1
|
Reinsalu O, Scheler O, Mikelsaar R, Mikelsaar AV, Hallap T, Jaakma Ü, Padrik P, Kavak A, Salumets A, Kurg A. A dual colour FISH method for routine validation of sexed Bos taurus semen. BMC Vet Res 2019; 15:104. [PMID: 30943959 PMCID: PMC6446427 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1839-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Usage of sexed semen that allows to choose the gender of the calves, is commonly practiced in livestock industry as a profitable breeding alternative, especially in dairy farming. The flow cytometric cell sorting is the only commercially available method for bovine sperm sexing. For validation of the sexing procedure several methods have been developed including sperm fluorescence in situ hybridisation techniques. Latter usually include the use of pre-labelled nucleotides for probe synthesis which is relatively expensive approach compared to combined application of aminoallyl-dUTP and chemical binding of fluorescent dyes. Here a sex determining dual colour bovine sperm fluorescence in situ hybridisation method is presented which is considered more cost-effective technique than the previously reported approaches. Results The reliability of sex chromosome identifying probes, designed in silico, was proven on bovine metaphase plate chromosomes and through comparison with a commercially available standard method. In the dual colour FISH experiments of unsexed and sexed bovine sperm samples the hybridisation efficiency was at least 98%, whereas the determined sex ratios were not statistically different from the expected. Very few cells carried both of the sex chromosome-specific signals (less than 0.2%). Conclusions A protocol for a dual colour bovine sperm FISH method is provided which is cost-effective, simple and fast for sex determination of spermatozoa in bull semen samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olavi Reinsalu
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia. .,The Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tiigi 61B, 50410, Tartu, Estonia.
| | - Ott Scheler
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, TalTech University, Akadeemia tee 15, 12618, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Ruth Mikelsaar
- The Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tiigi 61B, 50410, Tartu, Estonia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Aavo-Valdur Mikelsaar
- The Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tiigi 61B, 50410, Tartu, Estonia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50411, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Triin Hallap
- Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 62, 51014, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Ülle Jaakma
- Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 62, 51014, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Peeter Padrik
- Animal Breeders Association of Estonia, Koogimäe 4, Keava, 79005, Kehtna parrish, Estonia
| | - Ants Kavak
- Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 62, 51014, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Andres Salumets
- The Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tiigi 61B, 50410, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Biomedicine, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Ravila 19, 50412, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ants Kurg
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malo AF, Martinez-Pastor F, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Garde J, Ballou JD, Lacy RC. A father effect explains sex-ratio bias. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 284:rspb.2017.1159. [PMID: 28855362 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Sex ratio allocation has important fitness consequences, and theory predicts that parents should adjust offspring sex ratio in cases where the fitness returns of producing male and female offspring vary. The ability of fathers to bias offspring sex ratios has traditionally been dismissed given the expectation of an equal proportion of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm (CBS) in ejaculates due to segregation of sex chromosomes at meiosis. This expectation has been recently refuted. Here we used Peromyscus leucopus to demonstrate that sex ratio is explained by an exclusive effect of the father, and suggest a likely mechanism by which male-driven sex-ratio bias is attained. We identified a male sperm morphological marker that is associated with the mechanism leading to sex ratio bias; differences among males in the sperm nucleus area (a proxy for the sex chromosome that the sperm contains) explain 22% variation in litter sex ratio. We further show the role played by the sperm nucleus area as a mediator in the relationship between individual genetic variation and sex-ratio bias. Fathers with high levels of genetic variation had ejaculates with a higher proportion of sperm with small nuclei area. This, in turn, led to siring a higher proportion of sons (25% increase in sons per 0.1 decrease in the inbreeding coefficient). Our results reveal a plausible mechanism underlying unexplored male-driven sex-ratio biases. We also discuss why this pattern of paternal bias can be adaptive. This research puts to rest the idea that father contribution to sex ratio variation should be disregarded in vertebrates, and will stimulate research on evolutionary constraints to sex ratios-for example, whether fathers and mothers have divergent, coinciding, or neutral sex allocation interests. Finally, these results offer a potential explanation for those intriguing cases in which there are sex ratio biases, such as in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelio F Malo
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK .,Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL, USA.,Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Felipe Martinez-Pastor
- SaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario s. n. 02071, Albacete, Spain.,INDEGSAL and Molecular Biology (Cell Biology), University of León, León, Spain
| | - Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
- Estacion Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.,Centre for Evolutionary Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Julián Garde
- SaBio IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Campus Universitario s. n. 02071, Albacete, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang WH, Zhuang XJ, Song SD, Wu H, Zhang Z, Yang YZ, Zhang HL, Mao JM, Liu DF, Zhao LM, Lin HC, Hong K, Ma LL, Qiao J, Qin W, Tang Y, Jiang H. Ran-binding protein M is associated with human spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Mol Med Rep 2017; 17:2257-2262. [PMID: 29207172 PMCID: PMC5783472 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to explore the underlying mechanism and diagnostic potential of Ran-binding protein M (RanBPM) in human spermatogenesis and oogenesis. RanBPM expression in human testis and ovaries was analysed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blotting, and immunofluorescence was performed on testis and ovary tissue sections during different developmental stages of spermatogenesis and oogenesis using RanBPM antibodies. Interactions with a variety of functional proteins were also investigated. RanBPM mRNA and protein expression levels were determined by PCR and western blotting in the tissue sections. Results revealed that the mRNA expression levels were highest in the testis followed by the ovary. The RanBPM protein was predominantly localized in the nucleus of germ cells, and the expression levels were highest in pachytene spermatocytes and cells surrounding spermatids in testis tissue. In ovary cells, RanBPM was localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm. In conclusion, the results suggested that RanBPM may have multiple roles in the regulation of germ cell proliferation during human spermatogenesis and oogenesis. This research may provide a novel insight into the underlying molecular mechanism of RanBPM and may have implications for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of human infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Hao Tang
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Xin-Jie Zhuang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Shi-De Song
- Department of Urology, Rizhao People's Hospital, Rizhao, Shandong 276500, P.R. China
| | - Han Wu
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Yu-Zhuo Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Hong-Liang Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Jia-Ming Mao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - De-Feng Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Lian-Ming Zhao
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Hao-Cheng Lin
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Kai Hong
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Lu-Lin Ma
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Jie Qiao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| | - Weibing Qin
- Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Family Planning Research Institute of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510600, P.R. China
| | - Yunge Tang
- Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Family Planning Research Institute of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510600, P.R. China
| | - Hui Jiang
- 1Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|