Colonoscopy is superior to neostigmine in the treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome

Management Strategies for Refractory Ogilvie's Syndrome: A Case Report of Extensive Colonic Ileus in a Critically Ill 65-Year-Old Patient

Ogilvie's syndrome is characterized by acute dilatation of the colon without any anatomic obstruction. It presents with signs and symptoms of small or large bowel obstruction. The management could be challenging, especially in critically and chronically ill patients. We present a case of a 65-year-old male patient who developed extensive colonic ileus following prolonged hospitalization. We discuss different management strategies that we adopted.

Postburn Abdominal Pain of Gastrointestinal Origin: A Scoping Review

After burn injury, patients may have abdominal pain due to several causes and etiologies, some of which could be life-threatening, including pancreatitis, stress ulcers, Clostridium difficile infection, and so forth. This pain sometimes poses a major diagnostic challenge. This scoping review is the first reported review to address and discuss this entity of patients after burn injury in abdominal pain of gastrointestinal origin. A scoping review of PubMed, Google Scholar, and other electronic research sites was performed. All relevant articles of any study design were included in this review. Variables included in this study were sex distribution, age, related total burn surface area, incidence rate, characteristics of pain, diagnosis, management, outcomes, and mortality rate. The medical literature identified 114 articles. According to our inclusion criteria, 91 articles were reviewed in this article. Through these articles, we reviewed in detail the characteristics of postburn abdominal pain, the relevant diseases responsible for this complaint, the epidemiologic features of these diseases, and potential management approaches aiming to help burn specialists in making earlier diagnosis and, thus, timely treatment. Early recognition of postburn abdominal pain, as well as timely diagnosis and treatment, play a significant role in prognosis and mortality. Thus, it is extremely important for burn specialists and plastic surgeons to thoroughly investigate postburn abdominal pain. Also, one of the aims of this review was to shed light on the important role of the multidisciplinary team in burn patient management to improve the prognosis.

Acute Intestinal Obstruction in a Case of Cerebrovascular Accident

Ogilvie's syndrome represents an acute form of intestinal obstruction that occurs in the absence of a detectable mechanical blockage impeding fecal passage. Hence, it is also given the name of intestinal pseudo-obstruction. It has been deemed a disease of imbalance between the arms of the autonomic nervous system with an increase in parasympathetic outflow. Most often, it has an antecedent surgical or medical illness. There is evidence for the use of IV neostigmine in such cases to prevent imminent intestinal ischemia and perforation. In the case of a non-responder, decompression of the bowel using a colonoscope and surgery have also been tried to relieve the symptoms. In the case that follows, a middle-aged man developed progressive abdominal distension in the course of his recovery from an ischemic cerebrovascular accident. Initially, he received conservative treatment for 48 hours. Subsequently, he was given IV neostigmine, which relieved his symptoms.

Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction (ACPO)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is a cause of large intestinal dilation and obstruction without any physical transition point. It remains difficult to diagnose and treat. We review the recent updates on diagnosis and management of ACPO.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent guidelines have posited that conservative management can be tried in most cases of ACPO, but that early decompression and surgery should be considered. Use of neostigmine is still a viable option but there is also promising data on pyridostigmine as well as prucalopride. Resolution of ACPO should be followed by daily use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to help prevent recurrence. ACPO warrants early and accurate diagnosis with exclusion of alternate causes of large bowel dilation. Conservative management can be attempted for 48-72 h in those with cecal diameters < 12 cm and without signs of peritonitis and perforation. Early escalation of management should be attempted with neostigmine followed by endoscopy and/or surgery as needed, given that longer periods of dilation are associated with worse outcomes. There is promising new evidence for use of pyridostigmine and prucalopride, but further trials are needed prior to incorporating them into regular use. Finally, studies are lacking regarding prevention of ACPO after initial resolution.

Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction: Colonoscopy versus Neostigmine First?

INTRODUCTION

Neostigmine (NEO) and decompressive colonoscopy (COL) are two efficacious treatment modalities for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO). We hypothesize that a COL first strategy is associated with better outcomes compared to a NEO first strategy.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis was performed from 2013 to 2020. Patients ≥18 y with a diagnosis of ACPO were included. The outcome was a composite measure of acute operative intervention, 30-day readmission with ACPO, and 30-day ACPO-related mortality. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

Of 910 encounters in 849 patients, 50 (5.5%) episodes of ACPO in 39 patients were identified after exclusion of one patient with colon perforation on presentation. The median (interquartile range) age was 68 (62-84) y. NEO and COL were administered in 21 and 25 episodes, respectively. In 16 (32%) episodes, no NEO or COL was administered. When patients were given NEO first, COL or additional NEO was required in 12/18 (67%) compared with a COL first strategy where a second COL and/or NEO was given in 5/16 (32%) (P = 0.05). Both strategies had similar outcomes (NEO, 4/18 versus COL, 4/16, P = 0.85). Twenty-two (44%) episodes had an early intervention (≤48 h) with NEO and/or COL. There was no difference in outcome between those that received an early intervention and those who did not (5/22 versus 5/28, P = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients failing conservative measures, a COL first approach was associated with fewer subsequent interventions, but with similar composite outcomes compared to a NEO first approach. Early (≤48 h) intervention with NEO and/or COL was not associated with improved outcomes.

Ogilvie Syndrome and Acute Kidney Injury: A Rare Complication of Cesarean Section and Preeclampsia

Ogilvie syndrome, or acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPS) is a rare occurrence, usually following surgery. It consists of a massive dilatation of the cecum, whose diameter becomes greater than 10 cm; its severity is variable, but, if not promptly recognized, it may be life-threatening. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is reported in this context due to both septic complications and to effective hypovolemia. ACPS most commonly affects males and individuals older than 60. In women, the median age at diagnosis is lower due to a strong association with Caesarean sections. The differential diagnosis after delivery may be challenging, due to a potential overlap of symptoms with preeclampsia or hemolysis low platelet elevated liver enzymes (HELLP) syndrome, both associated with AKI. The case herein discussed, regarding a 35-year-old woman, who developed AKI and Ogilvie syndrome after a Caesarean section for preeclampsia, may exemplify these diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and is intended to raise awareness on this unusual complication of Caesarean delivery.

Gastrointestinal Emergencies and the Role of Endoscopy

Many gastrointestinal (GI) disorders present to the emergency room with acute clinical presentations, some even life threatening. Common emergencies encountered that require urgent endoscopic interventions include GI hemorrhage (variceal and nonvariceal), foreign body ingestion, obstructive jaundice, postprocedure-related complications such as postpolypectomy bleed or perforation, etc. A major advantage of emergency endoscopy is that it is cost effective and, on many occasions, can be life-saving. The present review will highlight a practical approach on various endoscopic modalities and their use in the GI emergencies.

Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome) after Hip Arthroplasty

Ogilvie's syndrome is a clinical entity that occurs with signs of excessive dilatation of the colon and obstruction, despite the absence of a mechanical obstruction. Although its etiology remains uncertain, anticholinergic drugs, metabolic disorders, diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, Parkinson's disease, major orthopedic interventions, or blunt abdominal trauma are considered to be possible causes. Imbalance in sympathetic innervation plays a role in the pathogenesis. The characteristic feature of the syndrome is the presence of a major trauma or surgical history. Although this is an uncommon complication, especially after hip and knee arthroplasty, it is an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Conservative or surgical colonic decompression and anticholinergic agents play a role in the treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome, which is defined as acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO). In this case report, we present the postoperative process of an elderly patient with comorbid diseases who underwent hemiarthroplasty due to a hip fracture as a result of a domestic fall. We will discuss the diagnosis of ACPO and the approach to multidisciplinary management of the treatment in a case that is frequently encountered in daily practice and starts as a normal report. We aim to remind surgeons that they may encounter ACPO in the postoperative period and to emphasize that mortality and morbidity can be reduced with early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach. We would like to emphasize that Ogilvie's syndrome should be included in the differential diagnosis portfolio of all orthopedic surgeons.

Ogilvie's syndrome-is there a cutoff diameter to proceed with upfront surgery?

Purpose

Although Ogilvie’s syndrome was first described about 70 years ago, its etiology and pathogenesis are still not fully understood. But more importantly, it is also not clear when to approach which therapeutic strategy.

Methods

Patients who were diagnosed with Ogilvie’s syndrome at our institution in a 17-year time period (2002–2019) were included and retrospectively evaluated regarding different therapeutical strategies: conservative, endoscopic, or surgical.

Results

The study included 71 patients with 21 patients undergoing conservative therapy, 25 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy, and 25 patients undergoing surgery. However, 38% of patients (n = 8) who were primarily addressed for conservative management failed and had to undergo endoscopy or even surgery. Similarly, 8 patients (32%) with primarily endoscopic treatment had to proceed for surgery. In logistic regression analysis, only a colon diameter ≥ 11 cm (p = 0.01) could predict a lack of therapeutic success by endoscopic treatment. Ninety-day mortality and overall survival were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

As conservative and endoscopic management fail in about one-third of patients, a cutoff diameter ≥ 11 cm may be an adequate parameter to evaluate surgical therapy.

COVID 19 and the risk of gastro-intestinal perforation: A case series and literature review

Background

COVID19 is a viral disease with pneumonia as its most common presentation. Many presentations and complications have been reported, but gastro-intestinal perforation has not received much attention.

Methods: three cases from our hospital are presented, and the current literature was reviewed.

Results, cases

All three patients were admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure due to COVID19 pneumonia and intubated. Our first patient was treated with steroids, and subsequently diagnosed with rectal perforation on day 34 of his hospital admission. The second patient was treated with steroids and tocilizumab, and diagnosed with colonic perforation 1 day after neostigmine administration, on day 14 of his hospital admission. Our third patient was treated with steroids and tocilizumab, and diagnosed colonic perforation 4 days after neostigmine administration, on day 14 of his hospital admission.

Results, literature

25 more cases were found in current literature, both upper GI and lower GI perforations, either as a presenting symptom or during the course of hospitalization. These were often associated with treatment with steroids, interleukin 6 inhibitors, or both.

Conclusions

Gastro-intestinal perforation is a rare but dangerous complication of COVID19. Treatment with tocilizumab and steroids may both increase the risk of this complication, and hamper diagnosis.

A case of acute-colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie Syndrome) post robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), or Ogilvie Syndrome, is a rare phenomenon where acute colonic distension occurs, in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Several post-operative cases of Ogilvie Syndrome are noted within the literature, pertaining to patients post hepatectomy, trauma or spinal surgery; but rarely following urological procedures. This case describes a 68-year-old gentleman who developed Ogilvie Syndrome post an uncomplicated robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). While bowel injury is an acknowledged rare complication following prostatectomy, patients with Ogilvie Syndrome may present in a similar manner, and an atypical case of colonic obstruction should raise suspicion of this as a cause.

Efficacy and Safety of Neostigmine and Decompressive Colonoscopy for Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction: A Single-Center Analysis

Background

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is characterized by acute colonic dilation in the absence of anatomical obstruction. Neostigmine is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor recommended as first-line salvage therapy for uncomplicated ACPO. Decompressive colonoscopy is recommended if neostigmine is contraindicated or unsuccessful. There is a need to better characterize relative efficacy and factors impacting treatment choice. The aim of the study was to examine the use, efficacy, and safety of neostigmine and decompressive colonoscopy in the management of ACPO at a single academic center.

Methods

Patients ≥ 18 years of age meeting established criteria for uncomplicated ACPO and with cecal diameter ≥ 10 cm on imaging between 1999 and 2019 were identified. Individuals were categorized as having received supportive care alone or subsequent trials of neostigmine or decompressive colonoscopy. Demographics and pre- and post-intervention data were collected, including indication and contraindication to intervention used, time to intervention, initial response, and adverse events.

Results

In 46 cases of ACPO (N = 42 patients), all but one individual received initial supportive care. Seven responded to conservative measures alone. Of the patients failing supportive care, 15 cases were initially treated with neostigmine (response rate 86.7%) and 24 initially underwent decompressive colonoscopy (response rate 95.8%) (P = 0.390). One episode of transient bradycardia, resolved with atropine, occurred in the neostigmine group. One patient experienced respiratory instability during colonoscopy.

Conclusions

Both neostigmine and decompressive colonoscopy appear effective for treating uncomplicated ACPO in individuals failing conservative therapy. Adverse events were infrequent in both cohorts. Future prospective studies examining treatment for ACPO should focus on whether either intervention is superior to the other.

The rare Ogilvie's Syndrome in pregnancy. How to manage? A case report and literature review

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, or Ogilvie's syndrome (OS), is a complication in gynaecology and obstetrics. Its occurrence during pregnancy is rare, redefining the therapeutic decision-making and treatment options. In this review we describe the case of a 37-year-old pregnant patient who developed OS at the 30th week of gestation. A laparotomy with colonic decompression was performed. Foetal condition, regularly monitored throughout the hospital stay, remained normal. The patient experienced an uncomplicated, natural delivery at 40 weeks. A comprehensive literature search, describing the occurrence of OS during pregnancy, was conducted. We identified six cases of OS arising during pregnancy. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features were analysed. Non-surgical management is generally the first-line option, with intravenous drug administration, rectal and nasogastric tube positioning and colonoscopic decompression the treatments of choice. Surgical decompression in usually performed in cases of failure of the first-line treatments. Including our own experience, in all cases, neither maternal nor foetal mortality was reported. A conservative approach is mandatory as first-line treatment, but when prompt resolution is not achieved, a multidisciplinary team, involving the gynaecologist/obstetrician, the surgeon, the radiologist and the intensivist is mandatory to avoid diagnostic delays, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality rates.

Endoscopic Decompression in Colonic Distension

Background

Acute colonic distension is a medical emergency with high morbidity and mortality. Clinically important causes of colonic distension are acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, colonic volvulus, and malignant obstruction. Endoscopic decompression is one established therapeutic strategy.

Summary

This therapeutic review will give an overview of possible therapeutic strategies based on the recently published literature, focusing on endoscopic decompression and summarizing the other therapeutic possibilities. The review discusses separately the therapeutic options of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, colonic volvulus, and malignant obstruction, providing an evidence-based orientation for clinical use.

Key Messages

Endoscopic decompression of colonic distension is an established therapy with high clinical success. The technique and its position in the therapy sequence differ depending on the medical condition, the trigger of the colonic distension, and the local expertise.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction with bowel rupture after caesarean section in HELLP syndrome: a case report

Background

Ogilvie syndrome, also known as acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), can occur postpartum after caesarean section (C-section), often resulting in caecal dilatation. The incidence rate is approximately 100 cases in 100,000 patients per year (Ross et al., Am Surg 82:102-11, 2016). Without proper diagnosis and treatment, it may progress to intestinal perforation or other fatal complications.

Case presentation

A 39-year-old pregnant woman underwent emergency low-segment C-section due to complications of Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets syndrome (HELLP) syndrome. ACPO was suspected on the third day after C-section based on inability to pass flatus, evident abdominal distension, slight abdominal pain, and computed tomography (CT) scan revealing severe, diffuse colonic distention with caecal dilatation of approximately 9 cm. Based on these findings, conservative treatment was implemented. However, 6 days after C-section, her symptoms worsened, and CT showed possible intestinal perforation; thus, an emergency laparotomy was performed. Due to a 3-cm (diameter) laceration in the anterolateral wall of the ascending colon and a 5-cm tear in the ileocecal junction, in combination with mucosal eversion in the colon, resection of the ileocecum, distal closure of the ascending colon, and a terminal ileostomy were performed. The patient was discharged 2 weeks post-laparotomy and continued to undergo nursing care for the incision and stoma. Ileostomy was performed 4 months later.

Conclusion

Ogilvie syndrome after C-section is an extremely rare but severe condition, which warrants early recognition and treatment to prevent potentially fatal complications, especially in patients with poor health status.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction and colonic volvulus

Colonic volvulus and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) are 2 causes of benign large-bowel obstruction. Colonic volvulus occurs most commonly in the sigmoid colon as a result of bowel twisting along its mesenteric axis. In contrast, the exact pathophysiology of ACPO is poorly understood, with the prevailing hypothesis being altered regulation of colonic function by the autonomic nervous system resulting in colonic distention in the absence of mechanical blockage. Prompt diagnosis and intervention leads to improved outcomes for both diagnoses. Endoscopy may play a role in the evaluation and management of both entities. The purpose of this document from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's Standards of Practice Committee is to provide an update on the evaluation and endoscopic management of sigmoid volvulus and ACPO.

Fluoroscopy-guided trans-anal decompression tube placement in the treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: a single center experience

PURPOSE

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO or Ogilvie's syndrome) is a rare but often fatal disease; timely colonic decompression may be essential for successful treatment. This study describes a technique of placing a trans-anal tube via fluoroscopy-guiding and investigates the effect of colon decompression on ACPO.

METHODS

Patients undergoing colonic decompression via fluoroscopy-guided trans-anal tube placement from April 2015 to May 2017 were included. The technical and clinical successes of this procedure were evaluated. Clinical features and long-term outcomes are described.

RESULTS

Decompression was successful in 72.73% (16/22) of the patients; the procedure was considered a clinical success in 50% (11/22) of the patients. 31.82% (7/22) of the patients underwent elective surgery, and only 18.19% (4/22) of the patients need emergency surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroscopy-guided trans-anal decompression tube placement was an easy and efficient method for treating ACPO. Additionally, ACPO once required emergency surgery, but now may only require elective surgery in certain instances.

Secretory diarrhea and hypokalemia associated with colonic pseudo-obstruction: A case study and systematic analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Colonic pseudo-obstruction (CPO) is characterized by colonic distention in the absence of mechanical obstruction or toxic megacolon. Concomitant secretory diarrhea (SD) with hypokalemia (SD-CPO) due to gastrointestinal (GI) loss requires further characterization.

AIM

To perform a systematic review of SD-CPO, report a case study, and compare SD-CPO with classical CPO (C-CPO).

METHODS

We performed a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus for reports based on a priori criteria for CPO, SD and GI loss of potassium. An additional case at Mayo Clinic was included.

RESULTS

Nine publications met inclusion criteria, with a total of 14 cases. Six studies had high, three moderate, and our case high methodological quality. Median age was 74 years (66-97), with 2:1 male/female ratio. Kidney disease was present in 6/14 patients. Diarrhea was described as profuse, watery, or viscous in 10 patients. Median serum, stool, and urine potassium concentrations (mmol/L) were 2.4 (range: 1.9-3.1), 137 (100-180), and 17 (8-40), respectively. Maximal diameter of colon and cecum (median) were 10.2 cm and 10.5 cm, respectively. Conservative therapy alone was effective in five out of 14 patients. Median potassium supplementation was 124 mEq/d (40-300). Colonic decompression was effective in three out of six patients; one had a total colectomy; three out of 14 had died. The main differences between SD-CPO and C-CPO were lower responses to treatments: conservative measures (35.7% vs 73.6%, P=.01), neostigmine (17% vs 89.2%, P<.001), and colonic decompression (50% vs 82.4%, P=.02).

CONCLUSION

SD-CPO is a rare phenotype associated with increased fecal potassium and is more difficult to treat than C-CPO.

Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to review the current status of prokinetics and to place it in historical context. Impaired motility and thus propulsion have long been thought to play important roles in the pathogenesis of a number of gastrointestinal disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroparesis, chronic idiopathic pseudo-obstruction, and constipation. Historically, disordered motility was also thought to contribute to a number of functional gastrointestinal disorders such as functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

RECENT FINDINGS

As we learn more of the pathophysiology of FD, IBS, GERD, constipation, and gastroparesis, the limitations of a therapeutic strategy based on the stimulation of motility (i.e., the use of a prokinetic) have become apparent and the disappointments of the past explained. The development of prokinetic drugs has also been hampered by the non-selective nature of many of the agents studied to date which resulted in some unexpected side effects. There is still an unmet need for an effective and safe prokinetic, but drug development in this area must be mindful of the challenges of the area and the need for selectivity for a given target receptor.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction associated with abdominal paracentesis

A 61-year-old man presented with accumulation of ascites secondary to alcoholic liver disease. He had an ascitic drain sited and 24 hours later he developed acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO). This is a rare condition previously associated with major surgery and severe sepsis. The patient did well with conservative management, and avoided the need for endoscopic decompression or surgical intervention. We believe that this is the first report of ACPO secondary to abdominal paracentesis.

Colonoscopic decompression should be used before neostigmine in the treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome

BACKGROUND

Performance of urgent colonoscopy for the purposes of diagnosis and treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome remains controversial. However, no trials have directly compared neostigmine with endoscopic therapy. This study aimed to compare the effect of neostigmine and colonoscopic decompression in the treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome.

METHODS

This study was designed as a retrospective, non-randomized clinical study of sequential patients. Patients who were diagnosed as having acute colonic pseudo-obstruction were separated into two groups after conservative treatment. Group 1 comprised patients who underwent colonoscopic decompression, because they had a poor first response to neostigmine treatment. Group 2 constituted patients who had a poor first response to colonoscopic decompression, and neostigmine was added to the treatment regimen. Groups 1 and 2 were compared for the success of disease management.

RESULTS

In groups 1 and 2, the average age of the patients was 63.19 years (±14.71 years) and 59.45 years (±15.31 years) (p = 0.312), respectively. No significant difference was determined between the groups in terms of distribution of sex, hospital stay, etiologies, and initial cecal sizes in imaging (p > 0.05). Response to first intervention was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Also, the total response was determined statistically significant for hospital stay if colonoscopic decompression was performed (p < 0.01). No recurrence was determined during the 1-month follow-up in both groups. Although there was no etiologic factor for neostigmine response according to univariate analysis results, colonoscopic success was decreased due to age, sex, and the presence of a cardiac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the success rate of neostigmine treatment was significantly lower in our homogeneous groups, no significant decrease was determined in terms of hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and requirement of colostomy compared with colonoscopic decompression. By comparison, colonoscopic decompression, which was performed by experienced endoscopists as a first-line treatment option, was more effective as an initial therapy and was more effective at avoiding a second treatment modality.

A case of cecal volvulus mimicking Ogilvie Syndrome in a hospitalized patient with a pelvis fracture

Introduction

Cecal volvulus and ogilvie syndrome are two entities which may display similar clinical presentation but require different treatment approaches.

Presentation of case

An 84-year old male patient admitted for conservative treatment of a pelvis fracture, complained of abdominal cramps and flatulence on the third hospitalization day. Abdominal radiographs arose suspicion of cecal volvulus. The diagnosis was ruled out on the CT scan but however was later confirmed by an exploratory laparotomy.

Discussion

The management of cecal volvulus requires prompt (emergency) surgical intervention while Ogilvie syndrome can be principally managed with conservative treatment. Our patient's profile was typical for both entities. The absence of air throughout all colonic segments including the rectosigmoid on plain abdominal radiographs seems to be the most important sign in the exclusion of the Ogilvie syndrome diagnosis.

Conclusion

Cecal volvulus and Ogilvie syndrome display overlapping clinical features at their time of presentation and need to be carefully distinguished. By uncertainty, an exploratory laparotomy should always be performed, in view of the reported high mortality rate of cecal volvulus if surgery is delayed.

•

Caecum Volvulus and Ogilvie Syndrome may have overlapping clinical features at the time of presentation.

•

Typical profile patient for both entities: a bed-ridden patient with co-morbidities and an acute colonic distension.

•

Caecum Volvulus requires immediate surgery.

•

Ogilvie Syndrome requires principally a conservative treatment eventually with neostigmin.

•

The absence of air throughout all colonic segments including the rectosigmoid on plain abdominal radiographs, might be the most important sign to exclude the diagnosis of Ogilvie Syndrome.

[Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome) post-renal transplant]

BACKGROUND

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, also known as Ogilvie syndrome, is a rare gastrointestinal syndrome in children. It is characterized by a marked dilatation of the colon evidenced by imaging and absence of mechanical obstruction. Patients typically present with abdominal pain and distended, tympanic abdomen, with peristalsis present, accompanied by nausea and vomiting. Up to 40% of patients can pass gas and/or have bowel movements. We decide to report this case because this syndrome is very rare in pediatric patients, and no cases have been reported in a post-renal transplant pediatric patient.

CASE REPORT

13 year old male patient with past medical history of psychomotor retardation due to perinatal asphyxia and chronic renal failure secondary to bilateral renal hypoplasia. Treated with peritoneal dialysis for one year until kidney transplant was performed. Currently under immunosuppressive regime. He began his condition with mild abdominal pain accompanied by semi-liquid stools, and progressive distention up to 78cm of abdominal circumference in 72hours, so image studies were performed. Managed with prokinetic drugs without any improvement. Two exploratory laparotomies observed flanges, without evidence of any mechanical obstruction. An abdominal magnetic resonance was performed, where important intestinal dilatation was observed with no evidence of mechanical obstruction. Ogilvie Syndrome was diagnosed, so management with neostigmine was established, which led to symptom resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

This case is reported because this syndrome is very rare in children, there is little clinical suspicion and lack of management guides for diagnosis and treatment in patients of this age.

Acute colonic pseudoobstruction

Acute colonic pseudoobstruction (ACPO), often referred to as Ogilvie syndrome, is a clinical entity characterized by severe colonic distension (adult acute megacolon) in the absence of mechanical obstruction. It can result in abdominal ischemia and perforation if left untreated. This article discusses the epidemiology and current pathophysiologic theories of ACPO as well as the clinical presentation and diagnostic modalities utilized to identify the disease. In addition, this article describes the current treatment options for ACPO, which range from conservative medical therapy, therapeutic endoscopy, to subtotal colectomy.

Acute and chronic pseudo-obstruction: a current update

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) and chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) are distinct clinical entities in which patients present similarly with symptoms of a mechanical obstruction without an occlusive lesion. Unfortunately, they also share the issues related to a delay in diagnosis, including inappropriate management and poor outcomes. Advancements have been made in our understanding of the aetiologies of both conditions. Several predisposing factors linked to critical illness have been implicated in ACPO. CIPO is a functional motility disorder, historically misdiagnosed, with unnecessary surgery being performed in many patients with dire consequences. This review discusses the pathophysiology, clinical and diagnostic features, and treatment of each. For ACPO, a safer pharmacological approach to treatment is presented in a modified up-to-date algorithm. The importance of CIPO as a differential diagnosis when seeing patients with recurrent admissions for abdominal pain and distention is also discussed, as well as specific indications for surgery. While surgery is often a last resort, the role of the surgeon in the management of both ACPO and CIPO cannot be undervalued. By characterizing each condition in a common review, the knowledge gleaned aims to optimize outcomes for these frequently complex patients.

Neostigmine for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is an uncommon condition that occasionally develops in hospitalized patients with serious underlying ailments. Its early recognition is essential to reduce life-threatening complications. Few low-powered randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have confirmed the effectiveness of neostigmine for treatment.

AIM

To analyse the effectiveness and main side effects of neostigmine in the treatment of ACPO.

EXPERIMENTAL

A literature search was performed for all published RCTs, reporting on neostigmine as treatment for ACPO.

RESULTS

Four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, evaluating 127 patients: treatment group = 65, control group = 62. Neostigmine effectiveness to resolve ACPO with only one dose was 89.2% versus 14.65% (P < 0.001, NNT = 1 [95% CI 1-2]).

CONCLUSIONS

Neostigmine is a safe and effective option for patients with ACPO who failed to respond to conservative management.