Updates on Simulation in Obstetrical Anesthesiology Through the COVID-19 Pandemic

Virtual simulation training for postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume hospitals in the US

Background

Maternal mortality in the United States is rising and many deaths are preventable. Emergencies, such as postpartum hemorrhage, occur less frequently in non-teaching, rural, and urban low-birth volume hospitals. There is an urgent need for accessible, evidence-based, and sustainable inter-professional education that creates the opportunity for clinical teams to practice their response to rare, but potentially devastating events.

Objective

To assess the feasibility of virtual simulation training for the management of postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume delivery hospitals.

Study design

The study occurred between December 2021 and March 2022 within 8 non-academic hospitals in the United States with low-to-moderate-delivery volumes, randomized to one of two models: direct simulation training and train-the-trainer. In the direct simulation training model, simulation faculty conducted a virtual simulation training program with participants. In the train-the-trainer model, simulation faculty conducted virtual lessons with new simulation instructors on how to prepare and conduct a simulation course. Following this training, the instructors led their own simulation training program at their respective hospitals. The direct simulation training participants and students trained by new instructors from the train-the-trainer program were evaluated with a multiple-choice questionnaire on postpartum hemorrhage knowledge and a confidence and attitude survey at 3 timepoints: prior to, immediately after, and at 3 months post-training. Paired t-tests were performed to assess for changes in knowledge and confidence within teaching models across time points. ANOVA was performed to test cross-sectionally for differences in knowledge and confidence between teaching models at each time point.

Results

Direct simulation training participants (n=22) and students of the train-the-trainer instructors (n=18) included nurses, certified nurse midwives and attending physicians in obstetrics, family practice or anesthesiology. Mean pre-course knowledge and confidence scores were not statistically different between direct simulation participants and the students of the instructors from the train-the-trainer course (79%+/-13 versus 75%+/-14, respectively, P-value=.45). Within the direct simulation group, knowledge and confidence scores significantly improved from pre- to immediately post-training (knowledge score mean difference 9.81 [95% CI 3.23-16.40], P-value<.01; confidence score mean difference 13.64 [95% CI 6.79-20.48], P-value<.01), which were maintained 3-months post-training. Within the train-the-trainer group, knowledge and confidence scores immediate post-intervention were not significantly different compared with pre-course or 3-month post-course scores. Mean knowledge scores were significantly greater for the direct simulation group compared to the train-the-trainer group immediately post-training (89%+/-7 versus 74%+/-8, P-value<.01) and at 3-months (88%+/-7 versus 76%+/-12, P-value<.01). Comparisons between groups showed no difference in confidence and attitude scores at these timepoints. Both direct simulation participants and train-the-trainer instructors preferred virtual education, or a hybrid structure, over in-person education.

Conclusion

Virtual education for obstetric simulation training is feasible, acceptable, and effective. Utilizing a direct simulation model for postpartum hemorrhage management resulted in enhanced knowledge acquisition and retention compared to a train-the-trainer model.

The importance of simulation-based multi professional training in obstetric anesthesia: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Simulation-based training remains an integral component of medical education by providing a well tolerated, controlled, and replicable environment for healthcare professionals to enhance their skills and improve patient outcomes. Simulation technology applied to obstetric anesthesiology continues to evolve as a valuable tool for the training and assessment of the multidisciplinary obstetric care team.

RECENT FINDINGS

Simulation-based technology has continued to play a role in training and assessment, including recent work on interdisciplinary communication, recognition, and management of obstetric hemorrhage, and support in the low or strained resource setting. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the evolution of simulation-based training away from a reliance on in-situ or high-fidelity manikin-based approaches toward an increasing utilization of modalities that allow for remote or asynchronous training.

SUMMARY

The evolution of simulation for interdisciplinary training and assessment in obstetric anesthesia has accelerated, playing a greater role in aspects of communication, management of hemorrhage and supporting low or strained resource settings. Augmented reality, virtual reality and mixed reality have advanced dramatically, spurred on by the need for remote and asynchronous simulation-based training during the pandemic.

Perioperative Pain Management Simulation Course: Improving Anesthesia Trainees' Confidence in the Management of Perioperative Pain and the Associated Critical Incidents

Introduction Pain management is a crucial aspect of patients' perioperative journey and a fundamental duty of every anesthetist. Throughout anesthesia training, there is an emphasis on the management of critical incidents, several of which surround pain management. With changes to the anesthesia curriculum over recent years, variable exposure to training opportunities, and a reduction in clinical hours during training, many trainees report feeling underprepared for their future roles as consultants. However, pain management remains a small fragment of the core anesthesia curriculum with no pain-focused simulation courses currently available across the UK. Simulation has proven to aid learning transfer in complicated and stressful scenarios with a substantial improvement in knowledge retention and prevention of skill loss while eliminating the risk of harm to patients. Aim A novel perioperative pain management simulation course was designed and implemented in the East of England to equip junior anesthesia trainees with the knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage perioperative pain and the associated critical incidents. Methods A multidisciplinary team (MDT) was involved in the course design. The faculty consisted of anesthesia consultants, trainees, pain nurses, and simulation technicians. The course ran twice over a six-month period both locally and regionally. A blended learning approach was adopted where 17 trainees attended PowerPoint presentations providing an overview of basic pain theories, perioperative pain management, regional anesthesia, and labor analgesia. Trainees then underwent telecasted simulation training using replicated patient notes, imaging, blood gas analysis, and a high-fidelity SimMan®. A debriefing period followed each scenario using Pendleton's model. An anonymized questionnaire was completed by all trainees before and after the course to assess improvement in their knowledge and confidence levels across four domains covering the management of perioperative pain. Results All 17 trainees completed the questionnaire; therefore, the entire dataset was analyzed. The pre-course questionnaire showed that using a scale of zero to 10, the vast majority of trainees reported low levels of confidence (<6/10) in the management of chronic pain during the perioperative period (82%), intraoperative pain management (76%), regional anesthesia (88%), and labor analgesia (65%). Following the simulation training, the results showed an overwhelmingly positive improvement in all 17 trainees' knowledge and confidence across all four tested domains. All 17 trainees (100%) also showed an improvement in their understanding of local pain protocols. The subjective feedback was positive, highlighting the overall usefulness of the course and that the tailored complexity of each simulation scenario was appropriate to each candidate's prior level of experience. Trainees also reported feeling more confident in starting their anesthesia on-calls. Conclusion This novel simulation course is the first of its kind in pain management. It has shown great improvements in trainee confidence in managing perioperative pain and the associated critical incidents. Subjective feedback has also been positively reassuring. Its inclusion into the East of England anesthesia training program and national training curriculum would greatly enhance trainee's knowledge and experience in pain management in the perioperative setting.