1
|
Taribagil P, Liu T, Bhattacharya V, Taribagil S. Do we need a co-pilot in the operating theatre? A cross-sectional study on surgeons' perceptions. Scott Med J 2023; 68:166-174. [PMID: 37849300 DOI: 10.1177/00369330231207989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this original study was to investigate general surgeons' perceptions on the role of dual surgeon operating for high-risk, elective complex surgical procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS A 21-part cross-sectional online survey was self-completed by 85 general surgeons across hospitals in the UK. The survey assessed the perception of dual surgeon operating on patient morbidity and mortality, surgeons' burnout rates, complaints, patient waiting times and overall trainee experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.6.1. RESULTS Overall 78.8% believed that dual surgeon operating could help to overcome these human factors. Sub-analysis includes improve surgeon fatigue (89.4%), improve confidence (83.5%), improve decision-making (76.5%), minimise technical error (69.4%), improve communication, team work and leadership skills (65.9%). 65.9% believed it would reduce surgeons' burnout. There was a statistically significant relationship between the participants believing it would reduce surgeons' burnout and those who felt it would reduce complaints, Chi-squared(4) = [30.8], p = [0.00000342]. A statistically significant relationship was noted between participants believing it would reduce surgeons' burnout and those who felt it would reduce patient mortality/morbidity, Chi-squared(4) = [19.9], p = [0.000517]. CONCLUSION The survey has highlighted positive surgeons' perceptions regarding dual surgeon operating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timing Liu
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Fellow, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vish Bhattacharya
- Consultant General and Vascular Surgeon, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK
| | - Sanjay Taribagil
- Consultant General and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeon, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hijos-Mallada G, Alfaro E, Navarro M, Cañamares P, Ariño I, Charro M, Bruno C, Solano M, Pardillos A, Jimeno C, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Lanas A, Domper-Arnal MJ. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in colorectal cancer diagnosis and presentation. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2023; 46:702-709. [PMID: 36716926 PMCID: PMC9882881 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a decrease in the colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, due to the disruption of screening programmes and a downscaling of endoscopic activity. The endpoint of this study is to evaluate if the pandemic has led to a change in CRC diagnostic rate and presentation in our population. METHODS Multicenter retrospective study of all public hospitals of the Aragon region, attending a population of 1,329,391 inhabitants. We have analyzed all CRC cases detected and endoscopic units workload the year before the pandemic onset (1 March 2019-14 March 2020) and the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (15 March 2020-28 February 2021). RESULTS The diagnosis of CRC cases dropped a 38.9% (888 pre-pandemic vs 542 pandemic cases). Also, there were 30.3% less colonoscopies performed (24,860 vs 17,337). During the pandemic, CRC cases were diagnosed in older patients (72.4±12.2 vs 71.2±12.1 years, p=0.021), and had more frequently severe complications at diagnosis (14.6% vs 10.4%, p=0.019). Moreover, most CRC cases were diagnosed in symptomatic patients (81.4%). No significant difference was found in CRC stage at diagnosis, although stage IV was more frequent (20.1% vs 16.1%). Most hospitals reported a lower workload of endoscopic activity. CONCLUSION CRC diagnostic rate was lower after the onset of the pandemic. CRC was diagnosed in older patients and was more frequently associated with complications. After the onset of the pandemic, the endoscopic units did not reach the workload performed previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Hijos-Mallada
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Enrique Alfaro
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Carrera-Lasfuentes
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Spain; Universidad San Jorge, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Angel Lanas
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Spain; University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Domper-Arnal
- Lozano Blesa University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain; Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain; University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tarta C, Marian M, Capitanio M, Faur FI, Duta C, Diaconescu R, Oprescu-Macovei AM, Totolici B, Dobrescu A. The Challenges of Colorectal Cancer Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania: A Three-Year Retrospective Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14320. [PMID: 36361200 PMCID: PMC9658781 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The predictions on the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on access to medical services in Romania predicted a 35% drop in oncological hospitalizations in 2020 compared to the previous decade, raising the hypothesis that patients with colorectal cancer can become indirect victims of the ongoing pandemic. Therefore, the aim of the current research was to observe how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced colorectal cancer surgery in Romania, to determine the level of addressability towards specialized care, to compare the cancer staging between the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods, and to observe the risk factors for disease progression. This retrospective study was spread over three years, respectively, from March 2019 to March 2022, and included a total of 198 patients with a history of colorectal cancer surgery. It was decided to perform a parallel comparison of 2019, 2020, and 2021 to observe any significant changes during the pandemic. Our clinic encountered a significant decrease in all interventions during the pandemic; although the number of CRC surgeries remained constant, the cases were more difficult, with significantly more patients presenting in emergency situations, from 31.3% in 2019 to 50.0% in 2020 and 57.1% in 2021. Thus, the number of elective surgeries decreased significantly. The proportion of TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging was, however, statistically significant between the pre-pandemic and pandemic period. In 2019, 13.3% of patients had stage IIa, compared with 28.8% in 2020 and 13.1% in 2021. Similarly, the proportion of very advanced colorectal cancer was higher during the pandemic period of 2020 and 2021 (12.0% in 2019 vs. 12.5% in 2020 and 25.0% in 2021), which was represented by a significantly higher proportion of patients with bowel perforation. Patients with an advanced TNM stage had a 6.28-fold increased risk of disease progression, followed by lymphovascular invasion (HR = 5.19). However, the COVID-19 pandemic, represented by admission years 2020 and 2021, did not pose a significant risk for disease progression and mortality. In-hospital mortality during the pandemic also did not change significantly. After the pandemic restrictions have been lifted, it would be advisable to conduct a widespread colorectal cancer screening campaign in order to identify any instances of the disease that went undetected during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristi Tarta
- Department X, 2nd Surgical Clinic of General Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Marco Marian
- Department X, 2nd Surgical Clinic of General Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Marco Capitanio
- Department X, 2nd Surgical Clinic of General Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Flaviu Ionut Faur
- Department X, 2nd Surgical Clinic of General Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ciprian Duta
- Department X, 2nd Surgical Clinic of General Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Razvan Diaconescu
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
| | - Anca Monica Oprescu-Macovei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Emergency Hospital “Prof. Dr. Agripa Ionescu”, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan Totolici
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
| | - Amadeus Dobrescu
- Department X, 2nd Surgical Clinic of General Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Domper-Arnal MJ, Hijos-Mallada G, Lanas Á. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221117636. [PMID: 36035306 PMCID: PMC9403473 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221117636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to healthcare systems worldwide, causing downscaling of almost all other activities, especially in its early stages. Currently, the availability of vaccines along with the spread of new viral variants has modified the epidemiology of the disease, and the previous activity is being gradually resumed in most healthcare facilities. In this review, we have summarized the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Population-based screening with either colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests has proven to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, so screening programs have been implemented in most western countries. However, during the first COVID-19 wave, most of these programs had to be disrupted temporarily. In this review, we have thoroughly analyzed the consequences of these disruptions of screening programs as well as of the forced delays in diagnostic and therapeutic services on CRC prognosis, although its exact impact cannot be exactly measured yet. In any way, strategies to minimize its effect, such as catch-up strategies expanding the colonoscopy capacity or using fecal occult blood concentration and other risk factors to prioritize patients, are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to a change in CRC patient presentation, with an overall temporary decreased incidence due to postponed diagnoses, but with more patients presenting in need of an emergency admission or with symptoms. Finally, changes in treatment approaches in CRC patients have been reported during the pandemic, namely a drop in the proportion of laparoscopic surgeries or a rise in short-term radiotherapy courses. We have therefore aimed to summarize the available evidence to guide the healthcare professionals treating CRC patients to choose the best treatment options in the current pandemic situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ángel Lanas
- Service of Digestive Diseases, University
Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain,Aragón Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón),
Zaragoza, Spain,CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain,University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|