Establishing best practices for structured NSQIP review

Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Baseline frailty status has been utilized to predict a wide range of outcomes and guide preoperative decision making in neurosurgery. This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature on the utilization of frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that utilized baseline frailty status to predict outcomes after a neurosurgical intervention were included in this systematic review. Studies that utilized sarcopenia as the sole measure of frailty were excluded. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was searched from inception to March 1st, 2023, to identify relevant articles.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 244 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was the most utilized frailty measure (N.=91, 37.2%) followed by the five-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) (N.=80, 32.7%). Spine surgery was the most common subspecialty (N.=131, 53.7%), followed by intracranial tumor resection (N.=57, 23.3%), and post-operative complications were the most reported outcome (N.=130, 53.2%) in neurosurgical frailty studies. The USA and the Bowers author group published the greatest number of articles within the study period (N.=176, 72.1% and N.=37, 15.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty literature has grown exponentially over the years and has been incorporated into neurosurgical decision making. Although a wide range of frailty indices exist, their utility may vary according to their ability to be incorporated in the outpatient clinical setting.

Surgeon volumes: preserving appropriate surgical outcomes in higher-risk patient populations undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction

BACKGROUND

It is increasingly recognized that complex abdominal wall reconstruction (cAWR) necessitates specialized training. No studies have been conducted to assess whether a volume-outcomes relationship is present in cAWR. We sought to determine if outcomes for patients undergoing cAWR varied based on surgeon volume among participants in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC).

METHODS

All patients with ventral hernias undergoing elective cAWR with component separation (lateral component release) were selected from ACHQC database. Surgeons were ranked based on annual number of cAWR procedures performed and then grouped in tertiles. Patient characteristics, hernia risk factors, operative details, and 30-days outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 9206 patients were identified, of which 310 (3.4%), 723 (7.9%) and 8173 (88.7%) cAWRs were performed by low (105 surgeons), medium (49) and high-volume (66) surgeons, respectively. Patients operated upon by high-volume surgeons tended to have more comorbidities and higher ASA class (72.5% of class ≥ III, vs 53.5%). Hernia characteristics demonstrated that high-volume surgeons more commonly operated on patients presenting with recurrent hernias (50.2% vs 42%), wider hernias (13.5 cm vs 10.5 cm), associated ostomies (13% vs 3.6%), and prior of surgical site infections (32% vs 26%, P = 0.035). High-volume surgeons more commonly performed posterior component separation procedures (92% vs 84%), utilized permanent mesh (92% vs 88%), and placed mesh in sublay position. In spite of operating on more advanced hernias, high-volume surgeons achieved comparable rates (all P > 0.4) of 30-day surgical site infections (SSI: 6.9% vs 7.1%) and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSO-PI: 8.9% vs 10%).

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume surgeons maintain comparable outcomes following cAWR despite performing operations on patients with more comorbidities and advanced hernia disease. These findings should be integrated into the debates related to regionalizing abdominal wall reconstruction procedures among high-volume surgeons.

American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as a reliable predictor of postoperative medical complications and mortality following ambulatory surgery: an analysis of 2,089,830 ACS-NSQIP outpatient cases

Background

Seventy percent of surgical procedures are currently performed in the outpatient setting. Although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification ability to predict risk has been evaluated for in-patient surgeries, an evaluation in outpatient surgeries has yet to be performed. The major goal of the current study is to determine if the ASA classification is an independent predictor for morbidity and mortality for outpatient surgeries.

Methods

The 2005 through 2016 NSQIP Participant Use Data Files were queried to extract all patients scheduled for outpatient surgery. ASA PS class was the primary independent variable of interest. The primary outcome was 30-day medical complications, defined as having one or more of the following postoperative outcomes: (1) deep vein thrombosis, (2) pulmonary embolism, (3) reintubation, (4) failure to wean from ventilator, (5) renal insufficiency, (6) renal failure, (7) stroke, (8) cardiac arrest, (9) myocardial infarction, (10) pneumonia, (11) urinary tract infection, (12) systemic sepsis or septic shock. Mortality was also evaluated as a separate outcome.

Results

A total of 2,089,830 cases were included in the study. 24,777 (1.19%) patients had medical complications and 1,701 (0.08%) died within 30 days. ASA PS IV patients had a much greater chance of dying when compared to healthy patients, OR (95%CI) of 89 (55 to 143), P < 0.001. Nonetheless, over 30,000 ASA PS IV patients had surgery in the outpatient setting. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a stepwise independent association between ASA PS class and medical complications (C statistic = 0.70), mortality (C statistic = 0.74) and readmissions (C statistic = 0.67). Risk stratifying ability was maintained across surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques.

Conclusions

ASA PS class is a simple risk stratification tool for surgeries in the outpatient setting. Patients with higher ASA PS classes subsequently developed medical complications or mortality at a greater frequency than patients with lower ASA PS class after outpatient surgery. Our results suggest that the ambulatory setting may not be able to match the needs of high-risk patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01256-6.

The association between surgical duration and venous thromboembolism in outpatient surgery: A propensity score adjusted prospective cohort study

Background

Outpatient surgeries account for 60–70% of all procedures. Increased surgical duration has been demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTEs) after inpatient surgeries. In contrast, it is currently unknown if surgical duration increases the risk of VTEs for outpatient surgeries.

Materials and methods

The 2005 through 2016 NSQIP Participant Use Data Files were queried to extract all patients scheduled for outpatient surgery. A z-score for surgical duration was calculated for each procedure to allow for standardization across surgeries of expected shorter or longer duration. The primary outcome measured was incidence of VTEs within 30 days of surgery.

Results

A total of 3474 patients out of 1,863,523 (0.19%) had a VTE. After adjusting for confounding factors, the first and fifth quintiles compared to the middle quintile had odds ratios (ORs) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.68, 0.80) and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.35%–1.52%), respectively, P < 0.001. Patients who developed VTEs were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital, OR (95%CI) of 51.9 (48.0–56.2), C statistic = 0.67.

Conclusion

Surgical duration is associated with the development of VTEs after outpatient surgery. While the overall incidence of VTE is low and does not require generalized prophylaxis, clinical practitioners should consider prophylaxis for patients undergoing outpatient surgery performed with excessive time compared to the average surgical procedure duration.

•

Surgical duration is related with VTE development 30 days within outpatient surgery.

•

Long outpatient surgeries resulted in a 1.43-fold increase in developing a VTE.

•

Short outpatient surgeries resulted in a 25% reduction in developing a VTE.

•

ENT surgery had the lowest VTE incidence while vascular surgery had the highest.

•

Patients who developed VTEs were 52 times more likely to be readmitted.