Risk of emergent bradycardia associated with the use of carvedilol and metoprolol in routine clinical practice

BRAНH syndrome: clinical case

The article describes a clinical case of BRAHH syndrome in a patient with arterial hypertension and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). The patient took perindopril 10 mg, indapamide 2.5 mg, amlodipine 10 mg, bisoprolol 2.5-5 mg daily. She was admitted to a hospital complaining of severe weakness, a heart rate decreases to 38 beats per minute against the background of high blood pressure. During the examination, she was diagnosed with complete atrioventricular block against the background of AF, stage 4 chronic kidney disease and severe hyperkalemia (potassium 8.7 mmol/l). The patient was prescribed treatment aimed at eliminating hyperkalemia, and temporary pacing was established. Against this background, her condition improved, and the complete atrioventricular blockade was resolved. This clinical example meets the criteria of BRAHH syndrome, since against the background of taking an atrioventricular node blocker in a small dose, a patient with chronic kidney disease and severe hyperkalemia developed complete atrioventricular block against the background of AF, accompanied by high blood pressure.

BRASH syndrome: а clinical case

The article describes a clinical case of BRASH syndrome in patient M., born in 1938, suffering from hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The patient took bisoprolol, eplerenone, azilsartan medoxomil, lercanidipine hydrochloride daily. She was admitted to the hospital complaining of weakness, eyes darkening, nausea, short-term loss of consciousness, rare pulse, diarrhea the day before. During the examination, she was diagnosed with severe sinus bradycardia (38 beats/min) and transient first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, stage 4 chronic kidney disease of with hyperkalemia (potassium 5.53-6.12 mmol/l). Pulse-reducing drugs, blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system were canceled for the patient, 0.9% sodium chloride solution and furosemide were prescribed. The patient was discharged in a satisfactory condition. This clinical example meets the criteria of BRASH syndrome, since against the background of taking an AV node blocker in a small dose, a patient with chronic kidney disease with mild to moderate hyperkalemia developed severe sinus bradycardia and transient grade 1 AV block. The trigger factors for BRASH syndrome development of were azilsartan medoxomil and eplerenone intake, as well as hypovolemia due to diarrhea.

Beta-Blocker-Related Atrioventricular Conduction Disorders-A Single Tertiary Referral Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Drug-related bradyarrhythmia is a well-documented major adverse event among beta-blocker users and a potential cause for hospitalization or additional interventions. Whether beta-blocker use is associated with specific bradyarrhythmia presentations, and how this relates to other predisposing factors, is not well known. We aim to evaluate the association between beta-blocker use and the type of atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorder in patients with symptomatic bradycardia. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 596 patients with a primary diagnosis of symptomatic bradyarrhythmia admitted to a single tertiary referral center. Of the cases analyzed, 253 patients were on beta-blocker treatment at presentation and 343 had no bradycardic treatment. We analyzed demographics, clinical and paraclinical parameters in relation to the identified AV conduction disorder. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to explore factors associated with beta-blocker use. Results: Of the 596 patients (mean age 73.9 ± 8.8 years, 49.2% male), 261 (43.8%) had a third-degree AV block, 92 (15.4%) had a second-degree AV block, 128 (21.5%) had slow atrial fibrillation, 93 (15.6%) had sick sinus syndrome and 21 (3.5%) had sinus bradycardia/sinus pauses. Beta-blocker use was associated with the female gender (p < 0.001), emergency admission (p < 0.001), dilated cardiomyopathy (p = 0.003), the lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.02), mitral stenosis (p = 0.009), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.02), higher potassium levels (p = 0.04) and QRS duration > 120 ms (p = 0.02). Slow atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.2, p < 0.001), sick sinus syndrome (OR = 2.8, p = 0.001) and sinus bradycardia/pauses (OR = 32.9, p < 0.001) were more likely to be associated with beta-blocker use compared to the most common presentation (third-degree AV block), after adjusting for other patient characteristics. Conclusions: Beta-blocker use is more likely to be associated with slow atrial fibrillation, sick sinus syndrome and sinus bradycardia/pauses, compared to a second- or third-degree AV block, after adjusting for other patient factors such as gender, admission type, ECG, comorbidities, cardiac function and lab testing.

Combining Antidepressants with β-Blockers: Evidence of a Clinically Significant CYP2D6 Drug Interaction

BACKGROUND

The β-blockers and antidepressants are two of the most commonly prescribed drug classes in the United States. Several antidepressants are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 2D6 liver enzymes (CYP2D6) and can increase the plasma concentrations of certain β-blockers when administered concomitantly, potentially leading to serious medical consequences such as hypotension, bradycardia, and falls.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this investigation was to determine whether initiating an antidepressant in patients receiving β-blockers increased the risk of hemodynamic adverse events. Our primary outcome was time to hospital admissions or emergency department (ED) visits for an International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnosis suggestive of excessive β-blockade.

METHODS

We conducted a survival analysis for adults continuously enrolled in the California Medicaid system (Medi-Cal) between 2004 and 2012. Eligible patients were required to be receiving β-blocker medications that are primarily CYP2D6 substrates (e.g., metoprolol, propranolol, or carvedilol). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed for patients who concurrently received antidepressants with β-blockers. An additional multivariable analysis analyzed the association of this combination upon hospitalizations or ED visits for all causes.

RESULTS

A total of 21,292 beneficiaries met the inclusion criteria, and 4.3% of patients required hospitalization or ED visits within 30 days of co-medication. In multivariable analysis, patients receiving antidepressants with moderate to strong CYP2D6 inhibitory potential (fluoxetine, paroxetine, duloxetine, or bupropion) had a greater risk for hospitalization or ED visits for hemodynamic events than those initiated on antidepressants with weak CYP2D6 inhibition for 30 days or less when each was compared with patients receiving no antidepressants (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.81; p=0.04 vs HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.82-1.88; p=0.30). Other demographic variables associated with increased morbidity included advanced age, male sex, higher β-blocker doses, and African American race or Hispanic ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this analysis suggest that initiation of certain antidepressants was associated with an increased risk for serious medical sequelae among patients concurrently receiving β-blockers. Greater risk was observed with antidepressants that potently inhibit the CYP2D6 enzyme, implying that increased morbidity may be mediated by a metabolic drug interaction.

Severe iatrogenic bradycardia related to the combined use of beta-blocking agents and sodium channel blockers

Purpose

Drug-induced bradycardia is common during antiarrhythmic therapy; the major culprits are beta-blockers. However, whether other antiarrhythmic drugs are also a significant cause of this, alone or in combination with beta-blockers, is not well known.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated the records of all patients hospitalized at our institution for drug-related bradycardia from the years 2004 to 2012. Patients with cardiac disease and electrolytic or hormonal abnormalities that could cause bradyarrhythmias were excluded.

Results

Eight patients were identified (mean age, 79±5 years; range, 71–85 years; 6 women). Three patients were taking only beta-blockers (hereafter referred to as the BB group), while five patients were on both beta-blockers and Na channel blockers (hereafter referred to as the BB + Na group). Heart rates ranged from 20∼49 beats/minute on arrival. The initial electrocardiogram showed sinus bradycardia (n=6) or sinus arrest with escape beats (n=2). QRS duration was 80–100 ms. The clinical presentation of the BB + Na group was considerably worse than that of the BB group, and included cardiogenic shock and heart failure. Four of the BB + Na patients had been on their medications for over 300 days. The BB group recovered solely with drug discontinuation, while 4 of the 5 patients in the BB + Na group needed additional treatments, such as intravenous administration of atropine or adrenergic agonist and temporary pacing. Bradycardia did not recur during follow-up (median, 687 days).

Conclusion

Although wide QRS ventricular tachyarrhythmia is a better known proarrhythmic effect of Na channel blockers, life-threatening bradycardia may also occur in combination with beta-blockers in the elderly, even months after the start of medication, and at plasma concentrations that do not prolong QRS width.

Cytochrome P450-2D6 Genotype Definition May Improve Therapy for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation A Case of Syncope Following "Pill-in-the-Pocket" Quinidine plus Propafenone

Classes 1A, 1C and III anti-arrhythmics may be ineffective or induce adverse events including potentially fatal arrhythmias when administered in recommended doses. Serum levels of these medications vary widely during conventional dosing due in large part to variations in cytochrome P450-2D6 isoenzyme activity which metabolizes most antiarrhythmics in addition to over 25% of other commonly prescribed medications. 2D6 activity is also profoundly inhibited by some antiarrhythmics and other commonly used medications and varies widely between the individuals of all populations, a pattern which has resulted in separation of subjects into 4 phenotypes and genotypes consisting of poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate metabolizers (IM), efficient metabolizers (EM), and ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM). Patients with a phenotype PM classification almost universally are also genotype PM due to the possession of two inactive 2D6 alleles, with this PM pattern often inducing supratherapeutic and toxic antiarrhythmic blood levels during conventional antiarrhythmic therapy. UM individuals have supranormal levels of 2D6 activity often created by the presence of 3 or more active alleles which often induce subtherapeutic and ineffective drug levels during antiarrhythmic administration in conventional doses. We searched for evidence relating Cytochrome P450-2D6 phenotypes or genotypes to antiarrhythmic metabolism in order to judge whether this analysis might contribute to improved safety and effectiveness of antiarrhythmic medications commonly utilized in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The available evidence strongly supported these possibilities. We also describe a patient in whom knowledge of his IM/PM CYP2D6 genotype might have prevented the only episode of syncope and myocardial stunning which developed during his 28 years of "Pill-in-a-Pocket" therapy.