Influenza Vaccination in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Efficacy, Effectiveness, Safety, Utilization, and Barriers

Crucial Roles of RSAD2/viperin in Immunomodulation, Mitochondrial Metabolism and Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune diseases are typically characterized by aberrant activation of immune system that leads to excessive inflammatory reactions and tissue damage. Nevertheless, precise targeted and efficient therapies are limited. Thus, studies into novel therapeutic targets for the management of autoimmune diseases are urgently needed. Radical S-adenosyl methionine domain-containing 2 (RSAD2) is an interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) renowned for the antiviral properties of the protein it encodes, named viperin. An increasing number of studies have underscored the new roles of RSAD2/viperin in immunomodulation and mitochondrial metabolism. Previous studies have shown that there is a complex interplay between RSAD2/vipeirn and mitochondria and that binding of the iron-sulfur (Fe-S) cluster is necessary for the involvement of viperin in mitochondrial metabolism. Viperin influences the proliferation and development of immune cells as well as inflammation via different signaling pathways. However, the function of RSAD2/viperin varies in different studies and a comprehensive overview of this emerging theme is lacking. This review will describe the characteristics of RSAD2/viperin, decipher its function in immunometabolic processes, and clarify the crosstalk between RSAD2/viperin and mitochondria. Furthermore, we emphasize the crucial roles of RSAD2 in autoimmune diseases and its potential application value.

Influenza knowledge and barriers to vaccination in immunosuppressed patients in the pediatric rheumatology clinic

BACKGROUND

Most patients with a pediatric rheumatic disease are at increased risk of influenza due to immunosuppressive medication use. Despite initial quality improvement efforts, our influenza vaccination rate plateaued at 72%, which prompted a survey of patients and families to assess provider vaccine recommendations, influenza knowledge, and barriers to influenza vaccination.

METHODS

Patients on immunosuppressive medication or their parent were eligible to complete a survey between July 2019 and January 2020. Survey questions assessed demographics, rheumatology diagnosis, immunosuppressive medication(s), influenza vaccination recommendation, patient/parent influenza knowledge, and barriers to influenza vaccination. Influenza vaccination rates for immunosuppressed patients were acquired each influenza season from 2015-2020 and tracked on a control chart.

RESULTS

Of the 226 completed surveys, 145 (64.2%) were completed by parents and 81 (35.8%) by patients. The majority (85%) reported the influenza vaccine was recommended. The most common reasons for not receiving the influenza vaccine included: worry about disease flare (25.6%), concern the vaccine will cause influenza (25.6%), and lack of vaccine effectiveness (20.5%). Parents (40.9%) were more worried about disease flare compared to patients (17%; p = 0.024). Most respondents were able to correctly answer fever, cough and/or congestion as the most common symptoms of influenza; however, 23% answered gastrointestinal symptoms and 10.2% joint swelling. Most respondents (95.1%) were aware that immunosuppressive medication increases risk of infection. The average weekly influenza vaccination rate for the 2019-2020 flu season was 85.5%, which increased from 72.0% the previous year. Parents with higher education status were more likely to have their child receive the influenza vaccine compared to parents with less education.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey indicates that respondents understand the potential severity of influenza and the increased risk of infection due to immunosuppressive medication use; however, many inaccurately identified the most common symptoms of influenza and also reported misconceptions of influenza vaccine risks. The barriers identified in this survey will help drive future improvement efforts to increase influenza vaccination rates in this high-risk population.

Vaccination updates and special considerations for systemic lupus erythematosus patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the latest guidelines and note special considerations for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients when approaching vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, influenza, pneumococcus, herpes zoster, and potentially respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine in the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

SLE patients have unique infectious risks due to newer treatments and the nature of the disease itself. It is important to balance the benefit of additional protective immunity from updated vaccines against the possible risk of disease activity exacerbations.

SUMMARY

It is important to continuously evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of updated vaccines specifically for SLE patients. Additionally, the newly approved RSV vaccine should be considered for this population to reduce severe respiratory illness.

Risk of flare or relapse in patients with immune-mediated diseases following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases (AI-IMD) are at greater risk of COVID-19 infection; therefore, they should be prioritized in vaccination programs. However, there are concerns regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in terms of disease relapse, flare, or exacerbation. In this study, we aimed to provide a more precise and reliable vision using systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for original articles reporting the relapse/flare in adult patients with AI-IMD between June 1, 2020 and September 25, 2022. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using R software.

RESULTS

A total of 134 observations of various AI-IMDs across 74 studies assessed the rate of relapse, flare, or exacerbation in AI-IMD patients. Accordingly, the crude overall prevalence of relapse, flare, or exacerbation was 6.28% (95% CI [4.78%; 7.95%], I2 = 97.6%), changing from 6.28% (I2 = 97.6%) to 6.24% (I2 = 65.1%) after removing the outliers. AI-IMD patients administering mRNA, vector-based, and inactive vaccines showed 8.13% ([5.6%; 11.03%], I2 = 98.1%), 0.32% ([0.0%; 4.03%], I2 = 93.5%), and 3.07% ([1.09%; 5.9%], I2 = 96.2%) relapse, flare, or exacerbation, respectively (p-value = 0.0086). In terms of disease category, nephrologic (26.66%) and hematologic (14.12%) disorders had the highest and dermatologic (4.81%) and neurologic (2.62%) disorders exhibited to have the lowest crude prevalence of relapse, flare, or exacerbation (p-value < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The risk of flare/relapse/exacerbation in AI-IMD patients is found to be minimal, especially with vector-based vaccines. Vaccination against COVID-19 is recommended in this population.

Revealing common differential mRNAs, signaling pathways, and immune cells in blood, glomeruli, and tubulointerstitium of lupus nephritis patients based on transcriptomic data

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a potentially fatal autoimmune disease. The purpose of this study was to find potential key molecular markers of LN to aid in the early diagnosis and management of the disease. Datasets GSE99967_blood, GSE32591_glomeruli, and GSE32591_tubulointerstitium were included in this study. Differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs) were identified between the normal control and LN groups using the limma package in R. Common DEmRNAs in the three datasets were taken. Subsequently, functional enrichment analysis, immune correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) verification were performed. In this study, 11 common DEmRNAs were obtained and all of them were up-regulated. In protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, we found that MX dynamin like GTPase 1 (MX1) and radical S-adenosyl methionine domain containing 2 (RSAD2) had the highest interaction score (0.997). Functional enrichment analysis revealed that MX1 and RSAD2 were enriched in influenza A and hepatitis C signaling pathways. The area under the curve (AUC) values of interferon-induced protein 44 (IFI44) and MX1 in GSE32591_glomeruli and GSE32591_tubulointerstitium datasets are 1, which is worthy of further study on their diagnostic value and molecular mechanism. The xCell analysis showed abnormal distribution of granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP) cells in blood, glomeruli, and tubulointerstitium. Pearson's correlation analysis found that GMP cells were significantly correlated with lactotransferrin (LTF) and cell cycle. Identification of common DEmRNAs and key pathways in the blood, glomeruli, and tubulointerstitium of patients with LN provides potential research directions for exploring the molecular mechanisms of the disease.

A survey of systemic lupus erythematosus patients' attitudes toward influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in Southwest China

Introduction

Vaccination is the most effective measure for prevention against infectious diseases in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Therefore, it is important to know SLE patients' attitudes toward influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. This study aimed to investigate the attitude toward influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among SLE patients in Southwest China and its influencing factors.

Methods

A web-based questionnaire was conducted to collect data regarding SLE patients' demographics, history of infections, medications, comorbidities, attitudes toward infection and vaccination, rates of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, and role of health professionals in promoting vaccination. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the vaccination willingness-associated factors.

Results

A total of 251 patients participated in the survey and 240 questionnaires were completed and statistically analyzed. The influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates were 8.3 and 1.7%, respectively. The top three reasons for non-vaccination were worrying about the SLE exacerbation or flare resulting from the vaccine or its adjuvants, being concerned about adverse events, and the lack of awareness of vaccine availability. More than half of the participants were willing to be vaccinated against influenza (56.2%) and pneumococcus (52.9%). Factors associated to the willingness to receive the influenza vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine were being afraid of infection, believing in the efficacy of influenza vaccination, lower family income, less perceived care from family members, perceived susceptibility to pneumococcal infection, and perceiving influenza and pneumococcal vaccination as beneficial for health.

Conclusions

The influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates are low among SLE patients in Southwest China. The positive perspective of vaccination on health represented the most impacting factor on their willingness to undergo influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. Non-vaccinated patients were mainly concerned about exacerbation of the disease or adverse events caused by vaccines. It is important to improve the compliance with the guideline-recommended roles of health professionals and to promote the collaboration between rheumatology and primary care teams.

Hesitancy for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and post-vaccination flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

To study the rate of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and post-vaccination disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

Patients who fulfilled ≥ 4 of the ACR criteria for SLE were identified and their SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status was traced. Flares of SLE at 6-week post-vaccination were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics of patients with and without vaccination, and those who did or did not experience post-vaccination flares were compared by statistical analyses.

Results

914 adult patients with SLE were studied (92.5 % women, age 48.6 ± 14.0 years; SLE duration 14.5 ± 8.6 years). Two doses of the SARS-Cov-2 vaccines (61.5 % BioNTech; 38.5 % CoronaVac) were received by 449 (49.1 %) patients. The vaccination rate in SLE was significantly lower than that of the adult general population (77.8 %; p < 0.001) at the time of data analysis. Patients who were hesitant for vaccination were more likely to be hypertensive, have a history of neuromuscular manifestations, and a significantly higher organ damage score (1.10 ± 1.45 vs 0.74 ± 1.15; p < 0.001). However, none of these factors were significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy on multivariate analysis. Among 449 vaccinated patients, 37(8.2 %) experienced SLE flares: mild/moderate in 34; severe in 3. In an equal number of unvaccinated SLE controls randomly matched for the post-vaccination observation period, 28(6.2 %) had SLE flares: mild/moderate in 17; severe in 11 (odds ratio [OR] for flare in vaccinated patients 1.40[0.81–2.43]; p = 0.23, adjusted for age, sex, active serology, SLE duration and prednisolone use). In vaccinated patients, logistic regression revealed that active lupus serology before vaccination (OR 2.63[1.05–6.62]; p = 0.04) and a history of arthritis (OR 2.71[1.05–7.00]; p = 0.04) or discoid skin lesion (OR 4.73[1.90–11.8]; p = 0.001) were associated with SLE flares following vaccination, adjusted for confounders.

Conclusion

Hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccination is common in SLE patients. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is not significantly associated with increased SLE flares. Patients with active SLE serology or a history of arthritis/discoid lesion are more likely to flare after vaccination.

Utilization of preventive services in a systemic lupus erythematosus population-based cohort: a Lupus Midwest Network (LUMEN) study

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease that can lead to damage of multiple organs and, along with certain treatments, increase the risk of developing cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and infections. Preventive services are particularly important in patients with SLE to mitigate the aforementioned risks. We aimed to evaluate the trends of preventive services utilization in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, compared with non-SLE population.

METHODS

All ≥19-year-old patients in the Lupus Midwest Network (LUMEN) registry, a population-based cohort, with SLE on January 1, 2015, were included and matched (1:1) by sex, age, race, and county to non-SLE comparators. Among both groups, we compared the rates of screenings for breast and cervical cancer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and osteoporosis as well as immunizations.

RESULTS

We included 440 SLE patients and 430 non-SLE comparators. The probability of breast cancer screening among women with SLE was similar to comparators (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09, 95% CI 0.85-1.39), while cervical cancer screening was lower (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.96). Hypertension screening was higher among patients with SLE (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.62); however, hyperlipidemia screening was similar to comparators (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.96-1.41). Diabetes and osteoporosis screenings were more likely to be performed for SLE patients than for comparators (HR 2.46, 95% CI 2.11-2.87; and HR 3.19, 95% CI 2.31-4.41; respectively). Influenza and pneumococcal immunizations were higher among SLE patients (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12-1.54; and HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.38-3.09; respectively), while zoster vaccination was similar (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.81-1.69).

CONCLUSIONS

The trends of utilization of preventive services by SLE patients vary according to screening or vaccine compared with the general population. Considering these differences, we demonstrate an opportunity for improvement, particularly in cervical cancer, hyperlipidemia, and osteoporosis screenings and vaccinations.