Practical aspects of immunoglobulin replacement

Pediatric Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune neurological disorder seen in both pediatric and adult populations. CIDP typically presents with progressive and persistent weakness over at least 4 weeks in addition to sensory symptoms in the extremities. Although CIDP shares common clinical features between children and adults, it sometimes presents as a distinct clinical entity in children that requires close attention and recognition. A major caveat when diagnosing a child with CIDP is the clinical and diagnostic overlap with inherited neuropathies, most commonly Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT). Demyelinating CMT (dCMT) and CIDP might share similar clinical presentations, and sometimes it might be difficult to differentiate them on the basis of the electrodiagnostic findings or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) albumino-cytological dissociation. This indeed merits early consideration for genetic testing in patients who do not respond to conventional CIDP therapies. Current treatment options for CIDP include intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), corticosteroids (CS), and plasmapheresis (PLEX). The need for novel therapies is essential in instances where patients continue to have symptoms despite the standard therapies or due to adverse effects of long-term use of standard therapies such as CS. This paper reviews the challenges in the diagnosis of CIDP in children and the current as well as novel therapies for CIDP.

Sentiment analysis of subcutaneous and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: public healthcare perception through social media discourse

Purpose

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy remains a cornerstone of treatment in antibody deficiencies and other inborn errors of immunity. While patient preferences between subcutaneous and intravenous immunoglobulin have been studied through questionnaires, no study has yet explored patient perspectives in a free environment. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a sentiment analysis as well as a temporal and geographical analysis on public opinions obtained from social media to better understand patient satisfaction and public perception on immunoglobulin therapy.

Methods

A dataset of 43,700 tweets spanning from the 1st of January of 2012 to the 31st of December of 2022 was obtained. A Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning sentiment analysis was performed, followed by statistical, geographical and temporal analyses.

Results

Mean polarity of intravenous immunoglobulin related tweets was 0.1295 (positive), while mean polarity for subcutaneous immunoglobulin was 0.2117 (positive). Temporal analysis through a statistical model demonstrated that the volume of tweets increased over time for both subcutaneous and intravenous treatment. Geographical analysis revealed that the majority of texts originated from the United States. The highest mean polarity was observed in Romania with a mean value of 0.2966, while the lowest polarity was documented in Norway with a mean of -0.0211.

Conclusion

Tweets linked to subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment had a higher average polarity, indicating a more positive public perception. The amount of tweets relating to both therapies showed a tendency to increase as the years progressed, implying an increase in public discussion on immunoglobulin treatment.

Immunoglobulin therapy for immunodeficiency

Immunoglobulin replacement is donor-derived pooled immunoglobulin G, which provides passive immunity to patients with antibody deficiency or dysfunction. It may be administered via either intravenous or subcutaneous routes. Intravenous immunoglobulin is administered at higher doses every 3-4 weeks, whereas most forms of subcutaneous immunoglobulin are administered at lower doses, usually every 1-2 weeks. Benefits and risks, including adverse effects, convenience, and cost vary according to route of administration. Immunoglobulin products also differ in their composition, so patient-specific comorbidities are important to consider when selecting an immunoglobulin product. We discuss adverse effects associated with immunoglobulin therapy, their associated risk factors, treatment, and ways to mitigate these risks. Finally, the laboratory monitoring and vaccination recommendations for patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy are reviewed.

Immunoglobulin treatment for B-cell immunodeficiencies

This article aims to describe the rationale and utility of immunoglobulin therapies in patients with B-cell immunodeficiency states. We describe the historical perspective, mechanism of actions, and indications for use in this population. We then focus upon management pearls and special considerations for its utility. Finally, we elaborate upon the important economic implications for these patients and the need to develop individualized management strategies in this vulnerable population.

Nuts and Bolts of Subcutaneous Therapy

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is standard of care in treatment of many primary immunodeficiency diseases. The goal of replacement therapy is to reduce infections in individuals with primary immune deficiency and improve their quality of life. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is most often lifelong, therefore ease of administration is vital for adherence to treatment. Self-infusion via subcutaneous intravenous immunoglobulin (SCIG) allows patient input to design an individualized and optimal treatment plan. Because SCIG regimens are flexible and allow for increased autonomy, patients receiving SCIG report improved quality of life. This article summarizes the dosing, administration, and adverse event management of SCIG infusions.

A New Intravenous Immune Globulin: Novel or Not?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical use and determine the place in therapy for immune globulin intravenous (IV), human-slra, a recently approved IV immune globulin for the treatment of primary immune deficiency diseases (PIDD).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed and MEDLINE search (2010 to April 2020) was conducted for relevant articles. Data were also obtained from the package insert.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English language publications regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of immune globulin-slra were analyzed. Publications focused on use of immune globulin products were also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Immune globulin-slra is indicated for patients with PIDD and was specifically developed to include donor plasma with high respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antibody titers. Efficacy was demonstrated through favorable incidence of infections and infection-related complications. Patients treated with immune globulin-slra had increases in anti-RSV neutralizing antibody titers compared with baseline. Adverse events occurred at rates similar to or less than other available immune globulin products.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review describes a new immune globulin product available for use in patients with PIDD. A novel approach to managing patients at risk of serious infections may be to utilize products with formulations proven to not only boost IgG levels, but also antibodies to specific pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of which immune globulin product to select for a patient or formulary is complex. Each product is unique, and differences between products should be taken into consideration, along with cost and availability.

Evaluation of pulmonary findings in patients with humoral immunodeficiency

Aim:

To determine the frequency of sinopulmonary infections, detect changes in the respiratory system, and measure functional capacity of the lungs in our patients with humoral immunodeficiency.

Material and Methods:

Fifty-six patients with humoral immunodeficiency were enrolled in this study. The clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data, and pulmonary function tests of the subjects were evaluated from their file records, retrospectively.

Results:

The distribution of our patients was as follows: 25 patients had common variable immune deficiency, three patients had X-linked agammaglobulinemia, five patients had hyper immunoglobulin M syndrome, 19 patients had deficiency of immunoglobulin G subset, and four patients had selective immunoglobulin A deficiency. The most common symptom of the patients was chronic cough (n=47, 83.9%). The most common pathologies on high-resolution computed tomography of the chest were atelectasis and bronchiectasis (27.7%). The most common pathology in pulmonary function tests was the presence of moderate obstructive patterns along with restrictive patterns (n=6,12.5%). The FEV 1, FVC, and FEF 25–75 values were significantly lower in patients with common variable immunodeficiency compared with the patients who had IgG subset deficiencies (p=0.001, p=0.01, p=0.01). Among the patients who were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin, the age at the diagnosis of immunodeficiency was higher in patients with bronchiectasis (14.2±8.4 years) compared with those without bronchiectasis (10.1±11.4 years) (p=0.04).

Conclusion:

Clinical findings are not sufficient to monitor the structural and functional changes in the respiratory system, and patients should be evaluated using high-resolution computed tomography of the chest and pulmonary function tests.