Decision making and informed consent in uterus transplant recipients: A mixed-methods study of the Dallas uterus transplant study (DUETS) participants

Motivations for uterus transplantation in women with absolute uterine factor infertility: A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Uterine transplantation is indicated for women with absolute uterine factor infertility, which is usually associated with congenital causes (the most common being Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome) or acquired via hysterectomy. For these women, uterus transplantation is the only possibility for them to be able to conceive and have a biological child. The aim of this study was to understand the motivations that lead women with absolute uterine factor infertility to wish to undergo a uterus transplant.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS.

RESULTS

439 articles were identified, and nine studies were finally selected. Uterine transplantation was the preferred choice over adoption and surrogacy in most studies (ranging from 45 % to 97.5 %). The main motivations for this type of transplant include the desire to conceive a pregnancy, the desire to have a genetic child, the desire to have control over pregnancy, the physiological repair of the body, the restoration of femininity, and the desire to contribute to science.

CONCLUSION

The motivations for uterus transplantation go far beyond the desire to get pregnant and include personal and unique motivations.

How do women with Rokitansky syndrome and healthcare professionals reflect on the provision of uterine transplantation? Insights from an interview study in France, Norway, and Sweden

INTRODUCTION

Uterine transplantation is currently intended for women with absolute uterine infertility. Since proof of the concept in 2014, many countries have started research programs and clinical activities. However, access to uterine transplantation remains limited given that only a few hundred transplants have been described worldwide compared with the 1.5 million women of childbearing age who suffer from absolute uterine infertility. The aim of this study was to investigate how limited access to uterine transplantation is perceived by women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and health professionals involved in uterus transplantation programs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study with semistructured interviews in France, Norway, and Sweden with women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and health professional involved in uterine transplantation programs. The interviews were analyzed manually using thematic content analysis. The research questions were: How do (a) women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and (b) healthcare professionals involved in uterus transplantation programs perceive uterus transplantation and its accessibility 10 years after proof of concept?

RESULTS

The interviews enabled us to highlight a number of themes addressed by doctors and women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, the main ones being the hope raised by this technique and the disappointment for those who do not have access to it, the lack of perception of the risks associated with the technique, and finally, an inequity of access and the training difficulties this entails for the teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to uterine transplantation varies widely across Europe owing to legislative restrictions and limited access due to resources or competence. The result is a feeling of injustice/misunderstanding and despair for these women who had planned to become parents and cannot benefit from a transplant. They appear to be poorly supported. Women who are ultimately unable to access a transplant program should perhaps be given psychological support to deal with this disappointment, whereas the minority who finally have had access to transplant programs are supervised by well-trained multidisciplinary teams.

The journey from infertility to uterus transplantation: A qualitative study of the perspectives of participants in the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess how absolute uterine factor infertility affects women who undergo uterus transplantation, how uterus transplantation impacts women with absolute uterine factor infertility and how uterus transplant recipients view uterus transplantation in terms of their reproductive autonomy.

DESIGN

Qualitative semi-structured interview study.

SETTING

Uterus transplant programme in a large academic medical centre in the USA.

POPULATION/SAMPLE

Twenty one uterus transplant recipients.

METHODS

A medical chart review was conducted to collect patient demographic information and clinical outcomes. Semi-structured interviews collected information regarding participants' experience.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The outcomes of interest were participants' experience of infertility, experience with uterus transplantation and general perceptions of uterus transplantation.

RESULTS

Six participants were pregnant (one with a second child), six had experienced early graft failure and removal, five had delivered a healthy baby, and four had a viable graft and were awaiting embryo transfer. The primary themes identified were: the negative impact of absolute uterine factor infertility diagnosis on psychological wellbeing, relationships and female identity; the positive impact of uterus transplantation on healing the emotional scars of absolute uterine factor infertility, female identity and value of research trial participation and the perception of uterus transplantation as an expansion of reproductive autonomy. All participants reported that uterus transplantation was worthwhile, regardless of individual outcome.

CONCLUSION

Absolute uterine factor infertility has a negative impact on women from a young age, affects multiple relationships and challenges female identity. Uterus transplantation helps to reverse this impact, transforming women's life narrative of infertility and enhancing female identity.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) adversely affects women. Uterus transplantation helps mitigate the negative impact of AUFI, by transforming women's life narratives of infertility and enhancing female identity.

Uterus transplantation - donor and recipient work-up

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is transitioning from an experimental procedure to a clinical treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). Standardized protocols for the evaluation and selection of donors and recipients that maximize chances of success - a healthy live birth - are needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

To date, recipient eligibility has been limited to otherwise healthy women with AUFI who are of childbearing age and are good candidates for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). For donors (living or deceased), selection criteria vary, apart from basic requirements of blood-type compatibility and freedom from critical infectious diseases, but generally require a term birth and a uterus free from uterine pathologies. The stepwise evaluation process for candidate recipients and living donors moves through health screening (medical and psychosocial); initial selection committee review; IVF (recipients only); and final selection committee review. This eliminates candidates with poor chances of success before exposure to unnecessary risks.

SUMMARY

The currently stringent selection criteria for prospective recipients and donors will likely broaden, as UTx becomes more widely available. Continued research is needed to define the donor, recipient and uterine graft factors associated with successful outcomes, and to support the development of standardized selection criteria.

Uterus transplantation: ethical considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uterus transplantation (Utx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility the opportunity to carry their own pregnancies. As Utx transitions from an experimental to standard clinical procedure, we review the status of the ethical issues applicable to the stakeholders involved.

RECENT FINDINGS

With more than 65 Utx procedures reported to date, evidence is accruing that enables the chance of success - a live birth - for the recipient to be weighed against the risks the recipient incurs through the Utx process, as well as risks to living donors undergoing surgery, to children exposed in utero to immunosuppressants and the uterine graft environment, and to third parties related to uterus procurement from multiorgan deceased donors. Experience has also informed aspects of recipient and donor autonomy that must be safeguarded.

SUMMARY

Clinical trial results provides a basis for weighing the interests of the stakeholders implicated in Utx, and so can inform transplant centers' and regulatory bodies' development of policies and protocols that will determine access to Utx and allocation of organs, together with other considerations of justice. Additional evidence, particularly on long-term outcomes, is needed, and new questions can be expected to arise as access to and indications for Utx broaden.