Endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for elderly patients

Treatment of elderly patients with head and neck cancer in an aging society: Focus on geriatric assessment and surgical treatment

Previous studies of the treatment of elderly head and neck cancer (HNC) patients were very limited and sometimes controversial. Although conclusions differ across various reports, it is often concluded that advanced chronological age does not directly affect prognosis, but that comorbidities and declines in physical and cognitive functions promote the occurrence of adverse events, especially with surgical treatment. Geriatric assessment (GA) and its screening tools are keys to help us understand overall health status and problems, predict life expectancy and treatment tolerance, and to influence treatment choices and interventions to improve treatment compliance. In addition, personal beliefs and values play a large role in determining policies for HNC treatment for elderly patients, and a multidisciplinary approach is important to support this. In this review, past research on HNC in older adults is presented, and the current evidence is explained, focusing on the management of elderly HNC patients, with an emphasis on the existing reports on each treatment stage and modality, especially the surgical procedures.

Safety and outcome of three-dimensional transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) is widely used in Japan, and conventional two-dimensional (2D) endoscopic methods have been established. Three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic surgery offers superior distance perception because it provides stereoscopic views. Recently, we have developed 3D endoscopy for TOVS (3D TOVS).

METHODS

This study included 46 patients with pharyngeal cancer who underwent 3D TOVS. The perioperative complications and survival curves were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

One patient with oropharyngeal cancer who underwent neck dissection and transoral resection simultaneously experienced postoperative hemorrhage of the neck. Another patient with oropharyngeal cancer underwent hemostasis for postoperative pharyngeal hemorrhage. There was one case of aspiration pneumonia. One patient developed cervical lymph node recurrence; however, there was no local recurrence or primary mortality. The 2-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control rates, locoregional control rate, and invasive disease-free survival were 90.9%, 100%, 100%, 97.4%, and 79.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional endoscopy can be safely applied to TOVS.

Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Objectives

Hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC) is a head and neck carcinoma with poor prognosis. Traditional laryngopharyngectomy offered promising oncological outcomes at the cost of functional outcomes. The recent advent in transoral robotic surgery (TORS), an organ-preserving surgery, has opened up new perspectives in the treatment for HPC. Here, we evaluate minimally invasive organ preservation surgery [TORS and endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS)] for HPC in terms of feasibility and oncological and functional outcomes.

Methods

This is a systematic review. Six databases [CUHK Full-Text Journals, Embase 1910 to 2021, Ovid Emcare, Ovid MEDLINE (R), CINAHL, PubMed] were searched for articles and primary studies for TORS and ELPS for HPC. Screening was completed using predefined inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Results

A total of 8 studies on TORS and 3 studies on ELPS were eventually chosen after full-text review. For studies on TORS, 61.3% of patients (84 out of 137) still survived at the last follow-up with a mean follow-up time of 23.20 months (range: 12.8–37.21 months). Severe intraoperative and postoperative complications have not been reported. No cases of TORS required a conversion to open surgery. Swallowing function was optimal postoperatively with only 6 patients eventually required a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for feeding. Disease-specific survival was taken as the parameter for the measurement of oncological outcomes. A total of 2 studies reported a disease-specific survival of 100% within their follow-up period of 1 and 1.5 years, respectively. Another 2 studies reported a 2-year DSS of 89 and 98%, respectively. A 5-year DSS of 100% in early stage and 74% in late stage were achieved in one study. Another study also reported a 5-year DSS of 91.7%. For studies of ELPS, a 5- and 3-year disease-specific survival of 100% were achieved in 2 studies. Patients who underwent ELPS had good postoperative swallowing function with no PEG placement. There were also no other fatal complications.

Conclusions

Both TORS and ELPS for HPC provide satisfactory long-term oncological and functional outcomes improving postoperative quality of life of patients.

Current Status of Transoral Surgery for Patients With Early-Stage Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Cancers in Japan

As the laryngopharynx is closely related to swallowing, speech, and phonation, it is necessary to consider not only disease control but also a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal cancer. Transoral surgery has been reported to be a minimally invasive method for treating these diseases. Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS) have been developed in Japan and recently emerged as treatments for patients with early stage pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers. However, securing an appropriate field of view and a narrow operating space during TOVS or ELPS are critical issues to be resolved for these surgeries. The clinical significance and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) using the da Vinci Surgical System have been widely reported to provide surgeons with increased visualization and magnification, resulting in precise surgical margins and rapid functional recovery. In this context, a multi-institutional clinical study was conducted to evaluate the treatment outcomes of TORS for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal cancer in Japan, and the da Vinci Surgical System for oral robot-assisted surgery for these diseases was approved by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Agency in August 2018. This review provides an overview of the therapeutic effects of TOVS, ELPS, and TORS, with a particular focus on these therapeutic results in Japan.

Treatment outcomes of transoral robotic and non-robotic surgeries to treat oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective observational study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this multicenter retrospective cohort study was to compare efficacy and subsequent postoperative treatment between transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and any non-robotic transoral surgery in Japanese patients with early oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), hypopharyngeal SCC (HPSCC), or supraglottic SCC (SGSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical information and surgical outcomes were compared between patients with early-stage OPSCC, HPSCC, and SGSCC who underwent TORS (TORS cohort) and those who underwent non-robotic transoral surgery, including transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS), endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS), and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) (non-robotic cohort). The data of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan (registry cohort) were used to validate the comparison. The main outcomes were the presence of positive margins under pathology and the requirement for postoperative therapy, including radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients in the TORS cohort, 236 patients in the non-robotic cohort, and 1,228 patients in the registry cohort were eligible for this study. Patients in the TORS cohort were more likely to have oropharyngeal tumor disease and T2/3 disease than those in the other cohorts (P<0.001 and P=0.052, respectively). The TORS cohort had significantly fewer patients with positive surgical margins than the non-robotic cohort (P=0.018), as well as fewer patients who underwent postoperative treatment, although the difference was not significant (P=0.069). In the subgroup analysis of patients with OPSCC, a total of 57 patients in the TORS cohort, 73 in the non-robotic cohort, and 171 in the registry cohort were eligible for the present study. Patients with OPSCC who underwent TORS were more likely to have lateral wall lesions than those in the other cohorts (P=0.003). The TORS cohort also had significantly fewer patients with positive surgical margins than the non-robotic cohort (P=0.026), and no patients in the TORS cohort underwent any postoperative treatment for OPSCC, although the difference was not significant (P=0.177).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TORS leads to fewer positive surgical margins than non-robotic transoral surgeries. The clinical significance of TORS may be further validated through the results of all-case surveillance for patients who underwent TORS running in Japan in the future.

Simultaneous Endoscopic Resection of Superficial Cancers of the Hypopharynx and Esophagus: A Case Report

Diagnosis and treatment of superficial laryngopharyngeal cancers has recently received considerable attention. Here, we present a case of superficial hypopharyngeal cancer and superficial esophageal cancer treated with simultaneous endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The patient was a 67-year-old man. During his follow-up for distal gastrectomy-performed earlier for stomach cancer-upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed three primary cancers: a superficial hypopharyngeal cancer, superficial esophageal cancer, and esophagogastric junction cancer. After total resection of the remnant stomach, combined hypopharyngeal ELPS with esophageal ESD was performed. He developed aspiration pneumonia after surgery but recovered and was discharged on the 16th day. Thus, safe and effective endoscopic therapy can be performed even for double superficial cancers of the laryngopharynx and esophagus.