Validation of clinical prediction rules for a low probability of nonsentinel and extensive lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients

Axillary ultrasonography in breast cancer patients helps in identifying patients preoperatively with limited disease of the axilla

BACKGROUND

The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure is the method of choice for the identification and monitoring of regional lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. In the case of a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN), additional lymph node dissection is still warranted for regional control, although 40-65 % have no additional axillary disease. Recent studies show that after breast-conserving surgery, SLNB, and adjuvant systemic therapy, there is no significant difference between recurrence-free period and overall survival if there are ≤2 positive axillary nodes. The purpose of this study was preoperative identification of patients with limited axillary disease (≤2 macrometastases) by using ultrasonography.

METHODS

Data from 1,103 consecutive primary breast cancer patients with tumors smaller than 50 mm, no palpable adenopathy, and a maximum of 2 SLNs with macrometastases were collected. The variable of interest was US of the axilla.

RESULTS

Of the 1,103 patients included, 1,060 remained after exclusion criteria. Of these, 102 (9.6 %) had more than 2 positive axillary nodes on ALND. Selected by unsuspected US, the chance of having >2 positive lymph nodes (LNs) is substantially lower (4.2 %). This is significant on univariate and multivariate analysis. After excluding the patients with extracapsular extension of the SLN, the chance of having >2 positive LNs is only 2.6 %. For pT1-2, this is 2.2 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of more than 2 positive axillary nodes is relatively small in patients with cT1-2 breast cancer. US of the axilla helps in further identifying patients with a minimal risk of additional axillary disease, putting ALND up for discussion.

Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: evaluation of the tenon score

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines recommend completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in case of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis larger than 0.2 mm. However, in 50%-65% of these patients, the non-SLNs contain no further metastases and cALND provides no benefit. Several nomograms and scoring systems have been suggested to predict the risk of metastases in non-SLNs. We have evaluated the Tenon score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review of the Swedish Sentinel Node Multicentre Cohort Study, risk factors for additional metastases were analysed in 869 SLN-positive patients who underwent cALND, using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn on the basis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Tenon score, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Non-SLN metastases were identified in 270/869 (31.1%) patients. Tumour size and grade, SLN status and ratio between number of positive SLNs and total number of SLNs were significantly associated with non-SLN status in multivariate analyses. The area under the curve for the Tenon score was 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.69). In 102 patients with a primary tumour <2 cm, Elston grade 1-2 and SLN metastases ≤2 mm, the risk of non SLN metastasis was less than 10%.

CONCLUSION

The Tenon score performed inadequately in our material and we could, based on tumour and SLN characteristics, only define a very small group of patients in which negative non-sentinel nodes could be predicted.

Axillary recurrences following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy with individual tumor cells or micrometastases and no axillary dissection

The increased use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) excision for staging the axilla in women with breast cancer has benefited women by lowering morbidity and at the same time has raised issues related to the extent of treatment needed to the nodal basin. This is of particular concern when micrometastases or isolated tumor cells are found in the sentinel nodes on the final pathology. The probability of finding metastatic disease in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN) ranges from 0 to 20% with only micrometastatic deposits in the SLN. Very low rates (0-3.7%) of axillary recurrence have been reported in selected patients with micrometastases tumor in sentinel nodes who have not had a completion axillary node dissection (ALND). Risk factors for additional positive NSLN include primary tumor size, the presence of lymphovascular invasion and the size of the SN metastatic deposit. Currently, the decision to not complete the ALND when micrometastic disease is found in the SLN should be made on a case-by-case basis. One should consider the tumor characteristics, findings within the SLN, and a multidisciplinary treatment plan. Clinical trial results may help to resolve the dilemma. There appears to be a low risk for axillary recurrence.

Meta-analysis of predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive SLN

AIMS

A meta-analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathological variables most predictive of non-sentinel node (NSN) metastases when the sentinel node is positive.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted that ultimately identified 56 candidate studies. Original data were abstracted from each study and used to calculate odds ratios. The random-effects model was used to combine odds ratios to determine the strength of the associations.

FINDINGS

The 8 individual characteristics found to be significantly associated with the highest likelihood (odds ratio >2) of NSN metastases are SLN metastases >2mm in size, extracapsular extension in the SLN, >1 positive SLN, ≤1 negative SLN, tumour size >2cm, ratio of positive sentinel nodes >50% and lymphovascular invasion in the primary tumour. The histological method of detection, which is associated with the size of metastases, had a correspondingly high odds ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 8 factors predictive of NSN metastases that should be recorded and evaluated routinely in SLN databases. These factors should be included in a predictive model that is generally applicable among different populations.

Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer: a compiled update

The number of positive axillary nodes is a strong prognostic factor in breast cancer, but is affected by variability in nodal staging technique yielding varying numbers of excised nodes. The nodal ratio of positive to excised nodes is an alternative that could address this variability. Our 2006 review found that the nodal ratio consistently outperformed the number of positive nodes, providing strong arguments for the use of nodal ratios in breast cancer staging and management. New evidence has continued to accrue confirming the prognostic significance of nodal ratios in various worldwide population settings. This review provides an updated summary of available data, and discusses the potential application of the nodal ratio to breast cancer staging and prognostication, its role in the context of modern surgical techniques such as sentinel node biopsy, and its potential correlations with new biologic markers such as circulating tumor cells and breast cancer stem cells.

Minimal disease in sentinel nodes

Isolated tumor cells and micrometastases represent low-volume or minimal disease in the regional lymph nodes of breast cancer patients as compared to macrometastases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a functional selection and removal of the most likely site of regional metastasis, and gives pathologists the opportunity to concentrate detection techniques on a limited number of lymph nodes. Consequently, more lesions belonging in the two mentioned staging categories are discovered in sentinel lymph nodes. Despite some publications contradicting stochastic models of breast cancer, micrometastases seem to reflect a prognosis intermediate between the node-negative and macrometastatic nodal status, and they also reflect a risk of non-sentinel node involvement slightly higher than that associated with a node-negative status. Data are more contradictory as concerns isolated tumor cells. This minireview summarizes the definitions, their inconsistencies, pathological protocols aiming at the detection of minimal nodal disease, the prognostic impact and non-sentinel node involvement related risk of such nodal lesions, and their therapeutic consequences.