1
|
Sarpong N, Seifert J, Bennewitz J, Rodehutscord M, Camarinha-Silva A. Microbial signatures and enterotype clusters in fattening pigs: implications for nitrogen utilization efficiency. Front Microbiol 2024; 15:1354537. [PMID: 38659980 PMCID: PMC11040106 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1354537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
As global demand for pork continues to rise, strategies to enhance nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) in pig farming have become vital for environmental sustainability. This study explored the relationship between the fecal microbiota, their metabolites, and NUE in crossbreed fattening pigs with a defined family structure. Pigs were kept under standardized conditions and fed in a two-phase feeding regime. In each phase, one fecal sample was collected from each pig. DNA was extracted from a total of 892 fecal samples and subjected to target amplicon sequencing. The results indicated an influence of sire, sampling period (SP), and sex on the fecal microbiota. Streptococcus emerged as a potential biomarker in comparing high and low NUE pigs in SP 1, suggesting a genetic predisposition to NUE regarding the fecal microbiota. All fecal samples were grouped into two enterotype-like clusters named cluster LACTO and cluster CSST. Pigs' affiliation with enterotype-like clusters altered over time and might be sex-dependent. The stable cluster CSST demonstrated the highest NUE despite containing pigs with lower performance characteristics such as average daily gain, dry matter intake, and daily nitrogen retention. This research contributes with valuable insights into the microbiome's role in NUE, paving the way for future strategies to enhance sustainable pig production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Sarpong
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
- HoLMiR - Hohenheim Center for Livestock Microbiome Research, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Jana Seifert
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
- HoLMiR - Hohenheim Center for Livestock Microbiome Research, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Jörn Bennewitz
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
- HoLMiR - Hohenheim Center for Livestock Microbiome Research, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Markus Rodehutscord
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
- HoLMiR - Hohenheim Center for Livestock Microbiome Research, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Amélia Camarinha-Silva
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
- HoLMiR - Hohenheim Center for Livestock Microbiome Research, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang D, Chen G, Li W, Chai M, Zhang H, Su Y. Effects of Low Protein Diet on Production Performance and Intestinal Microbial Composition in Pigs. Vet Sci 2023; 10:655. [PMID: 37999478 PMCID: PMC10675339 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10110655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In order to study the effects of a low protein diet on the production performance and intestinal microbiota composition of Hexi pigs, twenty-seven Hexi pigs with an initial body weight of 60.50 ± 2.50 kg were randomly divided into three groups (control group (CG), group 1 (G1), and group 2 (G2)) and participated in a 60-day finishing trial. The CG was fed a normal protein level diet with a protein level of 16.0%, and G1 and G2 were fed a low protein level diet with protein levels of 14.0% and 12.0%, respectively. The results showed that the low protein level diet had no significant effect on the production performance of Hexi pigs, compared with the CG, the slaughter rate of G1 and G2 increased by 2.49% (p > 0.05) and 6.18% (p > 0.05), the shear force decreased by 2.43% (p > 0.05) and 15.57% (p > 0.05), the cooking loss decreased by 24.02% (p < 0.05) and 21.09% (p > 0.05), and the cooking percentage increased by 13.20% (p > 0.05) and 11.59% (p > 0.05). From 45 min to 24 h and 48 h after slaughter, each group of pH decreased by 1.02, 0.66, and 0.42. For muscle flesh color, the lightness (L) increased by 13.31% (p > 0.05) and 18.01% (p > 0.05) in G1 and G2 and the yellowness (b) increased by 7.72% (p > 0.05) and 13.06% (p > 0.05). A low protein level diet can improve the intestinal flora richness and diversity of growing and finishing pigs. In the jejunum, the ACE index (899.95), Simpson index (0.90), and Shannon (4.75) index were higher in G1 than in the other groups, but the Chao1 index (949.92) was higher in G2 than in the remaining two groups. Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Euryarchaeota, and Verrucomicrobia were significantly higher in G1 than in the CG. The relative abundances of Lactobacillus, Terrisporobacter, and Megasphaera in G1 was significantly higher than in the CG (p < 0.05). In the cecum, the ACE index (900.93), Chao1 index (879.10), Simpson index (0.94), and Shannon (5.70) index were higher in G1 than in the remaining groups. The Spirochaetes in G2 were significantly higher than in the other groups, but the Verrucomicrobia was significantly lower than in the other groups. The relative abundances of Lactobacillus were higher in G1 and G2 than in the CG (p > 0.05). The relative abundances of unidentified_Clostridiales and Terrisporobacter in G2 were significantly lower than in the CG (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Turicibacter in G1 was significantly lower than in the CG (p < 0.05). The relative abundances of other bacterial genera in G1 and G2 were increased by 30.81% (p > 0.05) and 17.98% (p > 0.05).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; (D.W.); (W.L.); (H.Z.)
| | - Guoshun Chen
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; (D.W.); (W.L.); (H.Z.)
| | - Wenzhong Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; (D.W.); (W.L.); (H.Z.)
| | - Mingjie Chai
- Pingliang Animal Husbandry and Fishery Station, Pingliang 744000, China;
| | - Hua Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; (D.W.); (W.L.); (H.Z.)
| | - Yingyu Su
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Xinjiang Agricultural Vocational Technical College, Changji 831100, China;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mi M, Shen Z, Hu N, Zhang Q, Wang B, Pan L, Qin G, Bao N, Zhao Y. Effects of diets with different amino acid release characteristics on the gut microbiota and barrier function of weaned pigs. BMC Microbiol 2023; 23:18. [PMID: 36658475 PMCID: PMC9850806 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-023-02762-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The absorption and utilization of proteins by animals is affected by the amino acid (AA) release characteristics of their diets. In the present study, we aimed to determine the effects of diets with various amino acid release characteristics on the intestinal barrier function and diversity of gut microbiota of weaned pigs. RESULTS Forty-eight pigs (7.45 ± 0.58 kg) were fed with diets having different amino acid release characteristics during a period of 28 days. We used a 2 × 3 full-factor (two protein levels and three protein sources with differing amino acid release characteristics) experimental design, with normal (standard terminal ileal digestibility of 17.5%) or low (standard terminal ileal digestibility of 14.9%) protein levels as the first factor. Casein (CAS), corn gluten meal (CGM) and a MIX diet were used as protein sources. Due to the more balanced release of amino acids, the diamine oxidase (DAO) concentrations in the CAS and MIX groups were significantly lower than those in the CGM group (P < 0.05); Reducing the dietary protein content from 17.5% to 14.9% had no significant effects on the levels of serum DAO or D-lactic acid. By contrast, it increased the microbial diversity (chao1 and ACE values) and the number of Lactobacillus in the jejunum (P < 0.05). The CAS-containing diet and the MIX diet resulted in significantly higher microbial diversity (Simpson and Shannon) than the CGM-containing diet in the jejunum. CONCLUSION The balanced release of amino acids in CAS and MIX diets maintained intestinal barrier function and increased gut microbiota diversity. These findings could potentially provide a scientific reference for the rational preparation of piglet feed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengmeng Mi
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Zhiwen Shen
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Nianzhi Hu
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Qiyu Zhang
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Bin Wang
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Li Pan
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Guixin Qin
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Nan Bao
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| | - Yuan Zhao
- grid.464353.30000 0000 9888 756XKey Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang D, Chen G, Chai M, Shi C, Geng Y, Che Y, Li Y, Liu S, Gao Y, Hou H. Effects of dietary protein levels on production performance, meat quality and flavor of fattening pigs. Front Nutr 2022; 9:910519. [PMID: 35938115 PMCID: PMC9354234 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.910519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary protein level on the production performance, slaughter performance, meat quality, and flavor of finishing pigs. Twenty-seven Duroc♂ × Bamei♀ binary cross-bred pigs (60.86 ± 2.52 kg body weight) were randomly assigned to three groups, each group has three replicates, and each replicate has three pigs. Three groups of finishing pigs were fed 16.0, 14.0, and 12.0% crude protein levels diets, and these low-protein diets were supplemented with four limiting amino acids (lysine, methionine, threonine and tryptophan). The results showed that the pigs fed low-protein diets increased (P < 0.05) loin eye muscle area, and reduced (P < 0.05) heart weight, lung weight. The feed-weight ratio of the 14.0% protein group was reduced (P > 0.05); Dietary protein levels significantly affected the luminance (L24h), yellowness (b45min and b24h) (P < 0.05), reduced shear stress, muscle water loss, drip loss, the levels of crude fat (P < 0.05), and increased marbling score (P < 0.05) in the muscle of finishing pigs; The low-protein diets improved PUFA/TFA, PUFA/SFA (P > 0.05), and increased hexanal, E-2-heptenal, 1-octen-3-ol, EAA/TAA in the muscle of finishing pigs (P < 0.05); The results indicated that reduced the crude protein levels of dietary by 2.0–4.0%, and supplementation with four balanced limiting amino acids had no significant effects on the production performance and slaughter performance of finishing pigs, and could effectively improve meat quality and flavor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Guoshun Chen
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Guoshun Chen
| | - Minjie Chai
- Pingliang Animal Husbandry and Fishery Station, Pingliang, China
| | - Chengrui Shi
- College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yiwen Geng
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuyan Che
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yancui Li
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shuaishuai Liu
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yancheng Gao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Haoxia Hou
- Gansu Longyuan Agricultural Economic Cooperation Center, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang Q, Wang B, Hu N, Bao N, Pan L, Zhao Y, Qin G. Relationship between dietary amino acid release kinetics and nitrogen deposition in growing pigs. Animal Nutrition 2022; 9:233-239. [PMID: 35600549 PMCID: PMC9092382 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Although the protein content of swine diets is formulated based on the ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids (AA) under current nutrition requirements, the nitrogen utilization efficiency of swine varies based on protein source, which may be related to AA release kinetics. In this experiment, a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with casein (CAS)-enriched or corn gluten meal (CGM)-enriched protein sources at different digestible crude protein levels (normal [N], 13%; and low [L], 11%) were applied to 24 crossbred (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) growing pigs (average body weight = 43.3 ± 3.5 kg) in 4 treatments (N.CAS, L.CAS, N.CGM, L.CGM, respectively) to investigate the effects of AA release kinetics on nitrogen deposition in growing pigs. Standardized ileal digestible AA in all diets were balanced by adding individual AA to meet the nutrient requirements. The AA release kinetics were detected in vitro by measuring the hydrolysis of various protein diets under pepsin and trypsin conditions. The results demonstrated that the time of AA release peak in the CGM diet was 12 h later than that in the CAS diet. The synchronization indices of dietary AA release in N.CAS, N.CGM, L.CAS, and L.CGM were 23.73%, 29.37%, 23.40%, and 26.07%, respectively. The N.CGM had the poorest AA release synchronism while the N.CAS had the greatest among the 4 diets. However, within the pigs, L.CAS and N.CGM showed the highest (81.08%) and lowest (73.54%) nitrogen biological values, respectively, despite the standard ileal digestible AA levels being equal for all diets. These results indicate that the release kinetics of dietary AA had great effect on nitrogen deposition. To optimize nitrogen deposition, AA release kinetics and composition should be taken into consideration when formulating diets for growing pigs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Eugenio FA, van Milgen J, Duperray J, Sergheraert R, Le Floc'h N. Feeding intact proteins, peptides, or free amino acids to monogastric farm animals. Amino Acids 2022; 54:157-168. [PMID: 35106634 DOI: 10.1007/s00726-021-03118-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
For terrestrial farm animals, intact protein sources like soybean meal have been the main ingredients providing the required amino acids (AA) to sustain life. However, in recent years, the availability of hydrolysed protein sources and free AA has led to the use of other forms of AA to feed farm animals. The advent of using these new forms is especially important to reduce the negative environmental impacts of animal production because these new forms allow reducing the dietary crude protein content and provide more digestible materials. However, the form in which dietary AA are provided can have an effect on the dynamics of nutrient availability for protein deposition and tissue growth including the efficiency of nutrient utilization. In this literature review, the use of different forms of AA in animal diets is explored, and their differences in digestion and absorption rates are focused on. These differences affect the postprandial plasma appearance of AA, which can have metabolic consequences, like greater insulin response when free AA or hydrolysates instead of intact proteins are fed, which can have a profound effect on metabolism and growth performance. Nevertheless, the use and application of the different AA forms in animal diets are important to achieve a more sustainable and efficient animal production system in the future, as they allow for a more precise diet formulation and reduced negative environmental impact. It is, therefore, important to differentiate the physiological and metabolic effects of different forms of AA to maximize their nutritional value in animal diets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F A Eugenio
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France
- BCF Life Sciences, Boisel, 56140, Pleucadeuc, France
| | - J van Milgen
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France
| | - J Duperray
- BCF Life Sciences, Boisel, 56140, Pleucadeuc, France
| | - R Sergheraert
- BCF Life Sciences, Boisel, 56140, Pleucadeuc, France
| | - N Le Floc'h
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France.
| |
Collapse
|