Outcomes of En bloc resection followed by reconstruction of giant cell tumor around knee and distal radius. A case series

Unusual Multiple Recurrences of Soft Tissue Giant Cell Tumors in a Patient Above 60 Years

Primary giant cell tumors of soft tissues (GCT-ST) are rare neoplasms that share histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics with osseous giant cell tumors. While GCT-ST generally exhibits a benign progression and can affect individuals of various ages, older patients may face a higher risk of recurrence and aggressive disease progression. In this case report, we present the case of a 63-year-old woman who experienced recurrent GCT-ST nine months after the complete excision of an initially localized tumor. Despite the mainstay treatment of GCT-ST being tumor-free margin surgical excision, this case demonstrates the occurrence of recurrences. The etiology of recurrence in GCT-ST remains unclear, highlighting the need for further studies and careful patient follow-up to prevent potential complications such as lung metastasis or widespread metastasis. Thus, this report aims to raise awareness of these tumors and emphasize the importance of diligent patient follow-up to facilitate early identification and management, thereby preventing potential complications such as lung or widespread metastasis.

Reconstruction After En Bloc Resection of a Distal Radius Tumor. An Updated and Concise Review

The distal radius is rarely affected by either primary or metastatic bone cancers. The most frequent tumors of the distal radius are giant cell tumors, which are benign tumors with the propensity to invade. En bloc excision of giant cell tumors of the distal radius achieves a low recurrence rate but compromises the wrist joint, necessitates a significant reconstruction, and has functional consequences. Reconstruction after en bloc resection of a distal radius bone tumor is challenging. Furthermore, orthopedic oncologists disagree on treating such long bone anomalies most effectively. The present article summarizes the various biological and non-biological reconstruction techniques performed after en bloc resection of a distal radius tumor, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each reconstruction strategy, and summarizes several case studies and case reports.

Aseptic loosening of tumor prostheses in distal femur after revision surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Tumor prostheses of the distal femur after revision surgery is associated with high rates of aseptic loosening, which has introduced great challenges to the survival of patients, but only a few studies have evaluated their X-ray imaging. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors for recurrence of aseptic loosening and make recommendations to reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening after revision surgery of tumor prostheses in the distal femur.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 patients who had revision surgery for distal femur prostheses due to aseptic loosening between June 2002 and June 2021. They were divided into two groups based on the condition of the prostheses after revision surgery: loosening group (9 patients) and control group (14 patients). Following the initial replacement, the length and diameter of the prosthetic intramedullary stem were measured through the standard full-length anteroposterior X-ray imaging of both lower limbs. The osteotomy length, femoral length and diameter, femoral intramedullary stem diameter, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and so on were measured as well. Following that, statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Patients in the loosening group had statistically significant differences in the ratio of prostheses length to femur length (71.89 ± 6.62) and the ratio of intramedullary stem diameter to femoral diameter (25.50 ± 6.90) (P < 0.05), when compared to the control group. The HKAA (175.58 ± 2.78), mLDFA (94.42 ± 2.57), and the deviation angle between the lower limb alignment and the tibial prostheses force line (2.23 ± 1.09) in the loosening group were significantly different from those in the control group (P < 0.05) on postoperative radiographs of the entire length of the lower limbs. The lowest score in intramedullary manubrium I indicated less osteolysis, while the highest score in intramedullary manubrium III indicated the most serious osteolysis, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the use of longer and thicker intramedullary stems can effectively decrease the occurrence of aseptic loosening. Additionally, it is important to avoid using the original prostheses and reconstruct the standard line of lower limb force to further reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening. It is crucial to closely monitor the distal segment of the intramedullary stem for osteolysis after surgery.

Single-Centre Experience Regarding the Use of Fibular Graft for Reconstruction after Resection of Grade III GCT of Distal Radius

Background: A giant cell tumour (GCT) is a locally invasive benign tumour of bone in young adults. Treatment includes surgical resection as first-line or denosumab pharmacotherapy in inoperable patients. However, surgical resection of distal radius GCT has produced debatable functional outcomes. Here we study the use of fibular grafts for reconstruction of surgically resected GCT of the distal radius. Methods: A total of 11 patients having Grade III GCT of the distal radius were recruited for a retrospective single-centred study. Five underwent arthrodesis with fibular shaft graft and six received arthroplasty with the proximal fibula. Functional outcomes at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months were measured by Mayo wrist score (MWS) (>51% = good) and Revised Musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score (>15 = good). Results: At 6 weeks, mean MSTS score and MWS were 23.64 and 58.64% respectively, and the length of the fibular graft was a predictor for both MSTS score (p = 0.014) and MWS (p = 0.006). At 6 months, the mean MSTS and MWS were 26.36 and 76.82%, respectively. At 6 months, the surgical procedure was a predictor in MSTS score (p = 0.02) while MWS was predicted by length of graft (p = 0.02). At 12 months, MSTS score was 28.73, and MWS remained 91.82%. Length of the fibular graft was an insignificant predictor, but a significant risk factor was surgical procedure for MWS (p = 0.04) at 12 months. No variable was found significant for MSTS score. Conclusions: Resection along with reconstruction of Grade III GCT of the radius with fibular graft was found an optimal treatment option. Also, use of the fibular head grafts and shorter length grafts are predictors for better outcomes after surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).