Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in Behcet's disease

Secondary autoimmune immune ear disease (AIED): a systematic review and meta-analysis on vestibular manifestations of systemic autoimmune and inflammatory disorders

Secondary autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) is often bilateral and asymmetric in patients presenting with audiovestibular symptoms due to a systemic autoimmune disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed at identifying and highlighting patterns in prevalence of vestibular dysfunction, symptom presentation, and diagnostic methods in extant literature by combining clinical context from case reports with quantitative analyses from cohort studies. Screening of articles by title, abstract, and full text was completed by four reviewers (K.Z., A.L., S.C., and S.J.). In this study, we grouped secondary AIED and systemic autoimmune diseases by pathophysiologic mechanism: (1) connective tissue disease (CTD), (2) vasculitides (VAS), (3) systemic inflammatory disorders (SID), and (4) other immune-mediated disorders (OIMD). The search for AIED disease identified 120 articles (cohorts and case reports) that met the final inclusion criteria. All 120 were included in the qualitative review, and 54 articles were included for meta-analysis. Of these 54 articles, 22 included a control group (CwC). Ninety individual cases or patient presentations from 66 articles were included for analysis in addition to the 54 cohort articles. Secondary AIED does not have a diagnostic algorithm for managing vestibular symptoms. The management of audiovestibular symptoms requires close collaboration between otolaryngologists and rheumatologists to preserve end-organ function of the ear. To improve our ability to understand the impact on the vestibular system, vestibular clinicians need to develop a standardized reporting method. Clinical presentation should frequently be paired with vestibular testing to contextually investigate symptom severity and provide higher quality care.

The use of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) in the diagnosis of otolithic dysfunction of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a survey of awareness and recognition of otorhinolaryngology medical staffs

PURPOSE

To assess awareness and recognition of vestibular function tests in otorhinolaryngology medical staffs, especially the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) testing in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

A survey was delivered via either email or a social media app. The medical staffs of the Chinese Medical Association of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery from various branches were enrolled. Study data were collected and managed with an online data collection tool.

RESULTS

A total of 1781 emails and 623 social media messages were sent to 2404 otorhinolaryngology medical staffs. One hundred and fifty-seven of them participated in the survey, including 24 via emails and 133 via the social media app. Regarding the knowledge of VEMP, only 59 (37.6%) of them agreed that OSA could be related to vertigo/dizziness/imbalance and 28 (17.8%) believed that OSA could result in VEMP abnormalities and would factor this in diagnosing the impairment of the vestibular function of OSA patients. A total of 7.6% of the respondents had never heard of the VEMP tests. Responses regarding the minimum age at which VEMP are possible ranged from younger than 6 months to greater than 18 years of age. Beliefs regarding the utility and reliability of VEMP varied, with 'unsure' being the most frequent response. In addition, only 17.8% of otolaryngologists indicated some access to the VEMP test.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge and beliefs about the role of VEMP in diagnosing otolithic organ dysfunction caused by OSA in otorhinolaryngology vary widely. It is important for otorhinolaryngology medical staffs to learn the latest literatures and updated knowledge through continuing education.

Does blindness affect ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of blindness on ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) responses.

METHODS

Thirty-one subjects with unilateral blindness (UB group) and 25 age and sex-matched healthy subjects (control group) were recruited for the present study. The oVEMP responses including latency, amplitude and amplitude asymmetry ratio (AR) were measured and compared between the blind side, the contralateral eye of the UB group and the control subjects.

RESULTS

Ocular VEMP recordings were obtained from 29 of 31 patients (93.5%) for the blind side of the UB group. There was no significant difference in terms of latency, amplitude and AR value between the blind side and the contralateral eye of the UB group and the control subjects.

CONCLUSION

Clear oVEMP recordings can be elicited as long as the eyeball and extraocular muscles are preserved in a blind eye.