Vitrification of stallion sperm using 0.25 ml straws: Effect of volume, concentration and carbohydrates (sucrose/trehalose/raffinose)

Sperm vitrification in horses and donkeys

Sperm vitrification is an alternative freezing method, which includes high cooling rates and non-permeable cryoprotectants agents. The first attempt in equids was using the spheres technique by directly dropping small volumes of the sperm into liquid nitrogen. Later, vitrification was developed using 0.25 mL straws with outer covers, which resulted in similar progressive motility when compared to conventional freezing in donkeys (44.3 ± 15.0 % vs. 44.7 ± 18.2 %) or even higher in horses (48.2 ± 2.3 % vs. 37.3 ± 2.2 %). Subsequently, the vitrification of larger volumes of sperm in 0.5 mL straws was evaluated, but the results showed poor sperm quality after different warming procedures. Finally, fertility was assessed in vitro and in vivo. In horses, the sperm fertilizing capacity was assessed utilizing heterologous in vitro fertilization (IVF) and vitrified sperm showed the ability to penetrate cattle oocytes, leading to pronuclear formation and hybrid embryo cleavage. In donkeys, fertility trials were conducted in vivo on a small group of jennies, showing no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates between artificial insemination (AI) with vitrified semen (22%) or frozen semen (10%); however, the uterine inflammatory response after AI with vitrified semen solved faster than frozen semen. In conclusion, sperm vitrification has been optimized in horses and donkeys using 0.25 mL straws with outer covers and can be considered as an alternative to conventional freezing.

Sperm Vitrification in Horse and Donkey

Sperm vitrification is a novel-assisted reproductive technique that is increasingly gaining relevance in the last years. This technique allows to cryopreserve sperm from valuable stallions and donkeys without the exposure to permeable cryoprotectants, particularly toxic for the gametes of these species.This chapter aims to describe the current range of methodologies available that are key to ensure sperm quality after vitrification and warming of stallion and donkey sperm.

Kinetic vitrification: concepts and perspectives in animal sperm cryopreservation

Sperm cryopreservation is an important tool for genetic diversity management programs and the conservation of endangered breeds and species. The most widely used method of sperm conservation is slow freezing, however, during the process, sperm cells suffer from cryoinjury, which reduces their viability and fertility rates. One of the alternatives to slow freezing is vitrification, that consist on rapid freezing, in which viable cells undergo glass-like solidification. This technology requires large concentrations of permeable cryoprotectants (P- CPA's) which increase the viscosity of the medium to prevent intracellular ice formation during cooling and warming, obtaining successful results in vitrification of oocytes and embryos. Unfortunately, this technology failed when applied to vitrification of sperm due to its higher sensitivity to increasing concentrations of P-CPAs. Alternatively, a technique termed 'kinetic sperm vitrification' has been used and consists in a technique of permeant cryoprotectant-free cryopreservation by direct plunging of a sperm suspension into liquid nitrogen. Some of the advantages of kinetic vitrification are the speed of execution and no rate-controlled equipment required. This technique has been used successfully and with better results for motility in human (50-70% motility recovery), dog (42%), fish (82%) and donkey (21.7%). However, more studies are required to improve sperm viability after devitrification, especially when it comes to motility recovery. The objective of this review is to present the principles of kinetic vitrification, the main findings in the literature, and the perspectives for the utilization of this technique as a cryopreservation method.

Donkey semen cryopreservation: Alternatives with permeable, non-permeable cryoprotectants and seminal plasma

Cryopreservation of semen is an important technique to preserve genetic material. Yet, pregnancy rates in jennies after artificial insemination with frozen-thawed donkey semen are poor. This condition has been attributed to the impact of permeable cryoprotectants, that could cause high post-breeding endometritis. Removal of seminal plasma (SP) prior to semen freezing process is another contributing factor. SP is involved in a multitude of sperm functions and events preceding fertilization and has a mediating effect of sperm capacitation and postcoital uterine inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to evaluate different alternatives in donkey semen cryopreservation with permeable, non-permeable cryoprotectants, BSA and SP. Thirty ejaculates from 10 donkeys were cryopreserved with different combinations of dimethylformamide (DMF, 5%), sucrose (SUC, 200 mM) and homologous SP (10%): DMF (T1), DMF/SP (T2), SUC/BSA (T3), SUC/BSA/SP (T4), DMF/SUC/BSA (T5), DMF/SUC/BSA/SP (T6), DMF/BSA (T7) and DMF/BSA/SP (T8). After thawing, sperm motility and kinetics were assessed by computerized semen analysis. Sperm vitality (SV) was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy, functional membrane integrity (FMI) by the HOST test, abnormal morphology by eosin-nigrosin staining and sperm membrane stability by flow cytometry. For statistical analysis, sperm quality indexes (SQi) were obtained, general linear models were carried out and mean comparisons were made by the Tukey test. T1, T2, T5, T6, and T7 had higher and equivalent results for motility, most kinetic parameters and function membrane integrity. Cryopreservation of donkey semen without permeable cryoprotectant (T3 and T4) showed a reduction in motility, kinetics, SV, FMI and SQi. T5 showed a reduction in progressive motility, sperm velocities, IMF and SQi compared to other DMF treatments. T6 and T8 achieved higher SQi values compared to T1, but they were not different compared to T2 and T7. T1 had a smaller sperm population with low-M540 compared to T3. It is concluded that the use of permeable cryoprotectant is essential to achieve higher post-thaw quality of donkey semen. In addition, the combined use of BSA, SUC and/or PS may provide additional sperm protection compared to the individual use of DMF.

Cryo-banking of human spermatozoa by aseptic cryoprotectants-free vitrification in liquid air: Positive effect of elevated warming temperature

Cryoprotectant-free vitrification is a common method for spermatozoa cryopreservation by direct plunging into liquid nitrogen. However, the commercial liquid nitrogen could be potentially contaminated by microorganisms. Warming temperature plays an essential role for quality of human spermatozoa after vitrification. This study aimed to evaluate comparatively a quality spermatozoa after vitrification in liquid nitrogen and clean liquid air as well as with two warming rates: at 42 °C and 45 °C. After performing of routine swim-up of normozoospermia samples, spermatozoa from the same ejaculate were divided into two groups: vitrified in liquid nitrogen (LN) and sterile liquid air (LA). Spermatozoa of LN group were warmed at 42 °C, and spermatozoa of LA groups were divided and warmed at 42 °C (LA42) and 45 °C (LA45). Then spermatozoa motility, reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and viability were assessed. It was no found significant differences in quality of spermatozoa from LN and LA groups in the motility, ROS, MMP, RNS rates after warming at 42 °C. A tendency to obtain better spermatozoa quality was found with using of warming by 42 °C in comparison with 45 °C. It was concluded that cryoprotectant-free vitrification by direct dropping of human spermatozoa into clean liquid air can be used as an alternative to cooling in liquid nitrogen. Warming of spermatozoa at 42 °C allows to preserve the spermatozoa physiological parameters.

Aseptic capillary vitrification of human spermatozoa: Cryoprotectant-free vs. cryoprotectant-included technologies

The protocol of aseptic cryoprotectant-free vitrification on human spermatozoa is well documented. However, data about the effect of permeable cryoprotectants at this procedure is limited. Presented study aimed to test the aseptic capillary vitrification technologies using permeable cryoprotectant-included or cryoprotectant-free media. Thirty-two normal samples were included and analyzed after vitrification in three different media and thawing. Three treatment groups were formed: Group 1, basic medium; Group 2, basic medium with 0.25 M sucrose; Group 3, basic medium with glycerol. Before plunging into liquid nitrogen, capillaries were filled by 10 μl of spermatozoa suspension and isolated from liquid nitrogen by location in hermetically closed 0.25 ml straws. Progressive motility, plasma membrane integrity, total motility/viability after 24, 48 and 72 h in vitro culture, apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) were determined after thawing at 42 °C. Progressive motility of spermatozoa in groups 1, 2, 3 was 24.9 ± 1.7%, 34.5 ± 2.8% and 34.0 ± 1.4%, respectively (P_1-2,3<0.05). The plasma membrane integrity of spermatozoa in groups 2 and 3 (48.4 ± 2.9% and 45.5 ± 3.9%, respectively) was higher than in Group 1 (33.3 ± 2.1%, P < 0.05). After 24 h, 48 h and 72 h in vitro culture, the total motility and viability of spermatozoa in Group 1 was significantly lower than Group 2 and Group 3. The apoptosis rate in Group 3 (44.5 ± 3.0%) and Group 2 (47.7 ± 4.1%) were lower than in Group 1 (52.5 ± 4.4%; P < 0.05). ΔΨm rates in Group 3 and Group 2 were higher than in Group 1 (P < 0.05) with no statistical differences between this parameter in Group 2 and Group 3 (P > 0.1). In conclusion, supplementation of medium for aseptic capillary technology for cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa by permeable cryoprotectant does not improve the quality of spermatozoa after warming.

Fertilizing capacity of vitrified stallion sperm assessed utilizing heterologous IVF after different semen warming procedures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fertilizing capacity of frozen or vitrified stallion sperm after assessing different warming procedures. In Experiment 1, different warming procedures were compared after sperm vitrification: immersion in extender at 43 °C (C), or in a water bath at 37 °C/30 s (W37), 43 °C/10 s (W43) or 60 °C/5 s (W60). With the W60 treatment, there were greater values (P < 0.05) for VCL (83.93 ± 3.6 μm/s) and ALH (3.00 ± 0.2 μm) than freezing and with the C group, and greater values (P < 0.001) for PM (35.33 ± 2.5 %) than with the W43 treatment. In Experiment 2, the fertilizing capacity of vitrified and frozen sperm was assessed utilizing heterologous IVF procedures, using cattle oocytes. Vitrification resulted in greater values (P < 0.05) than freezing for the number of bound sperm (1.36 ± 0.3 and 0.69 ± 0.2, respectively). There were no differences between frozen or vitrified sperm in pronuclear formation (26 hours post-insemination - hpi; 14.08 ± 4.2 % and 22.78 ± 4.8 %, respectively) or cleavage rate (32.77 ± 4.3 % and 39.66 ± 4.6 %, respectively). In conclusion, vitrified stallion sperm warmed in a water bath at 60 ºC had the capacity to penetrate cattle oocytes, leading to pronuclear formation and hybrid embryo cleavage after heterologous IVF.

Vitrification of donkey sperm using straws as an alternative to conventional slow freezing

Cryoprotectant-free vitrification of donkey sperm using 0.25 ml straws has been recently developed, but the obtained results have not been directly compared to conventional slow freezing yet. The aim of this study was to compare sperm quality parameters after cryopreservation using both methods. Semen samples were collected from three Andalusian Donkeys. Semen was centrifuged and pellets resuspended with an extender with glycerol for conventional freezing or the same extender without glycerol, but with sucrose 0.1 mol/L for vitrification. Conventional freezing was performed in nitrogen vapours and thawed in a water bath (30s/37°C). Vitrification was performed in covered 0.25 ml straws plunged directly into liquid nitrogen and warmed in 3 ml of a milk-based extender at 43°C. Total (TM, %) and progressive motility (PM, %) were evaluated by computer-assisted sperm analysis, and plasma membrane (PMI, %) and acrosome (AIS, %) integrities by epifluorescence microscopy. No differences (p > .05) were found between slow freezing and vitrification methods for any of the parameters assessed: TM (58.2 ± 16.1% vs. 52.7 ± 15.6%), PM (44.7 ± 18.2% vs. 44.3 ± 15.0%), PMI (55.4 ± 9.0% vs. 49.2 ± 11.2%) and AIS (38.4 ± 19.6% vs. 45.0 ± 11.0%), respectively. In conclusion, donkey sperm vitrification in straws presented similar sperm quality after thawing in comparison to conventional freezing. Therefore, it could be considered as an alternative to slow freezing regarding the sperm parameters assessed.

Effect of permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification on DNA fragmentation of equine oocyte-cumulus cells

DNA fragmentation of cumulus cells could be used as an indicator of oocyte vitrification success as an indirect indicator of the quality of the oocyte. This study was designed to compare the DNA fragmentation of post-mortem equine cumulus cells before or after vitrification in the absence of permeable cryoprotectant agents. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs; n = 56) were recovered from slaughterhouse ovaries and subjected to in vitro maturation (42 hr/38.2°C/5%CO₂ ) before (control group) or after a permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method using 1 M sucrose (vitrification group). After in vitro maturation, COCs were denuded, and cumulus cells were washed and stored at -80°C until thawing. Cumulus cell samples were processed with the chromatin dispersion test (Ovoselect, Halotech DNA, Spain). Low, high and total DNA fragmentation percentages of cumulus cells were recorded and compared between the two groups by Student's t test. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. The vitrified group resulted in significantly higher (p < 0.05) percentages for low (16.81 ± 1.62 vs. 6.63 ± 0.77) and total (21.14 ± 1.84 vs. 12.76 ± 1.48) DNA fragmentation of cumulus cells. There were no significant differences between groups for high DNA fragmentation of cumulus cells. In conclusion, permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification of equine oocytes increased the total DNA fragmentation rate of cumulus cells but protected them against high DNA fragmentation rates. Further studies are needed to examine the relationship between DNA fragmentation of cumulus cells and the developmental competence of equine oocytes.