Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications

Enhancing Lymph Node Yield in Gastric Cancer Resection: Impact of Back Table Dissection on Number of Lymph Node Examined

INTRODUCTION

During gastric cancer resection, back table dissection (BTD) involves examination and separation of lymph node (LN) packets from the surgical specimen based on LN stations, which are sent to pathology as separately labeled specimens. With potential impact on clinical outcomes, we aimed to explore how BTD affects number of LNs examined.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a gastric cancer database was performed, including all cases of gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy from January 2009 to March 2022. Back table dissection and conventional groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to identify potential predictors of number of LN examined.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were identified: 39 (22%) BTD and 135 (78%) conventional. More patients in the BTD group underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (62% vs 29%, P < .05). Compared to the conventional group, the BTD group had a greater number of LNs examined (42 [26-59] vs 21[15-33], median [IQR], P < .001), lower LN positivity ratio (.01 vs .07, P = .013), and greater number of LNs in patients with BMI >35 (32.5[27.5-39] vs 22[13-27], P = .041). A multiple linear regression model controlling for age, BMI, preoperative N stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgeon experience, and operative approach identified BTD as a significant positive predictor of number of LN examined (β = 19.7, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Back table dissection resulted in improved LN yield during gastric cancer resection. As a simple technical addition, BTD helps enhance pathology examination and improve surgeon awareness, which may ultimately translate to improve oncologic outcomes.

Prediction of lymph node metastasis in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma based on dual-energy CT radiomics: focus on the features of lymph nodes with a short axis diameter ≥6 mm

Objective

To explore the value of the features of lymph nodes (LNs) with a short-axis diameter ≥6 mm in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) based on dual-energy CT (DECT) radiomics.

Materials and methods

Data of patients with GAC who underwent radical gastrectomy and LN dissection were retrospectively analyzed. To ensure the correspondence between imaging and pathology, metastatic LNs were only selected from patients with pN3, nonmetastatic LNs were selected from patients with pN0, and the short-axis diameters of the enrolled LNs were all ≥6 mm. The traditional features of LNs were recorded, including short-axis diameter, long-axis diameter, long-to-short-axis ratio, position, shape, density, edge, and the degree of enhancement; univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to establish a clinical model. Radiomics features at the maximum level of LNs were extracted in venous phase equivalent 120 kV linear fusion images and iodine maps. Intraclass correlation coefficients and the Boruta algorithm were used to screen significant features, and random forest was used to build a radiomics model. To construct a combined model, we included the traditional features with statistical significance in univariate analysis and radiomics scores (Rad-score) in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating curve (ROC) curves and the DeLong test were used to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of the models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical benefits of the models.

Results

This study included 114 metastatic LNs from 36 pN3 cases and 65 nonmetastatic LNs from 28 pN0 cases. The samples were divided into a training set (n=125) and a validation set (n=54) at a ratio of 7:3. Long-axis diameter and LN shape were independent predictors of LNM and were used to establish the clinical model; 27 screened radiomics features were used to build the radiomics model. LN shape and Rad-score were independent predictors of LNM and were used to construct the combined model. Both the radiomics model (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.986 and 0.984) and the combined model (AUC of 0.970 and 0.977) outperformed the clinical model (AUC of 0.772 and 0.820) in predicting LNM in both the training and validation sets. DCA showed superior clinical benefits from radiomics and combined models.

Conclusion

The models based on DECT LN radiomics features or combined traditional features have high diagnostic performance in determining the nature of each LN with a short-axis diameter of ≥6 mm in advanced GAC.

Development and validation of nomogram for predicting early recurrence after radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

After radical surgery, early detection of recurrence and metastasis is a crucial factor in enhancing the prognosis and survival of patients with gastric cancer (GC). Therefore, assessing the risk of recurrence in gastric cancer patients and determining the timing for postoperative recurrence is crucial.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data of 521 patients with recurrent gastric cancer, who underwent radical gastrectomy at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2010 and January 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: a training group (n = 365) and a validation group (n = 156). In the training set, patients were further categorized into early recurrence (n = 263) and late recurrence (n = 102) groups based on a 2-year boundary. Comparative analyses of clinicopathological features and prognoses were conducted between these two groups. Subsequently, a nomogram for predicting early recurrence was developed and validated.

RESULTS

In this study, the developed nomogram incorporated age, serous infiltration, lymph node metastasis, recurrence mode, and the tumour marker CA19-9. In the training cohort, the area under the curve (AUC value) was 0.739 (95% CI, 0.682-0.798), with a corresponding C-index of 0.739. This nomogram was subsequently validated in an independent validation cohort, yielding an AUC of 0.743 (95% CI, 0.652-0.833) and a C-index of 0.743. Furthermore, independent risk factors for prognosis were identified, including age, absence of postoperative chemotherapy, early recurrence, lymph node metastasis, abdominal metastasis, and vascular cancer embolus.

CONCLUSION

Independent risk factors for gastric cancer recurrence following radical surgery were utilized to construct a nomogram for predicting early relapse. This nomogram effectively assesses the risk of recurrence, aids in treatment decision-making and follow-up planning in clinical settings, and demonstrated strong performance in the validation cohort.

Short-and long-term outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage gastrectomy for perforated gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVE

There is no scientific consensus about the treatment of perforated gastric cancer (PGC). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate which is the better treatment option for PGC between the single-stage and two-stage strategies.

METHODS

All 81 PGC patients from 13 medical institutions were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The PGC patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy were divided into one-stage surgery and two-stage surgery groups. The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups were compared, and 415 regular gastric cancer patients without perforation were randomly selected as a control. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to find matched regular GC patients with similar clinicopathological parameters. The OS (overall survival) and the number harvested lymph nodes from PGC patients and regular GC patients were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with PGC patients who underwent one-stage surgery, those who underwent two-stage surgery harvested significantly more lymph nodes [31(27, 38) vs 17 (12, 24), P < 0.001], required less blood transfusion [0 (0, 100) vs 200 (0, 800), P = 0.034], had a shorter ICU stay [0 (0, 1.5) vs 3 (0, 3), P = 0.009], and had a significantly better OS (Median OS: 45 months vs 11 months, P = 0.007). Compared with propensity score-matched regular GC patients without perforation, PGC patients who underwent one-stage gastrectomy had a poorer quality of lymphadenectomy [17 (12, 24) vs 29 (21, 37), P < 0.001] and suffered a worse OS (Median OS: 18 months vs 30 months, P = 0.024). Conversely, two-stage gastrectomy can achieve a comparable quality of lymphadenectomy (P = 0.506) and a similar OS (P = 0.096) compared to propensity score-matched regular GC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For PGC patients in poor condition, two-stage treatment is a better option when D2 radical gastrectomy cannot be achieved in emergency surgery, based on our findings that two-stage gastrectomy could provide PGC patients with a better quality of lymphadenectomy and a better OS.

Comprehensive analysis reveals TSPEAR as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and has high morbidity and mortality rates. Previous studies have shown that TSPEAR mutations are involved in the development and progression of gastric cancer and liver cancer. However, the role of TSPEAR in CRC is still unclear. Methods: In The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, 590 CRC patients with complete survival information were analyzed. We assessed TSPEAR expression in a pan-cancer dataset from the TCGA database. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with prognosis. Enrichment analysis via the R package "clusterProfiler" was used to explore the potential function of TSPEAR. The single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) method from the R package "GSVA" and the TIMER database were used to investigate the association between the immune infiltration level and TSPEAR expression in CRC. The R package "maftools" was used to explore the association between tumour mutation burden (TMB) and TSPEAR expression in CRC. CCK-8 assays and cell invasion assays were used to detect the effect of TSPEAR and TGIF2 on the biological behavior of CRC cells. Results: Pan-cancer analysis revealed that TSPEAR was upregulated in CRC tissues compared to normal tissues and that high TSPEAR expression was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (p=0.0053). The expression of TSPEAR increased with increasing TNM stage, T stage, N stage, and M stage. The nomogram constructed with TSPEAR, age, and TNM stage showed better predictive value than TSPEAR, age, or TNM stage alone. Immune cell infiltration analysis revealed that high expression of TSPEAR was associated with lower immune cell infiltration. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) analysis indicated that high expression of TSPEAR was associated with lower TMB (p=0.005), and high TMB was associated with shorter OS (p=0.02). CCK-8 assays and cell invasion assays indicated that in vitro knockdown of TSPEAR inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CRC cells. In addition, TSPEAR expression may be regulated by the upstream transcription factor TGIF2. Conclusion: TSPEAR expression was higher in CRC tissues than in normal tissues. Its upregulation was significantly associated with a poor prognosis. Additionally, TSPEAR plays a significant role in tumor immunity and the biological behavior of CRC cells. Thus, TSPEAR may become a promising prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for CRC patients.

Diagnostic Utility of NLR, PLR and MLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer: an Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

PURPOSE

Inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are linked with the pathogenesis of gastric cancer (GC). However, the clinical significance of the combination of these markers is unclear. Hence, this study was carried out to determine the individual and combined diagnostic accuracy of NLR, PLR and MLR among patients with GC.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional study, patients were recruited into three groups, GC, precancerous lesions and age and gender-matched controls. The primary outcome was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of GC. The secondary outcome was to determine the correlation of inflammatory markers with the stage of gastric cancer, nodal involvement and metastasis.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients, 76 in each group, were enrolled. The cut-off value of NLR, PLR and MLR were 2.23, 146.8 and 0.26, respectively, for the diagnosis of GC. The diagnostic abilities of NLR, PLR and MLR were significantly high at 79, 75 and 68.4, respectively, to predict GC compared to precancerous and control groups. All the models of inflammatory markers showed excellent discrimination between GC and the controls with an AUC > 0.7. The models also showed acceptable discrimination between GC and the precancerous lesion group with AUC between 0.65 and 0.70. No significant difference was found in correlating inflammatory markers with clinicopathological features.

CONCLUSION

The discrimination capacity of the inflammatory markers could be used as screening biomarkers in diagnosing GC, even in its early stages.

Prognostic significance of a five-factor modified frailty index in patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative-intent resection: A cohort study

The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) evaluates frailty based on variables including functional status, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension requiring medication. Despite its effectiveness in predicting surgical risk, the potential of mFI-5 as a predictor of long-term survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) has not been investigated. This study aims to assess the prognostic significance of mFI-5 in patients with GC who have undergone curative-intent gastric resection. Among the 494 patients diagnosed with stage I to III GC, multivariate analysis revealed that age, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, geriatric nutritional risk index, mFI-5, and the type of gastrectomy were significant predictors for both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We assessed 3 models: Baseline model (BM, TNM stage only), interim model (IM, all significant variables except mFI-5), and full model (FM, all significant variables including mFI-5). FM outperformed BM for OS (C-index 0.818 vs 0.683; P < .001) and DFS (C-index 0.805 vs 0.687; P < .001). Similarly, IM outperformed BM for OS (C-index 0.811 vs 0.683; P < .001) and DFS (C-index 0.797 vs 0.687; P < .001). Multiple metrics consistently supported the improved discriminative capacity of FM and IM compared to BM. However, while FM exhibits enhanced predictive capacity over IM, this improvement lacks statistical significance across key metrics. In conclusion, our study highlights the clinical significance of the mFI-5, along with age, TNM stage, geriatric nutritional risk index, and type of gastrectomy, as valuable predictors of long-term survival in GC patients. The FM consistently demonstrates enhanced predictive accuracy compared to the BM. However, it is important to note that while the FM improves predictive power over the IM, this enhancement does not achieve statistical significance across multiple metrics. These findings collectively emphasize the potential clinical value of the FM as a robust tool for surgeons in predicting long-term survival outcomes before surgery in patients with GC.

Effect of transarterial chemotherapy on the outcome and prognosis of patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of transarterial infusion chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients undergoing proximal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 96 patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer diagnosed in Gansu Cancer Hospital from July 2014 to July 2017 were enrolled. Among them, 40 patients undergoing surgery after 4 cycles of intravenous + oral chemotherapy and 2-4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery were grouped as the control group (CG); the remaining 56 patients treated with left gastric artery infusion chemotherapy were grouped as the observation group (OG). The clinical efficacy, surgical regimen, adverse reactions (nausea, vomiting, and bone marrow suppression) after chemotherapy, improvement of clinical symptoms, 5-year survival, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) after treatment were compared between the two groups. Cox regression was used to analyze prognostic factors affecting PFS.

RESULTS

Compared to the CG, the OG exhibited a significantly higher overall response rate and smaller tumor volume (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01); the overall incidence of clinical symptoms in the OG was lower (P < 0.05); the proportion of patients who underwent radical resection in the OG was significantly higher (P < 0.05); nausea and vomiting symptoms were more common in the OG (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference in terms of bone marrow suppression (P > 0.05); and the OG had significantly higher 5-year progression-free survival and survival time of patients (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor stage, tumor type and treatment regimen were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Regional arterial infusion chemotherapy is an ideal neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer, which can evidently reduce the tumor lesions in a short time, increase the resection rate, and significantly prolong the PFS of the patients. The gastrointestinal side effects are comparatively significant but tolerable.

Prognostic significances of PD-L1- and CTLA-4-positive T cells and positive correlations of immunosuppressive marker expression between cancer tissue and peripheral blood in patients with gastric cancer

Introduction

Although tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging has been used for prognostic assessment of gastric cancer (GC), the prognosis may vary among patients with the same TNM stage. Recently, the TNM-Immune (TNM-I) classification staging system has been used for prognostic assessment of colorectal cancer based on intra-tumor T-cell status, which is a superior prognostic factor compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. However, an immunoscoring system with prognostic significance for GC has not been established.

Method

Here, we evaluated immune phenotypes in cancer and normal tissues, then examined correlations between tissues and peripheral blood. GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between February 2000 and May 2021 were included. We collected 43 peripheral blood samples preoperatively and a pair of gastric mucosal samples postoperatively, including normal and cancer mucosa, which did not influence tumor diagnosis and staging. Tissue microarray samples of GC were collected from 136 patients during surgery. We investigated correlations of immune phenotypes between tissues and peripheral blood using immunofluorescence imaging and flow cytometry, respectively. GC mucosa exhibited an increased number of CD4⁺ T cells, as well as increased expression levels of immunosuppressive markers (e.g., programmed death-ligand-1 [PD-L1], cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 [CTLA-4], and interleukin-10), in CD4+ T cells and non-T cells.

Result

The expression levels of immunosuppressive markers were significantly increased in cancer tissues and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In gastric mucosal tissues and peripheral blood of GC patients, similar immunosuppression phenotypes were observed, including increased numbers of PD-L1- and CTLA-4-positive T cells.

Discussion

Therefore, peripheral blood analysis may be an important tool for prognostic assessment of GC patients.

Pathological Nodal Staging Score for Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical Tool of Adequate Nodal Staging

Background: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) is a subset of gastric cancer with distinct histological and inconsistent prognosis outcome. Currently, the association between the adequate regional lymph node and proper nodal staging in GSRCC is rarely noticed. Materials and methods: Clinical data of GSRCC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Beta-binomial distribution model was employed for the estimation of the probability of missing nodal disease, followed by the development of a nodal staging score (NSS). Results: A total of 561 GSRCC patients were included in this study, with 193 in lymph node-negative and 368 in lymph node-positive diagnoses. As the number of examined lymph nodes increased, the probability of missing nodal disease decreased rapidly, with T stage-specific curves. The probability of missing nodal disease in T4 was lower than that in T1. NSS calculation indicated that T1 stage patients commonly had NSS > 0.8. However, with the NSS of T2−T4 to reach 0.8, the number of examined lymph node was required to be larger than 12 in T2, 17 in T3 and 27 in T4. NSS ≥ 0.75 (quantile 75%) subgroup in T2−T4 subgroups tended to have better outcome; however, without significant prognostic value. Conclusions: NSS is served as a reliable and feasible tool in adequate nodal staging of GSRCC with statistical basis and provides further evidence for clinical decision making.