The Value of Thromboelastography for Bleeding Risk Prediction in Hematologic Diseases

Bleeding risk assessment with thromboelastography in interventional pulmonology procedures

OBJECTIVE

Thromboelastography (TEG) offers a point-of-care and comprehensive evaluation of the coagulation cascade, but its utility in predicting bleeding risk in Interventional Pulmonology (IP) procedures has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of TEG in assessing bleeding risk in patients undergoing elective IP procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of patients who underwent elective IP procedures at Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville, FL, USA) from November 2022 to May 2024. Patients had TEG performed within a day before the procedure and met standard coagulation criteria (INR<2, platelets>50,000/mm³). The primary outcome was the incidence of bleeding, defined by validated scales. The association between TEG results and bleeding was analyzed using Fisher's Exact test and binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

76 patients were included, 13 (17.1 %) experienced bleeding despite "normal" coagulation panel. Of these, 10 (14.93 %) had a non-hypocoagulant TEG (p = 0.082) suggesting no statistical association of TEG results and bleeding. TEG showed high specificity (94 %) but low sensitivity (23 %) for predicting bleeding risk. Hypocoagulant TEG provided a 5.1-fold increase in the odds of bleeding in our study (OR 5.1, 95%CI: 0.84-31.29, p = 0.066). Notably, TEG results identified 8.9 % (n = 6) of patients as hypocoagulable and 50 % experienced bleeding, highlighting the potential value of TEG in identifying patients at higher risk.

CONCLUSION

TEG may offer additional value in pre-procedural bleeding risk assessment in IP procedures, particularly due to its high specificity. However, larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and to better understand TEG's role in this context.

Performance evaluation of a novel platelet count parameter, hybrid platelet count, on the BC-780 automated hematology analyzer

OBJECTIVES

Automated hematology analysis is expected to improve the performance of platelet counting. We evaluated the performance of a new platelet counting, hybrid (PLT-H) and also impedance (PLT-I) and optical (PLT-O) on the BC-780 automated hematology analyzer compared to the international reference method (IRM) in blood samples with thrombocytopenic and platelet interference.

METHODS

The basic platelet count performance of the BC-780 automated hematology analyzer was evaluated according to the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) Document H26-A2. Additionally, the thrombocytopenic (low PLT count) blood samples and the platelet interference blood samples including fragmented red blood cells (RBCs), microcytes or small RBCs, and giant platelets were determined with the BC-780 hematology analyzer compared to the IRM.

RESULTS

Blank counting and the carry-over contamination rate of platelet count using the BC-780 both met the manufacturers' claim. For both 123 thrombocytopenic and 232 platelet interference blood samples (72 fragmented RBCs, 91 microcytes and 51 giant platelets), all three platelet counting methods exhibited high comparability with the IRM (the lowest correlation (r)=0.916). Interestingly, the comparability of PLT-H (r=0.928-0.986) with the IRM was better than that of PLT-I (r=0.916-0.979).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of PLT-H in the BC-780 met the manufacturer's specifications. PLT-H exhibits better reproducibility than did PLT-I, correlates well with the PLT-O for thrombocytopenic samples and demonstrates good anti-interference ability. PLT-H counting is therefore recommended as a zero-cost alternative platelet counting method for platelet interference samples in clinical settings.

Application of thromboelastography to predict the severity of bleeding after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancy

OBJECTIVES

We aim to analyze the predictive value of thromboelastography on bleeding severity of patients with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with refractory/relapsed hematological malignancy were enrolled and divided into two groups: the severe bleeding group and the non-severe bleeding group. The thromboelastography data was collected on the day of CAR-T infusion and the 3rd, 7th, 10th, 13th, 17th, and 20th day after CAR-T cell infusion.

RESULTS

The patients of the severe bleeding group had lower platelet (p < .007), maximum amplitude (p = .002), coagulation index (p = .005), and longer coagulation time (p = .019). Increasing trend in reaction time and coagulation time and decreasing trend in Alpha, maximum amplitude, and coagulation index on Days 0-10, opposite on Days 10-20. Univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed maximum amplitude on the 3rd day after CAR-T cell infusion (MA3) (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.84-0.95; p < .001) and cytokine release syndrome grade (OR = 2.57; 95% CI = 1.35-5.32; p = .006) were significantly associated with high bleeding severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Thromboelastography was considered to be a good predictor of bleeding severity.

CREST: clinical bleeding and risk evaluation in hematology-oncology patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of thromboelastography's role

Thrombocytopenia and bleeding are common complications of hematologic malignancies. Often, prophylactic platelets are administered to minimize bleeding risk, based on total platelet count (TPC). However, TPC is a poor predictor, and does not provide rapid information. This review presents a novel prospective in the use of point-of-care viscoelastic studies to assess bleeding risk and guide transfusion therapy in a haematological oncological population, where its use can be extended to a ward level as a bedside test. Monitoring TEG maximum amplitude trends may be useful to guide transfusion protocols, especially for patients with total platelet counts ranging 30-100 × 10 9 /l. Fibrinogen assessment in this group of patients may identify other blood components that require replacing to reduce bleeding risk. Normal maximum amplitude parameters for patients with low platelet counts can be a reassuring sign. This meta-analysis serves to remind the reader that absolute platelet quantity does not equate to the quality of clot formation.

Small Animal Transfusion Medicine

Transfusion medicine can be a lifesaving intervention. Component therapy has expanded the availability and blood products available. Patient safety and minimizing risk is important and can be accomplished through proper donor screening, collection, storage, compatibility testing, administration, and monitoring. The pros and cons of available products must be considered and tailored to each individual patient. Recent discoveries include new antigens and blood types, microbial effects on blood type, and the association between blood type and disease prevalence.

Predictive value of thromboelastography parameters combined with antithrombin III and D-Dimer in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion

PROBLEM

To investigate the value of thromboelastography (TEG) combined with antithrombin III (AT-III) and D-Dimer in predicting the occurrence of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA).

METHOD OF STUDY

One hundred and five RSA patients and 40 fertile women were enrolled. The subjects were subjected into four groups: group 1 (40 fertile women), group 2 (58 women with 2 abortions), group 3 (30 women with 3 abortions), and group 4 (17 women with four abortions). TEG was conducted on all subjects. Clotting time, reaction time, angle degree, coagulation index, and maximum amplitude were measured. The levels AT-III, D-Dimer, platelet counts, and fibrinogen concentration were determined. The ROC curve analysis was done using MedCalc software to analyse the diagnosis accuracy of the parameters of interest and the combined approach.

RESULTS

The AT-III level in all group 4 was significantly lower than in fertile women. The D-Dimer concentration, platelet count, and MA in patients with four prior abortions were significantly higher than the other three groups. CI and fibrinogen concentration in patients with four prior pregnancy losses were significantly higher than group 1. The ROC curves suggested that combined use of CI, MA, AT-III, and D-Dimer was with the highest accuracy 92.8%, thus predicting the most accurate diagnosis for RSA.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent spontaneous abortion is associated with abnormal coagulation and anticoagulation. TEG combined with detection of AT-III and D-Dimer levels can distinguish patient with RSA from those with normal fertility and highly possibly predict the occurrence of RSA.

Compare the accuracy and precision of Coulter LH780, Mindray BC-6000 Plus, and Sysmex XN-9000 with the international reference flow cytometric method in platelet counting

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of different platelet counting methods (optical, impedance, fluorescence and hand counting) applied in different analysers by comparing with the international flow cytometric reference method (IRM).

Methods

A total of 333 blood samples from different subgroups (168 cases with thrombocytopenia, 136 cases with normal platelet counts and 29 cases with thrombocytosis) were tested. Regarding IRM as the gold standard, we compared the accuracy and precision of different platelet count methods; i.e. LH780 (impedance), BC-6000 Plus (optical (O) and impedance (I)), Sysmex XN-9000 (optical (O), impedance (I), fluorescence (F)), and hand counting.

Results

Sysmex XN-9000-F (r = 0.988) had the best correlation with IRM for thrombocytopenic samples; BC-6000 Plus-I (r = 0.966) was more relevant to IRM than any other method for samples with normal platelet counts. Correlation between Sysmex XN-9000-I (r = 0.960) and IRM was the highest among these methods for samples with thrombocytosis. For bias evaluation, the average bias of Sysmex XN-9000-F was -1.5 × 10⁹/L (95% LA = -9.4 to +6.4) for samples with thrombocytopenia, compared with IRM. BC-6000 Plus-I had a small mean difference with IRM for samples with normal platelet counts or thrombocytosis. Moreover, all evaluated methods had acceptable sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rates as compared with IRM in the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis.

Conclusions

Platelet counting by Sysmex XN-9000-F is more accurate than other methods for thrombocytopenic samples. BC-6000 Plus-I has superior association and consistency for normal platelet counts. As for thrombocytosis patients, Sysmex XN-9000-I has the highest correlation with IRM while Sysmex XN-9000-O has the highest diagnosis efficacy.

Multiple electrode aggregometry and thromboelastography in thrombocytopenic patients with haematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

In thrombocytopenic patients better assessment of bleeding risk than that provided by platelet count alone is required. Multiplate® aggregometry and thromboelastography (TEG) could be used, but information on their role in such patients is limited. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of Multiplate® analyses in patients with haematological malignancies. A secondary aim was to explore whether a multiple logistic regression model combining Multiplate®, TEG, clinical and laboratory variables was associated with risk of bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an exploratory, prospective observational study of thrombocytopenic patients with haematological malignancies. Total platelet count (TPC), white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, temperature and bleeding status were recorded daily. TEG and Multiplate® analyses with four agonists were performed on weekdays.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled into the study. The median number of days in a study period was 21. Bleeding was observed on 64 of 298 study days. TPC <20×109/L and <10×109/L occurred on 119 and 25 days, respectively. When TPC was <33×109/L, many samples showed no aggregation, regardless of bleeding status. Despite this, the odds of World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 bleeding decreased significantly as aggregation increased and Multiplate® had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 19% for significant bleeding. In the multiple logistic regression model collagen-activated Multiplate® aggregation, TEG angle, TEG reaction time and CRP significantly affected the odds of WHO grade 2 bleeding. The combined model had a NPV of 99% and a PPV of 19%.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that the markers of platelet function and haemostasis provided by Multiplate® aggregometry and TEG may add information to support prediction of bleeding, although platelet count still remains the most accessible analysis for routine testing.

Prediction of bleeding by thromboelastography in ICU patients with haematological malignancy and severe sepsis

: ICU patients with haematological malignancy have an increased risk of bleeding. Recently, global haemostatic methods such as thromboelastography (TEG) have gained impact in evaluating coagulation. The aim of this study was to observe whether TEG could predict bleeding in haematological ICU patients with severe sepsis. Post-hoc single-centre analysis of patients with haematological malignancy included in the Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock (6S) trial. Clinical characteristics, TEG measurements and details regarding bleeding complications were retrieved from the 6S database. The association between TEG and bleeding were analysed by Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. A total of 202 patients with severe sepsis were admitted to the ICU of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen and included in the 6S trial. Forty-one had haematological malignancy and were analysed in the current study. During ICU stay, 20 patients (49%) had bleeding complications and 13 (32%) patients bled within the first 5 ICU days. We observed no associations between TEG and subsequent bleeding in Cox regression models. TEG variables at baseline had low predictive value for bleeding. Baseline TEG variables did not add value in identifying patients with high risk of bleeding in ICU patients with haematological malignancy and severe sepsis.

Assessment of agreement and interchangeability between the TEG5000 and TEG6S thromboelastography haemostasis analysers: a prospective validation study

Background

TEG6S® and TEG5000® (Haemonetics Corp, USA) are haemostasis analysers that measure viscoelasticity properties of whole blood. Both use different mechanisms to assess similar components of the coagulation process. The aim of this study was to assess agreement and interchangeability between the TEG6S and TEG5000 analysers.

Methods

3.5 mL whole blood was collected from 25 adult patients in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Analysis was performed using TEG6S and TEG5000 haemostatic platforms. Agreement between platforms was measured using Lin’s concordance coefficient (Lin’s CC), further validated using intraclass correlation coefficients and reduced major axis regression (RMAR).

Results

Sixteen (64%) patients were male; mean (range) age: 59yo (23–86). TEG6S and TEG5000 systems were broadly interchangeable. The majority of TEG variables demonstrated almost perfect or substantial agreement and minimal proportional bias (maximum amplitude demonstrated a fixed bias). LY30%, however, demonstrated poor agreement and a proportional bias. Lin’s CC coefficients (95% CI, RMAR slope, intercept) between TEG6S and TEG5000 variables were: R time: 0.78 (0.64–0.92, 0.76, 0.92); K time: 0.82 (0.69–0.94, 1.30, − 0.93); alpha angle: 0.79 (0.64–0.95, 1.04, − 1.43); maximum amplitude (MA): 0.90 (0.83–0.96, 0.99, − 5.0); LY30%: 0.34 (0.1–0.58, 0.43, 0.04).

Conclusions

Adult patients with critical illness demonstrate almost perfect agreement in the R time and MA, substantial agreement in K time and alpha angle, but poor agreement in LY30%, as measured by the TEG6S and TEG5000 analysers. With the exception of LY30%, the TEG6S and TEG5000 platforms appear interchangeable. This has important implications for use in clinical practice and multi-site research programs.

Trial registration

ANZCRT number: 12617000062325, registered 12/Jan17. Retrospectively registered.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-019-0717-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.