Morphologic Findings in Donor (Transplanted) Hearts at Necropsy Early and Late After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

Update and breakthrough in cardiac xenotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Considerable advancements have been made in the field of cardiac xenotransplantation in the recent years, achieving prolonged survival of the life-supporting cardiac xenograft and paving the way toward first clinical implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The combination of genetic modifications and novel immunosuppression with costimulation blockade, as well as supporting therapy with antiinflammatory treatment, growth prevention, and adaptation of the heart procurement system to reduce myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury improves the overall cardiac xenograft function and overall survival in nonhuman primates. Through the newly identified xenoantigens and novel gene-editing techniques, further genetic modification of the porcine xenografts should be explored, to ensure clinical safety.

SUMMARY

With continuous progress in all fields of cardiac xenotransplantation, first clinical use in humans seems accomplishable. To ensure the clinical safety and to conform to the ethical regulations, further investigation of the infectious and immunological implications on humans should be explored prior to first clinical use. The first clinical use of cardiac xenotransplantation will be limited to only highly selected patients.

Clinicopathological manifestations of myocarditis in a heart failure population

Myocarditis continues to present challenges in diagnosis and management. The goal of this study is to determine the occurrence and manifestations of myocarditis in a heart failure (HF) population. The analyzed patients had acute or persistent HF and were referred over a 6-year period to a quaternary HF center for advanced HF therapies including mechanical circulatory support, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, and/or heart transplantation. The histopathological diagnosis of myocarditis was made based on the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate of the myocardium, typically with associated cardiomyocyte (CMC) damage, combined as indicated with immunohistochemical and molecular biology characterization. The pathological findings were correlated with a panel of clinical parameters and clinical course of the patients. Myocarditis was identified in 36 patients, with initial diagnoses made in 10 (40%) of 25 by endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), 1 by atrial biopsy (maze procedure), 7 (2.1%) of 331 at LVAD implantation, and 18 (7.8%) of 229 in the explanted heart. There were 20 cases of lymphocytic myocarditis, 4 cases of giant cell myocarditis, 3 cases of eosinophilic myocarditis, and 9 cases of lymphohistocytic with granulomas myocarditis - cardiac sarcoidosis. EMB was performed in 25 patients and was positive in 10 (40%) of cases. Myocarditis was found in 23 explanted hearts including 18 cases de novo and 5 cases with a previously positive specimen. Of the 23 explanted hearts, 21 were nonischemic cardiomyopathy and 2 were ischemic cardiomyopathy. Our findings show that, in patients presenting to a quaternary medical center, myocarditis can be manifest as acute HF as well as a complicating factor in chronic HF.

Clinicopathological complexity in the application of the universal definition of myocardial infarction

A universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI) has been established, periodically updated, and refined over the past twenty years. The primary purpose of the UDMI is to bring uniformity and accuracy to clinical diagnosis. Herein, a review and analysis of the UDMI is presented with emphasis on clinicopathological correlation. Determination of the presence of myocardial injury is based on the detection of abnormal serum cardiac biomarkers, particularly cardiac troponin (cTn), and in the current fourth iteration of the UDMI, high sensitivity (hs)-cTn. Differentiation of myocardial infarction from other causes of myocardial injury requires the documentation of clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia. In this review, difficulties in applying the UDMI in actual practice are discussed, based on the experience and perspective of those of us who face these problems as part of our own practice of pathology. The complexity in application of the UDMI is highlighted by the presentation of five illustrative cases involving the differential diagnosis of myocardial injury and myocardial infarction due to atherothrombotic and nonatherothrombotic coronary artery disease. The cases include myocardial infarction due to severe coronary atherosclerosis, supply-demand mismatch, coronary artery dissection associated with an eosinophilic coronary periarteritis, and coronary thromboembolism, and a case with a differential diagnosis of myocarditis and myocardial infarction. These cases illustrate how pathological findings can contribute to more accurate application of the UDMI and how, when critically applied, the UDMI can be used to better characterize myocardial infarcts in clinical practice.