in over 50% of the patients, including radiofrequency and/or cryoablation of other areas of the left atrium. Freedom from a repeat ablation procedure was 87%, while freedom from recurrent hospitalization for AF was 89%, as compared to previous reports of 65%. Of the 13 patients who had a repeat ablation procedure, only one was found to have a reconnection of pulmonary veins, while 4 were found to have atrial flutter. Cryoablation for AF produces a durable result in most patients out to 3 years with better outcomes than previously reported.

Who Needs Catheter Ablation And Which Approach?

Catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has gained a significant role during maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to anti-arrhythmic medication. Catheter ablation techniques are also improved and progressed over years in parallel to better understanding of disease mechanisms and technological advancements. However, due to invasive nature of the therapy with its pertinent procedural risks, both appropriate patient selection and use of relevant approach should be considered by all electrophysiologists before decide to perform catheter ablation.

Cryo-Balloon Catheter Localization Based on a Support-Vector-Machine Approach

Cryo-balloon catheters have attracted an increasing amount of interest in the medical community as they can reduce patient risk during left atrial pulmonary vein ablation procedures. As cryo-balloon catheters are not equipped with electrodes, they cannot be localized automatically by electro-anatomical mapping systems. As a consequence, X-ray fluoroscopy has remained an important means for guidance during the procedure. Most recently, image guidance methods for fluoroscopy-based procedures have been proposed, but they provide only limited support for cryo-balloon catheters and require significant user interaction. To improve this situation, we propose a novel method for automatic cryo-balloon catheter detection in fluoroscopic images by detecting the cryo-balloon catheter's built-in X-ray marker. Our approach is based on a blob detection algorithm to find possible X-ray marker candidates. Several of these candidates are then excluded using prior knowledge. For the remaining candidates, several catheter specific features are introduced. They are processed using a machine learning approach to arrive at the final X-ray marker position. Our method was evaluated on 75 biplane fluoroscopy images from 40 patients, from two sites, acquired with a biplane angiography system. The method yielded a success rate of 99.0% in plane A and 90.6% in plane B, respectively. The detection achieved an accuracy of 1.00 mm±0.82 mm in plane A and 1.13 mm±0.24 mm in plane B. The localization in 3-D was associated with an average error of 0.36 mm±0.86 mm.

Results from a multicentre comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: is cryoablation more reproducible?

AIM

Cryoballoon ablation (Cryoballoon) has emerged as a new alternative for the treatment of symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether the results of Cryoballoon are more reproducible than those of radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains to be proved.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 860 consecutive patients undergoing a first ablation procedure for paroxysmal AF (467 treated with RF and 393 treated with Cryoballoon) were selected from a prospective multicentre survey of AF ablation (FrenchAF). Radiofrequency and Cryoballoon were compared regarding mid-term efficacy and safety. During a median follow-up of 14 months (interquartile range 8-23), patients treated with Cryoballoon displayed similar rates of freedom from atrial arrhythmia relapse in centres performing this technique (68-80% at 18 months). However, in centres performing RF, a greater heterogeneity in procedural results was observed (46-79% were free from atrial arrhythmia relapse at 18 months). On multivariate analysis, Cryoballoon (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.65, P < 0.001) and annual AF ablation caseload (HR = 0.87 per every 100 AF ablation procedures per year; 95% CI 0.80-0.96, P = 0.003) were independent predictors of procedural success. However, on sensitivity analysis, according to the ablation method, annual AF ablation caseload predicted only sinus rhythm maintenance in the subgroup of patients treated with RF. Analysis of interoperator results with Cryoballoon and RF confirmed lower reproducibility of RF, but suggested that besides caseload, other operator-related factors may play a role.

CONCLUSION

Cryoballoon seems to be less operator-dependent and more reproducible than RF in the setting of paroxysmal AF ablation.

Two-Year Follow-Up after Contact Force Sensing Radiofrequency Catheter and Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Single Centre Study

Background. There are little comparative data on catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) using the contact force radiofrequency (CF-RF) catheter versus the second-generation cryoballoon (CB2). Methods and results. This is a single center, retrospective, nonrandomized study of 98 patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent their first PVI ablation using either the CB2 (n = 40) or CF-RF (n = 58). The mean age was 60 years with 63% men, a mean LA size of 42 mm. The procedure duration (74 ± 17 versus 120 ± 49 minutes p < 0.05) was shorter for CB2 group; the fluoroscopy time (14 ± 17 versus 16 ± 5 minutes, p = 0.45) was similar. Complete PVI was achieved in 96% of patients with RF-CF and 98% with CB2. Phrenic nerve palsies (2 transient and 1 persistent) occurred exclusively in the CB2 group and 1 severe, nonlethal complication (pericardial tamponade) occurred in the CF-RF group. At 24-month follow-up, the success rate, defined as freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) after a single procedure without antiarrhythmic drug, was comparable in CF-RF group and CB2 group (65.5% versus 67%, resp., log rank p = 0.54). Conclusion. Both the CB2 and the RF-CF ablation appeared safe; the success rate at 2 years was comparable between both technologies.