One-Year Ischemic and Bleeding Events According to Renal Function in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Third-Generation Antiplatelet Drugs

Recurrent events after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: predictors and features of plaque progression and stent failure

OBJECTIVES

Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at high risk for recurrent coronary events (RCE). Non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure are the main causes of RCEs. We sought to identify the incidence and predictors of RCEs.

METHODS

Eight hundred thirty patients with STEMI were enrolled and followed up for 5 years. All patients underwent blood test analysis at hospital admission, at 1-month and at 12-month follow-up times. Patients were divided into RCE group and control group. RCE group was further categorized into non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure subgroups.

RESULTS

Among 830 patients with STEMI, 63 patients had a RCE (7.6%). At hospital admission, HDL was numerically lower in RCE group, while LDL at both 1-month and 12-month follow-up times were significantly higher in RCE group. Both HDL at hospital admission and LDL at 12-month follow-up were independently associated with RCEs (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99 and OR 1.041, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, respectively). RCEs were due to non-culprit plaque progression in 47.6% of cases, while in 36.5% due to stent failure. The mean time frame between pPCI and RCE was significantly greater for non-culprit plaque progression subgroup as compared to stent failure subgroup (27 ± 18 months and 16 ± 14 months, P  = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

RCEs still affect patients after pPCI. Low levels of HDL at admission and high levels of LDL at 12 months after pPCI significantly predicted RCEs. A RCE results in non-culprit plaque progression presents much later than an event due to stent failure.

Impact of renal function on adverse bleeding events associated with dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome

It is believed, but not well established, that renal dysfunction increases the risk of adverse bleeding events associated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study is to estimate the impact of renal function on adverse bleeding events associated with DAPT in patients with ACS. A total of 1,264 ACS patients who received DAPT, clopidogrel (n = 530) or prasugrel (n = 734) in addition to aspirin, were assessed in a multicenter observational study. The relationship between renal function and bleeding event, defined as BARC 3 or 5, was determined using a marginal effect from the logit model and Royston-Parmar model. During an average 313.1 days of the observation period, defined as the duration of DAPT after admission until the implementation of a change in the regimen, bleeding events were observed in 7.4% of patients (n = 94). The estimated curves demonstrated that the probability of bleeding was positive correlated with renal dysfunction (6.0 to 8.6), regardless of the DAPT regimen used. This probability was consistently higher in clopidogrel (7.4 to 10.5) than in prasugrel (4.8 to 0.7). This trend was also shown in maintenance hemodialysis patients (6.7 vs. 10.3). Estimated cumulative incidences among individual stages of renal function were drawn. In conclusion, bleeding events increased with worsening renal function, and prasugrel is safer than clopidogrel as a component of DAPT throughout all levels of renal function, including hemodialysis patients after ACS.

Usefulness of the PRECISE-DAPT score at differentiating between ticagrelor and prasugrel for dual antiplatelet therapy initiation

As a part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), prasugrel or ticagrelor is prescribed along with aspirin to patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess if the PRECISE-DAPT score, which provides prediction of bleeding during DAPT, could be used to choose between prasugrel and ticagrelor for DAPT initiation. 181 patients out of which 71 received prasugrel and 110 received ticagrelor were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated for everyone and was used to dichotomize patients into two subgroups (score <25 and ≥25). After balancing potential confounders in baseline characteristics of the subgroups using propensity scores, comparison of a composite outcome of 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (4P-MACE) (i.e., cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or coronary revascularization due to stent thrombosis) and bleeding (any type as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) within 1-year post-PCI was performed among the subgroups using Cox proportional hazards regression. Prasugrel was associated with lower and comparatively higher 4P-MACE events in subgroups with score ≥25 (HR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77) and score <25 (HR: 3.58; 95% CI, 0.62-20.70) respectively. For bleeding outcome, prasugrel trended towards more clinical benefit for scores ≥25 (HR: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.10-1.93) than <25 (HR: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.13-6.58). Therefore, prasugrel was associated with better clinical effectiveness and trended towards a lower bleeding risk compared to ticagrelor within 1-year post-PCI for those with a high PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25). This finding requires validation through larger studies.