Abstract
AIM
To assess the value of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with high resolution MRI (HR-MRI) in preoperative T and N staging of rectal cancer by comparing with pathological staging.
METHODS
The clinical data of 84 patients with primary rectal cancer who were admitted to Tianjin Haibin People's Hospital from January 2017 to October 2017 and underwent conventional MRI and HR-MRI preoperatively and pathological examination postoperatively were collected. The consistency and correlation were analyzed between preoperative T and N staging by conventional MRI and HR-MRI and pathological T and N staging. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of conventional MRI combined with HR-MRI in diagnosing T and N stages were calculated.
RESULTS
There was a strong consistency between preoperative T and N staging by conventional MRI and HR-MRI and pathological T and N staging (κ = 0.691, P = 0.000), and the correlation rate was 84.52% (71/84). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of conventional MRI and HR-MRI were 93.15%, 87.44%, and 92.36% for preoperative T1 staging, 91.23%, 86.19%, and 95.42% for preoperative T2 staging, 93.15%, 87.44%, and 92.36% for preoperative T3 staging, and 95.24%, 100.00%, and 77.78% for preoperative T4 staging. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of conventional MRI combined with HR-MRI for preoperative N staging were 93.15%, 87.44%, and 92.36%, respectively. Using postoperative pathological results as the "gold standard", the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of conventional MRI combined with HR-MRI in predicting mesorectal invasion before surgery were 93.15%, 87.44%, and 92.36%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Conventional MRI combined with HR-MRI has high diagnostic value in preoperative evaluation of T and N stages and mesangial invasion in patients with rectal cancer, which can provide a reliable reference for the clinical planning of surgical procedures.
Collapse