Beyond demographics: Missing sociodemographics in surgical research

Randomized controlled trials in the shoulder arthroplasty literature rarely include key demographic and socioeconomic patient data

BACKGROUND

It is well known that socioeconomic and demographic variables can greatly affect health outcomes. Previous studies across medical and surgical subspecialties have demonstrated that these variables are frequently under-reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). No such study currently exists that examines rates of reporting of sociodemographic variables in shoulder arthroplasty RCTs. This study aims to present these rates and explore the impact of failing to report socioeconomic variables in shoulder arthroplasty RCTs.

METHODS

The PubMed database was queried for the term shoulder arthroplasty. Sixty-five RCTs from the past 10 years were identified for inclusion from 5 high-impact orthopedic surgery journals. Each RCT was analyzed for patient age and sex or gender as well as the following sociodemographic variables: race, ethnicity, insurance status, income, work status, and education. It was also noted whether each of the above variable was mentioned in the results section of the article. Data were presented in a descriptive fashion as well as analyzed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests where appropriate.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2023, the 65 shoulder arthroplasty RCTs published reported age in 40 of 65 (61.5%) in their results sections and 61 of 65 (93.8%) in any section. Sex or gender was reported in 27 of 65 (41.5%) in their results sections and 61 of 65 (93.8%) in any section. No articles included any sociodemographic variables in the results section. Reporting rates for sociodemographic variables in any section were as follows: race, 6 of 65 (9.2%); ethnicity, 5 of 65 (7.7%); work status, 4 of 65 (6.2%); and insurance status, 1 of 65 (1.5%). No studies included income or education of the enrolled patients. There was no difference in reporting sociodemographic variables by journal (P = .45) or by year of publication (P = .57). However, no study prior to 2020 included any sociodemographic variable (0 of 27, 0%), whereas from 2020 onward 6 studies included at least 1 (6 of 38, 15.8%). Sociodemographic variables were reported significantly less frequently than age and sex or gender (P = .001).

DISCUSSION

Our study found sociodemographic variables are rarely reported in shoulder arthroplasty RCTs, whereas age and sex or gender are reported with great frequency. In order to understand the results of shoulder arthroplasty RCTs, apply their findings to the care of our patients, and address health disparities, we must ensure these studies include patient sociodemographic data.

Improving Randomized-Controlled Trials in Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics: The Need to Include Sociodemographic Patient Data

BACKGROUND

The representation of sociodemographic data within randomized-controlled trials (RCT) regarding foot and ankle surgery is undefined. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of sociodemographic data being reported in contemporary foot and ankle RCTs.

METHODS

Randomized-controlled trials within the PubMed database from 2016 to 2021 were searched and the full text of 40 articles was reviewed to identify sociodemographic variables reported in the manuscript. Data regarding race, ethnicity, insurance status, income, work status, and education were collected.

RESULTS

Race was reported in the results in 4 studies (10.0%), ethnicity in 1 (2.5%), insurance status in 0 (0%), income in 1 (2.5%), work status in 3 (7.5%) and education in 2 (5.0%). In any section other than the results, race was reported in 6 studies (15.0%), ethnicity in 1 (2.5%), insurance status in 3 (7.5%), income in 6 (15.0%), work status in 6 (15.0%), and education in 3 (7.5%). There was no difference in sociodemographic data by journal (P = .212), year of publication (P = .216), or outcome study (P = .604).

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of sociodemographic data reported in foot and ankle RCTs is low. There was no difference in the reporting of sociodemographic data between journal, year of publication, or outcome study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Postacute Care Utilization and Episode of Care Payments Following Common Elective Operations

OBJECTIVE

To describe PAC utilization and associated payments for patients undergoing common elective procedures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Utilization and costs of PAC are well described for benchmarked conditions and operations but remain understudied for common elective procedures.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of adult patients in a statewide administrative claims database undergoing elective cholecystectomy, ventral or incisional hernia repair (VIHR), and groin hernia repair from 2012 to 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds of PAC utilization, and multivariable linear regression to determine the association of 90-day episode of care payments and PAC utilization.

RESULTS

Among 34,717 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy, 0.7% utilized PAC resulting in significantly higher payments ($19,047 vs $7830, P < 0.001). Among 29,826 patients undergoing VIHR, 1.7% utilized PAC resulting in significantly higher payments ($19,766 vs $9439, P < 0.001). Among 37,006 patients undergoing groin hernia repair, 0.3% utilized PAC services resulting in significantly higher payments ($14,886 vs $8062, P < 0.001). We found both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with PAC utilization. Morbid obesity was associated with PAC utilization following VIHR [odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-2.02, P < 0.001]. Male sex was associated with lower odds of PAC utilization for VIHR (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35-0.51, P < 0.001) and groin hernia repair (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.98, P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

We found both modifiable (eg, obesity) and nonmodifiable (eg, female sex) patient factors that were associated with PAC. Optimizing patients to reduce PAC utilization requires an understanding of patient risk factors and systems and processes to address these factors.

Call to Action for Enhanced Equity and Inclusion in Cannabis Research

Introduction: Policies regarding cannabis use are rapidly evolving in the United States as exemplified by the legalization of recreational use in 11 states and the District of Columbia. Previous cannabis-related laws, however, disproportionately targeted communities of color before legalization, and many argue new policies are not being developed with the input of minority stakeholders postlegalization. Given that biomedical research has also historically underrepresented communities of color, there is an obligation on the part of researchers now to actively work toward improving equity in cannabis research at a time when the field is rapidly expanding. This is particularly important for research concerning therapeutic uses of cannabis and risk liabilities. Objective: This article is a call to action to improve equity and inclusion in cannabis research design and practice. Specifically, it includes three recommendations focusing on (1) inclusiveness of recruitment, (2) improve demographic reporting in articles, and (3) strengthening publication requirements. Conclusion: These efforts will enhance the shared values and ethics of our field and improve the quality and validity of our research findings moving forward.