1
|
Colón-Emeric CS, Lee R, Pieper CF, Lyles KW, Zullig LL, Nelson RE, Robinson K, Igwe I, Jadhav J, Adler RA. Protocol for the models of primary osteoporosis screening in men (MOPS) cluster randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 112:106634. [PMID: 34844000 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend primary osteoporosis screening for at-risk men to reduce the morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with osteoporotic fractures. However, analyses in a national Veterans Health Administration cohort of over 4,000,000 men demonstrated that primary osteoporosis screening as it is currently operationalized does not benefit most older Veterans due to inefficient targeting and low subsequent treatment and adherence rates. The overall objective of this study is to determine whether a new model of primary osteoporosis screening reduces fracture risk compared to usual care. We are conducting a pragmatic group randomized trial of 38 primary care teams assigned to usual care or a Bone Health Service (BHS) screening model in which screening and adherence activities are managed by a centralized expert team. The study will: 1) compare the impact of the BHS model on patient-level outcomes strongly associated with fracture rates (eligible proportion screened, proportion meeting treatment criteria who receive osteoporosis medications, medication adherence, and femoral neck bone mineral density); 2) quantify the impact on provider and facility-level outcomes including change in DXA volume, change in metabolic bone disease clinic volume, and PACT provider time and satisfaction; and 3) estimate the impact on health system and policy outcomes using Markov models of screening program cost per quality adjusted life year based from health system and societal perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathleen S Colón-Emeric
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), 508 Fulton St. Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Richard Lee
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), 508 Fulton St. Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Carl F Pieper
- Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kenneth W Lyles
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), 508 Fulton St. Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), 508 Fulton St. Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Richard E Nelson
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, VA Salt Lake City VA Health Care System, 500 Foothills Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA; University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Katina Robinson
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), 508 Fulton St. Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Ivuoma Igwe
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), 508 Fulton St. Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Jyotsna Jadhav
- Durham VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), 508 Fulton St. Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Robert A Adler
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toles M, Colón-Emeric C, Moreton E, Frey L, Leeman J. Quality improvement studies in nursing homes: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:803. [PMID: 34384404 PMCID: PMC8361800 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06803-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality improvement (QI) is used in nursing homes (NH) to implement and sustain improvements in patient outcomes. Little is known about how QI strategies are used in NHs. This lack of information is a barrier to replicating successful strategies. Guided by the Framework for Implementation Research, the purpose of this study was to map-out the use, evaluation, and reporting of QI strategies in NHs. METHODS This scoping review was completed to identify reports published between July 2003 through February 2019. Two reviewers screened articles and included those with (1) the term "quality improvement" to describe their methods, or reported use of a QI model (e.g., Six Sigma) or strategy (e.g., process mapping) (2), findings related to impact on service and/or resident outcomes, and (3) two or more NHs included. Reviewers extracted data on study design, setting, population, problem, solution to address problem, QI strategies, and outcomes (implementation, service, and resident). Vote counting and narrative synthesis were used to describe the use of QI strategies, implementation outcomes, and service and/or resident outcomes. RESULTS Of 2302 articles identified, the full text of 77 articles reporting on 59 studies were included. Studies focused on 23 clinical problems, most commonly pressure ulcers, falls, and pain. Studies used an average of 6 to 7 QI strategies. The rate that strategies were used varied substantially, e.g., the rate of in-person training (55%) was more than twice the rate of plan-do-study-act cycles (20%). On average, studies assessed two implementation outcomes; the rate these outcomes were used varied widely, with 37% reporting on staff perceptions (e.g., feasibility) of solutions or QI strategies vs. 8% reporting on fidelity and sustainment. Most studies (n = 49) reported service outcomes and over half (n = 34) reported resident outcomes. In studies with statistical tests of improvement, service outcomes improved more often than resident outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study maps-out the scope of published, peer-reviewed studies of QI in NHs. The findings suggest preliminary guidance for future studies designed to promote the replication and synthesis of promising solutions. The findings also suggest strategies to refine procedures for more effective improvement work in NHs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Toles
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
| | | | | | - Lauren Frey
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker P, Kifley A, Kurrle S, Cameron ID. Increasing the uptake of vitamin D supplement use in Australian residential aged care facilities: results from the vitamin D implementation (ViDAus) study. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:383. [PMID: 33023492 PMCID: PMC7542101 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01784-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate (≥800 IU/day) vitamin D supplement use in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) is variable and non-optimal. The vitamin D implementation (ViDAus) study aimed to employ a range of strategies to support the uptake of this best practice in participating facilities. The aim of this paper is to report on facility level prevalence outcomes and factors associated with vitamin D supplement use. METHODS This trial followed a stepped wedge cluster, non-randomised design with 41 individual facilities serving as clusters pragmatically allocated into two wedges that commenced the intervention six months apart. This multifaceted, interdisciplinary knowledge translation intervention was led by a project officer, who worked with nominated champions at participating facilities to provide education and undertake quality improvement (QI) planning. Local barriers and responsive strategies were identified to engage stakeholders and promote widespread uptake of vitamin D supplement use. RESULTS This study found no significant difference in the change of vitamin D supplement use between the intervention (17 facilities with approx. 1500 residents) and control group (24 facilities with approx. 1900 residents) at six months (difference in prevalence change between groups was 1.10, 95% CI - 3.8 to 6.0, p = 0.6). The average overall facility change in adequate (≥800 IU/day) vitamin D supplement use over 12 months was 3.86% (95% CI 0.6 to 7.2, p = 0.02), which achieved a facility level average prevalence of 59.6%. The variation in uptake at 12 months ranged from 25 to 88% of residents at each facility. In terms of the types of strategies employed for implementation, there were no statistical differences between facilities that achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (≥10%) or a desired prevalence of vitamin D supplement use (80% of residents) compared to those that did not. CONCLUSIONS This work confirms the complex nature of implementation of best practice in the RACF setting and indicates that more needs to be done to ensure best practice is translated into action. Whilst some strategies appeared to be associated with better outcomes, the statistical insignificance of these findings and the overall limited impact of the intervention suggests that the role of broader organisational and governmental support for implementation should be investigated further. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered (ANZCTR ID: ACTRN12616000782437 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippy Walker
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Annette Kifley
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Susan Kurrle
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Health Service, Hornsby, NSW, 2077, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cotterill S, Tang MY, Powell R, Howarth E, McGowan L, Roberts J, Brown B, Rhodes S. Social norms interventions to change clinical behaviour in health workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
A social norms intervention seeks to change the clinical behaviour of a target health worker by exposing them to the values, beliefs, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. These low-cost interventions can be used to encourage health workers to follow recommended professional practice.
Objective
To summarise evidence on whether or not social norms interventions are effective in encouraging health worker behaviour change, and to identify the most effective social norms interventions.
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources
The following databases were searched on 24 July 2018: Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to week 2 July 2018), EMBASE (1974 to 3 July 2018), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1937 to July 2018), British Nursing Index (2008 to July 2018), ISI Web of Science (1900 to present), PsycINFO (1806 to week 3 July 2018) and Cochrane trials (up to July 2018).
Participants
Health workers took part in the study.
Interventions
Behaviour change interventions based on social norms.
Outcome measures
Health worker clinical behaviour, for example prescribing (primary outcome), and patient health outcomes, for example blood test results (secondary), converted into a standardised mean difference.
Methods
Titles and abstracts were reviewed against the inclusion criteria to exclude any that were clearly ineligible. Two reviewers independently screened the remaining full texts to identify relevant papers. Two reviewers extracted data independently, coded for behaviour change techniques and assessed quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We performed a meta-analysis and presented forest plots, stratified by behaviour change technique. Sources of variation were explored using metaregression and network meta-analysis.
Results
A total of 4428 abstracts were screened, 477 full texts were screened and findings were based on 106 studies. Most studies were in primary care or hospitals, targeting prescribing, ordering of tests and communication with patients. The interventions included social comparison (in which information is given on how peers behave) and credible source (which refers to communication from a well-respected person in support of the behaviour). Combined data suggested that interventions that included social norms components were associated with an improvement in health worker behaviour of 0.08 standardised mean differences (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.10 standardised mean differences) (n = 100 comparisons), and an improvement in patient outcomes of 0.17 standardised mean differences (95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.20) (n = 14), on average. Heterogeneity was high, with an overall I
2 of 85.4% (primary) and 91.5% (secondary). Network meta-analysis suggested that three types of social norms intervention were most effective, on average, compared with control: credible source (0.30 standardised mean differences, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.47); social comparison combined with social reward (0.39 standardised mean differences, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.64); and social comparison combined with prompts and cues (0.33 standardised mean differences, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.44).
Limitations
The large number of studies prevented us from requesting additional information from authors. The trials varied in design, context and setting, and we combined different types of outcome to provide an overall summary of evidence, resulting in a very heterogeneous review.
Conclusions
Social norms interventions are an effective method of changing clinical behaviour in a variety of health service contexts. Although the overall result was modest and very variable, there is the potential for social norms interventions to be scaled up to target the behaviour of a large population of health workers and resulting patient outcomes.
Future work
Development of optimised credible source and social comparison behaviour change interventions, including qualitative research on acceptability and feasibility.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016045718.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 41. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Cotterill
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Mei Yee Tang
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachael Powell
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Elizabeth Howarth
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Laura McGowan
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Jane Roberts
- Outreach and Evidence Search Service, Library and E-learning Service, Northern Care Alliance, NHS Group, Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, UK
| | - Benjamin Brown
- Health e-Research Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Rhodes
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin J, Viprey M, Castagne B, Merle B, Giroudon C, Chapurlat R, Schott AM. Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:429-446. [PMID: 31993718 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a major public health concern, but still OP care does not meet guidelines. Interventions have been developed to improve appropriate OP management. The objective of the present study was to systematically review the current literature to ascertain the efficacy of interventions to improve OP care and characterize interventions taking into account elements related to their potential cost and feasibility. Studies published from 2003 to 2018 were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Wiley Online Library databases. Screening of references and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. We classified interventions into three types according to the target of the intervention: health system (structural interventions), healthcare professional (HCP), and patient. Meta-analysis was performed by type of intervention and their effect on two outcomes: prescription of BMD measurement and prescription of OP therapy. A total of 4268 records were screened; 32 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 29 studies in the quantitative analysis. Structural interventions strongly and significantly improved prescription of BMD measurement (OR = 9.99, 95% CI 2.05; 48.59) and treatment prescription (OR = 3.82, 95% CI 2.16; 6.75). The impact of HCP-centered interventions on BMD measurement prescription did not reach statistical significance (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 0.84; 5.73) but significantly improved treatment prescription (OR = 3.82, 95% CI 2.16; 6.75). Interventions involving patients significantly improved the prescription of BMD measurement (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.62; 2.89) and treatment prescription (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.35; 2.14). Interventions to improve OP management had a significant positive impact on prescription of BMD measurement but a more limited impact on treatment prescription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Martin
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, F-69008, Lyon, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, 69003, Lyon, France
| | - M Viprey
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, F-69008, Lyon, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, 69003, Lyon, France
| | - B Castagne
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, F-69008, Lyon, France
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU Gabriel Montpied, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - B Merle
- INSERM UMR1033, Lyon, France
| | - C Giroudon
- Centre de documentation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - R Chapurlat
- INSERM UMR1033, Lyon, France
- Service de Rhumatologie et de Pathologie Osseuse, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - A-M Schott
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, F-69008, Lyon, France.
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, 69003, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shimodan S, Sato D, Takahashi K, Nakamura Y, Hyakkan R, Watanabe T, Hishimura R, Ota M, Shimizu H, Hojo Y, Hasegawa Y, Chubachi T, Yasui K, Tsujimoto T, Tsukuda Y, Asano T, Takahashi D, Takahata M, Iwasaki N, Shimizu T. Ten years change in post-fracture care for hip fracture patients. J Bone Miner Metab 2020; 38:222-229. [PMID: 31583538 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-019-01047-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to clarify the changes in postoperative care provided by orthopaedic surgeons after hip fractures and clarify the incidence of secondary fractures requiring surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects were patients with hip fracture treated surgically in seven hospitals during the 10-year period from January 2008 to December 2017. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative osteoporosis treatments, and secondary fractures were collected from the medical records. RESULTS In total, 4764 new hip fractures in 982 men and 3782 women (mean age: 81.3 ± 10.0 years) were identified. Approximately 10% of patients had a history of osteoporosis drug treatment and 35% of patients received postoperative drug treatment. The proportion of patients receiving postoperative drug therapy increased by approximately 10% between 2009 and 2010, 10% between 2010 and 2011, and 10% between 2011 and 2013. Although the rate of secondary fractures during the entire period and within 3 years decreased from 2011, the rate of secondary fracture within 1 year remained at around 2% every year. CONCLUSIONS The approval of new osteoporosis drugs and the establishment of osteoporosis liaison services have had a positive effect on the use of postoperative drug therapy in the orthopedic field. Our finding that the rate of secondary fracture within 1 year of the initial fracture remained around 2% every year, despite improvements in postoperative drug therapy, suggests that both rehabilitation for preventing falls and early postoperative drug therapy are essential to prevent secondary fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Shimodan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kushiro City General Hospital, Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Dai Sato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iwamizawa City Hospital, Iwamizawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kaname Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hakodate General Central Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yumejiro Nakamura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hakodate General Central Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryota Hyakkan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hakodate General Central Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takamasa Watanabe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hakodate General Central Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Hishimura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ebetsu City Hospital, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ota
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokushokai Hospital, Iwamizawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Shimizu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hojo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hasegawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Obihiro Kosei Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshiya Chubachi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Obihiro Kosei Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keigo Yasui
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Obihiro Kosei Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takeru Tsujimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Otaru City Hospital, Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yukinori Tsukuda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Otaru City Hospital, Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Asano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Daisuke Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Masahiko Takahata
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Norimasa Iwasaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Shimizu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Negm AM, Ioannidis G, Jantzi M, Bucek J, Giangregorio L, Pickard L, Hirdes JP, Adachi JD, Richardson J, Thabane L, Papaioannou A. Validation of a one year fracture prediction tool for absolute hip fracture risk in long term care residents. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:320. [PMID: 30587140 PMCID: PMC6307179 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-1010-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frail older adults living in long term care (LTC) homes have a high fracture risk, which can result in reduced quality of life, pain and death. The Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) was designed for fracture risk assessment in LTC, to optimize targeting of services in those at highest risk. This study aims to examine the construct validity and discriminative properties of the FRS in three Canadian provinces at 1-year follow up. METHODS LTC residents were included if they were: 1) Adults admitted to LTC homes in Ontario (ON), British Columbia (BC) and Manitoba (MB) Canada; and 2) Received a Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0. After admission to LTC, one-year hip fracture risk was evaluated for all the included residents using the FRS (an eight-level risk scale, level 8 represents the highest fracture risk). Multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the differences in incident hip or all clinical fractures across the provinces and FRS risk levels. We examined the differences in incident hip or all clinical fracture for each FRS level across the three provinces (adjusted for age, BMI, gender, fallers and previous fractures). We used the C-statistic to assess the discriminative properties of the FRS for each province. RESULTS Descriptive statistics on the LTC populations in ON (n = 29,848), BC (n = 3129), and MB (n = 2293) are: mean (SD) age 82 (10), 83 (10), and 84 (9), gender (female %) 66, 64, and 70% respectively. The incident hip fractures and all clinical fractures for FRS risk level were similar among the three provinces and ranged from 0.5 to 19.2% and 1 to 19.2% respectively. The overall discriminative properties of the FRS were similar between ON (C-statistic = 0.673), BC (C-statistic = 0.644) and MB (C-statistic = 0.649) samples. CONCLUSION FRS is a valid tool for identifying LTC residents at different risk levels for hip or all clinical fractures in three provinces. Having a fracture risk assessment tool that is tailored to the LTC context and embedded within the routine clinical assessment may have significant implications for policy, service delivery and care planning, and may improve care for LTC residents across Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed M Negm
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,School of Rehabilitation Sciences, IAHS 403, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 1C7, Canada.
| | - George Ioannidis
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Micaela Jantzi
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenn Bucek
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lora Giangregorio
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Kinesiology and Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Pickard
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - John P Hirdes
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Adachi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, IAHS 403, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 1C7, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nayak S, Greenspan SL. How Can We Improve Osteoporosis Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Quality Improvement Strategies for Osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33:1585-1594. [PMID: 29637658 PMCID: PMC6129396 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although osteoporosis affects 10 million people in the United States, screening and treatment rates remain low. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of quality improvement strategies to improve osteoporosis screening (bone mineral density [BMD]/dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA] testing) and/or treatment (pharmacotherapy) initiation rates. We developed broad literature search strategies for PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, and applied inclusion/exclusion criteria to select relevant studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for outcomes of BMD/DXA testing and/or osteoporosis treatment. Forty-three randomized clinical studies met inclusion criteria. For increasing BMD/DXA testing in patients with recent or prior fracture, meta-analyses demonstrated several efficacious strategies, including orthopedic surgeon or fracture clinic initiation of osteoporosis evaluation or management (risk difference 44%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 26%-63%), fracture liaison service/case management (risk difference 43%, 95% CI 23%-64%), multifaceted interventions targeting providers and patients (risk difference 24%, 95% CI 15%-32%), and patient education and/or activation (risk difference 16%, 95% CI 6%-26%). For increasing osteoporosis treatment in patients with recent or prior fracture, meta-analyses demonstrated significant efficacy for interventions of fracture liaison service/case management (risk difference 20%, 95% CI 1%-40%) and multifaceted interventions targeting providers and patients (risk difference 12%, 95% CI 6%-17%). The only quality improvement strategy for which meta-analysis findings demonstrated significant improvement of osteoporosis care for patient populations including individuals without prior fracture was patient self-scheduling of DXA plus education, for increasing the outcome of BMD testing (risk difference 13%, 95% CI 7%-18%). The meta-analyses findings were limited by small number of studies in each analysis; high between-study heterogeneity; sensitivity to removal of individual studies; and unclear risk of bias of included studies. Despite the limitations of the current body of evidence, our findings indicate there are several strategies that appear worthwhile to enact to try to improve osteoporosis screening and/or treatment rates. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kastner M, Perrier L, Munce SEP, Adhihetty CC, Lau A, Hamid J, Treister V, Chan J, Lai Y, Straus SE. Complex interventions can increase osteoporosis investigations and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:5-17. [PMID: 29043392 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4248-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is affecting over 200 million people worldwide. Despite available guidelines, care for these patients remains sub-optimal. We developed an osteoporosis tool to address the multiple dimensions of chronic disease management. Findings from its evaluation showed a significant increase from baseline in osteoporosis investigations and treatment, so we are revising this tool to include multiple chronic conditions including an update of evidence about osteoporosis. Our objectives were to conduct a systematic review of osteoporosis interventions in adults at risk for osteoporosis. We searched bibliometric databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in any language evaluating osteoporosis disease management interventions in adults at risk for osteoporosis. Reviewer pairs independently screened citations and full-text articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Analysis included random effects meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were osteoporosis investigations and treatment, and fragility fractures. Fifty-five RCTs and one companion report were included in the analysis representing 165,703 patients. Our findings from 55 RCTs and 18 sub-group meta-analyses showed that complex implementation interventions with multiple components consisting of at least education + feedback + follow-up significantly increased the initiation of osteoporosis medications, and interventions with at least education + follow-up significantly increased the initiation of osteoporosis investigations. No significant impact was found for any type of intervention to reduce fracture. Complex interventions that include at least education + follow-up or feedback have the most potential for increasing osteoporosis investigations and treatment. Patient education appears to be an important component in osteoporosis disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kastner
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - L Perrier
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S E P Munce
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - C C Adhihetty
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Hamid
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - V Treister
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Chan
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Y Lai
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S E Straus
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Videoconferencing for Health Care Provision for Older Adults in Care Homes: A Review of the Research Evidence. Int J Telemed Appl 2017; 2017:5785613. [PMID: 29081795 PMCID: PMC5610821 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5785613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Revised: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A scoping review was conducted to map the research evidence on the use of videoconferencing for remote health care provision for older adults in care homes. The review aimed to identify the nature and extent of the existing evidence base. Databases used were Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Reviews. The review identified 26 articles for inclusion, of which 14 were case studies, making the most used study design. Papers described videoconferencing as being used for assessment, management of health care, clinical support, and diagnosis, with eight of the papers reporting the use of videoconferencing for more than one clinical purpose. A further eight papers reported the use of videoconferencing for assessment alone. The literature reported the collection of various types of data, with 12 papers describing the use of both qualitative and quantitative data. The outcomes mainly addressed staff satisfaction (n = 9) and resident satisfaction (n = 8). Current evidence supports the feasibility of videoconferencing in care homes. However, research needs to be undertaken to establish the contexts and mechanisms that underpin the successful implementation of videoconferencing in care homes and to define useful measures for success.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ioannidis G, Jantzi M, Bucek J, Adachi JD, Giangregorio L, Hirdes J, Pickard L, Papaioannou A. Development and validation of the Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) that predicts fracture over a 1-year time period in institutionalised frail older people living in Canada: an electronic record-linked longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016477. [PMID: 28864698 PMCID: PMC5588955 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate our Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) over a 1-year time period, using the long-term care (LTC) Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (RAI-MDS 2.0). DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. SETTING LTC homes in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS Older adults who were admitted to LTC and received a RAI-MDS 2.0 admission assessment between 2006 and 2010. RESULTS A total of 29 848 LTC residents were enrolled in the study. Of these 22 386 were included in the derivation dataset and 7462 individual were included in the validation dataset. Approximately 2/3 of the entire sample were women and 45% were 85 years of age or older. A total of 1553 (5.2%) fractures were reported over the 1-year time period. Of these, 959 (61.8%) were hip fractures. Following a hip fracture, 6.3% of individuals died in the emergency department or as an inpatient admission and did not return to their LTC home. Using decision tree analysis, our final outcome scale had eight risk levels of differentiation. The percentage of individuals with a hip fracture ranged from 0.6% (lowest risk level) to 12.6% (highest risk level). The area under the curve of the outcome scale was similar for the derivation (0.67) and validation (0.69) samples, and the scale exhibited a good level of consistency. CONCLUSIONS Our FRS predicts hip fracture over a 1-year time period and should be used as an aid to support clinical decisions in the care planning of LTC residents. Future research should focus on the transformation of our scale to a Clinical Assessment Protocol and to assess the FRS in other healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Geriatric Education and Research in Ageing Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Micaela Jantzi
- Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenn Bucek
- Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Adachi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Geriatric Education and Research in Ageing Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lora Giangregorio
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Hirdes
- Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Pickard
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Geriatric Education and Research in Ageing Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Geriatric Education and Research in Ageing Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diehl H, Graverholt B, Espehaug B, Lund H. Implementing guidelines in nursing homes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:298. [PMID: 27456352 PMCID: PMC4960750 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1550-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on guideline implementation strategies has mostly been conducted in settings which differ significantly from a nursing home setting and its transferability to the nursing home setting is therefore limited. The objective of this study was to systematically review the effects of interventions to improve the implementation of guidelines in nursing homes. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, DARE, HTA, CENTRAL, SveMed + and ISI Web of Science from their inception until August 2015. Reference screening and a citation search were performed. Studies were eligible if they evaluated any type of guideline implementation strategy in a nursing home setting. Eligible study designs were systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted-time-series studies. The EPOC risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. The overall quality of the evidence was rated using GRADE. RESULTS Five cluster-randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, evaluating a total of six different multifaceted implementation strategies. One study reported a small statistically significant effect on professional practice, and two studies demonstrated small to moderate statistically significant effects on patient outcome. The overall quality of the evidence for all comparisons was low or very low using GRADE. CONCLUSIONS Little is known about how to improve the implementation of guidelines in nursing homes, and the evidence to support or discourage particular interventions is inconclusive. More implementation research is needed to ensure high quality of care in nursing homes. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014007664.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Diehl
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Bergen University College, Inndalsveien 58, 5063 Bergen, Norway
| | - Birgitte Graverholt
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Bergen University College, Inndalsveien 58, 5063 Bergen, Norway
| | - Birgitte Espehaug
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Bergen University College, Inndalsveien 58, 5063 Bergen, Norway
| | - Hans Lund
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Bergen University College, Inndalsveien 58, 5063 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Sports Science and Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Treatment of Osteoporosis in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: Update on Consensus Recommendations for Fracture Prevention. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17:852-9. [PMID: 27349626 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) are at a higher risk of suffering fractures than the community-dwelling older population. The first Consensus Conference on Treatment of Osteoporosis in RACFs in Australia, held in Sydney in July 2009, aimed to address some of the issues relating to the treatment of older residents with osteoporosis in RACFs. Considering that the field of osteoporosis diagnosis and management has significantly advanced in the last 5 years and that new evidence has been generated from studies performed within RACFs, a Second Consensus Conference was held in Sydney in November 2014. METHODS An expert panel met in November 2014 in Penrith, NSW, Australia in an attempt to reach a consensus on diverse issues related to the treatment of osteoporosis at RACFs. Participants were selected by the scientific committee on the basis of their practice in an RACF and/or major published articles. The co-chairs distributed topics randomly to all participants, who then had to propose a statement on each topic for approval by the conference after a short, evidence-based presentation, when possible. RESULTS This article provides an update on the most relevant evidence on osteoporosis in older people living in RACFs graded according to its level, quality, and relevance. CONCLUSION As with the first consensus, it is hoped that this statement will constitute an important guide to aid physicians in their decision making while practicing at RACFs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Effects of Zoledronate on Mortality and Morbidity after Surgical Treatment of Hip Fractures. Adv Orthop 2016; 2016:3703482. [PMID: 27092280 PMCID: PMC4820612 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3703482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Revised: 02/14/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the effects of intertrochanteric femoral fractures on mortality, morbidity, and cost of zoledronate treatment in elderly patients treated by osteosynthesis. Based on Evans classification, 114 patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures were treated with osteosynthesis. After the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures, the treatment group (M/F, 24/32; mean age, 76.7 ± SD years) received zoledronate infusion, and the control group (M/F, 20/38; mean age, 80.2 ± SD years) received placebo. Postoperative control visits were performed at 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month time points. Functional level of patients was evaluated by the modified Harris hip score and Merle d'Aubigné hip score. By 12 months, the mean HHS in treatment and control groups was 81.93 and 72.9, respectively. For time of death of the patients, mortality was found to be 57.1% (16/28) on the first 3 months and 92.9% (26/28) on the first six months. The mortality rate in the treatment and control groups was 14.3% (8/56) and 34.5% (20/58), respectively. The use of zoledronic acid after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in osteoporotic elderly patients is a safe treatment modality which helps to reduce mortality, improves functional outcomes, and has less side effects with single dose use per year.
Collapse
|
15
|
Alamri SH, Kennedy CC, Marr S, Lohfeld L, Skidmore CJ, Papaioannou A. Strategies to overcome barriers to implementing osteoporosis and fracture prevention guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative analysis of action plans suggested by front line staff in Ontario, Canada. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15:94. [PMID: 26231516 PMCID: PMC4522131 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-015-0099-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Osteoporosis is a major global health problem, especially among long-term care (LTC) facilities. Despite the availability of effective clinical guidelines to prevent osteoporosis and bone fractures, few LTC homes actually adhere to these practical recommendations. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practices for osteoporosis and fracture prevention in LTC facilities and elicit practical strategies to address these barriers. Methods We performed a qualitative analysis of action plans formulated by Professional Advisory Committee (PAC) teams at 12 LTC homes in the intervention arm of the Vitamin D and Osteoporosis Study (ViDOS) in Ontario, Canada. PAC teams were comprised of medical directors, administrators, directors of care, pharmacists, dietitians, and other staff. Thematic content analysis was performed to identify the key themes emerging from the action plans. Results LTC teams identified several barriers, including lack of educational information and resources prior to the ViDOS intervention, difficulty obtaining required patient information for fracture risk assessment, and inconsistent prescribing of vitamin D and calcium at the time of admission. The most frequently suggested recommendations was to establish and adhere to standard admission orders regarding vitamin D, calcium, and osteoporosis therapies, improve the use of electronic medical records for osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment, and require bone health as a topic at quarterly reviews and multidisciplinary conferences. Conclusions This qualitative study identified several important barriers and practical recommendations for improving the implementation of osteoporosis and fracture prevention guidelines in LTC settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan H Alamri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. .,Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. .,Geriatrics Residency Program, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave. E., Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
| | - Courtney C Kennedy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. .,Juravinski Research Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences - St. Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada.
| | - Sharon Marr
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. .,Juravinski Research Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences - St. Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada.
| | - Lynne Lohfeld
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada.
| | - Carly J Skidmore
- Juravinski Research Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences - St. Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada.
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, McMaster University, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. .,Juravinski Research Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences - St. Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tjia J, Field T, Mazor K, Lemay CA, Kanaan AO, Donovan JL, Briesacher BA, Peterson D, Pandolfi M, Spenard A, Gurwitz JH. Dissemination of Evidence-Based Antipsychotic Prescribing Guidelines to Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63:1289-98. [PMID: 26173554 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of efforts to translate and disseminate evidence-based guidelines about atypical antipsychotic use to nursing homes (NHs). DESIGN Three-arm, cluster randomized trial. SETTING NHs. PARTICIPANTS NHs in the state of Connecticut. MEASUREMENTS Evidence-based guidelines for atypical antipsychotic prescribing were translated into a toolkit targeting NH stakeholders, and 42 NHs were recruited and randomized to one of three toolkit dissemination strategies: mailed toolkit delivery (minimal intensity); mailed toolkit delivery with quarterly audit and feedback reports about facility-level antipsychotic prescribing (moderate intensity); and in-person toolkit delivery with academic detailing, on-site behavioral management training, and quarterly audit and feedback reports (high intensity). Outcomes were evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. RESULTS Toolkit awareness of 30% (7/23) of leadership of low-intensity NHs, 54% (19/35) of moderate-intensity NHs, and 82% (18/22) of high-intensity NHs reflected adoption and implementation of the intervention. Highest levels of use and knowledge among direct care staff were reported in high-intensity NHs. Antipsychotic prescribing levels declined during the study period, but there were no statistically significant differences between study arms or from secular trends. CONCLUSION RE-AIM indicators suggest some success in disseminating the toolkit and differences in reach, adoption, and implementation according to dissemination strategy but no measurable effect on antipsychotic prescribing trends. Further dissemination to external stakeholders such as psychiatry consultants and hospitals may be needed to influence antipsychotic prescribing for NH residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Tjia
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Terry Field
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Kathleen Mazor
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Celeste A Lemay
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Abir O Kanaan
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,MCPHS University, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer L Donovan
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,MCPHS University, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Becky A Briesacher
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Peterson
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jerry H Gurwitz
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.,Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Thabane L, Adachi JD, Marr S, Giangregorio LM, Morin SN, Crilly RG, Josse RG, Lohfeld L, Pickard LE, van der Horst ML, Campbell G, Stroud J, Dolovich L, Sawka AM, Jain R, Nash L, Papaioannou A. Successful knowledge translation intervention in long-term care: final results from the vitamin D and osteoporosis study (ViDOS) pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16:214. [PMID: 25962885 PMCID: PMC4431601 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0720-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few studies have systematically examined whether knowledge translation (KT) strategies can be successfully implemented within the long-term care (LTC) setting. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary KT intervention for improving the prescribing of vitamin D, calcium and osteoporosis medications over 12-months. Methods We conducted a pilot, cluster randomized controlled trial in 40 LTC homes (21 control; 19 intervention) in Ontario, Canada. LTC homes were eligible if they had more than one prescribing physician and received services from a large pharmacy provider. Participants were interdisciplinary care teams (physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, and other staff) who met quarterly. Intervention homes participated in three educational meetings over 12 months, including a standardized presentation led by expert opinion leaders, action planning for quality improvement, and audit and feedback review. Control homes did not receive any additional intervention. Resident-level prescribing and clinical outcomes were collected from the pharmacy database; data collectors and analysts were blinded. In addition to feasibility measures, study outcomes were the proportion of residents taking vitamin D (≥800 IU/daily; primary), calcium ≥500 mg/day and osteoporosis medications (high-risk residents) over 12 months. Data were analyzed using the generalized estimating equations technique accounting for clustering within the LTC homes. Results At baseline, 5,478 residents, mean age 84.4 (standard deviation (SD) 10.9), 71% female, resided in 40 LTC homes, mean size = 137 beds (SD 76.7). In the intention-to-treat analysis (21 control; 19 intervention clusters), the intervention resulted in a significantly greater increase in prescribing from baseline to 12 months between intervention versus control arms for vitamin D (odds ratio (OR) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12, 2.96) and calcium (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.74), but not for osteoporosis medications (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.51). In secondary analyses, excluding seven nonparticipating intervention homes, ORs were 3.06 (95% CI: 2.18, 4.29), 1.57 (95% CI: 1.12, 2.21), 1.20 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.60) for vitamin D, calcium and osteoporosis medications, respectively. Conclusions Our KT intervention significantly improved the prescribing of vitamin D and calcium and is a model that could potentially be applied to other areas requiring quality improvement. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01398527. Registered: 19 July 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney C Kennedy
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - George Ioannidis
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Lehana Thabane
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Jonathan D Adachi
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Sharon Marr
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Lora M Giangregorio
- University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
| | - Suzanne N Morin
- McGill University, 845Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada.
| | - Richard G Crilly
- Western University, Parkwood Hospital, 801 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6C 5 J1, Canada.
| | - Robert G Josse
- University of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada.
| | - Lynne Lohfeld
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Laura E Pickard
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | | | - Glenda Campbell
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Jackie Stroud
- Medical Pharmacies Group Limited, 590 Granite Crt, Pickering, ON, L1W 3X6, Canada.
| | - Lisa Dolovich
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Anna M Sawka
- University of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada.
| | - Ravi Jain
- Osteoporosis Canada, Suite 301, 1090 Don Mills Road, Toronto, ON, M3C 3R6, Canada.
| | - Lynn Nash
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS) Centre, St. Peter's Hospital, Room 151, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON, L8M 1 W9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Implementing a knowledge translation intervention in long-term care: feasibility results from the Vitamin D and Osteoporosis Study (ViDOS). J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014; 15:943-5. [PMID: 24953541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2014] [Revised: 05/04/2014] [Accepted: 05/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of implementing an interdisciplinary, multifaceted knowledge translation intervention within long-term care (LTC) and to identify any challenges that should be considered in designing future studies. DESIGN Cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING Forty LTC homes across the province of Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS LTC teams composed of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other staff. MEASUREMENTS Cluster-level feasibility measures, including recruitment, retention, data completion, and participation in the intervention. A process evaluation was completed by directors of care indicating which process/policy changes had been implemented. RESULTS Recruitment and retention rates were 22% and 63%, respectively. Good fidelity with the intervention was achieved, including attendance at educational meetings. After ViDOS, 7 process indicators were being newly implemented by more than 50% of active intervention homes. CONCLUSION Despite recruitment and retention challenges, the multifaceted intervention produced a number of policy/process changes and had good intervention fidelity. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01398527.
Collapse
|
19
|
Santesso N, Carrasco‐Labra A, Brignardello‐Petersen R. Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD001255. [PMID: 24687239 PMCID: PMC10754476 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001255.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older people living in nursing care facilities or older adults living at home are at high risk of falling and a hip fracture may occur after a fall. Hip protectors have been advocated as a means to reduce the risk of hip fracture. Hip protectors are plastic shields (hard) or foam pads (soft), usually fitted in pockets in specially designed underwear.This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1999, and updated several times, most recently in 2010. OBJECTIVES To determine if the provision of external hip protectors (sometimes referred to as hip pads or hip protector pads) reduces the risk of fracturing the hip in older people. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (December 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1950 to week 3 November 2012), MEDLINE In-Process (18 December 2012), EMBASE (1988 to 2012 Week 50), CINAHL (1982 to December 2012), BioMed Central (January 2010), trial registers and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing an intervention group provided with hip protectors with a control group not provided with hip protectors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We sought additional information from trialists. Data were pooled using fixed-effect or random-effects models as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS This review includes 19 studies, nine of which were cluster randomised. These included approximately 17,000 people (mean age range 78 to 86 years). Most studies were overall at low risk of bias for fracture outcomes. Trials tested hard or soft hip protectors enclosed in special underwear in 18 studies.Pooling of data from 14 studies (11,808 participants) conducted in nursing or residential care settings found moderate quality evidence for a small reduction in hip fracture risk (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.00); the absolute effect is 11 fewer people (95% CI, from 20 fewer to 0) per 1000 having a hip fracture when provided with hip protectors.There is moderate quality evidence when pooling data from five trials in the community (5614 participants) that shows little or no effect in hip fracture risk (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.58); the absolute effect is two more people (95% CI 2 fewer to 6 more) per 1000 people having a hip fracture when provided with hip protectors.There is probably little to no effect on falls (rate ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.16) or fractures other than of the hip or pelvis (rate ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.07). However, the risk ratio for pelvic fractures is RR 1.27 (95% CI 0.78 to 2.08); this is an absolute effect of one more person (95% CI 1 fewer to 5 more) per 1000 having a pelvic fracture when provided with hip protectors.The incidence of adverse events while wearing hip protectors, including skin irritation, ranged from 0% to 5%. Adherence, particularly in the long term, was poor. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Hip protectors probably reduce the risk of hip fractures if made available to older people in nursing care or residential care settings, without increasing the frequency of falls. However, hip protectors may slightly increase the small risk of pelvic fractures. Poor acceptance and adherence by older people offered hip protectors is a barrier to their use. Better understanding is needed of the personal and design factors that may influence acceptance and adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Santesso
- McMaster UniversityDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics1200 Main Street WestHamiltonOntarioCanadaL8N 3Z5
| | - Alonso Carrasco‐Labra
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of ChileEvidence Based Dentistry UnitSergio Livingstone Pohlhammer 943, IndependenciaSantiagoChile8380000
| | - Romina Brignardello‐Petersen
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of ChileEvidence Based Dentistry UnitSergio Livingstone Pohlhammer 943, IndependenciaSantiagoChile8380000
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Lu X, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P. Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014; 8:827-41. [PMID: 24940049 PMCID: PMC4051798 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s60106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To use a mixed-methods approach to develop a letter that can be used to notify patients of their bone mineral density (BMD) results by mail that may activate patients in their bone-related health care. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary team developed three versions of a letter for reporting BMD results to patients. Trained interviewers presented these letters in a random order to a convenience sample of adults, aged 50 years and older, at two different health care systems. We conducted structured interviews to examine the respondents' preferences and comprehension among the various letters. RESULTS A total of 142 participants completed the interview. A majority of the participants were female (64.1%) and white (76.1%). A plurality of the participants identified a specific version of the three letters as both their preferred version (45.2%; P<0.001) and as the easiest to understand (44.6%; P<0.01). A majority of participants preferred that the letters include specific next steps for improving their bone health. CONCLUSION Using a mixed-methods approach, we were able to develop and optimize a printed letter for communicating a complex test result (BMD) to patients. Our results may offer guidance to clinicians, administrators, and researchers who are looking for guidance on how to communicate complex health information to patients in writing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie W Edmonds
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Correspondence: Stephanie W Edmonds, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Internal Medicine, C44-G GH, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA, Tel +1 319 356 1761, Fax +1 319 356 1229, Email
| | - Samantha L Solimeo
- Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Xin Lu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Douglas W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peter Cram
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
O'Rourke HM, Fraser KD, Boström AM, Baylon MAB, Sales AE. Regulated provider perceptions of feedback reports. J Nurs Manag 2013; 21:1016-25. [PMID: 24015973 DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM This paper reports on regulated (or licensed) care providers' understanding and perceptions of feedback reports in a sample of Canadian long-term care settings using a cross-sectional survey design. BACKGROUND Audit with feedback quality improvement studies have seldom targeted front-line providers in long-term care to receive feedback information. METHODS Feedback reports were delivered to front-line regulated care providers in four long-term care facilities for 13 months in 2009-10. Providers completed a postfeedback survey. RESULTS Most (78%) regulated care providers (n = 126) understood the reports and felt they provided useful information for making changes to resident care (64%). Perceptions of the report differed, depending on the role of the regulated care provider. In multivariable logistic regression, the regulated nurses' understanding of more than half the report was negatively associated with 'usefulness of information for changing resident care', and perceiving the report as generally useful had a positive association. CONCLUSIONS Front-line regulated providers are an appropriate target for feedback reports in long-term care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT Long-term care administrators should share unit-level information on care quality with unit-level managers and other professional front-line direct care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M O'Rourke
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Warriner AH, Outman RC, Kitchin E, Chen L, Morgan S, Saag KG, Curtis JR. A randomized trial of a mailed intervention and self-scheduling to improve osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27:2603-10. [PMID: 22836812 PMCID: PMC3502704 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2012] [Revised: 07/11/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Guidelines recommend bone density screening with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in women 65 years or older, but <30% of eligible women undergo DXA testing. There is a need to identify a systematic, effective, and generalizable way to improve osteoporosis screening. A group randomized, controlled trial of women ≥65 years old with no DXA in the past 4 years, randomized to receive intervention materials (patient osteoporosis brochure and a letter explaining how to self-schedule a DXA scan) versus usual care (control) was undertaken. Outcome of interest was DXA completion. Of 2997 women meeting inclusion criteria, 977 were randomized to the intervention group. A total of 17.3% of women in the intervention group completed a DXA, compared to 5.2% in the control group (12.1% difference, p < 0.0001). When including only those medically appropriate, we found a difference of 19% between the two groups (p < 0.0001). DXA receipt was greater in main clinic patients compared to satellite clinic patients (20.9% main clinic versus 10.1% satellite clinic). The cost to print and mail the intervention was $0.79 per patient, per mailing. The number of women to whom intervention needed to be mailed to yield one extra DXA performed was 9, at a cost of $7.11. DXA scan completion was significantly improved through use of a mailed osteoporosis brochure and the availability for patients to self-schedule. This simple approach may be an effective component of a multifaceted quality improvement program to increase rates of osteoporosis screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H Warriner
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gordon AL, Logan PA, Jones RG, Forrester-Paton C, Mamo JP, Gladman JRF. A systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in care homes. BMC Geriatr 2012; 12:31. [PMID: 22731652 PMCID: PMC3503550 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2011] [Accepted: 06/25/2012] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A thorough understanding of the literature generated from research in care homes is required to support evidence-based commissioning and delivery of healthcare. So far this research has not been compiled or described. We set out to describe the extent of the evidence base derived from randomized controlled trials conducted in care homes. Methods A systematic mapping review was conducted of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in care homes. Medline was searched for “Nursing Home”, “Residential Facilities” and “Homes for the Aged”; CINAHL for “nursing homes”, “residential facilities” and “skilled nursing facilities”; AMED for “Nursing homes”, “Long term care”, “Residential facilities” and “Randomized controlled trial”; and BNI for “Nursing Homes”, “Residential Care” and “Long-term care”. Articles were classified against a keywording strategy describing: year and country of publication; randomization, stratification and blinding methodology; target of intervention; intervention and control treatments; number of subjects and/or clusters; outcome measures; and results. Results 3226 abstracts were identified and 291 articles reviewed in full. Most were recent (median age 6 years) and from the United States. A wide range of targets and interventions were identified. Studies were mostly functional (44 behaviour, 20 prescribing and 20 malnutrition studies) rather than disease-based. Over a quarter focussed on mental health. Conclusions This study is the first to collate data from all RCTs conducted in care homes and represents an important resource for those providing and commissioning healthcare for this sector. The evidence-base is rapidly developing. Several areas - influenza, falls, mobility, fractures, osteoporosis – are appropriate for systematic review. For other topics, researchers need to focus on outcome measures that can be compared and collated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Gordon
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD000259. [PMID: 22696318 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1344] [Impact Index Per Article: 112.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Audit and feedback is widely used as a strategy to improve professional practice either on its own or as a component of multifaceted quality improvement interventions. This is based on the belief that healthcare professionals are prompted to modify their practice when given performance feedback showing that their clinical practice is inconsistent with a desirable target. Despite its prevalence as a quality improvement strategy, there remains uncertainty regarding both the effectiveness of audit and feedback in improving healthcare practice and the characteristics of audit and feedback that lead to greater impact. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of audit and feedback on the practice of healthcare professionals and patient outcomes and to examine factors that may explain variation in the effectiveness of audit and feedback. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2010, Issue 4, part of The Cochrane Library. www.thecochranelibrary.com, including the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register (searched 10 December 2010); MEDLINE, Ovid (1950 to November Week 3 2010) (searched 09 December 2010); EMBASE, Ovid (1980 to 2010 Week 48) (searched 09 December 2010); CINAHL, Ebsco (1981 to present) (searched 10 December 2010); Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, ISI Web of Science (1975 to present) (searched 12-15 September 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials of audit and feedback (defined as a summary of clinical performance over a specified period of time) that reported objectively measured health professional practice or patient outcomes. In the case of multifaceted interventions, only trials in which audit and feedback was considered the core, essential aspect of at least one intervention arm were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS All data were abstracted by two independent review authors. For the primary outcome(s) in each study, we calculated the median absolute risk difference (RD) (adjusted for baseline performance) of compliance with desired practice compliance for dichotomous outcomes and the median percent change relative to the control group for continuous outcomes. Across studies the median effect size was weighted by number of health professionals involved in each study. We investigated the following factors as possible explanations for the variation in the effectiveness of interventions across comparisons: format of feedback, source of feedback, frequency of feedback, instructions for improvement, direction of change required, baseline performance, profession of recipient, and risk of bias within the trial itself. We also conducted exploratory analyses to assess the role of context and the targeted clinical behaviour. Quantitative (meta-regression), visual, and qualitative analyses were undertaken to examine variation in effect size related to these factors. MAIN RESULTS We included and analysed 140 studies for this review. In the main analyses, a total of 108 comparisons from 70 studies compared any intervention in which audit and feedback was a core, essential component to usual care and evaluated effects on professional practice. After excluding studies at high risk of bias, there were 82 comparisons from 49 studies featuring dichotomous outcomes, and the weighted median adjusted RD was a 4.3% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5% to 16%) absolute increase in healthcare professionals' compliance with desired practice. Across 26 comparisons from 21 studies with continuous outcomes, the weighted median adjusted percent change relative to control was 1.3% (IQR = 1.3% to 28.9%). For patient outcomes, the weighted median RD was -0.4% (IQR -1.3% to 1.6%) for 12 comparisons from six studies reporting dichotomous outcomes and the weighted median percentage change was 17% (IQR 1.5% to 17%) for eight comparisons from five studies reporting continuous outcomes. Multivariable meta-regression indicated that feedback may be more effective when baseline performance is low, the source is a supervisor or colleague, it is provided more than once, it is delivered in both verbal and written formats, and when it includes both explicit targets and an action plan. In addition, the effect size varied based on the clinical behaviour targeted by the intervention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Audit and feedback generally leads to small but potentially important improvements in professional practice. The effectiveness of audit and feedback seems to depend on baseline performance and how the feedback is provided. Future studies of audit and feedback should directly compare different ways of providing feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Ivers
- Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 2Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services,Oslo,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Anderson RA, Corazzini K, Porter K, Daily K, McDaniel RR, Colón-Emeric C. CONNECT for quality: protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial to improve fall prevention in nursing homes. Implement Sci 2012; 7:11. [PMID: 22376375 PMCID: PMC3310735 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2011] [Accepted: 02/29/2012] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Quality improvement (QI) programs focused on mastery of content by individual staff members are the current standard to improve resident outcomes in nursing homes. However, complexity science suggests that learning is a social process that occurs within the context of relationships and interactions among individuals. Thus, QI programs will not result in optimal changes in staff behavior unless the context for social learning is present. Accordingly, we developed CONNECT, an intervention to foster systematic use of management practices, which we propose will enhance effectiveness of a nursing home Falls QI program by strengthening the staff-to-staff interactions necessary for clinical problem-solving about complex problems such as falls. The study aims are to compare the impact of the CONNECT intervention, plus a falls reduction QI intervention (CONNECT + FALLS), to the falls reduction QI intervention alone (FALLS), on fall-related process measures, fall rates, and staff interaction measures. Methods/design Sixteen nursing homes will be randomized to one of two study arms, CONNECT + FALLS or FALLS alone. Subjects (staff and residents) are clustered within nursing homes because the intervention addresses social processes and thus must be delivered within the social context, rather than to individuals. Nursing homes randomized to CONNECT + FALLS will receive three months of CONNECT first, followed by three months of FALLS. Nursing homes randomized to FALLS alone receive three months of FALLs QI and are offered CONNECT after data collection is completed. Complexity science measures, which reflect staff perceptions of communication, safety climate, and care quality, will be collected from staff at baseline, three months after, and six months after baseline to evaluate immediate and sustained impacts. FALLS measures including quality indicators (process measures) and fall rates will be collected for the six months prior to baseline and the six months after the end of the intervention. Analysis will use a three-level mixed model. Discussion By focusing on improving local interactions, CONNECT is expected to maximize staff's ability to implement content learned in a falls QI program and integrate it into knowledge and action. Our previous pilot work shows that CONNECT is feasible, acceptable and appropriate. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00636675
Collapse
|
26
|
Levine DA, Funkhouser EM, Houston TK, Gerald JK, Johnson-Roe N, Allison JJ, Richman J, Kiefe CI. Improving care after myocardial infarction using a 2-year internet-delivered intervention: the Department of Veterans Affairs myocardial infarction-plus cluster-randomized trial. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 171:1910-7. [PMID: 22123798 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular risk reduction in ambulatory patients who survive myocardial infarction (MI) is effective but underused. We sought to evaluate a provider-directed, Internet-delivered intervention to improve cardiovascular management for post-MI outpatients. METHODS The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) MI-Plus study was a cluster-randomized trial involving 168 community-based primary care clinics and 847 providers in 26 states, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico, from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2008, with the clinic as the randomization unit. We collected administrative data for 15,847 post-MI patients and medical record data for 10,452 of these. A multicomponent, Internet-delivered intervention included quarterly educational modules, practice guidelines, monthly literature summaries, and automated e-mail reminders delivered to providers for 27 months. Main outcome measures included percentage of patients who achieved each of 7 clinical indicators, a composite score of the 7 clinical indicators, and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hemoglobin A(1c) levels. RESULTS Clinics had a median of 3 providers (interquartile range, 2-6), with a median of 50.0% of providers (33.3%-66.7%) participating in the study. Patients in intervention clinics had greater improvements (from 70.0% to 85.5%) in the percentages prescribed β-blockers than patients in control clinics (71.9% to 84.0%; adjusted improvement gain for intervention vs control, 2.6%; 95% CI, 0.1%-4.1%). We found nonsignificant differences in improvements favoring patients in intervention clinics for 5 of 6 remaining clinical indicators and levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hemoglobin A(1c). CONCLUSION A longitudinal, Internet-delivered intervention improved only 1 of 7 clinical indicators of cardiovascular management in ambulatory post-MI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Levine
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Greenspan S, Nace D, Perera S, Ferchak M, Fiorito G, Medich D, Zukowski K, Adams D, Lee C, Saul M, Resnick N. Lessons learned from an osteoporosis clinical trial in frail long-term care residents. Clin Trials 2011; 9:247-56. [PMID: 22157987 DOI: 10.1177/1740774511430516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although osteoporosis affects women of all ages, the impact is most pronounced in frail residents in long-term care. Nevertheless, few interventional trials have been performed in this population, and few data on therapeutic alternatives are available in this cohort. PURPOSE We describe the challenges and lessons learned in developing and carrying out a trial in frail long-term-care residents. METHODS The Zoledronic acid in frail Elders to STrengthen bone (ZEST) study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of a single-dose therapy for osteoporosis in frail residents in long-term care in the Pittsburgh area. Women with osteoporosis who were 65 years of age and older and currently not on therapy were randomized in a blinded fashion to intravenous zoledronic acid or placebo. Follow-up of each participant was planned for 2 years. All participants received appropriate calcium and vitamin D supplementation. RESULTS Seven hundred and thirty-three contacts were made with long-term care residents of nine participating facilities. Of 252 women screened, 181 were eligible, enrolled, and randomized. Multiple barriers to research in long-term-care facilities were encountered but overcome with direct communication, information sessions, in-service trainings, and social events. Lessons learned included designing the study in a manner that avoided placing an additional burden on an already overcommitted facility staff, a two-stage consent process to separate screening from randomization, and a flexible examination schedule to accommodate residents while obtaining the necessary outcome measurements. Furthermore, a mobile unit accessible to participants containing state-of-the-art dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), assessment for vertebral fractures, and phlebotomy equipment allows all assessments to be performed on-site at each facility. Serious adverse events are collected from affiliated hospitals in real time with a novel electronic surveillance system. LIMITATIONS The major limitation is selection of outcomes that can be assessed at participating facilities and do not require transport of participants to hospitals or clinics. CONCLUSIONS Clinical research for osteoporosis can be successfully and safely performed with frail residents in long-term care facilities. Lessons learned from this study may inform future investigations among frail elderly residents of these facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sl Greenspan
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Linnebur SA, Fish DN, Ruscin JM, Radcliff TA, Oman KS, Fink R, Van Dorsten B, Liebrecht D, Fish R, McNulty M, Hutt E. Impact of a multidisciplinary intervention on antibiotic use for nursing home-acquired pneumonia. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 9:442-450.e1. [PMID: 22055208 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Academic detailing in nursing homes (NHs) has been shown to improve drug use patterns and adherence to guidelines. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary intervention that included academic detailing on adherence to national nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) guidelines related to use of antibiotics. METHODS This quasi-experimental study evaluated the effects of a 2-year multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention targeting implementation of national evidence-based guidelines for NHAP. Interventions took place in 8 NHs in Colorado; 8 NHs in Kansas and Missouri served as controls. Interventions included (1) educational sessions for nurses to improve recognition and timely treatment of NHAP symptoms and (2) academic detailing to clinicians by pharmacists regarding diagnostic and prescribing practices. Differences in antibiotic use between groups were compared after 2 intervention years relative to baseline. RESULTS A total of 549 episodes of NHAP were evaluated in the intervention group and 574 in the control group. Compared with baseline, 1 facility in the intervention group significantly improved in guideline adherence for optimal antibiotic use (P = 0.007), whereas no facilities in the control group improved. The mean adherence score for optimal antibiotic use in intervention NHs increased from 60% to 66%, whereas the control NHs increased from 32% to 39% (P = 0.3). Mean adherence to guidelines recommending antibiotic use within 4 hours of NHAP diagnosis increased from 57% to 75% in intervention NHs but decreased from 38% to 31% in control NHs (P = 0.0003 for difference). There was no difference between intervention and control NHs for guideline adherence regarding optimal duration of antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS The ability of this multifaceted study to repeatedly remind nursing staff of the importance of timely antibiotic administration contrasts with its limited academic detailing interaction with clinicians. This difference within the intervention may explain the differential impact of the intervention on antibiotic guideline adherence.
Collapse
|
29
|
Outman RC, Curtis JR, Locher JL, Allison JJ, Saag KG, Kilgore ML. Improving osteoporosis care in high-risk home health patients through a high-intensity intervention. Contemp Clin Trials 2011; 33:206-12. [PMID: 22005175 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2011] [Revised: 09/23/2011] [Accepted: 09/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We developed and tested a multi-modal intervention, delivered in the home health care setting, aimed at increasing osteoporosis treatment rates to prevent fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The intervention focused on home health nurses. Key components included: nursing education; development of a nursing care plan; patient teaching materials and creation of physician materials. Nursing education consisted of a lecture covering osteoporosis, fracture risks and prevention, and the effectiveness of anti-osteoporosis treatment options. Patients received education materials concerning osteoporosis and anti-osteoporosis medications. A pocket-sized treatment algorithm card and standardized order sets were prepared for physicians. Focus groups of physicians and nurses were conducted to obtain feedback on the materials and methods to facilitate effective nurse-physician communication. Successful application required nurses to identify patients with a fracture history, initiate the care plan, prompt physicians on risk status, and provide patient education. The intervention was piloted in one field office. RESULTS In the year prior to the intervention, home health patients (n=92) with a fracture history were identified in the pilot field office and only 20 (22%) received osteoporosis prescription therapy. In the three months following the intervention, 21 newly enrolled patients were identified and 9 (43%) had received osteoporosis prescription medications. CONCLUSIONS Home health care provides a venue where patients and physicians can be informed by nurses about osteoporosis and fracture risks and, consequently, initiate appropriate therapy. This multi-modal intervention is easily transportable to other home health agencies and adaptable to other medical conditions and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Outman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, FOT 820, 1530 3rd Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Funkhouser E, Levine DA, Gerald JK, Houston TK, Johnson NK, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI. Recruitment activities for a nationwide, population-based, group-randomized trial: the VA MI-Plus study. Implement Sci 2011; 6:105. [PMID: 21906278 PMCID: PMC3184080 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2010] [Accepted: 09/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) oversees the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. The feasibility of a large-scale, nationwide, group-randomized implementation trial of VHA outpatient practices has not been reported. We describe the recruitment and enrollment of such a trial testing a clinician-directed, Internet-delivered intervention for improving the care of postmyocardial infarction patients with multiple comorbidities. METHODS With a recruitment goal of 200 eligible community-based outpatient clinics, parent VHA facilities (medical centers) were recruited because they oversee their affiliated clinics and the research conducted there. Eligible facilities had at least four VHA-owned and -operated primary care clinics, an affiliated Institutional Review Board (IRB), and no ongoing, potentially overlapping, quality-improvement study. Between December 2003 and December 2005, in two consecutive phases, we used initial and then intensified recruitment strategies. RESULTS Overall, 48 of 66 (73%) eligible facilities were recruited. Of the 219 clinics and 957 clinicians associated with the 48 facilities, 168 (78%) clinics and 401 (42%) clinicians participated. The median time from initial facility contact to clinic enrollment was 222 days, which decreased by over one-third from the first to the second recruitment phase (medians: 323 and 195 days, respectively; p < .001), when more structured recruitment with physician recruiters was implemented and a dedicated IRB manager was added to the coordinating center staff. CONCLUSIONS Large group-randomized trials benefit from having dedicated physician investigators and IRB personnel involved in recruitment. A large-scale, nationally representative, group-randomized trial of community-based clinics is feasible within the VHA or a similar national healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Funkhouser
- VA Research Enhancement Award Program (REAP), Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Curtis JR. Improving osteoporosis care through multimodal interventions: insights from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22 Suppl 3:445-50. [PMID: 21847763 PMCID: PMC3767024 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1710-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2011] [Accepted: 06/24/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Despite the many advances in scientific research over the last several decades, cutting edge technologies and therapeutics often take many years to find their way into widespread use. The dissemination and uptake of best practices into clinical care is sometimes a neglected component of research that is essential to improve the population's health. Type 2 translational research, sometimes called "Proof in Practice Research," seeks to maximize the yield of what has been learned from the bench and from carefully controlled clinical trials and to extend those benefits to a larger population. One aspect of type 2 translational research, sometimes called evidence implementation or implementation science, applies what has been learned about clinical medicine to achieve best practices across providers and health systems. This article describes evidence implementation as applied to osteoporosis care, drawing from several published or ongoing studies to illustrate challenges and potential solutions in improving the quality of osteoporosis care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics on Musculoskeletal Disorders, FOT 805D, 510 20th street south, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Parikh S, Brookhart MA, Stedman M, Avorn J, Mogun H, Solomon DH. Correlations of nursing home characteristics with prescription of osteoporosis medications. Bone 2011; 48:1164-8. [PMID: 21320653 PMCID: PMC3096758 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2010] [Revised: 01/18/2011] [Accepted: 02/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in the nursing home (NH) populations but medications that increase bone mineral density are used infrequently. Prior research finds few patient characteristics predict treatment. NH characteristics have been associated with prescription of some medications. We examined associations of NH-level characteristics with osteoporosis treatment in elderly patients admitted to a NH after a fracture. METHOD We conducted a cohort study of patients with hip, wrist and humeral fractures admitted to a NH in NJ. They were followed for 12 months from 1999 to 2004. Possible NH-level predictors of receiving osteoporosis treatment were assessed in mixed multivariable models to account for clustering within individual NHs. RESULTS Of the 2838 post-fracture patients identified from 180 NHs, 156 (5.5%) were prescribed an osteoporosis medication. There was wide variation in treatment between individual NHs (0-40%), which was substantially reduced after adjusting for patient case mix. Several patient characteristics did associate with osteoporosis treatment-female gender (odds ratio (OR) 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42, 4.61), younger age per year (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.96, 0.99), white race (OR 2.37, 95%CI 1.23, 4.56) and prior history of fracture (OR 4.41, 95%CI 1.04, 18.73). However no NH characteristics significantly associate with treatment (profit status, NH chain member, occupancy rate, and bed size). CONCLUSION NH characteristics did not predict pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. Further studies of osteoporosis prescribing in NHs need to consider other types of variables as possible correlates of prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema Parikh
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Womens’ Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Suite 3030 1640 Tremont St, Boston, MA
- Division of Gerontology, Lowry Medical Office Building, Suite 1B, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 110 Francis St, Boston MA 02215
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Womens’ Hospital, 75 Francis St Boston, MA 02115
| | - M. Alan Brookhart
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Womens’ Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Suite 3030 1640 Tremont St, Boston, MA
| | - Margaret Stedman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Womens’ Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Suite 3030 1640 Tremont St, Boston, MA
| | - Jerry Avorn
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Womens’ Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Suite 3030 1640 Tremont St, Boston, MA
| | - Helen Mogun
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Womens’ Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Suite 3030 1640 Tremont St, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel H Solomon
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Womens’ Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Suite 3030 1640 Tremont St, Boston, MA
- Aged Care Services, Caulfield General Medical Center, 260 Kooyong Road, Caulfield, Victoria, Australia 3162
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Valdés JC, Videla M, Lafuente M, Henere E, Poal-Manresa A, Madrid P, Benet A, Videla S. [Clinical audits of the procedure of the total hip arthroplasty and its impact on the improvement of the quality care]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 26:83-9. [PMID: 21339078 DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2010.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2010] [Revised: 09/22/2010] [Accepted: 09/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical audits are critical and systematic quality analysis of medical care. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a routine practice and cost-effective, although there is little information on the quality of care of it. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a clinical audit cycle in the quality of care in the primary THA procedures for non-traumatic cause. PATIENTS AND METHODS A series of two audits (first audit in 2005 and second one in 2007) were performed. Patients of both sexes with non-traumatic primary THA and with a follow-up of 6 months were included. Time (days) in hospital stay and the rate (percentage) of readmissions were used as indicators of management; and as indicators of clinical practice: the index (percentage) of dislocation and the rate (percentage) of infection. Both audits were compared with respect to these indicators. RESULTS A total of 160 patients (79 and 81, first and second audit respectively) were analysed. Management indicators: median (range) of hospital stay was 8 (7-78) and 7 (6-16), p<0.001, and the percentage of readmissions 5% (4/79) and 0 (0/81), p=0.057. Indicators of clinical practice: the rate of dislocation was 8% (6/79) and 0 (0/81), p=0.013, and the rate of infection 1% (1/79) and 1% (1/81), p=1. A multivariate analysis did not find other factors related to these indicators. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a clinical audit cycle has improved the quality of care of primary THA procedures for non-traumatic cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Valdés
- Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Dos de Maig, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
The use of data for process and quality improvement in long term care and home care: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011; 13:103-13. [PMID: 21450243 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardized resident or client assessments, including the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), have been available in long term care and home care settings (continuing care sector) in many jurisdictions for a number of years. Although using these data can make quality improvement activities more efficient and less costly, there has not been a review of the literature reporting quality improvement interventions using standardized data. OBJECTIVES To address 2 questions: (1) How have RAI and other standardized data been used in process or quality improvement activities in the continuing care sector? and (2) Has the use of RAI and similar data resulted in improvements to resident or other outcomes? DATA SOURCES Searches using a combination of keyword and controlled vocabulary term searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and PsychINFO. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: English language publications from database inception to October 2008 were included. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) set in continuing care (long-term care facility or home care), (2) involved some form of intervention designed to improve quality or process of care, and (3) used standardized data in the quality or process improvement intervention. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS After reviewing the articles, we grouped the studies according to the type of intervention used to initiate process improvement. Four different intervention types were identified. We organized the results and discussion by these 4 intervention types. RESULTS Key word searches identified 713 articles, of which we excluded 639 on abstract review because they did not meet inclusion criteria. A further 50 articles were excluded on full-text review, leaving a total of 24 articles. Of the 24 studies, 10 used a defined process improvement model, 8 used a combination of interventions (multimodal), 5 implemented new guidelines or protocols, and 1 used an education intervention. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS The most frequently cited issues contributing to unsuccessful quality improvement interventions were lack of staff, high staff turnover, and limited time available to train staff in ways that would improve client care. Innovative strategies and supporting research are required to determine how to intervene successfully to improve quality in these settings characterized by low staffing levels and predominantly nonprofessional staff. Research on how to effectively enable practitioners to use data to improve quality of care, and ultimately quality of life, needs to be a priority.
Collapse
|
35
|
Little EA, Eccles MP. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis. Implement Sci 2010; 5:80. [PMID: 20969769 PMCID: PMC2988064 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2010] [Accepted: 10/22/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
36
|
Lau AN, Ioannidis G, Potts Y, Giangregorio LM, Van der Horst ML, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A. What are the beliefs, attitudes and practices of front-line staff in long-term care (LTC) facilities related to osteoporosis awareness, management and fracture prevention? BMC Geriatr 2010; 10:73. [PMID: 20929589 PMCID: PMC2958961 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2010] [Accepted: 10/08/2010] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to the general elderly population, those institutionalized in LTC facilities have the highest prevalence of osteoporosis and subsequently have higher incidences of vertebral and hip fractures. The goal of this study is to determine how well nurses at LTC facilities are educated to properly administer bisphosphonates. A secondary question assessed was the nurse's and PSW's attitudes and beliefs regarding the role and benefits of vitamin D for LTC patients. METHODS Eight LTC facilities in Hamilton were surveyed, and all nurses were offered a survey. A total 57 registered nurses were surveyed. A 21 item questionnaire was developed to assess existing management practices and specific osteoporosis knowledge areas. RESULTS The questionnaire assessed the nurse's and personal support worker's (PSWs) education on how to properly administer bisphosphonates by having them select all applicable responses from a list of options. These options included administering the drug before, after or with meals, given with or separate from other medications, given with juice, given with or without water, given with the patient sitting up, or finally given with the patient supine. Only 52% of the nurses and 8.7% of PSWs administered the drug properly, where they selected the options: (given before meals, given with water, given separate from all other medications, and given in a sitting up position). If at least one incorrect option was selected, then it was scored as an inappropriate administration. Bisphosphonates were given before meals by 85% of nurses, given with water by 90%, given separately from other medication by 71%, and was administered in an upright position by 79%. Only 52% of the nurses and 8.7% of PSWs surveyed were administering the drug properly. Regarding the secondary question, of the 57 nurses surveyed, 68% strongly felt their patients should be prescribed vitamin D supplements. Of the 124 PSWs who completed the survey, 44.4% strongly felt their patients should be prescribed vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSION Bisphosphonates are quite effective in increasing the bone mineral density of LTC patients, and may reduce fracture rates, but it is only effective if properly administered. In our study, proper administration of bisphosphonate therapy was less than optimal. In summary, although the education of health providers has improved since the mid-1990's, this area still requires further attention and the subject of future quality assurance research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur N Lau
- Division of Rheumatology and Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - George Ioannidis
- Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yelena Potts
- St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mary-Lou Van der Horst
- Division of Geriatrics and Department of Medicine, Hamilton Health Science and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CIHR -Eli Lilly Chair Osteoporosis and Fracture Prevention, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Adachi
- Division of Rheumatology and Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Division of Geriatrics and Department of Medicine, Hamilton Health Science and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CIHR -Eli Lilly Chair Osteoporosis and Fracture Prevention, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fracture in older people usually results from a fall on the hip. Hip protectors have been advocated as a means to reduce the risk of hip fracture. OBJECTIVES To determine if external hip protectors reduce the incidence of hip fractures in older people following a fall. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (January 2010), The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2, MEDLINE (1950 to November 2009), MEDLINE in-process (30 December 2009), EMBASE (1988 to 2009 week 52), CINAHL (1982 to February 2009), BioMed Central (January 2010) and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of hip protectors with an unprotected control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We sought additional information from trialists. Data were pooled using fixed-effect or random-effects models as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS Pooling of data from 13 studies (11,573 participants) conducted in nursing or residential care settings found a marginally significant reduction in hip fracture risk (risk ratio (RR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.99); statistical significance was lost following exclusion of five studies (3757 participants) assessed at high risk of bias (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.18).Pooling of data from three trials (5135 community-dwelling participants) showed no evidence of reduction in hip fracture risk (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.57).There was no evidence of a statistically significant effect on incidence of pelvic or other fractures, or on rate of falls. No important adverse effects of the hip protectors were reported but adherence, particularly in the long term, was poor. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of the provision of hip protectors in reducing the incidence of hip fracture in older people is still not clearly established, although they may reduce the rate of hip fractures if made available to frail older people in nursing care. It remains unknown from studies identified to date if these findings apply to all types of hip protectors. Some cluster-randomised trials have been associated with high risk of bias. Poor acceptance and adherence by older people offered hip protectors have been key factors contributing to the continuing uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Gillespie
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, UK, HU6 7RX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Marcum ZA, Handler SM, Wright R, Hanlon JT. Interventions to improve suboptimal prescribing in nursing homes: A narrative review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 8:183-200. [PMID: 20624609 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2010.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate medication prescribing for nursing home residents remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review of the published literature describing randomized controlled trials that used interventions to improve suboptimal prescribing in nursing homes. METHODS The PubMed, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published in the English language between January 1975 and December 2009, using the terms drug utilization, pharmaceutical services, aged, long-term care, nursing homes, prescribing, geriatrics, and randomized controlled trial. A manual search of the reference lists of identified articles and the authors' files, book chapters, and recent review articles was also conducted. Abstracts and posters from meetings were not included in the search. Studies were included if they: (1) had a randomized controlled design; (2) had a process measure outcome for quality of prescribing or a distal outcome measure for medication-related adverse patient events; and (3) involved nursing home residents. RESULTS Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Seven of those studies described educational approaches using various interventions (eg, outreach visits) and measured suboptimal prescribing in different manners (eg, adherence to guidelines). Two studies described computerized decision-support systems to measure the intervention's impact on adverse drug events (ADEs) and appropriate drug orders. Five studies described clinical pharmacist activities, most commonly involving a medication review, and used various measures of suboptimal prescribing, including a measure of medication appropriateness and the total number of medications prescribed. Two studies each described multidisciplinary and multifaceted approaches that included heterogeneous interventions and measures of prescribing. Most (15/18; 83.3%) of these studies reported statistically significant improvements in >or=1 aspect of suboptimal prescribing. Only 3 of the studies reported significant improvements in distal health outcomes, and only 3 measured ADEs or adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS Mixed results were reported for a variety of approaches used to improve suboptimal prescribing. However, the heterogeneity of the study interventions and the various measures of suboptimal prescribing used in these studies does not allow for an authoritative conclusion based on the currently available literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Marcum
- Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Duque G, Close JJ, Jager JP, Ebeling PR, Inderjeeth C, Lord S, McLachlan AJ, Reid IR, Troen BR, Sambrook PN. Treatment for osteoporosis in Australian residential aged care facilities: consensus recommendations for fracture prevention. Med J Aust 2010; 193:173-9. [DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03839.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2009] [Accepted: 03/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Duque
- Ageing Bone Research Program, Sydney Medical School – Nepean Campus, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | - Jacqueline J Close
- Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
| | | | - Peter R Ebeling
- Department of Medicine, Western Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Charles Inderjeeth
- Area Rehabilitation and Aged Care, National Institute of Clinical Studies and University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
| | - Stephen Lord
- Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
| | - Andrew J McLachlan
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney and Centre for Education and Research in Ageing, Sydney, NSW
| | - Ian R Reid
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Bruce R Troen
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Fla, USA
| | - Philip N Sambrook
- Kolling Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School – Northern Campus, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Curtis JR, Arora T, Narongroeknawin P, Taylor A, Bingham CO, Cush J, Saag KG, Safford M, Delzell E. The delivery of evidence-based preventive care for older Americans with arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2010; 12:R144. [PMID: 20637072 PMCID: PMC2945038 DOI: 10.1186/ar3086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2010] [Revised: 05/27/2010] [Accepted: 07/16/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous research suggests patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may receive suboptimal care with respect to preventive tests and services. We evaluated the proportion of older Americans with RA, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and osteoarthritis (OA) receiving these services and the specialty of the providers delivering this care. METHODS Using data from 1999 to 2006 from the Medicare Chronic Conditions Warehouse, we identified persons age >/= 65 in the national 5% sample. Over the required five-year observation period, we identified tests and services recommended for older adults and the associated healthcare provider. Services of interest included dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, hyperlipidemia lab testing, mammography and colonoscopy. RESULTS After accounting for the sampling fraction, we identified 141,140 RA, 6,300 PsA, and 770,520 OA patients eligible for analysis. Over five years, a majority of RA, PsA, and OA patients were tested for hyperlipidemia (84%, 89% and 87% respectively) and received DXA (69%, 75%, and 52%). Only approximately one-third of arthritis patients received pneumococcal vaccination; 19% to 22% received influenza vaccination each year. Approximately 20% to 35% of arthritis patients never underwent mammography and colonoscopy over five years. Concomitant care from both a rheumatologist and a primary care physician was significantly associated with a greater likelihood of receiving almost all preventive tests and services. CONCLUSIONS Among older Americans on Medicare, the absolute proportion of persons with arthritis receiving various recommended preventive services and screening tests was substantially less than 100%. Improved co-management between primary care and arthritis physicians may in part improve the delivery of preventive care for arthritis patients, but novel systematic interventions in this area are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, FOT 805D, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave So, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Tarun Arora
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave So, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Pongthorn Narongroeknawin
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, FOT 805D, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Allison Taylor
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave So, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Clifton O Bingham
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 5200 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | - Jack Cush
- Baylor Research Institute, 3434 Live Oak St, Dallas, TX 75204, USA
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, FOT 805D, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave So, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Monika Safford
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave So, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Elizabeth Delzell
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave So, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Roux C. Survenue d’une fracture de l’extrémité supérieure du fémur : il n’est pas trop tard pour traiter ! Rev Med Interne 2010; 31:253-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2009.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2009] [Revised: 07/06/2009] [Accepted: 07/07/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
42
|
Crilly RG, Hillier LM, Mason M, Gutmanis I, Cox L. Prevention of hip fractures in long-term care: relevance of community-derived data. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58:738-45. [PMID: 20345863 DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02766.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis and falling are two major contributing factors to fractures in older persons; the relevant contribution of these may vary according to age, setting, and frailty. The purpose of this review was to examine the existing evidence on osteoporosis treatments to determine whether participants in clinical trials include or resemble the older and frailer adult population living in long-term care (LTC). The trials (N=50) used to support major Canadian guidelines for osteoporosis treatment were reviewed because these are used to recommend treatment for all older adults, and several more-recent studies were added. Trials conducted specifically with participants living in LTC were also reviewed (N=6). The majority of studies (96.0%) on osteoporosis treatments were conducted with community-dwelling participants, with many excluding participants resembling the LTC population. Mean ages ranged from 52 to 84, although for the majority of studies, the mean age was younger than 70. Similarly, 80.0% of studies conducted in LTC included only residents who were ambulatory, mobile, able to transfer independently, or not permanently bedridden. Mean ages in these studies ranged from 83 to 85. These findings suggest that frail older adults, particularly the oldest and frailest adults in LTC, are neglected in clinical trials of osteoporosis fracture prevention. There is little evidence to support the application of community-based guidelines to the LTC population, and studies directly involving this population are needed. The role of age, frailty, and the mechanics of falls in hip fracture are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard G Crilly
- Specialized Geriatric Services, St. Joseph's Health Care London, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Curtis JR, Arora T, Xi J, Silver A, Allison JJ, Chen L, Saag KG, Schenck A, Westfall AO, Colón-Emeric C. Do physicians within the same practice setting manage osteoporosis patients similarly? Implications for implementation research. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20:1921-7. [PMID: 19319619 PMCID: PMC2766011 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-0900-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2008] [Accepted: 02/03/2009] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Using data from long-term glucocorticoid users and long-term care residents, we evaluated osteoporosis prescribing patterns related to physician behavior and common practice settings. We found no significant clustering effect for common practice setting, suggesting that osteoporosis quality improvement (QI) efforts may be able to ignore this factor in designing QI interventions. INTRODUCTION Patients' receipt of prescription therapies are significantly influenced by their physician's prescribing patterns. If physicians in the same practice setting influence one another's prescribing, evidence implementation interventions must consider targeting the practice as well as individual physicians to achieve maximal success. METHODS We examined receipt of osteoporosis treatment (OP Rx) from two prior evidence implementation studies: long-term glucocorticoid (GC) users and nursing home (NH) residents with prior fracture or osteoporosis. Common practice setting was defined as doctors practicing at the same address or in the same nursing home. Alternating logistic regression evaluated the relationship between OP Rx, common practice setting, and individual physician treatment patterns. RESULTS Among 6,281 GC users in 1,296 practices, the proportion receiving OP Rx in each practice was 6-100%. Among 779 NH residents in 66 nursing homes, the proportion in each NH receiving OP Rx was 0-100%. In both, there was no significant relationship between receipt of OP Rx and common practice setting after accounting for treatment pattern of individual physicians. CONCLUSION Physicians practicing together were not more alike in prescribing osteoporosis medications than those in different practices. Osteoporosis quality improvement may be able to ignore common practice settings and maximize statistical power by targeting individual physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Curtis
- Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Osteoporosis is an escalating global problem. Hip fractures, the most catastrophic complication of osteoporosis, continue to cause significant mortality and morbidity despite increasing availability of effective preventative agents. Among these agents, oral bisphosphonates have been the first choice for the treatment and prevention of osteoporotic fractures. However, the use of oral bisphosphonates, especially in the older population, has been limited by their side effects and method of administration thus compromising their persistent use. The resultant low adherence by patients has undermined their full potential and has been associated with an increase in the incidence of fragility fractures. Recently, annual intravenous zoledronic acid (ZOL) has been approved for osteoporosis. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated ZOL to be safe, have good tolerability and produce significant effect on bone mass and microarchitecture. Adherence has also been shown to be better with ZOL. Furthermore two large trials firmly demonstrated significant anti-osteoporotic effect (∼59% relative risk reduction of hip fractures) and mortality benefit (28% reduction in mortality) of ZOL in older persons with recent hip fractures. In this review, we report the current evidence on the use of ZOL for the prevention of hip fractures in the elderly. We also report the pharmacological characteristics and the advantages and disadvantages of ZOL in this particular group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oddom Demontiero
- Aging Bone Research Program, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O'Brien MA, Wolf F, Davis D, Odgaard-Jensen J, Oxman AD. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 2009:CD003030. [PMID: 19370580 PMCID: PMC7138253 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 649] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Educational meetings are widely used for continuing medical education. Previous reviews found that interactive workshops resulted in moderately large improvements in professional practice, whereas didactic sessions did not. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of educational meetings on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY We updated previous searches by searching the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group Trials Register and pending file, from 1999 to March 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of educational meetings that reported an objective measure of professional practice or healthcare outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Studies with a low or moderate risk of bias and that reported baseline data were included in the primary analysis. They were weighted according to the number of health professionals participating. For each comparison, we calculated the risk difference (RD) for dichotomous outcomes, adjusted for baseline compliance; and for continuous outcomes the percentage change relative to the control group average after the intervention, adjusted for baseline performance. Professional and patient outcomes were analysed separately. We considered 10 factors to explain heterogeneity of effect estimates using weighted meta-regression supplemented by visual analysis of bubble and box plots. MAIN RESULTS In updating the review, 49 new studies were identified for inclusion. A total of 81 trials involving more than 11,000 health professionals are now included in the review. Based on 30 trials (36 comparisons), the median adjusted RD in compliance with desired practice was 6% (interquartile range 1.8 to 15.9) when any intervention in which educational meetings were a component was compared to no intervention. Educational meetings alone had similar effects (median adjusted RD 6%, interquartile range 2.9 to 15.3; based on 21 comparisons in 19 trials). For continuous outcomes the median adjusted percentage change relative to control was 10% (interquartile range 8 to 32%; 5 trials). For patient outcomes the median adjusted RD in achievement of treatment goals was 3.0 (interquartile range 0.1 to 4.0; 5 trials). Based on univariate meta-regression analyses of the 36 comparisons with dichotomous outcomes for professional practice, higher attendance at the educational meetings was associated with larger adjusted RDs (P < 0.01); mixed interactive and didactic education meetings (median adjusted RD 13.6) were more effective than either didactic meetings (RD 6.9) or interactive meetings (RD 3.0). Educational meetings did not appear to be effective for complex behaviours (adjusted RD -0.3) compared to less complex behaviours; they appeared to be less effective for less serious outcomes (RD 2.9) than for more serious outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Educational meetings alone or combined with other interventions, can improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes for the patients. The effect is most likely to be small and similar to other types of continuing medical education, such as audit and feedback, and educational outreach visits. Strategies to increase attendance at educational meetings, using mixed interactive and didactic formats, and focusing on outcomes that are likely to be perceived as serious may increase the effectiveness of educational meetings. Educational meetings alone are not likely to be effective for changing complex behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Forsetlund
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, PO Box 7004, St Olavs plass, Oslo, Norway, 0130.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Teng GG, Curtis JR, Saag KG. Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job? Curr Osteoporos Rep 2009; 7:27-34. [PMID: 19239827 DOI: 10.1007/s11914-009-0006-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
A significant gap exists between evidence-based advances and real-world clinical practice in the diagnosis and prevention of osteoporosis. The goal of osteoporosis care is to prevent fractures and improve health-related quality of life, and ideally lower mortality. Despite recent advances in osteoporosis detection and treatment options, studies suggest underdiagnosis and undertreatment of osteoporosis, even among those who have already sustained fractures. The challenges in translating knowledge into practice are multifaceted, with efforts directed at the patient, provider, and health care system levels achieving variable success at the population level. Methods to improve quality of care in osteoporosis need to be multipronged, with emphasis on clinical process improvement and reliance on interdisciplinary teams. We review the growing literature on quality of care for osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gim Gee Teng
- Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics of Musculoskeletal Disorders, and Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-3708, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Bruyere O, Brandi ML, Burlet N, Harvey N, Lyritis G, Minne H, Boonen S, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Akesson K. Post-fracture management of patients with hip fracture: a perspective. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24:2841-51. [PMID: 18759997 DOI: 10.1185/03007990802381430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fracture creates a worldwide morbidity, mortality and economic burden. After surgery, many patients experience long-term disability or die as a consequence of the fracture. A fracture is a major risk factor for a subsequent fracture, which may occur within a short interval. METHODS A literature search on post-fracture management of patients with hip fracture was performed on the Medline database. Key experts convened to develop a consensus document. FINDINGS Management of hip-fracture patients to optimize outcome after hospital discharge requires several stages of care co-ordinated by a multidisciplinary team from before admission through to discharge. Further studies that specifically assess prevention and post-fracture management of hip fracture are needed, as only one study to date has assessed an osteoporosis medication in patients with a recent hip fracture. Proper nutrition is vital to assist bone repair and prevent further falls, particularly in malnourished patients. Vitamin D, calcium and protein supplementation is associated with an increase in hip BMD and reduction in falls. Rehabilitation is essential to improve functional disabilities and survival rates. Fall prevention and functional recovery strategies should include patient education and training to improve balance and increase muscle strength and mobility. Appropriate management can prevent further fractures and it is critical that high-risk patients are identified and treated. To foster this process, clinical pathways have been established to support orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSION Although hip fracture is generally associated with poor outcomes, appropriate management can ensure optimal recovery and survival, and should be prioritized after a hip fracture to avoid deterioration of health and prevent subsequent fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Bruyere
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology & Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Baum E, Peters KM. The diagnosis and treatment of primary osteoporosis according to current guidelines. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2008; 105:573-81; quiz 581-2. [PMID: 19471676 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2008] [Accepted: 06/12/2008] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Osteoporosis is the most common generalized disease of the skeleton, yet it is markedly undertreated in Germany. METHODS Selective literature review on the basis of the current German guidelines regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and in men aged 60 and above, and a further search of literature published in the last three years. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The indication for dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement for the specific diagnosis of osteoporosis is derived from the patient's age, sex, history of fractures in the past, and further risk factors. The therapeutic threshold for osteoporosis has been set at a 30% predicted risk of osteoporotic fractures occurring within 10 years. The treatment consists of basic measures for fracture prevention combined with specific pharmacotherapy. The recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in particular are alendronic and ibandronic acid, raloxifen, risedronic acid, and strontium ranelate; the only approved drugs for men at present are alendronic and risedronic acid and teriparatid. Intensive patient education markedly improves the otherwise poor compliance with osteoporosis treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Baum
- Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, präventive und rehabilitative Medizin, Universität Marburg sowie Hausarztpraxis in Biebertal
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Miles RW. Hip Fracture Reduction in Northwest Arkansas Nursing Homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2008; 9:449-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2007] [Revised: 04/10/2008] [Accepted: 04/11/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|