Optimal Pain Management After Cesarean Delivery

Surveying anesthesia care provision and deficiencies among the secondary public sector hospitals of rural Sindh, Pakistan

PURPOSE

Provision of anesthesia care must go hand in hand with surgical care to equitably widen surgical coverage of underserved populations, especially the rural segments of low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to assess the availability of key items and infrastructure needed for anesthesia care.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey at ten subdistrict or taluqa headquarter (THQ) hospitals and five district headquarter (DHQ) hospitals in six rural districts of the Sindh province of Pakistan using the Anesthesia Facility Assessment Tool. We assessed the domains of infrastructure, workforce, service delivery, conduct of anesthesia, equipment, and medications. We also scored these components and then compared the difference in mean scores.

RESULTS

Three hospitals did not meet the minimum bed number required for a secondary hospital. Four hospitals had nonfunctioning operating rooms and conducted procedures elsewhere. Ten had full-time, certified anesthesiologists, while 11 had a postanesthesia care unit. There were only two hospitals with critical care units providing mechanical ventilation, and only one hospital conducting telemetry. Six hospitals did not have a dedicated anesthesia provider present at all times. Thirteen hospitals did not use the World Health Organization preoperative checklist before performing procedures. There were deficiencies in drugs such as hypnotics, opioids, and vasopressors.

CONCLUSION

There are many shortcomings in anesthesia care provision among these rural hospitals. Greater attention and investment are needed to safely conduct anesthesia in this setting.

Consensus statement on pain management for pregnant patients with opioid use disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Pain management in pregnant and postpartum people with an opioid use disorder requires a balance among the risks associated with opioid tolerance, including withdrawal or return to opioid use, considerations around the social needs of the maternal-infant dyad, and the provision of adequate pain relief for the birth episode that is often characterized as the worst pain a person will experience in their lifetime. This multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine provides a framework for pain management in obstetrical patients with opioid use disorder. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations and is targeted to healthcare providers in obstetrics and anesthesiology. The statement is focused on prenatal optimization of pain management, labor analgesia and postvaginal delivery pain management, and postcesarean delivery pain management. Topics include a discussion of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options for pain management, medication management for opioid use disorder (eg, buprenorphine, methadone), considerations regarding urine drug testing and other social aspects of care for maternal-infant dyads, and a review of current practices. The authors provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize pain management while reducing risks and the complications associated with opioid use disorder in the peripartum period. Ultimately, this multidisciplinary consensus statement provides practical and concise clinical guidance to optimize pain management for people with opioid use disorder in the context of pregnancy to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

The efficacy of abdominal binder in women undergoing cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Abdominal binders are a prominent non-pharmacological intervention aimed at mitigating adverse outcomes following Cesarean delivery (CD), including pain and distress.

AIM

We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the effects of abdominal binders on women undergoing CD.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using terms such as "abdominal binder," "clinical trials," and variations of "cesarean" across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan-Fang database, up to November 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 4.0. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of abdominal binders compared to no binder usage following CD were included. The outcomes analyzed were postoperative pain, symptom distress, ambulatory function, and the occurrence of adverse effects.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs were included. Abdominal binders demonstrated a strong safety profile with no significant differences in postoperative complications between groups. Significant pain reductions were observed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (weighted mean differences [WMD]: -1.13, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -2.15 to -0.10, p = 0.03; WMD: -1.48, 95 % CI: -2.90 to -0.06, p = 0.04;WMD: -0.95, 95 % CI: -1.49 to -0.41, p = 0.0005; and WMD: -0.70, 95 % CI: -1.17 to -0.22, p = 0.004, respectively). Pain interference with breastfeeding was significantly lower in the binder group (WMD: -1.30, 95 % CI: -2.24 to -0.36, p = 0.006). Symptom Distress Scale scores were significantly reduced at 24 and 48 h (WMD: -1.22, 95 % CI: -2.05 to -0.39, p = 0.004; WMD: -1.63, 95 % CI: -2.67 to -0.60, p = 0.002). Improved ambulatory function was also observed at 8, 12, and 24 h (WMD: 20.57, 95 % CI: 16.91 to 24.23, p < 0.00001; WMD: 11.97, 95 % CI: 7.67 to 16.27, p < 0.00001; WMD: 10.14, 95 % CI: 1.89 to 18.40, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study uniquely demonstrates the temporal effects of abdominal binder use, with significant pain reductions noted at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post-CD. These results provide actionable guidance for the timing of abdominal binder application, emphasizing their importance as an early intervention to optimize postoperative recovery. As a secure, cost-effective, and non-pharmacological solution, abdominal binders are strongly recommended as part of routine postpartum care for women following CD.

The effect of an abdominal binder on pain, bleeding and breastfeeding success after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial

This randomized controlled intervention study aims to determine the effect of an abdominal binder on pain, bleeding, and breastfeeding success after cesarean delivery. The study was conducted with women who underwent cesarean section and were followed-up for the first 48 hours at the obstetrics clinic of a state hospital in Türkiye between September 2020-March 2021. The study was completed with a total of 128 women who met the inclusion criteria (Intervention (IG):64, Control (CG):64). Data were collected using a "Socio-demographic Form" and "Postpartum Follow-up Form." Statistical significance was defined as p < .05. The IG showed significantly lower pain scores in both the abdominal area (uterine involution) and cesarean incision compared to the CG (p < .001), (respectively, IG:0.19 ± 0.58 vs. CG:1.33 ± 1.16; IG:0.23 ± 0.61 vs. CG:0.75 ± 1.26). The amount of puerperal bleeding was significantly lower in the IG (p < .001) (IG:327.65 ± 112.61 mL vs. CG:402.61 ± 157.45 mL), and their hemoglobin and hematocrit values were significantly higher (p < .05) (Hemoglobin, IG:11.00 ± 0.78 g/dL vs. CG:10.62 ± 0.90 g/dL; Hematocrit, IG:34.54 ± 1.79 percent vs. CG:33.51 ± 2.56 percent). The breastfeeding success scores were significantly higher in the IG (p < .001) (IG:9.97 ± 0.17 vs. CG:9.81 ± 0.43). These data demonstrate that the abdominal binder is beneficial and applicable for reducing pain, bleeding, and for improving breastfeeding success in the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery.

Postoperative Cesarean Section Pain Management Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Compare and evaluate the effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus intrathecal morphine (ITM) on elective postcesarean section pain, opioid consumption, and related side effects.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A search for evidence was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration Database, UpToDate, Health Source, and gray literature. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the study. The methodological quality of evidence assessment was conducted using the Risk of Bias and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. The meta-analysis used Review Manager (RevMan 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration).

FINDINGS

A total of 11 RCTs involving 1,129 patients were analyzed. Compared to ITM, TAP has a similar effect on static (mean difference [MD]; 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.04 to 0.79; P = .08) and dynamic pain scores (MD, 0.43; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.92; P = .09) within the first 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, the TAP block had a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.66; P < .0001) and increased opioid consumption (MD, 6.78; 95% CI, 3.79 to 9.77; P < .00001). Overall, TAP block and ITM did not differ in the time to first to rescue analgesia, incidence of sedation, and pruritus.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that TAP blocks are equivalent to ITM in pain scores and more effective at lowering the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet ITM has been shown to be more effective in reducing postoperative opioid consumption.

Evidence-based cesarean delivery: postoperative care (part 10)

The following review focuses on routine postoperative care after cesarean delivery (CD), including specific Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean recommendations as well as important postpartum counseling points. Following CD, there is insufficient evidence to support administration of prophylactic multi-dose antibiotics to all patients. Additional antibiotic doses are indicated for the following scenarios: patients with obesity who did not receive preoperative azithromycin, CD lasting ≥4 hours since prophylactic dose, blood loss >1500 mL, or those with an intra-amniotic infection. An oxytocin infusion for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage should be continued post-CD. While initial measures to prevent postoperative pain occur in the intraoperative period, with the consideration of 1 g intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and IV or intramuscular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (eg, 30 mg IV ketorolac), the focus postoperatively continues with this multimodal approach with scheduled acetaminophen per os (PO, 650 mg every 6 hours) and nonsteroidal agents (ketorolac 30 mg IV every 6 hours for 4 doses followed by ibuprofen 600 mg PO every 6 hours) being recommended. Short-acting opioids should be reserved for breakthrough pain. Low-risk patients should receive mechanical thromboprophylaxis until ambulation with chemoprophylaxis being reserved for patients with additional risk factors. When an indwelling bladder catheter was placed intraoperatively for scheduled CD, it should be removed immediately postoperatively. Chewing gum to aid in return of bowel function and early oral intake of solid food can occur immediately after CD and within 2 hours, respectively. For prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, administration of 5HT3 antagonists with the addition of either a dopamine antagonist or a corticosteroid is recommended based on noncesarean data. Early ambulation after CD starting 4 hours postoperatively is encouraged and should be incentivized by pedometer. For patients that receive a dressing over the CD skin incision, limited evidence supports leaving it in place for 48 hours. Adjunct nonpharmacologic interventions for postoperative recovery discussed in this review are acupressure, acupuncture, aromatherapy, coffee, ginger, massage, reiki, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. In the low-risk patient, hospital discharge may occur as early as 24 to 28 hours if close (ie, 1-2 days) outpatient neonatal follow-up is available due to the potential for neonatal jaundice; otherwise, patients should be discharged at 48 to 72 hours postoperatively. Upon discharge, the multimodal pain control recommendations of acetaminophen and ibuprofen should be continued. If short-acting opioids are necessary, the prescribing practices should be individualized based upon the inpatient opioid requirements. Other portions of postoperative/postpartum counseling during the inpatient stay include the optimal interpregnancy interval of 18 to 23 months, encouraging exclusive breastfeeding for at least 6 months, quick resumption of physical activity, and vaginal intercourse guidance as tolerated. Patients should also be counseled pre-CD on the option of immediate postpartum intrauterine devices insertion, intraoperative salpingectomy, or placement of long-acting reversible contraception in the postpartum period. Implementation of such evidence-based postoperative care protocols decrease length of stay, surgical site infection rates, and improve patient satisfaction and breastfeeding rates. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

Regional nerve block in postoperative analgesia after cesarean section: A narrative review

Of all obstetric operations, cesarean section is one of the most common. The impact of postoperative pain on physical and mental health in women cannot be ignored. Moreover, effective postoperative analgesia is essential in women who have given birth. Traditional systemic analgesic methods (intravenous analgesia, oral analgesics, etc) are often accompanied by adverse reactions that are positively correlated with the drug dosage. Regional nerve block is an analgesic and anesthetic technique that temporarily blocks nerve conduction by injecting local anesthetics around the nerve roots, nerve trunks, nerve plexus, ganglia, or surgical area, thereby alleviating or eliminating pain. Currently, the regional block techniques used for postoperative analgesia following cesarean section include paravertebral nerve block, transversus abdominis plane block, rectus sheath block, quadratus lumborum block, ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block, erector spinae block, wound infiltration analgesia, and intraperitoneal infusion of local anesthetics. These regional block techniques hold great promise for providing effective postoperative analgesia after cesarean section, each with unique advantages. Moreover, regional blocks have a unique place in multimodal analgesia protocols following cesarean section and are increasingly used in clinical practice for analgesia after cesarean section. This review provides an overview of the regional nerve block techniques used for postoperative analgesia following cesarean section, discusses their benefits and drawbacks, and provides a reference for choosing postoperative pain management following cesarean delivery, offering a hopeful outlook for improved patient care.

Efficacy of continuous preperitoneal ropivacaine infusion in women with cesarean section: A prospective, randomized controlled, single blinded study

Background

Adequate postoperative pain management after cesarean section is important for the prognosis of both mother and infant. However, excessive prescription of opioid analgesics has become a concern. This study evaluated the efficacy of local continuous subfascial infusion of ropivacaine in relieving postoperative pain and reducing opioid requirements in postpartum women with cesarean section.

Methods

Seventy eligible women undergoing cesarean section were randomly allocated to the ropivacaine and the normal saline group for continuous subfascial wound infiltration. All patients received additional fentanyl through an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia pump. Pain score using the visual analog scale, opioid consumption through pump, and requirements for other analgesics were postoperatively measured within 8 h, 1 day, and 2 days after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with independent t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Paired Wilcoxon and student's t-tests were used for paired samples.

Results

Sixty-nine patients (35 in the study and 34 in the control group) were analyzed. The mean VAS scores were lower in the study group all three periods, with significance achieved at day 2 (2.74 ± 0.95 versus 3.41 ± 1.33, p = 0.028). The intravenous fentanyl consumptions were significantly lower in the study group at all three periods. Total administration of additional non-opioid analgesics including ketorolac, propacetamol, and pethidine was higher in the control group.

Conclusions

Continuous subfascial ropivacaine infusion is effective in relieving pain and reducing opioid-based analgesia and other analgesics requirements.

Consensus Statement on Pain Management for Pregnant Patients with Opioid-Use Disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Pain management in pregnant and postpartum people with an opioid-use disorder (OUD) requires a balance between risks associated with opioid tolerance, including withdrawal or return to opioid use, considerations around social needs of the maternal-infant dyad, and the provision of adequate pain relief for the birth episode that is often characterized as the worst pain a person will experience in their lifetime. This multidisciplinary consensus statement between the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) provides a framework for pain management in obstetric patients with OUD. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations and is targeted to health care providers in obstetrics and anesthesiology. The statement is focused on prenatal optimization of pain management, labor analgesia, and postvaginal delivery pain management, and postcesarean delivery pain management. Topics include a discussion of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options for pain management, medication management for OUD (eg, buprenorphine, methadone), considerations regarding urine drug testing, and other social aspects of care for maternal-infant dyads, as well as a review of current practices. The authors provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize pain management while reducing risks and complications associated with OUD in the peripartum period. Ultimately, this multidisciplinary consensus statement provides practical and concise clinical guidance to optimize pain management for people with OUD in the context of pregnancy to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Postoperative pain control and opioid use with transversus abdominis plane block and scheduled multimodal pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

The impact of a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing cesarean section requires further evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores and opioid use in cesarean surgery patients undergoing either a TAP block and scheduled multimodal pain management (SMPM) or SMPM alone.

METHODS

In this retrospective, dual cohort study, cesarean surgery patients underwent neuraxial anesthesia and a TAP block (SMPM/TAP) or SMPM; the TAP block incorporated ropivacaine (20-30 mL) administered bilaterally. The group analyses involved a comparison of postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale and opioid consumption at 24 and 24-48 h.

RESULTS

There were 94 (52.8%) patients in the SMPM/TAP group and 84 (47.2%) subjects in the SMPM alone group. At 24 h postoperatively, the SMPM/TAP group exhibited significantly lower pain scores (4.07 vs 4.54) than the SMPM group (P < 0.001) and reduced opioid consumption (2.29 vs 3.28 mg; P < 0.001). However, at 24-48 h, the SMPM group demonstrated lower pain scores (5.46 vs 5.98) compared to the SMPM/TAP group (P < 0.001) and reduced opioid consumption (8.75 vs 10.21 mg; P < 0.001); overall opioid consumption was higher (12.50 vs 12.02 mg) in the SMPM/TAP group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TAP block improved cesarean surgery patients' pain scores and reduced opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively but the effect of the TAP block was ephemeral as the SMPM/TAP group exhibited inferior pain scores and greater opioid consumption compared to the SMPM group at 24-48 h postoperatively.

Fixed-time interval vs on-demand oral analgesia after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Scheduled administration of analgesics was proven superior to on-demand dosing following cesarean deliveries. However, this protocol was not compared after vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a fixed- vs on-demand analgesic protocol for the management of pain in the first 24 hours after a vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized, prospective, controlled trial was conducted at a single tertiary medical center between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022. Vaginally delivered patients were randomly assigned to receive oral analgesics (paracetamol 1 g + ibuprofen 400 mg) either every 6 hours for the first 24 hours postpartum (scheduled analgesia group) or as needed (on-demand group). Pain level during the first 24 hours postdelivery was measured using a 10-point visual analog scale.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were randomized 1:1 to the 2 cohorts. Baseline and delivery characteristics, including oxytocin augmentation, epidural anesthesia, episiotomy rate, and neonatal birthweight, were comparable between groups. Patients in the scheduled group received more paracetamol and ibuprofen doses in the first 24 hours (2.9±1.3 and 2.9±1.2 doses vs 0.8±1.1 and 0.7±1.1 doses, respectively; P<.001). Pain score was comparable between study groups (5.31±1.92 vs 5.29±1.67; P=.626) even after subanalysis for primiparity, episiotomy, and vacuum-assisted delivery (P>.05). However, patients on a fixed treatment schedule were more likely to breastfeed their baby (98% vs 88%; P=.006) as than those receiving treatment on demand. In addition, they were more satisfied with their labor and delivery experience, as evaluated by Birth Satisfaction Scale questionnaires quality control (37.9±4.7 vs 31.1±5.2; P=.0324), patient attributes (35.0±5.1 vs 30.3±6.3; P=.0453), and stress experienced (58.1±8.5 vs 50.1±8.3; P=.0398). No side effects or adverse outcomes were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

A scheduled analgesic protocol for postpartum pain management following vaginal delivery revealed similar pain scores compared with an on-demand protocol, although it was associated with higher breastfeeding rates and higher maternal satisfaction.

Comparison of two methods of complementary medicine on postoperative pain and anxiety: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain and anxiety are unpleasant situations that are often experienced by women undergoing cesarean section. Since the routine methods of pain relief after surgery is still inadequate, the need for complementary treatments is felt. Foot Reflexology (FR) and Auricular Acupressure (AA) are two of the most popular and safe procedures of complementary and alternative medicine therapies. So, this study aimed to determine and compare the effectiveness of reflexology and AA on postoperative pain and anxiety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This three-group randomized clinical trial study was performed on 101 pregnant women, admitted to Mashhad Omolbanin hospital, for a cesarean section, in 2015. In the intervention groups, 2-3 h after the operation, AA or FR was performed for 20 min. Routine care was provided for the control group. Pain and anxiety were evaluated by VAS and Spielberger anxiety questionnaire before and 1 and 2 h after the intervention.

RESULTS

The results showed that immediately after the intervention, pain intensity was significantly lower in both AA and FR groups (P < 0.001) compared with the control group. In addition, 2 h after the interventions, pain intensity was significantly lower in the AA group compared with the control group (P = 0.006). However, no significant differences were observed between the FR and the control groups (P = 0.095). In addition, 1 and 2 h after the intervention, anxiety was significantly different between the three groups (P = 0.033 and P = 0.018), respectively. The results of the Tukey test showed that this difference was only between FR and control groups (P = 0.025 and P = 0.017), respectively.

CONCLUSION

AA is more effective in reducing post-cesarean pain while FR effectively reduces post-cesarean anxiety. Therefore, these complementary medicine treatments as easy and noninvasive methods are recommended to be used during labor for improving maternal outcomes.

Comparison of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cesarean section is associated with moderate to severe pain and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly employed. The optimal NSAID, however, has not been elucidated. In this network meta-analysis and systematic review, we compared the influence of control and individual NSAIDs on the indices of analgesia, side effects, and quality of recovery.

METHODS

CDSR, CINAHL, CRCT, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing a specific NSAID to either control or another NSAID in elective or emergency cesarean section under general or neuraxial anesthesia. Network plots and league tables were constructed, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis.

RESULTS

We included 47 trials. Cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h, the primary outcome, was examined in 1,228 patients and 18 trials, and control was found to be inferior to diclofenac, indomethacin, ketorolac, and tenoxicam (very low quality evidence owing to serious limitations, imprecision, and publication bias). Indomethacin was superior to celecoxib for pain score at rest at 8-12 h and celecoxib + parecoxib, diclofenac, and ketorolac for pain score on movement at 48 h. In regard to the need for and time to rescue analgesia COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib were inferior to other NSAIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests the presence of minimal differences among the NSAIDs studied. Nonselective NSAIDs may be more effective than selective NSAIDs, and some NSAIDs such as indomethacin might be preferable to other NSAIDs.

Effect of Using Silver Nylon Dressings on Postoperative Pain after Cesarean Delivery

OBJECTIVE

Silver dressings have been associated with a decrease in postoperative pain in selected populations, but it is unknown if the benefit can be observed after cesarean deliveries. We sought to evaluate the impact of silver nylon dressings in reducing postoperative pain after cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A secondary analysis of data from a blinded randomized clinical trial of women undergoing cesarean delivery scheduled and unscheduled at a single site was conducted. Women were recruited for participation from a single site and randomized to a silver nylon dressing or an identical-appearing gauze wound dressing. Wounds were evaluated in the outpatient clinic at 1 and 6 weeks after delivery and patient responded to the modified patient scar assessment scale. The primary outcome of this analysis was inpatient opioid and nonopioid analgesic dispensed. The secondary outcome was patient-reported pain at the 1- and 6-week postpartum visits. Data were analyzed using chi-square test, Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney's test, and logistic regression where appropriate. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Among the 649 participants, women allocated to the silver nylon dressing group, when compared with the gauze group, were similar in the amount of dispensed opioid and nonopioid analgesic medications (morphine equivalent milligrams of opioids dispensed [82.5 vs. 90 mg, p = 0.74], intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [120 vs. 120 mg, p = 0.55], and oral NSAIDs [4,800 vs. 5,600 mg in the gauze group, p = 0.65]). After adjusting for confounding variables, postoperative wound infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 11.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.51-30.31) at 1-week postoperative and again at 6-week postoperative (aOR: 5.59; 95% CI: 1.03-30.31) but not gauze dressing was associated with patient-reported postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

Among women undergoing cesarean delivery, silver nylon dressing was not associated with a reduction in postoperative pain.

KEY POINTS

· Silver dressings showed no decrease in pain medications.. · Wound infection is associated with pain postoperatively.. · Silver dressings did not reduce postoperative pain..

Risk Factors for Severe Pain and Impairment of Daily Life Activities after Cesarean Section-A Prospective Multi-Center Study of 11,932 Patients

Cesarean section (CS) is the most widely performed and one of the most painful surgeries. This study investigated postoperative pain after CS using patient-related outcomes (PROs) to identify risk factors for severe pain. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the influence of surgery indication (primary CS (PCS) vs. urgent CS (UCS)). This multi-center, prospective cohort study included data submitted to the pain registry "quality improvement in postoperative pain treatment" (QUIPS) between 2010 and 2020. In total, 11,932 patients were evaluated. Median of maximal pain was 7.0 (numeric rating scale (NRS) 0 to 10); 53.9% suffered from severe pain (NRS ≥ 7), this being related to impairment of mood, ambulation, deep breathing and sleep, as well as more vertigo, nausea and tiredness (p < 0.001). Distraction, relaxation, mobilization, having conversations, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and pain monitoring were shown to be protective for severe pain (p < 0.001). Maximal pain in PCS and UCS was similar, but UCS obtained more analgesics (p < 0.001), and experienced more impairment of ambulation (p < 0.001) and deep breathing (p < 0.05). Severe pain has a major effect on daily-life activities and recovery after CS, and depends on modifiable factors. More effort is needed to improve the quality of care after CS.

Noninvasive Bioelectronic Treatment of Postcesarean Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Improved strategies are needed to decrease opioid use after cesarean delivery but still adequately control postoperative pain. Although transcutaneous electrical stimulation devices have proven effective for pain control after other surgical procedures, they have not been tested as part of a multimodal analgesic protocol after cesarean delivery, the most common surgical procedure in the United States.

Objective

To determine whether treatment with a noninvasive high-frequency electrical stimulation device decreases opioid use and pain after cesarean delivery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This triple-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 18, 2022, to January 31, 2023, in the labor and delivery unit at a single tertiary academic medical center in Ohio. Individuals were eligible for the study if they had a singleton or twin gestation and underwent a cesarean delivery. Of 267 people eligible for the study, 134 (50%) were included.

Intervention

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a high-frequency (20 000 Hz) electrical stimulation device group or to an identical-appearing sham device group and received 3 applications at the incision site in the first 20 to 30 hours postoperatively.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was inpatient postoperative opioid use, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, measured with the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire (scale, 0-10, with 0 representing no pain), MME prescribed at discharge, and receipt of additional opioid prescriptions in the postpartum period. Normally distributed data were assessed using t tests; otherwise via Mann-Whitney or χ2 tests as appropriate. Analyses were completed following intention-to-treat principles.

Results

Of 134 postpartum individuals who underwent a cesarean delivery (mean [SD] age, 30.5 [4.6] years; mean [SD] gestational age at delivery, 38 weeks 6 days [8 days]), 67 were randomly assigned to the functional device group and 67 to the sham device group. Most were multiparous, had prepregnancy body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) higher than 30, were privately insured, and received spinal anesthesia. One participant in the sham device group withdrew consent prior to treatment. Individuals assigned to the functional device used significantly less opioid medication prior to discharge (median [IQR], 19.75 [0-52.50] MME) than patients in the sham device group (median [IQR], 37.50 [7.50-67.50] MME; P = .046) and reported similar rates of moderate to severe pain (85% vs 91%; relative risk [RR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.29]; P = .43) and mean pain scores (3.59 [95% CI, 3.21-3.98] vs 4.46 [95% CI, 4.01-4.92]; P = .004). Participants in the functional device group were prescribed fewer MME at discharge (median [IQR], 82.50 [0-90.00] MME vs 90.00 [75.00-90.00] MME; P < .001). They were also more likely to be discharged without an opioid prescription (25% vs 10%; RR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.08-2.13]; P = .03) compared with the sham device group. No treatment-related adverse events occurred in either group.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial of postoperative patients following cesarean delivery, use of a high-frequency electrical stimulation device as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol decreased opioid use in the immediate postoperative period and opioids prescribed at discharge. These findings suggest that the use of this device may be a helpful adjunct to decrease opioid use without compromising pain control after cesarean delivery.

Does Preoperative Pain Belief Affect Postoperative Pain and Breastfeeding?

PURPOSE

This research was carried out to determine the relationship between pain belief of women who experienced cesarean section for the first time and their postcesarean pain and breastfeeding self-efficacy levels.

DESIGN

The research is a descriptive study.

METHODS

The study was conducted with 144 patients who had not undergone any surgical operation and had their first cesarean section. Data were collected with an introductory information form, pain beliefs questionnaire (PBQ), visual analog scale (VAS), and breastfeeding self-efficacy scale (BSES).

FINDINGS

The patients' PBQ organic belief score (3.06 ± 0.61) was higher than their PBQ psychological belief score (1.87 ± 0.83), and their pain beliefs were based on an organic cause. The postcesarean section pain of the women was moderate-severe (6.75 ± 1.71), breastfeeding self-efficacy levels were high and sufficient (57.88 ± 4.86), and their pain beliefs were of organic origin. There was no significant relationship between patients' pain beliefs and postcesarean pain and breastfeeding self-efficacy levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study indicate that working status, income status, and chronic illness were associated with patients' pain beliefs, but we observed no relationship between pain beliefs and postcesarean pain and breastfeeding self-efficacy levels.

Exploring the Effect of Pain Sensitive Questionnaire on Guiding Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Randomised Double Blind Controlled Trial

Objective

This study investigates the effect of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) in guiding patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section.

Methods

A total of 160 women who were to undergo a cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia were included in this study. Women with a preoperative PSQ <4 were randomly divided into a low pain-sensitive control group (LC group), and a low pain-sensitive observation group (LO group), and women with preoperative PSQ >6 were randomly divided into a high pain-sensitive control group (HC group) and a high pain-sensitive observation group (HO group). After the surgery, patients received the pump butorphanol concentration was 3.5 µg·kg-1·h-1 in the LC and HC groups, 3.0 µg·kg-1·h-1 in the LO group and 4.0 µg·kg-1·h-1 in the HO group.To compare the analgesic effects of postoperative PCIA and postoperative recovery in women.

Results

Wound pain and uterine contraction pain VAS scores at rest and activity were significantly lower in the LC group than in the LO group at 4 and 8 h postoperatively (P<0.05). Similarly, wound pain and uterine contraction pain VAS scores at rest and activity were significantly lower in the HO group than in the HC group at 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (P<0.05). The Ramsay scores were significantly higher in the LC than in the LO groups at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the Ramsay scores in the HC group and the HO group. There was no statistical difference in any of the post-operative recoveries (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared to the weight-based postoperative PCIA, the PSQ-based postoperative PCIA has better analgesic effects and can improve maternal satisfaction with postoperative analgesia.

The evaluation of the efficacy of etofenamate spray in postoperative cesarean pain: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

It was aimed to investigate the effect of etofenamate spray to be applied around the postoperative incision on pain control in cesarean section in this trial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial. 187 patients (93 cases and 94 controls) were recruited for the study. In the trial group, we applied the etofenamate spray (Doline® 50 ml) after closing the cesarean skin incision and go on four times a day on the skin incision for 24 h. In the control group, we applied a placebo. All patients received paracetamol IV (Paracerol®) as standard analgesic doses. If analgesia was insufficient, tramadol (Contramal®) 50 mg IV doses were added and recorded. A visually analog pain scale (VAS) was performed on both groups at 6-12-18-24th hours. Independent t-tests were performed for data showing normal distributions.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the mean of differences VAS scores between the two groups at 6-12, and 6-18 h. However, a significant difference was obtained in the mean of differences VAS score at the 6-24th hour (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared in terms of additional paracetamol need, a significant difference was found again (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tramadol need.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative administration of etofenamate spray provided an analgesic effect at 24 h and additional analgesic usage decreased. Postoperative analgesia can also be used by administering NSAIDs around the cesarean section incision. In this way, the side effects of other systemic analgesics are avoided.

CLINICAL TRIAL ID

PACTR201811864509898. CLINICAL TRIAL WEB LINK: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=5745.

Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia Use After Cesarean Delivery Under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study in 729 US Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Optimizing analgesia after cesarean delivery is essential to quality of patient recovery. The American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology recommend multimodal analgesia (MMA). However, little is known about clinical implementation of these guidelines after cesarean delivery under general anesthesia (GA). We performed this study to describe the use of MMA after cesarean delivery under GA in the United States and determine factors associated with use of MMA, variation in analgesia practice across hospitals, and trends in MMA use over time.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women over 18 years who had a cesarean delivery under GA between 2008 and 2018 was conducted using the Premier Healthcare database (Premier Inc). The primary outcome was utilization of opioid-sparing MMA (osMMA), defined as receipt of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen with or without opioids and without the use of an opioid-combination drug. Any use of either agent within a combination preparation was not considered osMMA. The secondary outcome was use of optimal opioid-sparing MMA (OosMMA), defined as use of a local anesthetic technique such as truncal block or local anesthetic infiltration in addition to osMMA. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with use of osMMA, as well as variation across hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 130,946 patients were included in analysis. osMMA regimens were used in 11,133 patients (8.5%). Use of osMMA increased from 2.0% in 2008 to 18.8% in 2018. Black race (7.9% vs 9.3%; odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] 0.87 [0.81-0.94]) and Hispanic ethnicity (8.6% vs 10.0%; OR, 0.86 [0.79-0.950]) were associated with less receipt of osMMA compared to White and non-Hispanic counterparts. Medical comorbidities were generally not associated with receipt of osMMA, although patients with preeclampsia were less likely to receive osMMA (9.0%; OR, 0.91 [0.85-0.98]), while those with a history of drug abuse (12.5%; OR, 1.42 [1.27-1.58]) were more likely to receive osMMA. There was moderate interhospital variability in the use of osMMA (intraclass correlation coefficient = 38%). OosMMA was used in 2122 (1.6%) patients, and utilization increased from 0.8% in 2008 to 4.1% in 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in osMMA utilization was observed after cesarean delivery under GA in this cohort of US hospitals. While increasing trends in utilization of osMMA and OosMMA are encouraging, there is need for increased attention to postoperative analgesia practices after GA for cesarean delivery given low percentage of patients receiving osMMA and OosMMA.

Critical Care in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders-A Call to Action

The rising in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) incidence, highlights the need for critical care allotment for these patients. Due to risk for hemorrhage and possible hemorrhagic shock requiring blood product transfusion, hemodynamic instability and risk of end-organ damage, having an intensive care unit (ICU) with surgical expertise (surgical ICU or equivalent based on institutional resources) is highly recommended. Intensive care units physicians and nurses should be familiarized with intraoperative anesthetic and surgical techniques as well as obstetrics physiologic changes to provide postpartum management of PAS. Validated tools such of bedside point of care ultrasound and viscoelastic tests such as thromboelastogram/rotational thromboelastometry (TEG/ROTEM) are clinically useful in the assessment of hemodynamic status (shock diagnosis, assessment of both fluid responsiveness and tolerance) and transfusion guidance (in patients requiring massive transfusion as opposed to tranditional hemostatic resuscitation) respectively. The future of PAS management lies in the collaborative and multidisciplinary environment. We recommend that women with high suspicion or a confirmed PAS should have a preoperative plan in place and be managed in a tertiary center who is experienced in managing surgically complex cases. KEY POINTS: · The rising in placenta accreta spectrum incidence highlights the need for critical care expertise.. · Emerging tools such as point-of-care ultrasound and thromboelastography/rotational thromboelastometry represent new avenues for real time optimization of hemodynamic and hematological care of patients with PAS.. · Patients with PAS should be referred to a tertiary center having an intensive care unit (ICU) with surgical expertise (or equivalent based on institutional resources)..

Anesthesia Considerations for Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Anesthesiologists are critical members of the multidisciplinary team managing patients with suspected placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). Preoperatively, anesthesiologists provide predelivery consultation for patients with suspected PAS where anesthetic modality and invasive monitor placement is discussed. Additionally, anesthesiologists carefully assess patient and surgical risk factors to choose an anesthetic plan and to prepare for massive intraoperative hemorrhage. Postoperatively, the obstetric anesthesiologist hold unique skills to assist with postoperative pain management for cesarean hysterectomy. We review the unique aspects of peripartum care for patients with PAS who undergo cesarean hysterectomy and explain why these responsibilities are critical for achieving successful outcomes for patients with PAS. KEY POINTS: · Anesthesiologists are critical members of the multidisciplinary team planning for patients with suspected placenta accreta spectrum.. · Intraoperative preparation for massive hemorrhage is a key component of anesthetic care for patients with PAS.. · Obstetric anesthesiologists have a unique skill set to manage postpartum pain and postoperative disposition for patients with PAS who undergo cesarean hysterectomy..

Analgesic Efficacy of COX-2 Inhibitors in Periodontal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors versus other drugs in periodontal surgery. Two researchers searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ACM Digital, BASE, EBSCOhost, Scopus, or Web of Science for clinical trials using various combinations of words. All articles that met the selection criteria were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. For data analysis, the inverse variance and mean difference statistical method was used with Review Manager 5.3 software for Windows. According to the conclusion of each study (qualitative evaluation), only one clinical trial had results in favor of a COX-2 inhibitor when compared to placebo, one clinical study informed that a COX-2 was better that an active control, four studies showed similar analgesic efficacy to active controls, and one clinical study informed the analgesic effect of one celecoxib-caffeine combination in comparison with celecoxib alone and placebo (n = 337). The COX-2 inhibitors showed a decrease in the rescue analgesic consumption (n = 138; I2 = 15%; mean difference = −0.31; 95%CIs = −0.6 to −0.01), and lower pain intensity at four hours (n = 178; I2 = 0%; mean difference = −2.25; 95%CIs = −2.94 to −1.55; p = 0.00001) when compared to active controls after periodontal surgery. In conclusion, the data indicate that COX-2 agents produce better pain relief in comparison to placebo and other drugs after periodontal surgery.

A Multimodal Protocol to Limit Opioid Exposure and Effectively Manage Postoperative Cesarean Birth Pain

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of implementing a multimodal plan of care in treating the pain of the postoperative cesarean birth patient that limited opioid exposure.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was conducted to evaluate a pain management protocol implemented for postoperative cesarean patients before and after a practice change. Sample included term postoperative cesarean patients ≥ 37 weeks of gestation, who had spinal or epidural, were 18 years or older, gave birth to a singleton newborn, admitted to the maternal child health department, and were prescribed opioids as a postoperative pain management treatment plan. Participants (N = 150) were evaluated based on two groups: n = 75 in the preimplementation group and n = 75 in the postimplementation group.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the total oral opioid milligrams administered between the pregroup (M = 27.13) and postgroup (M = 8.43), after the practice change (p < .001). There was an increase of nonopioids administered to treat and manage postoperative cesarean pain, Motrin PO (p = < .001) and Tylenol PO (p = .002).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Fewer milligram equivalents of morphine were administered when postoperative cesarean patients were placed on scheduled nonopioids to treat pain.

Effects of opioids administered via intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia after caesarean section: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

Post-caesarean section analgesia is important physiologically and psychologically for both mothers and infants. Patient-controlled analgesia is a well-established method of administering opioids for postoperative pain. However, to date, no study has systematically investigated the effects of opioids administered through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in parturients who have undergone caesarean section.

Methods

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the analgesic and adverse effects of opioids administered via IVPCA or PCEA in parturients who have undergone a caesarean section. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception through 02 10, 2022 for relevant records. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared opioids administered via IVPCA or PCEA and reported outcomes of interest were included. Studies were excluded if the solution for patient-controlled analgesia contained antiemetics and/or other analgesics in addition to opioids. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Summary data were extracted from each eligible study. The primary outcome was pain intensity, and the secondary outcomes were opioid-related adverse effects. Frequentist network meta-analyses were performed using a contrast-based random-effects model. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021254040.

Findings

Twenty-three studies with 2589 parturients were included. Compared with IVPCA morphine as a reference treatment, PCEA fentanyl had better analgesic effects at 4 h (mean difference [MD] in the visual analogue scale score, -0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.16, -0.34]) and 8 h (MD, -0.93; 95% CI [-1.57, -0.28]) and yielded lower odds of developing nausea/vomiting (odds ratio [OR], 0.27; 95% CI [0.09, 0.80]) and sedation/drowsiness (OR, 0.22; 95% CI [0.11, 0.45]). However, PCEA fentanyl may be more likely to cause pruritus than IVPCA treatments.

Interpretation

Considering the analgesic efficacy; opioid-induced nausea, vomiting, and sedation; and the well-being of breastfed infants, PCEA fentanyl may be the treatment of choice for post-caesarean section analgesia.

Funding

The Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (TCRD-TPE-111-27).

Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data

Women who have had a Cesarean Section (CS) frequently report severe pain and pain-related interference. One reason for insufficient pain treatment might be inconsistent implementation of evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the association between implementing three elements of care recommended by guidelines for postoperative pain management and pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women after CS. The analysis relied on an anonymized dataset of women undergoing CS, retrieved from PAIN OUT. PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provides clinicians with treatment assessment methodology and tools for patients to assess multi-dimensional pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. We examined whether the care included [i] regional anesthesia with a neuraxial opioid OR general anesthesia with wound infiltration or a Transvesus Abdominis Plane block; [ii] at least one non-opioid analgesic at the full daily dose; and [iii] pain assessment and recording. Credit for care was given only if all three elements were administered (= “full”); otherwise, it was “incomplete”. A “Pain Composite Score-total” (PCStotal), evaluating outcomes of pain intensity, pain-related interference with function, and side-effects, was the primary endpoint in the total cohort (women receiving GA and/or RA) or a sub-group of women with RA only. Data from 5182 women was analyzed. “Full” care was administered to 20% of women in the total cohort and to 21% in the RA sub-group. In both groups, the PCStotal was significantly lower compared to “incomplete” care (p < 0.001); this was a small-to-moderate effect size. Administering all three elements of care was associated with better pain-related outcomes after CS. These should be straightforward and inexpensive for integration into routine care after CS. However, even in this group, a high proportion of women reported poor outcomes, indicating that additional work needs to be carried out to close the evidence-practice gap so that women who have undergone CS can be comfortable when caring for themselves and their newborn.

Manejo del dolor postoperatorio de cesárea: Estudio Observacional en el Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal 2021

Objetivo. Describir los esquemas y efectividad del tratamiento del dolor postoperatorio en el Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal. Materiales y Métodos. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo de corte transversal, en el que se revisaron y analizaron 305 historias clínicas de pacientes atendidas entre enero y marzo del 2021, se recolectaron datos como los esquemas de tratamiento, frecuencia del dolor, manejo analgésico, rescates, uso de opioides, y efectos adversos. Resultados. De las 303 historias clínicas incluidas en el estudio el esquema de tratamiento más usado fue morfina intratecal en combinación de un a analgésico vía endovenosa (93.1%) el cual se inició en sala de operaciones, los efectos adversos más frecuentes fueron náuseas y vómitos (4.3%), prurito (1.3%), retención urinaria (0.3%). No se reportó, depresión respiratoria ni presencia de dolor severo; pero si hubo la necesidad de uso de rescate analgésico en un 20% de pacientes en el servicio de recuperación. Conclusiones. El esquema analgésico más usado para el dolor post operatorio fue morfina intratecal en combinación con un analgésico vía endovenosa (93.1%), y este esquema se inició durante la cirugía (98.7%). La analgesia multimodal incluyendo morfina neuroaxial aunado a analgésicos endovenosos tuvo menor incidencia del uso de medicamentos de rescate para controlar el dolor postoperatorio irruptivo secundario a cesárea en la muestra estudiada

Nalbuphine May Be Superior to Sufentanil in Relieving Postcesarean Uterine Contraction Pain in Multiparas: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Postcesarean pain remains a major complaint from puerperium women who have undergone cesarean section, especially uterine contraction induced visceral pain. The optimal opioid for pain relief after cesarean section (CS) is still unclear. The goal of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of Nalbuphine to Sufentanil in patients who underwent CS.

Patients and Methods

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we included patients who received Nalbuphine or Sufentanil Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after CS between 1 January 2018 and 30 November 2020. Data on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at uterine contraction, at rest, and at movement, analgesic consumption, and side effects were collected. We performed logistic regression to identify predictors of severe uterine contraction pain.

Results

A total of 674 patients were identified in the unmatched cohort, and 612 patients in the matched one. Compared to the Sufentanil group, lower VAS-contraction was recorded in the Nalbuphine group in both the unmatched and matched cohorts, the mean difference (MD) on POD1 was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.54, p<0.001) and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.47, p<0.001), respectively, and the MD of POD2 was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.40, P=0.019) and 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.41, P=0.026), respectively. On POD1 but not POD2, VAS-movement was lower in the Nalbuphine group as compared to the Sufentanil group. No difference was found between VAS-rest on POD1 and POD2 in both unmatched and matched cohorts. Less analgesic consumption, and side effects were recorded in the Nalbuphine group. Logistic regression indicated that multipara and analgesic consumption were risk factors for severe uterine contraction pain. In subgroup analysis, VAS-contraction was meaningfully reduced in the Nalbuphine group compared with the Sufentanil group in multipara patients, but not primiparas.

Conclusion

Compared to Sufentanil, Nalbuphine may provide better analgesia on uterine contraction pain. The superior analgesia may only exhibit in multiparas.

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Studies on Postoperative Pain Management of Cesarean Section

Purpose

Cesarean section (C-section) is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Many studies on pain management after C-section have been published in recent decades, many of which focused on new regional techniques. The purpose of this study is to outline the connections within the dynamic evolution of postcesarean delivery analgesia research publications using retrospective bibliometric analysis.

Patients and Methods

Published studies on postoperative pain management of C-section were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) of Web of Science (WOS) Core collection database. All papers published from 1978 to October 22, 2022 were searched. The research progress and growing trend were quantitatively analyzed by total publications, research institutions, journal impact factors, and author's contribution. Total citations frequency, average citations per item and h-index were used for evaluating literature quantity. Top 20 journals with the highest number of publications were charted. The keywords co-occurrence overlay map was visualized by the VOSviewer software.

Results

From 1978 to 2022, a total of 1032 articles in postcesarean delivery analgesia research field were published, with 23,813 times cited, average citations of 23.07 per item, and an h-index of 68. The most high-yield publication year, countries, journals, authors, institutions were 2020 (n=79), the United States (n=288), Anesthesia and Analgesia (n=108), Carvalho B (n=25), and Stanford University (n=33), respectively. The United States had the most cited papers. The future research interest might be "prescription", "quadratus lumborum block", "postnatal depression", "persistent pain", "dexmedetomidine", "enhanced recovery", and "multimodal analgesia".

Conclusion

By employing the online bibliometric tool and VOSviewer software, we found that studies on postcesarean analgesia had grown markedly. The focus had evolved to nerve block, postnatal depression, persistent pain, and enhanced recovery.

Cesarean delivery using an ERAS-CD process for nonopioid anesthesia and analgesia drug/medication management

Cesarean delivery (CD) is a surgical delivery of a neonate with surgical access through the maternal abdominal and uterine structures. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a standardized perioperative care program and surgery quality improvement process that has had global spread across numerous surgical disciplines. The medical and surgical use of opioids for pain management and the nonmedical opioid use, over the last three decades, have significantly increased the prevalence of abuse and addiction to opioids. This review summarizes pain, pregnancy substance use, and ERAS-directed analgesia and anesthesia for opioid use reduction or elimination in the operative and postoperative periods. Enhanced recovery (quality and safety) in the surgical CD context requires collaboration, consensus, and appropriate clinical prioritization to allow for the identification of 'the right patient, in the right clinical situation, with the right informed consent, and the right clinical care team and health system'.

Sufentanil Combined with Nalbuphine via Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Evaluation

Purpose

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy, opioid consumption, and safety profile of two patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) regimens (sufentanil combined with nalbuphine vs sufentanil alone) after cesarean section (CS).

Patients and Methods

Parturients (n = 1808) received sufentanil combined with nalbuphine (SN group) or sufentanil alone (S group) as PCIA after CS. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score with movement (NRS-M) at 24 h after CS. Secondary outcomes were NRS scores at rest (NRS-R) at 24 and 48 h after CS, NRS-M at 48 h after CS, cumulative PCIA bolus times, and opioid consumption during the first 24 and 48 h postoperatively, which was measured in morphine-equivalent doses.

Results

The population comprised 993 and 815 subjects in the SN and S groups, respectively. At 24 and 48 h after CS, the respective NRS-M scores of the SN group (4.62, 3.37) were each significantly lower than those of the S group (5.18, 4.01; P < 0.01 for both). The corresponding NRS-S scores were similarly lower in the SN group (0.96, 0.19) than in the S group (2.05, 0.92; P < 0.01 for both). After adjusting for covariates, the SN group still had lower NRS-M than the S group at 24 h after CS (estimate adjusted = 0.565, P < 0.001). The PCIA bolus times were significantly lower in the SN group than in the S group. The rates of bradycardia and respiratory depression were lower in the SN group than in the S group. However, the rates of dizziness and postoperative hypotension were slightly higher in the SN group, and those of nausea/vomiting were comparable.

Conclusion

Compared with sufentanil alone, sufentanil combined with nalbuphine for PCIA provided superior analgesia in parturient women after CS.

Placenta accreta spectrum part I: anesthesia considerations based on an extended review of the literature

"Placenta accreta spectrum" (PAS) describes abnormal placental adherence to the uterine wall without spontaneous separation at delivery. Though relatively rare, PAS presents a particular challenge to anesthesiologists, as it is associated with massive peripartum hemorrhage and high maternal morbidity and mortality. Standardized evidence-based PAS management strategies are currently evolving and emphasize: "PAS centers of excellence", multidisciplinary teams, novel diagnostics/pharmaceuticals (especially regarding hemostasis, hemostatic agents, point-of-care diagnostics), and novel operative/interventional approaches (expectant management, balloon occlusion, embolization). Though available data are heterogeneous, these developments affect anesthetic management and must be considered in planed anesthetic approaches. This two-part review provides a critical overview of the current evidence and offers structured evidence-based recommendations to help anesthesiologists improve outcomes for women with PAS. This first part discusses PAS management in centers of excellence, multidisciplinary care team, anesthetic approach and monitoring, surgical approaches, patient safety checklists, temperature management, interventional radiology, postoperative care and pain therapy. The diagnosis and treatment of hemostatic disturbances and preoperative prepartum anemia, blood loss, transfusion management and postpartum venous thromboembolism will be addressed in the second part of this series.

Use of Scheduled Nonopioid Analgesia to Decrease Inpatient Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Cesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To compare opioid use and pain scores in women who had scheduled cesarean birth before and after implementing a scheduled nonopioid analgesia practice guideline.

DESIGN

Quality improvement project with a comparison of pre-/postintervention.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

A 170-bed community hospital where the administration of postcesarean pain medications was unstandardized.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of 175 individuals who were scheduled for cesarean birth (106 in preintervention group and 69 in postimplementation group).

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

All participants had received a dose of 150 mcg of intrathecal morphine intraoperatively. Care of participants in the postimplementation group included a new practice guideline using preoperative oral acetaminophen 1 g and postoperative intravenous ketorolac 30 mg that transitioned to ibuprofen 600 mg orally every 6 hours until discharge. Acetaminophen 1 g every 6 hours also continued until discharge. For breakthrough pain, oxycodone 5 mg to 10 mg was available.

RESULTS

Results were analyzed using the chi-square and t test. There was a statistical difference in the mean milligram morphine equivalent consumed after scheduled cesarean birth (preintervention = 21.15 vs. postintervention = 3.91, p < .001). Postimplementation, 84.1% of participants did not consume any opioids beyond the intrathecal dose compared to 47.2% of participants preintervention. Mean pain scores decreased from 2.49 to 1.62 (p < .001), and there was an observed decrease of the highest reported pain score from 5.39 to 4.03 (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this project support the current literature indicating that the administration of a scheduled nonopioid multimodal analgesia regimen to individuals with scheduled cesarean birth is an effective postoperative pain management strategy. This approach to managing surgical birth pain can decrease subjective reports of pain and overall opioid consumption during the hospital stay.

Pentazocine with rectal diclofenac versus pentazocine alone for pain relief following caesarean delivery in Enugu, Nigeria: A randomized controlled trial

Objective

To measure postoperative pain relief following the use of rectal diclofenac combined with intramuscular pentazocine compared with intramuscular pentazocine alone in patients undergoing a caesarean delivery.

Methods

This single-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled pregnant women that had a caesarean section at the Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. Study participants were randomized to receive either 100 mg of rectal diclofenac given every 12 h plus 30 mg of intramuscular pentazocine given every 6 h (group A) or 60 mg of intramuscular pentazocine given every 6 h (group B). The primary outcome was the level of pain as measured using a visual analogue scale. The secondary outcomes were the level of satisfaction with pain relief and need for rescue analgesia.

Results

A total of 200 participants were randomized equally into the two groups. Participants in group A had significantly better pain control and satisfaction over the 48 h after surgery compared with group B. Significantly more of group B required rescue analgesia for breakthrough pain compared with group A.

Conclusion

Rectal diclofenac combined with intramuscular pentazocine was significantly better at controlling pain compared with pentazocine alone in the first 48 h following caesarean section.

Trial registration number: PACTR202107706925314 at www.pactr.org on 28 July 2021.

The Anesthetic Effect and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section: A Meta-Analysis

Objective. To evaluate the anesthetic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine in cesarean section. Methods. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases (established until September 2020) were searched by computer. Two authors independently screened and extracted literature related to the application of dexmedetomidine in the cesarean section according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The control group received either subarachnoid block (lumbar anesthesia) or combined lumbar anesthesia and epidural anesthesia (combined lumbar epidural anesthesia) with bupivacaine or combined bupivacaine and fentanyl. The observation group was additionally given dexmedetomidine based on the control group, to analyze the anesthetic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine in cesarean section. Results. A total of 580 cesarean delivery women were included in 8 studies, and the results showed that the peak time of sensory block in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group (standard mean $\text{difference}=-0.28$ ; 95% confidence interval: -0.48, -0.08; $P=0.006$ ), sensory block lasted longer than that in the control group (standard mean $\text{difference}=1.49$ ; 95% confidence interval: 1.21, 1.78; $P<0.00001$ ), the sedation rate was higher than that in the control group, the onset of the first postoperative pain was significantly delayed compared with that in the control group, and the incidence of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, postoperative chills, and fever was lower than that in the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. Dexmedetomidine combined with lumbar anesthesia or combined lumbar epidural anesthesia for women in cesarean section has more clinical benefits and better safety.

Post-cesarean section analgesia

Worldwide, the most performed surgical intervention is cesarean section. Hence, post-cesarean pain is a common problem with significant health and economic impact on the individual patient and society. Adequate treatment of post-cesarean pain is necessary to facilitate enhanced recovery, improve neonatal outcome by improving breastfeeding success and bonding between mother and child, and reduce pain-induced side effects. Therefore, optimal pain relief is important, but in the obstetric population, this is often complex due to the interplay of mother and neonate. To facilitate recovery and temper the side effects of potent analgesic drugs such as opioids, multimodal analgesia is currently advocated, and clear international guidelines and recommendations have recently been described. In the present overview, we will discuss the most recent guidelines and evaluate various analgesic interventions.

Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to determine the analgesic effectiveness of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), including each anatomical approach, with or without intrathecal morphine (ITMP) in cesarean delivery (CD). All relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic effectiveness of PNBs with or without ITMP after CD until July 2021. The two co-primary outcomes were designated as (1) pain at rest 6 h after surgery and (2) postoperative cumulative 24-h morphine equivalent consumption. Secondary outcomes were the time to first analgesic request, pain at rest 24 h, and dynamic pain 6 and 24 h after surgery. Seventy-six studies (6278 women) were analyzed. The combined ilioinguinal nerve and anterior transversus abdominis plane (II-aTAP) block in conjunction with ITMP had the highest SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) values for postoperative rest pain at 6 h (88.4%) and 24-h morphine consumption (99.4%). Additionally, ITMP, ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in conjunction with ITMP, lateral TAP block, and wound infiltration (WI) or continuous infusion (WC) below the fascia also showed a significant reduction in two co-primary outcomes. Only the II-aTAP block had a statistically significant additional analgesic effect compared to ITMP alone on rest pain at 6 h after surgery (−7.60 (−12.49, −2.70)). In conclusion, combined II-aTAP block in conjunction with ITMP is the most effective post-cesarean analgesic strategy with lower rest pain at 6 h and cumulative 24-h morphine consumption. Using the six described analgesic strategies for postoperative pain management after CD is considered reasonable. Lateral TAP block, WI, and WC below the fascia may be useful alternatives in patients with a history of sensitivity or severe adverse effects to opioids or when the CD is conducted under general anesthesia.

A comparison of acute pain management strategies after cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 1.2 million cesarean deliveries performed each year in the United States alone. While traditional postoperative pain management strategies previously relied heavily on opioids, practitioners are now moving toward opioid-sparing protocols using multiple classes of nonnarcotic analgesics. Multimodal pain management systems have been adopted by other surgical specialties including gynecology, although the data regarding their use for postoperative cesarean delivery pain management remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a multimodal pain management regimen after cesarean delivery reduces the required number of morphine milligram equivalents (a unit of measurement for opioids) compared with traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia while adequately controlling postoperative pain.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study of postoperative pain management for women undergoing cesarean delivery at a large county hospital. It was conducted during a transition from a traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia regimen to a multimodal regimen that included scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, with opioids used as needed. The data were collected for a 6-week period before and after the transition. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid use defined as morphine milligram equivalents in the first 48 hours. The secondary outcomes included serial pain scores, time to discharge, and exclusive breastfeeding rates. Women who required general anesthesia or had a history of substance abuse disorder were excluded. The statistical analyses included the Student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Hodges-Lehman shift, with a P value <.05 being considered significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 877 women underwent cesarean delivery and 778 met the inclusion criteria-378 received the traditional morphine patient-controlled analgesia and 400 received the multimodal regimen. The implementation of a multimodal regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the morphine milligram equivalent use in the first 48 hours (28 [14-41] morphine milligram equivalents vs 128 [86-174] morphine milligram equivalents; P<.001). Compared with the traditional group, more women in the multimodal group reported a pain score ≤4 by 48 hours (88% vs 77%; P<.001). There was no difference in the time to discharge (P=.32). Of the women who exclusively planned to breastfeed, fewer used formula before discharge in the multimodal group than in the traditional group (9% vs 12%; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Transition to a multimodal pain management regimen for women undergoing cesarean delivery resulted in a decrease in opioid use while adequately controlling postoperative pain. A multimodal regimen was associated with early successful exclusive breastfeeding.

Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anaesthetic wound infiltration for analgesia after caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and local anaesthetic wound infiltration are used to relieve pain after caesarean section.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether TAP block or local anaesthetic wound infiltration is the better analgesic option after caesarean section.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, Web of Science up to June 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We retrieved randomised controlled trials comparing TAP block with wound infiltration after caesarean section. Primary outcome was pain score during rest (analogue scale, 0 to 10) at 2 h postoperatively, analysed according to the TAP block technique (ultrasound-guided/landmark-guided), anaesthetic strategy (spinal/general), intrathecal fentanyl (yes/no) and multimodal analgesia (yes/no). Secondary pain-related outcomes included pain scores during rest at 12 and 24 h, and total intravenous morphine consumption at 2, 12 and 24 h. We sought rates of block complications, including postoperative infection, haematoma, visceral injury and local anaesthetic systemic toxicity.

RESULTS

Seven trials, totalling 475 patients, were identified. There was no difference in pain score during rest at 2 h between groups. Subgroup analyses revealed no differences related to TAP block technique (P = 0.64), anaesthetic strategy (P = 0.53), administration of intrathecal fentanyl (P = 0.59) or presence of multimodal analgesia (P = 0.57). Pain score during rest at 12 h and intravenous morphine consumption at 2 and 12 h were identical in both groups. Data were insufficient to compare block complications. Overall quality of evidence was moderate.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate level evidence that TAP block and wound infiltration provide similar postoperative analgesia after caesarean section.

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020208046.

Comparison of sequential versus pre mixed administration of intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine for patients undergoing elective Caesarean section at Zewditu memorial referral hospital: A prospective cohort study

Background

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the method of choice for surgery below umbilicus like elective cesarean section. However, Spinal anesthesia is associated with hypotension and limited analgesia duration. To minimize those complications adding opioids like fentanyl either sequentially with separate syringe or pre mixed with local anesthetics become common practice.

Objective

To compare the hemodynamic and analgesic effect of sequential versus pre mixed injection of intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine for patients who underwent elective CS under Spinal anesthesia.

Method

A prospective cohort study was performed on parturient who undergone elective cesarean section from 01 January 2020 to 30 March 2020. The decision to give either sequential or premixed drug was based on the responsible anesthetists. Sixty-six American society of Anesthesiologist Ⅱ age ≥18 was recruited. Those who received sequentially were grouped as (S- group) and those who had received pre mixed technique were grouped as (M-group). Data were entered into Epi Info version 7.0 and transported into SPSS Version 22 for analysis. Based on normality assumption, analysis was done by independent t-test for normally distributed data. Whereas Mann –Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data and x2 (Chi-square) test for categorical variable. P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Result

Significant reduction in intra operative mean arterial blood pressure was seen in premixed group compared to Sequential group until 15th minute immediately after spinal anesthesia. Thus, the incidence of hypotension was higher in M − group compared to S- group, (p < 0.05). The median Postoperative pain VAS score was significantly lower in the S - group compared to M − group of 4th, 5th and 6th hr. The mean time for 1st rescue analgesic request time was prolonged in the S - group compared to M − group (287.909 ± 15.255 vs. 261.39 ± 25.378) min respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The Sequential intrathecal injection of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine provided significant improvement in the blood pressure stability and of sensory and motor block compared to premixed groups.

•

Spinal anesthesia is associated with hypotension and limited analgesia duration.

•

To minimize those complications adding opioids like fentanyl either pre mixed with local anesthetics or in separate syringe become common practice.

•

Sequential intrathecal injection of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine provided significant improvement in the blood pressure stability and of sensory and motor block compared to premixed groups.

•

Longer time to first analgesia request was seen in sequential group compared with premixing group.

•

There was significant lower total tramadol consumption in sequential compared with premixing group but comparable total diclofenac consumption.

A multimodal approach to reducing post-caesarean opioid use: a quality improvement initiative

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a QI initiative to reduce post-caesarean opioid use.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic hospital in the USA.

POPULATION

Women over 18 years undergoing caesarean section.

METHODS

A quality improvement (QI) initiative titled Reduced Option for Opioid Therapy (ROOT) was implemented in women undergoing caesarean section. The intervention included implementation of a postpartum order set maximising the use of scheduled NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Additionally, nursing education promoted non-opioid therapy as first-line, with opioids reserved for breakthrough pain. Performance feedback was provided to nursing staff on a bimonthly basis. Post-caesarean opioid use was reviewed in the 6 months before and after implementation of ROOT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed during the postpartum admission. Secondary outcomes included opioid use per postoperative day, the proportion of opioid-free admissions, the percentage of patients discharged with a prescription for opioids, prescription size, and pain scores.

RESULTS

Following implementation of ROOT, median inpatient opioid use decreased by more than 60%, from 75 to 30 MME per admission (P < 0.001). The proportion of opioid-free admissions increased from 12.6% pre-intervention to 30.7% post-intervention (P < 0.001). Additionally, the median opioid dose prescribed at discharge decreased in the post-intervention cohort, and the proportion of patients discharged without an opioid prescription increased. The reduction in opioids was associated with a slight decrease in patient-reported pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ROOT significantly reduced opioid use while achieving comparable pain control.

Validation of translated Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-10A) score after nonelective cesarean delivery (CD) in an Arabic-speaking population

Background:

The ObsQoR-11 is a validated scale that assesses recovery after cesarean delivery (CD). This observational study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of its Arabic version.

Methods:

The original ObsQoR-11 was translated into an Arabic version (ObsQoR-10A). All participants completed the ObsQoR-10A at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively after CD. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility were assessed.

Results:

The ObsQoR-10A correlated with Global Health Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 24 h (R = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.56–0.80, P < 0.001) and at 48 h (R = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54–0.78, P < 0.001) and differentiated between good and poor recovery (median scores at 24 h 88 vs. 71, P < 0.001; at 48 h 95.5 vs. 70, P < 0.001). ObsQoR-10A correlated with hospital length of stay at 24 h (R = −0.21, 95% CI: −0.40 to −0.02, P = 0.03) and at 48 h (R = −0.21, 95% CI: −0.40 to −0.03, P = 0.02); gestational age at 24 h (R = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.03–0.40, P = 0.02); change in hemoglobin at 24 h (R = −0.30, 95% CI: 0.51 to −0.10, P < 0.01); and total opioids at 48 h (R = −0.45, 95% CI: −0.62 to −0.27, P < 0.001). There was a significant difference between 24 h and 48 h postoperative ObsQoR-10A scores (median difference: −18; P < 0.001 which shows responsiveness). Other key measures included a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, split-half 0.75, and intra-class correlation >0.62 with no floor or ceiling effects. Median (IQR) completion time was 3 (3-5) and 3 (2.5-3.5) minutes at 24 h and 48 h.

Conclusions:

ObsQoR-10A is a valid, reliable, responsive, and a clinically feasible tool in an Arabic-speaking obstetric population.

Impact of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Bupivacaine or Ropivacaine Versus Intrathecal Morphine on Opioid-related Side Effects After Cesarean Delivery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

Intrathecal morphine (ITM) is frequently associated with side effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pruritus. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus ITM on side effects following cesarean delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared TAP with ITM for cesarean delivery. The primary outcomes were opioid-related side effects. The secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and time to the first analgesia request.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 660 patients were included. TAP blocks were performed with bupivacaine or ropivacaine. There was less PONV with TAP versus ITM (risk ratio [RR]=0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.63, P<0.001; I2=0%), but no significant difference in pruritus (RR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.49-1.18, P=0.22; I2=78%) and sedation (RR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.19-1.00, P=0.05; I2=0%). TAP had a greater morphine consumption in 24 hours (mean difference: 5.80 mg; 95% CI: 1.38-10.22 mg, P=0.01; I2=89%) and higher pain score at rest at 6 hours (mean difference: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.39-1.02, P<0.001; I2=56%), but similar pain at rest at 24 hours and on movement compared with ITM. No differences were found in time to first analgesia and patient satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

Compared with ITM, TAP block is associated with less PONV but inferior early analgesia after cesarean delivery. However, the heterogeneity among the studies highlights the need for more well-designed studies to obtain more robust conclusions.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Cesarean Delivery

This review summarizes the importance of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) implementation for cesarean deliveries (CDs) and explores ERAS elements shared with the non-obstetric surgical population. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) consensus statement on ERAS for CD is used as a template for the discussion. Suggested areas for research to improve our understanding of ERAS in the obstetric population are delineated. Strategies and examples of anesthesia-specific protocol elements are included.

Influence of Catheter-Incision Congruency in Epidural Analgesia on Postcesarean Pain Management: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or epidural morphine may alleviate postcesarean pain; however, conventional lumbar epidural insertion is catheter–incision incongruent for cesarean delivery. Methods: In total, 189 women who underwent cesarean delivery were randomly divided into four groups (low thoracic PCEA, lumbar PCEA, low thoracic morphine, and lumbar morphine groups) for postcesarean pain management. Pain intensities, including static pain, dynamic pain, and uterine cramp, were measured using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The proportion of participants who experienced dynamic wound pain with a VAS score of >33 mm was evaluated as the primary outcome. Adverse effects, including lower extremity blockade, pruritus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation, and time of first passage of flatulence, were evaluated. Results: The low thoracic PCEA group had the lowest proportion of participants reporting dynamic pain at 6 h after spinal anesthesia (low thoracic PCEA, 28.8%; lumbar PCEA, 69.4%; low thoracic morphine, 67.3%; lumbar morphine group, 73.9%; p < 0.001). The aforementioned group also reported the most favorable VAS scores for static, dynamic, and uterine cramp pain during the first 24 h after surgery. Adverse effect profiles were similar among the four groups, but a higher proportion of participants in the lumbar PCEA group (approximately 20% more than in the other three groups) reported prolonged postoperative lower extremity motor blockade (p = 0.005). In addition, the first passage of flatulence after surgery reported by the low thoracic PCEA group was approximately 8 h earlier than that of the two morphine groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Epidural congruency is essential to PCEA for postcesarean pain. Low thoracic PCEA achieves favorable analgesic effects and may promote postoperative gastrointestinal recovery without additional adverse effects.

The Current Consideration, Approach, and Management in Postcesarean Delivery Pain Control: A Narrative Review

Optimal postoperative analgesia has a significant impact on patient recovery and outcomes after cesarean delivery. Multimodal analgesia is the core principle for cesarean delivery and pain management. For a standard analgesic regimen, the use of long-acting neuraxial opioids (e.g., morphine) and adjunct drugs, such as scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is recommended unless contraindicated. Oral or intravenous opioids should be reserved for breakthrough pain. In addition to the aforementioned use of multimodal analgesia, preoperative evaluation is critical to individualize the analgesic regimen according to the patient requirements. Risk factors for severe postoperative pain or analgesia-related adverse effects will require modifications to the standard analgesic regimen (e.g., the use of ketamine, gabapentinoids, or regional anesthetic techniques). Further investigation is required to determine analgesic drugs or dose alterations based on preoperative predictions for patients at risk of severe pain. Outcomes beyond pain and analgesic use, such as functional recovery, should be determined to evaluate analgesic treatment protocols.

Evidence-based guidance for use of intrathecal morphine as an alternative to diamorphine for Caesarean delivery analgesia

Intrathecal morphine in combination with fentanyl is an effective and safe alternative to diamorphine for Caesarean delivery analgesia. Evidence suggests minimal differences in clinical efficacy and side-effects between intrathecal morphine and diamorphine. Recommended intrathecal morphine doses for Caesarean delivery analgesia are 100-150 ug.

A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa

Background

The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neonatal bonding and the successful establishment of breastfeeding. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for post-CS analgesia. At present, no perioperative pain management protocols could be identified for the management of patients presenting for CS at regional hospitals in South Africa. This audit aimed to review the folders of patients who underwent CS, with particular reference to perioperative pain management guidelines for CS.

Methods

A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional audit was conducted. Three hundred folders (10% of the annual number of caesarean procedures performed) from New Somerset Hospital, a regional hospital in Cape Town, South Africa were reviewed.

Results

The women were a mean age of 30 years (standard deviation [s.d.]: 6.2). Median gravidity was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–3) and parity was 1 (IQR: 1–2); 52% had previously undergone a CS. In 93.3% cases, spinal anaesthesia was employed for CS. Pain assessment was poor, with only 55 (18%) patients having their pain assessed on the day of the operation. Analgesia was prescribed in over 98% of the patients, however, medication was only administered as prescribed in 32.6%. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed in < 5% of cases. None of the patients received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, or wound infusion catheter as supplementary strategies.

Conclusion

Pain management for post-CS patient at this hospital is lacking. There is the need for the implementation of a structured assessment tool to improve administration of analgesics in these patients. In addition, the reasons for the omission of NSAIDs from the analgesia regimen requires investigation. Hospital requires post-CS pain protocols to guide management especially in resource-limited settings.