Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced/DWI MRI and ultrasonography in the differentiation between benign and malignant myometrial tumors

Prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Five electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2022 for all studies allowing calculation of the prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma. Pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for each sonographic sign and was a priori defined as "very high" when it was ≥ 80%, "high" when it ranged from 80% to 70%, and less relevant when it was ≤ 70%.

RESULTS

6 studies with 317 sarcoma patients were included. The pooled prevalence was: · 25.0% (95%CI:15.4-37.9%) for absence of visibility of the myometrium. · 80.5% (95%CI:74.8-85.2%) for solid component. · 78.3% (95%CI:59.3-89.9%) for inhomogeneous echogenicity of solid component. · 47.9% (95%CI:41.1-54.8%) for cystic areas. · 80.7% (95%CI:68.3-89.0%) for irregular walls of cystic areas. · 72.3% (95%CI:16.7-97.2%) for anechoic cystic areas. · 54.8% (95%CI:34.0-74.1%) for absence of shadowing. · 73.5% (95%CI:43.3-90.9%) for absence of calcifications. · 48.7% (95%CI:18.6-79.8%) for color score 3 or 4. · 47.3% (95%CI:37.0-57.8%) for irregular tumor borders. · 45.4% (95%CI:27.6-64.3%) for endometrial cavity not visualizable. · 10.9% (95%CI:3.5-29.1%) for free pelvic fluid. · 6.4% (95%CI:1.1-30.2%) for ascites. · 21.2% (95%CI:2.1-76.8%) for intracavitary process. · 81.5% (95%CI:56.1-93.8%) for singular lesion..

CONCLUSION

Solid component, irregular walls of cystic areas, and singular lesions are signs with very high prevalence, while inhomogeneous echogenicity of solid component, anechoic cystic areas, and absence of calcifications are signs with high prevalence. The remaining signs were less relevant.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas is challenging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the second-line diagnostic method after ultrasound for the assessment of uterine masses.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed searching five electronic databases from their inception to June 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All peer-reviewed observational or randomized clinical trials that reported an unbiased postoperative histologic diagnosis of uterine leiomyoma or uterine sarcoma, which also comprehended a preoperative MRI evaluation of the uterine mass.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve on summary receiver operating characteristic of MRI in differentiating uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas were calculated as individual and pooled estimates, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Eight studies with 2495 women (2253 with uterine leiomyomas and 179 with uterine sarcomas), were included. MRI showed pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.94), specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.96-0.97), positive likelihood ratio of 13.55 (95% CI 6.20-29.61), negative likelihood ratio of 0.08 (95% CI 0.02-0.32), diagnostic odds ratio of 175.13 (95% CI 46.53-659.09), and area under the curve of 0.9759.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas.

Sonographic and Magnetic Resonance Characteristics of Gynecological Sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Gynecological sarcomas are rare malignant tumors with an incidence of 1.5-3/100,000 and are 3-9% of all malignant uterine tumors. The preoperative differentiation between sarcoma and myoma becomes increasingly important with the development of minimally invasive treatments for myomas, as this means undertreatment for sarcoma. There are currently no reliable laboratory tests or imaging-characteristics to detect sarcomas. The objective of this article is to gain an overview of sarcoma US/MRI characteristics and assess their accuracy for preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed and 12 studies on ultrasound and 21 studies on MRI were included.

RESULTS

For the ultrasound, these key features were gathered: solid tumor > 8 cm, unsharp borders, heterogeneous echogenicity, no acoustic shadowing, rich vascularization, and cystic changes within. For the MRI, these key features were gathered: irregular borders; heterogeneous; high signal on T2WI intensity; and hemorrhagic and necrotic changes, with central non-enhancement, hyperintensity on DWI, and low values for ADC.

CONCLUSIONS

These features are supported by the current literature. In retrospective analyses, the ultrasound did not show a sufficient accuracy for diagnosing sarcoma preoperatively and could also not differentiate between the different subtypes. The MRI showed mixed results: various studies achieved high sensitivities in their analysis, when combining multiple characteristics. Overall, these findings need further verification in prospective studies with larger study populations.

Advances in the Preoperative Identification of Uterine Sarcoma

Simple Summary

As a lethal malignant tumor, uterine sarcomas lack specific diagnostic criteria due to their similar presentation with uterine fibroids, clinicians are prone to make the wrong diagnosis or adopt incorrect treatment methods, which leads to rapid tumor progression and increased metastatic propensity. In recent years, with the improvement of medical level and awareness of uterine sarcoma, more and more studies have proposed new methods for preoperative differentiation of uterine sarcoma and uterine fibroids. This review outlines the up-to-date knowledge about preoperative differentiation of uterine sarcoma and uterine fibroids, including laboratory tests, imaging examinations, radiomics and machine learning-related methods, preoperative biopsy, integrated model and other relevant emerging technologies, and provides recommendations for future research.

Abstract

Uterine sarcomas are rare malignant tumors of the uterus with a high degree of malignancy. Their clinical manifestations, imaging examination findings, and laboratory test results overlap with those of uterine fibroids. No reliable diagnostic criteria can distinguish uterine sarcomas from other uterine tumors, and the final diagnosis is usually only made after surgery based on histopathological evaluation. Conservative or minimally invasive treatment of patients with uterine sarcomas misdiagnosed preoperatively as uterine fibroids will shorten patient survival. Herein, we will summarize recent advances in the preoperative diagnosis of uterine sarcomas, including epidemiology and clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, imaging examinations, radiomics and machine learning-related methods, preoperative biopsy, integrated model and other relevant emerging technologies.