Omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A real-life experience of dose and intervals adjustments in Belgium

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU): Real-Life Experience in Dose/Interval Adjustments and Treatment Discontinuation

BACKGROUND

Data on real-life experience with omalizumab dose/interval adjustments are still limited, as well as on omalizumab discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of omalizumab dose/interval adjustment in a Portuguese cohort of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and to characterize those who discontinued omalizumab.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who started omalizumab for CSU at a Portuguese Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence (UCARE) was conducted between 2009 and 2021. Response criteria were based on a weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) <7 points (partial: UAS7 7-15 points; nonresponders: UAS7 >15 points) and minimal important difference >10 points.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were enrolled in the study; 83% of them were women, and the median age was 49 years (interquartile range: 40-58 years). On 300 mg q4 weeks, 96 (70%) patients were responders, 29 (21%) partial responders, and 13 (9%) nonresponders. After dose/interval adjustments (up to 600 mg q2 weeks), 108 (78%) were responders, 27 (20%) partial responders, and 3 (2%) nonresponders. No adverse events were reported. Updosing was more frequent in patients with angioedema, body mass index >30 kg/m2, positive basophil activation test, and autologous serum test. A total of 71 (51%) patients lengthened interval, presenting higher median pre-omalizumab D-dimer (0.2 vs 0 mcg/mL, P = .038) and C-reactive protein (0.3 vs 0.1 mg/dL, P = .030) values than those with a standard dose. In total, 37 patients (27%) stopped omalizumab, but 14 (38%) of them needed retreatment on average 11 months after discontinuation. Patients with angioedema and a longer omalizumab duration had higher chance of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab dose and/or interval adjustment is effective and safe and should be implemented in partial/nonresponders for response improvement and in responders for further discontinuation. A protocol for regimen adjustments is proposed.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the course of refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria under omalizumab treatment

BACKGROUND

The course of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can be influenced by infections, depression, and stress.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the course of refractory CSU together with patient adherence to omalizumab and treatment adjustments.

METHODS

Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was used to assess disease activity. Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FC-19s), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21s) were performed to assess mental health status. All scales were performed during the Quarantine Period (QP) and Return to the Normal Period (RTNP). UAS7 Before Pandemic (BP) was recorded from the patients medical records.

RESULTS

The authors evaluated 104 omalizumab-receiving CSU patients. UAS7 scores during QP were significantly higher than those in RTNP and BP (p < 0.01). DASS-21 and FC-19 scores were significantly higher during QP compared to RTNP (p < 0.01). Nineteen (18.2%) patients ceased omalizumab, 9 patients prolonged the intervals between subsequent doses during the pandemic. UAS7 scores in QP were significantly higher in patients who ceased omalizumab than in those who continued (p < 0.001). Among patients who continued omalizumab, 22.4% had an increase in urticaria activity and higher FC-19 scores in comparison with those with stable disease activity (p = 0.008).

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The small sample size of patients with prolonged intervals of omalizumab and the lack of mental health evaluation with the same tools prior to the study.

CONCLUSION

Fear induced by COVID-19 can determine an increase in disease activity. Therefore, patients on omalizumab should continue their treatment and prolonged interval without omalizumab can be considered in patients with good urticaria control.

Analysis of the long-term economic burden of omalizumab on patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

Omalizumab (OMA) is highly effective for refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), but its high cost exerts a great economic burden on patients and society. Current knowledge is lacking regarding the economic impact of long-term administration of OMA on patients with CSU in the real-world setting. We retrospectively investigated drug costs relevant to CSU treatment during the period before through to 12 months after starting OMA in actual clinical practice. This study involved 32 patients who received at least two injections of OMA (300 mg/4 weeks) and achieved good responses of urticaria control test score of 12 or more and/or weekly urticaria activity score of 6 or less within 12 weeks. Median drug costs of the overall patient cohort increased from ¥14 496/month to ¥104 522 after starting OMA, but reduced to ¥48 810 in 12 months along with reduced amount of OMA administration and concomitant medication use. In patients pretreated with antihistamine alone or plus alternative medicines such as H₂ blocker and antileukotriene prior to OMA, the increased drug costs by adding OMA decreased to approximately 30% in 12 months mainly due to the OMA dose reduction and interval extension of OMA. The drug cost reduction was also observed in patients pretreated with intensive multi-agents, due to discontinuation of expensive immunosuppressants. In conclusion, the introduction of OMA significantly increased the total drug costs relevant to CSU management, but the costs decreased to half in 12 months, along with dose-reduced and interval-extended OMA and discontinued concomitant drugs in patients with CSU who responded well to OMA.

From regulatory limitations to new opportunities: Real-life experience on the effectiveness of short courses of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic idiopatic urticaria

Economic sustainability of long-term continuous treatment of antihistamine refractory chronic urticaria with omalizumab may be an issue. We assessed the efficacy of relatively short courses (5-6 months) of omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). We retrospectively studied 40 patients (observed between June 2015 and January 2019) affected by moderate-to-severe CIU refractory to anti-H1 antihistamines (up to fourfold doses). Omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, then for 20 weeks in case of a relapse of moderate-to-severe degree, then again for 24 weeks in case of a second relapse. Monthly clinical evaluations were performed. Mean disease severity significantly dropped after 1 month and further decreased thereafter, with 30 complete remissions after the first course of treatment. In 2-4 months, 18 patients had a relapse of moderate-to-severe degree. The profile of response to the second course of omalizumab was similar to the first. A third course was necessary for seven patients. No adverse effects were recorded. Courses of 5-6 months of omalizumab may induce rapid significant improvement of urticaria and many prolonged complete remissions. In case of relapse, further courses show a similar profile of response and may induce additional long-term complete remissions.

A retrospective analysis omalizumab treatment patterns in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: a real-world study in Belgium

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the repeated occurrence of persistent hives and/or angioedema for ≥6 weeks, without specific external stimuli. H₁‐antihistamines have long been the standard of care of CSU, but many patients remain uncontrolled even at 4× the approved dose. Add‐on therapy with omalizumab has proven effective in clinical trials, but little is known about omalizumab treatment in Belgium.

Objective

To collect real‐world clinical data on omalizumab treatment in adults with CSU in Belgium.

Methods

This was an observational, retrospective chart review of adults with CSU, who initiated omalizumab treatment between August 2014 and December 2016 (maximum 28 months follow‐up).

Results

In total, 235 patients were included (median time from symptom onset to diagnosis, 5.4 months; median time from diagnosis to commencing omalizumab, 6.7 months). Treatments used before/after commencing omalizumab did not always adhere to guidelines; many patients (26.4%/11.1%) received first‐generation H₁‐antihistamines, while 20.4% used omalizumab monotherapy after initiating treatment. The mean interval between omalizumab administrations was 4.8 (SD 1.7) weeks; 67.8% of patients had ≥1 interval prolongation and/or shortening. Mean baseline 7‐day Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was 32.0 (SD 6.05); this improved to 12.6 (SD 11.2) after 1 month of omalizumab. About 67.2% of patients reached UAS7 ≤ 6 (well controlled) during the study. A total of 87 patients stopped omalizumab and never restarted before the end of the observation period; the most prevalent reason was remission of symptoms (49.4% of patients), followed by lack of effect (12.6%), lost to follow‐up (6.9%) and adverse events (3.4%). Headache was the most common adverse event (n = 8/82). No anaphylaxis was reported.

Conclusions

This study revealed that patients initiated on omalizumab in Belgium had severe CSU at baseline, and showed substantial improvements after 1 month of treatment. Greater adherence to the prescription of guideline‐recommended medications is needed for the treatment of CSU.