Medical student perceptions of a mistreatment program during the surgery clerkship

New psychometric evidence for the thesis advisor abuse scale (EMAT) in Peruvian university students based on classic and modern procedures

Although evidence of mistreatment toward university students in the academic field has been reported for several years, its study in the context of the development of undergraduate research is still emerging. For this reason, it is necessary to have valid and reliable measurement instruments that allow assessing the magnitude of this problem. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Thesis Advisor Abuse Scale (EMAT, for its acronym in Spanish) in Peruvian university students. A total of 753 university students (women = 57.4%) from the 3 regions of Peru participated. The internal structure was analyzed under an analytical-factorial approach, and the discrimination and difficulty characteristics of the items were evaluated from the perspective of item response theory (IRT). The findings showed evidence supporting the original three-dimensional structure. Furthermore, all the items on the EMAT have good discriminatory power. Additionally, the EMAT proved to be strictly invariant according to sex, and the reliability coefficients reached high magnitudes. It is concluded that the EMAT is an instrument that has adequate psychometric properties to be used as a measure of mistreatment by advisors in the thesis preparation processes in Peruvian university students.

Neglect as an undefined and overlooked aspect of medical student mistreatment: A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Although the mistreatment of medical students is a well-researched topic, the scope of mistreatment often leaves out neglect, a subtype for which there is no accepted definition based in the published literature. This review sought to summarize the existing data on the prevalence and descriptors of neglect, identify strategies seen in the literature designed to improve it, and offer a synthesized definition of this phenomenon to guide future research.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a relevant systematic literature search from 2000 to April 2021 was performed to identify literature on neglect in clinical settings within American medical schools.

RESULTS

Neglect, a poorly defined phenomenon in medical education related to the suboptimal learning environment, is often excluded from research on medical student mistreatment. Neglect is a barrier to a successful learning environment, yet a paucity of data and the heterogeneous nature of the present literature render it difficult to estimate its true prevalence. Studies that include neglect frequently assess it solely as the result of identity discrimination or stated career interests. Recent interventions include promoting longitudinal relationships between students and clinical faculty and establishing teaching expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

Neglect is the mistreatment of medical students by the medical care team via a lack of meaningful inclusion in the clinical environment such that it has a notable negative impact on learning and student well-being, regardless of intentionality. An established definition that is grounded in the literature is required to create a common point of reference and understand its true prevalence, its associated variables, and the best mitigation strategies, as well as to guide future research, which should examine neglect independently and as a consequence of personal and professional identities.

A qualitative study of hospital clinical staff perceptions of their interactions with healthcare middle managers

PURPOSE

The authors explored clinical staff perceptions of their interactions with middle management and their experiences of the uncongeniality of their working environment.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

Semi-structured interviews of clinical staff from an Australian public health service's Emergency, Surgery and Psychiatry departments. Volunteer interview transcripts were inductively coded using a reflexive thematic content analysis.

FINDINGS

Of 73 interviews, 66 participants discussed their interactions with management. Most clinicians considered their interactions with middle management to be negative based on a violation of their expectations of support in the workplace. Collectively, these interactions formed the basis of clinical staff perceptions of management's lack of capacity and fit for the needs of staff to perform their roles.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Strategies to improve management's fit with clinicians' needs may be beneficial for reducing uncongenial workplaces for healthcare staff and enhanced patient care.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

This article is among the few papers that discuss interactions with management from the perspective of clinical staff in healthcare. How these perspectives inform the perception of workplace uncongeniality for clinicians contributes greater understanding of the factors contributing to adversarial relationships between clinicians and managers.

Hopes, fears, and rumors: Medical students and the general surgery clerkship

BACKGROUND

Surgical educators have worked to manage the hopes and fears as well as the recurring rumors that plague the surgical clerkship. It is not known if this has effected change over time.

METHODS

We gathered information on hopes, fears, and rumors during our clerkship orientations from 2017 to 2019 using anonymous polling software with real-time feedback. We analyzed 468 responses using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Students hoped for practical skills acquisition, self-improvement, and understanding the surgical profession. They feared lack of time and knowledge, burnout, mistreatment, and subjective evaluation. Rumors included negative perceptions of surgical culture work environment, and fear of mistreatment despite clerkship changes intended to allay these fears.

CONCLUSION

Students starting surgery clerkships hope to gain surgical and clinical skills but concerns about surgical culture and mistreatment appear to remain unchanged despite structural improvements in the clerkship experience. Surgeons should look beyond the clerkship itself to change these perceptions.

Consequences of Medical Hierarchy on Medical Students, Residents, and Medical Education in Otolaryngology

Objective

To (1) review concepts of medical hierarchy; (2) examine the role of medical hierarchy in medical education and resident training; (3) discuss potential negative impacts of dysfunctional hierarchy in medical and surgical training programs, focusing on otolaryngology; and (4) investigate solutions to these issues.

Data Sources

Ovid Medline, Embase, GoogleScholar, JSTOR, Google, and article reference lists.

Review Methods

A literature search was performed to identify articles relating to the objectives of the study using the aforementioned data sources, with subsequent exclusion of articles believed to be outside the scope of the current work. The search was limited to the past 5 years.

Conclusions

Two types of hierarchies exist: “functional” and “dysfunctional.” While functional medical hierarchies aim to optimize patient care through clinical instruction, dysfunctional hierarchies have been linked to negative impacts by creating learning environments that discourage the voicing of concerns, legitimize trainee mistreatment, and create moral distress through ethical dilemmas. Such an environment endangers patient safety, undermines physician empathy, hampers learning, lowers training satisfaction, and amplifies stress, fatigue, and burnout. On the other hand, functional hierarchies may improve resident education and well-being, as well as patient safety.

Implications for Practice

Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery programs ought to work toward creating healthy systems of hierarchy that emphasize collaboration and improvement of workplace climate for trainees and faculty. The goal should be to identify aspects of dysfunctional hierarchy in one’s own environment with the ambition of rebuilding a functional hierarchy where learning, personal health, and patient safety are optimized.

Exploring Action Items to Address Resident Mistreatment through an Educational Workshop

Mistreatment of trainees is common in the clinical learning environment. Resident mistreatment is less frequently tracked than medical student mistreatment, but data suggest mistreatment remains prevalent at the resident level. To address resident mistreatment, the authors developed an Educational Advance to engage emergency medicine residents and faculty in understanding and improving their learning environment. The authors designed a small-group session with the following goals: 1) Develop a shared understanding of mistreatment and its magnitude; 2) Recognize the prevalence of resident mistreatment data and identify the most common types of mistreatment; 3) Relate study findings to personal or institutional experiences; and 4) Generate strategies for combating mistreatment and strengthening the clinical learning environment at their home institutions. Design was a combination of presentation, small group discussion, and facilitated discussion. Results were presented to participants from a previously administered survey of resident mistreatment. Public humiliation and sexist remarks were the most commonly reported forms. Faculty were the most frequent perpetrators, followed by residents and nurses. A majority of respondents who experienced mistreatment did not report the incident. Session participants were then asked to brainstorm strategies to combat mistreatment. Participants rated the session as effective in raising awareness about resident mistreatment and helping departments develop methods to improve the learning environment. Action items proposed by the group included coaching residents about how to respond to mistreatment, displaying signage in support of a positive learning environment, zero tolerance for mistreatment, clear instructions for reporting, and intentionality training to improve behavior.

The Impact of Ergonomics on Recruitment to Surgical Fields: A Multi-Institutional Survey Study

BACKGROUND

Awareness of ergonomics in surgery is growing, but whether musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries in surgery influence trainee career choices remains unknown. This study aimed to characterize medical students' MSK pain during surgical rotations and determine whether ergonomics influence student interest in surgical fields.

METHODS

An online survey was administered to medical students in North Carolina. Students were asked about specialty interest, MSK pain on surgical rotations, and deterrents from surgical fields. Students were exposed to literature about ergonomics in surgery then queried again about relative specialty interest (medical versus surgical). Differences in specialty interest before and after the exposure were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 243 participants, 44.0% were interested in pursuing a surgical specialty. Overall, 75.3% reported MSK pain during their surgical rotation, with the average daily pain score highest during surgery rotations compared to all other clinical rotations. The worst pain was reported in the feet and low back while "standing in the operating room" (81.2%) or "retracting" (59.4%). Among students initially interested in surgery but whose interest changed to a medical specialty during medical school, "physical demands of the field" was a common deterrent (36.4%). After exposure to literature regarding the incidence of MSK injuries in surgery, student interest in surgical fields on a 10-point scale significantly decreased (average -0.5 points; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

High incidence of MSK injury among surgeons may be one factor deterring medical students from surgical careers. Ergonomic interventions may be important both to improve surgeon longevity and maintain the surgical workforce.

Assessment of Programs Aimed to Decrease or Prevent Mistreatment of Medical Trainees

IMPORTANCE

Mistreatment of medical students is pervasive and has negative effects on performance, well-being, and patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To document the published programmatic and curricular attempts to decrease the incidence of mistreatment.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and MedEdPORTAL were searched. Comprehensive searches were run on "mistreatment" and "abuse of medical trainees" on all peer-reviewed publications until November 1, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Citations were reviewed for descriptions of programs to decrease the incidence of mistreatment in a medical school or hospital with program evaluation data. A mistreatment program was defined as an educational effort to reduce the abuse, mistreatment, harassment, or discrimination of trainees. Studies of the incidence of mistreatment without description of a program, references to a mistreatment program without outcome data, or a program that has never been implemented were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Authors independently reviewed all retrieved citations. Articles that any author found to meet inclusion criteria were included in a full-text review. The data extraction form was developed based on the guidelines for Best Evidence in Medical Education. An assessment of the study quality was conducted using a conceptual framework of 6 elements essential to the reporting of experimental studies in medical education.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A descriptive review of the interventions and outcomes is presented along with an analysis of the methodological quality of the studies. A separate review of the MedEdPORTAL mistreatment curricula was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 3347 citations identified, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. Of the programs included in the 10 studies, all were implemented in academic medical centers. Seven programs were in the United States, 1 in Canada, 1 in the United Kingdom, and 1 in Australia. The most common format was a combination of lectures, workshops, and seminars over a variable time period. Overall, quality of included studies was low and only 1 study included a conceptual framework. Outcomes were most often limited to participant survey data. The program outcome evaluations consisted primarily of surveys and reports of mistreatment. All of the included studies evaluated participant satisfaction, which was mostly qualitative. Seven studies also included the frequency of mistreatment reports; either surveys to assess perception of the frequency of mistreatment or the frequency of reports via official reporting channels. Five mistreatment program curricula from MedEdPORTAL were also identified; of these, only 2 presented outcome data.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There are very few published programs attempting to address mistreatment of medical trainees. This review identifies a gap in the literature and provides advice for reporting on mistreatment programs.