Omalizumab for Treatment of Idiopathic Angioedema

Brain Delivery Strategies for Biomacromolecular Drugs: Intranasal Administration

Macromolecular Drugs (including monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, and nucleic acid therapies) have become a cornerstone strategy for intervening in complex pathological mechanisms such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, and genetic disorders due to their high specificity for disease targets and low off-target toxicity. However, compared to traditional small-molecule drugs, the high molecular weight (>10 kDa) and structural complexity of macromolecular drugs result in extremely low transmembrane permeability. This is particularly challenging in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases, where the blood-brain barrier (BBB) imposes stringent selectivity, further limiting drug delivery efficiency. This review focuses on the breakthrough strategy of nose-to-brain (NtB) drug delivery. On one hand, the NtB pathway bypasses the BBB, enabling direct CNS drug delivery. On the other hand, nanocarrier technology can synergistically achieve systemic delivery and brain-targeted transport. Based on the latest research advances, this article systematically examines the feasibility of delivering macromolecular drugs via NtB administration. We comprehensively summarize relevant delivery carriers and discuss the potential advantages of intranasal-brain delivery for CNS disease treatment. Notably, while significant progress has been made in this field, further exploration is still needed regarding the mechanisms of NtB delivery and challenges in clinical translation.

Angioedema

Angioedema can occur in the absence of urticaria and can be broadly divided into three main categories: mast cell-mediated (e.g., histamine), non-mast-cell-mediated (bradykinin-induced) and idiopathic angioedema. Non-mast-cell-mediated angioedema is largely driven by bradykinin. Bradykinin-induced angioedema can be hereditary, acquired or drug-induced, such as with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Although bradykinin-mediated angioedema can be self-limited, it can cause significant morbidity and laryngeal involvement may lead to fatal asphyxiation. The mainstays of management for angioedema are: (1) to avoid specific triggers (if possible and where known) and (2) treatment with medication (if indicated). For hereditary angioedema (HAE), there are specifically licensed treatments that can be used for the management of attacks, or for prophylaxis in order to prevent attacks. In this article, the authors will review the causes, diagnosis and management of angioedema.

Therapies for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Present and Future Developments

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a complex dermatological condition characterized by recurrent wheals and/or angioedema lasting for more than six weeks, significantly impairing patients' quality of life. According to European guidelines, the first step in treatment involves second-generation H1-antihistamines (sgAHs), which block peripheral H1 receptors to alleviate symptoms. In cases with inadequate responses, the dose of antihistamines can be increased by up to fourfold. If symptoms persist despite this adjustment, the next step involves the use of omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, which has shown efficacy in the majority of cases. However, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating alternative treatments such as immunosuppressive agents like cyclosporine or azathioprine. To address these unmet needs, several new therapeutic targets are being explored. Among them, significant attention is being given to drugs that block Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), such as remibrutinib, which reduces mast cell activation. Therapies like dupilumab, which target the interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 pathways, are also under investigation. Additionally, molecules targeting the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2), and those inhibiting the tyrosine kinase receptor Kit, such as barzolvolimab, show promise in clinical studies. These emerging treatments offer new options for patients with difficult-to-treat CSU and have the potential to modify the natural course of the disease by targeting key immune pathways, helping to achieve longer-term remission. Further research is essential to better elucidate the pathophysiology of CSU and optimize treatment protocols to achieve long-term benefits in managing this condition. Altogether, the future of CSU treatments that target pathogenetic mechanisms seems promising.

Different doses and courses of omalizumab for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background

The stability, efficacy, and safety of omalizumab at different doses and regimens for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are yet to be studied.

Objective

A systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis (MA) and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in CSU.

Methods

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of administering omalizumab versus placebo for CSU were searched. Random-effects MAs were performed using planned subgroup analyses. TSA was performed to control for the risk of random errors and assess the stability of our MA results. Publication bias was visually assessed using a contour-enhanced funnel plot and the trim-and-fill method. The quality of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.

Results

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Omalizumab had remarkable effects on the patient percentage of the weekly urticaria activity score is zero (UAS = 0) [RR 4.64, 95% CI (3.38, 6.37)], percentage of no angioedema-burdened days [MD 3.15, 95% CI (0.10, 6.19], patient percentage of UAS ≤6 [RR 3.05, 95% CI (2.46, 3.78)], and patient percentage of the weekly itch severity score minimally important difference (ISS7 MID) [RR 1.50, 95% CI (1.36, 1.66)]. Omalizumab was well tolerated across studies [RR 0.98, 95% CI (0.90, 1.08)]. TSA confirmed the above results, except for "the percentage of no angioedema-burdened day".

Conclusion

Among the different doses and courses assessed, omalizumab (300 mg, 12 weeks) can be recommended as an effective treatment for patients with CSU. However, whether omalizumab improves angioedema requires further investigation. The clinical management of angioedema accompanying CSU requires further attention.

Omalizumab for Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Narrative Review of Current Status

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating inflammatory disorder of the skin, characterized by a fluctuating natural history, a complex mechanism of action, and a significant burden on patients, including effect on quality of life, development of psychosocial disorders, and a range of comorbidities. Recent international guidelines recommend a therapeutic approach of first-line treatment with second generation H1-antihistamines and second-line treatment with the biologic omalizumab. Here, the salient aspects of CSU and current status of data for omalizumab for patients with CSU are reviewed, with a focus on mechanism of action, efficacy and real-world effectiveness (including patient outcomes, response, relapse, and remission), and safety (including consideration of the risk of anaphylaxis). The review also considers recent data on COVID-19, CSU, and omalizumab and presents our perspective on future needs. Overall, the data suggest that omalizumab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with CSU that provides benefits for a wide range of patients.