[Cardiac CT-Scan: Utility for the management of chest pain, cardiovascular screening and before atrial fibrillation ablation procedure]

[May Coronary CT-Scan be used as a systematic screening tool for the global population to prevent acute coronary syndrome and ischemic heart failure?]

Coronary CT-Scan permits non-invasive visualization of all stages of coronary artery atherosclerosis allowing early therapeutic interventions, lifestyle changes and accurate follow-up all of which result in an improved prognosis. We discuss the possibility of a systematic coronary CT-scan in the global population at certain ages such as fifty or sixty years-old (or both). May this strategy decrease the onset of myocardial infarction or ischemic chronic heart failure thus improving quality (and quantity) of life? May it also reduce the medical costs for the individual and the society? Is it technically possible to deploy such a strategy? What would be the obstacles for its set up and what solutions might be proposed?

[Benefits and drawbacks of CT scan as a triple rule-out exam in acute chest pain to exclude acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection]

Chest pain is one of the major causes for admission in the Emergency Room in most countries and one of the principal reasons for urgent consultation with a cardiologist or a general practitioner. After clinical examination and initial biological measurements, substantial patients require further explorations. CT scan allows the search for pulmonary embolism in the early stage of pulmonary arteries iodine contrast exploration. During the same exam at the systemic arterial phase, the search for aortic dissection or coronary artery disease is possible while exploring the later contrast in the aortic artery. This triple rule-out exam allows correct diagnosis in case of acute chest pain with suspected pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection and other acute aortic syndromes or acute coronary syndrome. But X-rays are substantially increased as well as iodine contrast agent quantity while exam quality is globally decreased. Artificial intelligence may play an important role in the development of this protocol.

High incidence of newly diagnosed obstructive coronary artery disease regardless of chest pain detected on pre-procedural cardiac computed tomography angiography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is often performed before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation to map atrial and pulmonary anatomy. Incident coronary artery disease (CAD) may also be diagnosed during cardiac CT angiography (CTA). Our aim was to assess whether coronary CTA might be able to identify a significant proportion of patients with obstructive CAD prior to their catheter ablation procedure event, even in asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing pre-ablation coronary CTA for atrial fibrillation between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively selected. Patients with previously diagnosed CAD were excluded. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% luminal stenosis. We analyzed the relationship between obstructive CAD, any chest pain, and traditional risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 2321 patients [median age 63.0 (54.4-69.2), 1052/2321 (45.3%) female] underwent coronary CTA and 488/2321 (21.0%) were diagnosed with obstructive CAD. There was no difference regarding the rate of obstructive CAD in patients with any chest pain compared to patients without any chest pain [91/404 (22.5%) vs. 397/1917 (20.7%), P = 0.416, respectively). The following parameters were associated with obstructive CAD: age > 65 years [odds ratio (OR) = 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.02-3.13; P < 0.001), male sex (OR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.28-1.98; P < 0.001), hypertension (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.08-1.81; P = 0.012), diabetes (OR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13-1.99; P = 0.006), dyslipidaemia (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07-1.66; P = 0.011) and history of smoking (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.68; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of obstructive CAD even in patients without chest pain highlights the importance of additional coronary artery diagnostics in patients undergoing left atrial CTA awaiting catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. These patients regardless of chest pain thus may require further risk modification to decrease their potential ischemic and thromboembolic risk.

[Heart imaging by CT-scan and MRI in cardiac tumors]

The etiology of cardiac masses is often oncological or thrombotic, rarely inflammatory. Among heart tumors, the vast majority are metastatic. We describe the most frequent benign primary cardiac tumors and the most frequent malignant primary cardiac tumors and give information about the advantages of using a multi-modality approach for the accurate diagnosis of a cardiac mass using Computed Tomography Scanner and Magnetic Resonance Investigation.

Incidental Cardiac Computed Tomography Findings in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective technique for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that is used as a crucial part of planning before CA procedures which can detect other incidental findings and require further diagnostic investigations.

Objectives: We sought to assess the prevalence and distribution of incidental CCT findings in patients with AF undergoing CA.

Methods: Retrospective analysis over a three-year period (2013-2016) of 218 patients undergoing CCT prior to AF CA. CCT findings were analyzed and incident clinically important findings were reported.

Results: Over the three-year period, 218 patients had undergone CCT. Of these, 28.8% showed clinically significant incidental findings in the chest and upper abdomen. Incidental findings included coronary artery disease (CAD), incomplete cor triatriatum, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, pulmonary nodules, pulmonary infiltrates, pulmonary mass, thoracic aortic aneurysm, mediastinal nodes, abdominal mass, and liver nodules.

Conclusions: CCT is a cornerstone investigation prior to AF CA and can show multiple incidental findings, thus potentially functioning as a screening method for the detection of other significant conditions. There is still a debate whether further workup is needed or not as most findings will eventually be benign and further investigations could mean financial burden and clinical risks to the patients. Further larger prospective studies are needed with long-term follow-up to determine whether incidental findings on CCT have an impact on the long-term outcomes of patients.

[Cardiac imaging in infiltrative cardiomyopathies. What cardiovascular imaging modalities to propose in hypertrophic cardiomyopathies ?]

Infiltrative cardiomyopathies are abnormal accumulations or depositions of different substances in cardiac tissue leading to its dysfunction, first diastolic, then systolic. The different infiltrative cardiomyopathies are amyloidosis (both light chain amyloidosis and transthyretin amyloidosis variants), lysosomal and glycogen storage disorders (Fabry-Anderson disease), and iron overload (hemochromatosis and thalassemia associated with blood transfusions), as well as inflammatory diseases such as sarcoidosis. We also evoke hypereosinophilic syndrome associated with endomyocardial fibrosis. Echocardiography is the first essential step after interrogatory and clinical examination and may help the cardiologist as a screening tool. Cardiac MRI is the second fundamental step towards the diagnosis especially due to the late gadolinium enhancement and to the T1-mapping. Cardiac amyloidosis diagnosis also requires the use of nuclear imaging. Cardiac CT-Scan may be useful for estimating the amyloid load, identify potential cardiac thrombus and rule out associated coronaropathy.

[Artificial Intelligence and teleradiology in cardiovascular imaging by CT-Scan and MRI]

Cardiac CT-Scan and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two booming cardiac imaging modalities especially in chest pain screening for CT-Scan and in surveillance of patients with known coronary artery disease for MRI. Artificial Intelligence is already of great help in radiologic diagnosis and its use should widen in the next few years. Teleradiology allows remote interpretation of all radiology exams and should develop in cardiac imaging. Expert radiology diagnosis centers should develop gathering cardiologists and radiologists with great experience in the field of cardiac imaging interpretation. Peripheral acquisition radiology centers would be disseminated all across the country without a need for a local expert and would send their images to the expert center for interpretation. The expert center would be the middle of this spider web, sending back the report and the selected images to the peripheral center, allowing optimal care for all patients nationwide. Artificial Intelligence would be a major asset of these expert centers, improving through the years. This operating mode would allow the onset of systematic screening for coronary artery disease in the global population and the surveillance of known coronary artery disease treated patients.