[Stent thrombosis: what's up in 2017?]

[stent thrombosis : A won battle ? (data from the France PCI registry)]

GOAL

The aim of the study is to assess the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of definite stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year in the France PCI multicenter prospective registry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Only patients who underwent coronary angioplasty with at least one stent implantation between 1^st January 2014 and 31 December 2019 were included. The population was separated into 2 groups: the "ST" group with stent thrombosis and the "control" group without stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

35,435 patients were included. 256 patients (0.72%) presented a ST at 1 year. The rate of ST decreased significantly in acute coronary syndrome (1.5% in 2014 vs. 0.73% in 2019; p = 0.05) but not in chronic coronary syndrome (0.46% in 2014 vs 0.40%; p = 0.98). The risk factors are young age (65.8 years vs 68.2; p = 0.002), clinical context (35.27% vs 16.68%; p = 0.0001), diabetes (35.2 % vs 26.4%; p = 0.002), renal failure (11.7% vs 8%; p = 0.009) and history of coronary angioplasty (28.63% vs 21.86%; p = 0.009) and peripheral arterial disease (14.5% vs 10.1%; p = 0.021), LV dysfunction (37% vs 27.5%; p = 0.003), mean length (39.6 mm vs 31, 7mm; p <0.0001) and the mean number of stents per procedure (1.9 vs 1.6; p <0.0001), a TIMI flow ≤1 pre procedure (21.5% vs 12.4%; p <0.0001) and an intrastent restenosis (11% vs 6%; p <0.0001). The 1-year mortality of the ST group was significantly higher than that of the control group (19.14% vs 5.82%; p <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Since 2014, the incidence of ST at 1 year has been decreasing but remains stuck at a floor level of 0.54% in 2019. The battle for ST seems to have been partly won and its risk factors well identified, but its mortality is still high.

[Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent placement or acute coronary syndrome. Is customisation possible?]

The recommended 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary angioplasty with implantation of a drug eluting stent is based on solid evidence, but must take into account continuous improvements in stent technology leading to reduced thrombogenicity. In stable patients with a high hemorrhagic risk, it is possible to reduce DAPT duration at 3 months without significant increase in the risks of ischemic events or stent thrombosis. Further reduction toward a 1-month DAPT is likely to involve new strategies of stopping aspirin at 1 month, and continuing long-term monotherapy with inhibitors of P2Y12 receptor. After acute coronary syndrome, it seems possible to reduce the duration of DAPT (standard, 12 months) in patients at high risk of bleeding. A 6-month DAPT, or even less, provides a good compromise between hemorrhagic risk and ischemic recurrences. Conversely, in patients who have fully tolerated a 12-month DAPT after infarction, and who are at very high risk of ischemic recurrence, the prolongation of a P2Y12 inhibitor in combination with aspirin may be considered, with a risk of haemorrhage almost double. A certain degree of customisation of the duration of DAPT is therefore possible, based on age, renal function, comorbidities, haemorrhagic history, and the use of risk scores (PRECISE-DAPT, DAPT).