Second postoperative hemorrhage five weeks after transoral robotic surgery

Useful combination of Gehanno method, polyglycolic acid sheet and fibrin glue for prevention of postoperative dysfunction after soft palate resection with TORS

Oropharyngeal cancer requiring combined resection of the soft palate is relatively out of indication for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) due to postoperative functional problems. We report the case of a patient with oropharyngeal cancer in which half of the soft palate was resected, and good function was maintained using the Gehanno method, polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet and fibrin glue. The patient was a woman in her 50 s with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (p16-positive, T2N1M0 stage I). TORS and right neck dissection were performed the same day. About half of the soft palate was resected cranially. After closing the right nasopharynx with the Gehanno method, the sutured part was reinforced by covering with a PGA sheet of about 10 mm on a side and fibrin glue. Oral feeding was started on postoperative day 4, but no nasal reflux was observed. Three weeks postoperatively, no nasal reflux was evident, normal food intake was possible, and nasal breathing was maintained. This technique may be effective after TORS surgery that requires soft palate resection.

Surgical Treatment for Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Narrative Review

Background and Objectives: to describe current scientific knowledge regarding the treatment options in advanced oropharyngeal cancer. The standard care for advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC) has been chemoradiotherapy, although surgical approaches followed by adjuvant treatment have been proposed. The best therapy for each patient should be decided by an interdisciplinary tumour-board. Different strategies should be considered for the specific patient's treatment: surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy or combinations of them. The treatment choice is influenced by tumour variability and prognostic factors, but it also depends on cancer extension, extranodal extension, nervous invasion, human papilloma virus (HPV) presence, making the decisional algorithm not always clear. HPV-related OPSCC is strongly associated with a favourable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rate (DSS); by contrast, HPV-negative OPSCC often flags a worse prognosis. Consequently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) differentiates OPSCC treatment and prognosis based on HPV status. Methods: we carried out a review of current scientific literature to analyze the different indications and limitations of surgical treatment options in OPSCC stage III and IV. Conclusion: robotic surgery or open approaches with reconstructive flaps can be considered in advanced stages, resulting in the de-intensification of subsequent systemic therapy and fewer related side effects. Furthermore, in the event of the primary failure of systemic therapy or disease recurrence, the surgical approach constitutes an additional therapeutic option which lengthens patient survival functions.

A Case of Oropharyngeal Carcinoma with an Oblique Neck that Benefited from Transoral Robotic Surgery

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) are minimally invasive procedures for early-stage head and neck cancers. However, due to its unique nature, transoral resection often leads to skeletal and anatomical disorders. We describe a case in which TORS was used in a 71-year-old man with a skeletal disorder, spastic stridor, and a T2N1M0 stage I p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Prior to the procedure, he underwent right cervical dissection (levels II-IV). Although he had an oblique neck, the right side of his neck was naturally hyperextended because the dissection was performed on the right side. The right facial, lingual, and external carotid arteries were ligated in preparation for TORS. Postoperative pathological examination revealed no extranodal involvement of the metastatic lymph nodes. A two-stage TOVS procedure was performed for the oropharyngeal tumor, in which the surgeon was required to be positioned at the patient's head to allow direct manipulation. This makes the neck and oral cavity more susceptible to the skeletal effects. In contrast, in TORS, the da Vinci insertion angle can be set to match the angle of the neck, allowing surgeons to operate with less skeletal influence. TORS is more useful in this setting.

Neck Dissection Timing in Transoral Robotic or Laser Microsurgery in Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Objective

This review assesses the effect on intra- and postoperative patient outcomes of the timing of neck dissection in relation to transoral surgery. Outcome measures include postoperative bleeding, intra- and postoperative fistula formation, and disease-specific and overall survival.

Data Sources

A search was conducted across the MEDLINE, Embase, US National Library of Medicine, and Cochrane databases with search terms in July 2021.

Review Methods

Articles that conformed with specified inclusion criteria were included. Included articles were scanned for bias with the ROBINS-I tool.

Results

Nineteen articles were selected for qualitative analysis, including 546 patients who had neck dissection in conjunction with transoral robotic surgery/transoral laser microsurgery (TORS/TLM). Seventy-one (18%) patients had neck dissection prior to TORS/TLM, 39 (10%) had neck dissection performed after TORS/TLM, and 281 (72%) had concurrent procedures. In patients with neck dissection before TORS/TLM, 3% experienced major postoperative bleeding, and fistula rates were 0%. In the cohort with neck dissection after TORS/TLM, 3% experienced minor postoperative hemorrhage, and 8% had intraoperative fistulae. In the concurrent cohort of patients, 1% had major postoperative bleeds and 0.3% had minor bleeds, while 4% developed intraoperative fistulas and 0.3% developed postoperative fistulas.

Conclusion

Current evidence indicated that there appears to be no correlation between timing of neck dissection and complications. This systematic review found insufficient data to comment on whether the timing of neck dissection in relation to TORS/TLM affects the outcomes of patients.