Multimodal Prehabilitation Programs for Older Surgical Patients

Feasibility of prehabilitation for patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty; a pilot study

Objective

To examine the feasibility of conducting a preoperative home-based prehabilitation program for total knee arthroplasty patients at risk for delayed in-hospital recovery, and to explore the pre- and postoperative impact of this program.

Design

A retrospective cohort study with matched controls, enabling subgroup analyses.

Setting

Home-based.

Subjects

Patients awaiting primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty between 2019 and 2020, were compared with matched historic cases from 2016 to 2017. Matching criteria were scoring ≤17 points on the De Morton Mobility Index and >12.5 s on the timed-up-and-go test.

Intervention

Supervised home-based prehabilitation program versus no prehabilitation.

Outcomes

Feasibility, determined by recruitment rate, adherence, and safety of the program. Preoperative impact, assessed for the intervention group by differences in mean values for aerobic capacity, muscle strength and functional mobility between the first and last sessions. Postoperative impact was defined as the time needed to achieve in-hospital independence of physical function and was measured by the differences in mean values between the intervention and control groups.

Results

Recruitment rate was 71 %; adherence and drop-out rates were 88 % and 12 % respectively. No adverse events were reported. Preoperatively, the intervention group showed significant improvements in aerobic capacity on the 2-min walking test (84.29 m-98.06 m; p = 0.007) and 2-min step test (40.35 steps to 52.95 steps; p = 0.014), muscle strength on the 30 s chair stand test (7.3 stands to 10.1 stands; p = 0.002), and functional mobility as seen in the timed-up-and-go-test (19.52 s-15.85 s; p = 0.031). Postoperatively, the intervention group achieved in-hospital independence of physical function earlier (mean rank 16.11) than the control group (mean rank 24.89; p=<0.01).

Conclusions

It is feasible to conduct a prehabilitation program 4-6 weeks preoperatively, for high-risk patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, the program appears to have a positive impact on physical fitness both pre- and postoperatively.

Prognostic impact of a 3-week multimodal prehabilitation program on frail elderly patients undergoing elective gastric cancer surgery: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Research indicates that prehabilitation is effective in optimizing physical status before surgery, although this method may be considered "aggressive" for frail elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether multimodal prehabilitation decreases postoperative complications and improves functional recovery in frail elderly patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery, in comparison to usual clinical care.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients over 65 years old with a Fried Frailty Index of 2 or higher, scheduled for gastric cancer surgery, were considered for inclusion. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group underwent a 3-week multimodal prehabilitation program prior to surgery, in addition to perioperative care guided by ERAS protocols. The control group received only the latter. The primary outcome was the comprehensive complications index (CCI) measured at 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included 30-day overall complications, functional walking capacity as assessed by 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 3-month postoperative quality of life. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06510088).

RESULTS

Among the 112 eligible patients, the median age was 74 years, with 58 (52.7%) being female. No between-group difference was found in the primary outcome measure, 30-day CCI. The Median (Q1-Q3) CCI for the intervention and control groups was 0 (0-12.2) and 0 (0-22.6) (P = 0.082), while the mean (SD) CCI was 6.1 (15.8) and 9.8 (12.7), respectively (P = 0.291). Notably, the incidence of severe complications (CCI > 20) was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (11.1% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.046), particularly in terms of medical complications (12.3% vs. 29.3%, P = 0.025). Preoperatively, 27 patients (47.4%) in the intervention group exhibited an increase in the 6MWD of at least 20 m, compared to 16 patients (27.6%) in the control group (P = 0.028). At 4 weeks postoperatively, more patients in the intervention group returned to their baseline 6MWD levels (63.2% vs. 43.1%, P = 0.031). Secondary parameters of functional capacity in the postoperative period generally favored the multimodal prehabilitation approach.

CONCLUSIONS

In frail elderly patients undergoing elective gastric cancer surgery, a prehabilitation program did not affect the 30-day postoperative complication rate or CCI but reduced severe complications and improved perioperative functional capacity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

[ClinicalTrials.gov], [NCT06510088], [07/15/2024], [Retrospectively registered].

Perioperative Considerations in Older Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Review

With the growth of the older adult population, the number of older adults waitlisted for and undergoing kidney and liver transplantation has increased. Transplantation is an important and definitive treatment for this population. We present a contemporary review of the unique preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative issues that patients older than 65 y face when they undergo kidney or liver transplantation. We focus on geriatric syndromes that are common in older patients listed for kidney or liver transplantation including frailty, sarcopenia, and cognitive dysfunction; discuss important considerations for older transplant recipients, which may impact preoperative risk stratification; and describe unique challenges in intraoperative and postoperative management for older patients. Intraoperative challenges in the older adult include using evidence-based best anesthetic practices, maintaining adequate perfusion pressure, and using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Postoperative concerns include controlling acute postoperative pain; preventing cardiovascular complications and delirium; optimizing immunosuppression; preventing perioperative kidney injury; and avoiding nephrotoxicity and rehabilitation. Future studies are needed throughout the perioperative period to identify interventions that will improve patients' preoperative physiologic status, prevent postoperative medical complications, and improve medical and patient-centered outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

Prehabilitation before elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review was to identify and map existing preoperative interventions, referred to as prehabilitation, in adult patients at home awaiting elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. This review also sought to report feasibility and patient experiences to shape clinical practice and underpin a future systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

As patients age, comorbidities become more common. Strategies to improve postoperative outcomes and to accelerate recovery are required in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Prehabilitation refers to a proactive process of increasing functional capacity before surgery to improve the patient's ability to withstand upcoming physiologic stress and, thus, avoid postoperative complications.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies that included adult patients waiting for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery at home and that described interventions optimizing preoperative physical and psychological health in any setting were included.

METHODS

The JBI methodology for conducting scoping reviews was used to identify relevant studies in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, SweMed+, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and PEDro. Gray literature was identified searching Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar, OpenGrey, NICE Evidence search, and SIGN. Studies in Danish, English, German, Norwegian, and Swedish were considered for inclusion, with no geographical or cultural limitations, or date restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and studies meeting the inclusion criteria were imported into Covidence. Sixty-seven studies from November 1987 to September 2022 were included. The data extraction tool used for the included papers was developed in accordance with the review questions and tested for adequacy and comprehensiveness with the first 5 studies by the same 2 independent reviewers. The tool was then edited to best reflect the review questions. Extracted findings are described and supported by figures and tables.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion, representing 28,553 participants. Analyses of extracted data identified various preoperative interventions for optimizing postoperative and psychological outcomes for adult patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Based on similarities, interventions were grouped into 5 categories. Eighteen studies reported on multimodal interventions, 17 reported on psychological interventions, 14 on physical training interventions, 13 on education interventions, and 5 on oral health interventions.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of strategies that can be applied when developing a prehabilitation program for patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Although prehabilitation has been tested extensively and appears to be feasible, available evidence is mostly based on small studies. For patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting to derive benefit from prehabilitation, methodologically robust clinical trials and knowledge synthesis are required to identify optimal strategies for patient selection, intervention design, adherence, and intervention duration. Future research should also consider the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions before surgery. Finally, there is a need for more qualitative studies examining whether individual interventions are meaningful and appropriate to patients, which is an important factor if interventions are to be effective.

Sleep, Pain, and Cognition: Modifiable Targets for Optimal Perioperative Brain Health

The prevention of perioperative neurocognitive disorders is a priority for patients, families, clinicians, and researchers. Given the multiple risk factors present throughout the perioperative period, a multicomponent preventative approach may be most effective. The objectives of this narrative review are to highlight the importance of sleep, pain, and cognition on the risk of perioperative neurocognitive disorders and to discuss the evidence behind interventions targeting these modifiable risk factors. Sleep disruption is associated with postoperative delirium, but the benefit of sleep-related interventions is uncertain. Pain is a risk factor for postoperative delirium, but its impact on other postoperative neurocognitive disorders is unknown. Multimodal analgesia and opioid avoidance are emerging as best practices, but data supporting their efficacy to prevent delirium are limited. Poor preoperative cognitive function is a strong predictor of postoperative neurocognitive disorder, and work is ongoing to determine whether it can be modified to prevent perioperative neurocognitive disorders.

Effects of Prehabilitation on Functional Capacity in Aged Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic Surgeries: A Systematic Review

Background: an increasing number of advanced age patients are considered for cardiothoracic surgeries. Prehabilitation optimizes the patients’ functional capacity and physiological reserve. However, the effectiveness of prehabilitation on physical functioning and postoperative recovery in the scope of cardiothoracic surgery is still uncertain. Objective: to assess the effectiveness of prehabilitation on pre- and/or postoperative functional capacity and physiological reserve in aged patients that are considered for cardiothoracic surgeries. Methods: this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021247117). The searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL until 18 April 2021. Randomized clinical trials that compared different prehabilitation strategies with usual care on the pre- and-postoperative results in aged patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries were included. Methodological quality was assessed by means of the Jadad scale, and the effectiveness of the interventions according to the Consensus on Therapeutic Exercise Training. Results: nine studies with 876 participants aged from 64 to 71.5 years old were included. Risk of bias was moderate due to the absence of double-blinding. The content of the interventions (multimodal prehabilitation n = 3; based on physical exercises n = 6) and the result measures presented wide variation, which hindered comparison across the studies. In general, the trials with better therapeutic quality (n = 6) reported more significant improvements in physical functioning, cardiorespiratory capacity, and in the postoperative results in the participants under-going prehabilitation. Conclusions: prehabilitation seems to improve functional capacity and postoperative recovery in aged patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries. However, due to the significant heterogeneity and questionable quality of the trials, both the effectiveness of prehabilitation and the optimum content are still to be determined.

Postoperative delirium mediates 180-day mortality in orthopaedic trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Frailty has been associated with increased incidence of postoperative delirium and mortality. We hypothesised that postoperative delirium mediates a clinically significant (≥1%) percentage of the effect of frailty on mortality in older orthopaedic trauma patients.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, retrospective observational study including 558 adults 65 yr and older, who presented with an extremity fracture requiring hospitalisation without initial ICU admission. We used causal statistical inference methods to estimate the relationships between frailty, postoperative delirium, and mortality.

RESULTS

In the cohort, 180-day mortality rate was 6.5% (36/558). Frail and prefrail patients comprised 23% and 39%, respectively, of the study cohort. Frailty was associated with increased 180 day mortality from 1.4% to 12.2% (11% difference; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-13.6), which translated statistically into an 88.7% (79.9-94.3%) direct effect and an 11.3% (5.7-20.1%) postoperative delirium mediated effect. Prefrailty was also associated with increased 180 day mortality from 1.4% to 4.4% (2.9% difference; 2.4-3.4), which was translated into a 92.5% (83.8-99.9%) direct effect and a 7.5% (0.1-16.2%) postoperative delirium mediated effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is associated with increased postoperative mortality, and delirium might mediate a clinically significant, but small percentage of this effect. Studies should assess whether, in patients with frailty, attempts to mitigate delirium might decrease postoperative mortality.

Effect of Cognitive Prehabilitation on the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Among Older Adults Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery: The Neurobics Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Postoperative delirium in older adults is a common and costly complication after surgery. Cognitive reserve affects the risk of postoperative delirium, and thus preoperative augmentation of reserve as a preventive technique is of vital interest.

Objective

To determine whether cognitive prehabilitation reduces the incidence of postoperative delirium among older adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2015 to August 2019 at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. Patients 60 years and older undergoing major, noncardiac, nonneurological surgery under general anesthesia, with an expected hospital stay of at least 72 hours, were eligible for trial inclusion. Patients were excluded for preoperative cognitive dysfunction and active depression.

Interventions

Participation in electronic, tablet-based preoperative cognitive exercise targeting memory, speed, attention, flexibility, and problem-solving functions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was incidence of delirium between postoperative day 0 to day 7 or discharge, as measured by a brief Confusion Assessment Method, Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, or a structured medical record review. Secondary outcomes compared delirium characteristics between patients in the intervention and control groups.

Results

Of the 699 patients approached for trial participation, 322 completed consent and 268 were randomized. Subsequently, 17 patients were excluded, leaving 251 patients in the primary outcome analysis. A total of 125 patients in the intervention group and 126 control patients were included in the final analysis (median [interquartile range] age, 67 [63-71] years; 163 women [64.9%]). Ninety-seven percent of the patients in the intervention group completed some brain exercise (median, 4.6 [interquartile range, 1.31-7.4] hours). The delirium rate among control participants was 23.0% (29 of 126). With intention-to-treat analysis, the delirium rate in the intervention group was 14.4% (18 of 125; P = .08). Post hoc analysis removed 4 patients who did not attempt any cognitive exercise from the intervention group, yielding a delirium rate of 13.2% (16 of 121; P = .04). Secondary analyses among patients with delirium showed no differences in postoperative delirium onset day or duration or total delirium-positive days across study groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

The intervention lowered delirium risk in patients who were at least minimally compliant. The ideal activities, timing, and effective dosage for cognitive exercise-based interventions to decrease postoperative delirium risk and burden need further study.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02230605.

Prehabilitation before elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review is to identify and map existing preoperative interventions, referred to as prehabilitation, in adult patients at home awaiting coronary bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. This scoping review also seeks to examine the feasibility and patient experiences in order to inform clinical practice and underpin a future systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

As patients age, comorbidities become more common. Strategies to improve postoperative outcomes and to accelerate recovery are required in patients undergoing CABG. Prehabilitation refers to a proactive process of increasing functional capacity before surgery to improve the patient's capacity to withstand upcoming physiologic stress and thus avoid postoperative complications.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This scoping review will consider any studies including adult patients at home awaiting CABG surgery. Studies will provide information on any prehabilitation intervention to optimize preoperative physical and psychological health status. Studies conducted in any setting will be included.

METHODS

The methodology will follow the JBI recommendations for scoping reviews. Any published or unpublished source of information will be considered. Studies published in English, German, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian will be included, with no geographical or cultural limitations. Retrieved papers will be screened by two independent reviewers, and a standardized tool will be used to extract data from each included source. The results will be presented as a map of the data extracted in a tabular form together with a narrative summary to provide a description of the existing evidence.

The effect of treatment modifications by an onco-geriatric MDT on one-year mortality, days spent at home and postoperative complications

OBJECTIVES

Decision-making in older patients with cancer can be complex, as benefits of treatment should be weighed against possible side-effects and life-expectancy. A novel care pathway was set up incorporating geriatric assessment into treatment decision-making for older cancer patients. Treatment decisions could be modified following discussion in an onco-geriatric multidisciplinary team (MDT). We assessed the effect of treatment modifications on outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in the surgical department of a University Hospital. Patients of 70 years and older with a solid malignancy were included. All patients underwent a nurse-led geriatric assessment (GA) and were discussed in an onco-geriatric MDT. This could result in a modified or an unchanged treatment advice compared to the regular tumor board. Primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were post-operative complications and days spent in hospital in the first year after inclusion.

RESULTS

For the 184 patients in the analyses, the median age was 77.5 years and 41.8% were female. For 46 patients (25%), the treatment advice was modified by the onco-geriatric MDT. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality between the unchanged and modified group (29.7% versus 26.1%, p = 0.7). There were, however, significantly fewer days spent in hospital (median 5 vs 8.5 days p = 0.02) and fewer grade II or higher postoperative complications (13.3% versus 35.5% p = 0.005) in the modified group.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating geriatric assessment in decision-making did not lead to excess one-year mortality, but did result in fewer complications and days spent in hospital.

Frailty is a useful predictive marker of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

Frailty results in a high risk for disability, hospitalization, and mortality. This study aimed to investigate perioperative details of frail patients who underwent pancreatectomy and whether frailty can be a predictive factor of postoperative complications, especially of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatectomy in our hospital between August 2016 and March 2019. The patients were divided into frail and pre-/non-frail groups. The diagnostic criteria were based on the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Results

Of 93 patients, 11 (11.8%) and 82 (88.2%) were frail and pre-/non-frail patients, with median ages of 82 and 72 years, respectively (p = 0.041). Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≧ IIIa) were found in 8 and 32 patients (p = 0.034), CR-POPF in 3 and 13 patients (p = 0.346), and postoperative hospital stays were 21 and 17 days (p = 0.041), respectively. On multivariate analysis, frailty was an independent predictive factor (odds ratio [OR] 5.604, 95.0% confidence interval [CI] 1.002-30.734; p = 0.047) of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≧ IIIa) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. On multivariate analysis, a soft pancreas (OR 5.696, 95.0% CI 1.142-28.149; p = 0.034) was an independent and significant predictive factor of CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Conclusions

Frailty may be a useful predictive factor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.