Contralateral lymph node recurrence rate and its prognostic factors in stage IVA-B well-lateralized oral cavity cancer

The predictive value of tumor depth of invasion for contralateral neck disease in tongue cancer

OBJECTIVE

Management of the contralateral cN0 neck in well-lateralized oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) is controversial. Depth of invasion (DOI) is a strong predictor of ipsilateral nodal metastases. This study examines if DOI can predict contralateral neck disease (CND).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with primary surgery for lateralized OTSCC at a single tertiary care academic institution from 2014 to 2021. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess the relationship between DOI and CND.

RESULTS

155 patients were included. 101 (65.2%) patients had T1/T2 disease, while 54 (34.8%) had T3/T4 disease. 22 (14.2%) patients had CND. Mean DOI of patients with CND and without CND was 21.0 mm and 9.8 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. Univariable regression models showed higher DOI was associated with increased risk of CND overall (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.17, p < 0.001), in patients with T1 disease (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.20, p = 0.038), and in patients with cN0 disease (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.17, p = 0.028). Multivariable regression model confirmed higher DOI was associated with increased risk of CND (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.16, p = 0.001). A DOI of 6 mm was identified as a potential threshold for increased risk of CND.

CONCLUSION

DOI was identified as a predictive factor for CND in OTSCC. At the time of ipsilateral neck dissection, a DOI ≥ 6 mm may represent a threshold associated with an increased risk of CND, indicating that contralateral neck management could be considered.

Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity with Perineural Invasion

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines indicate postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with perineural invasion (PNI), however, its real benefit has never been proven. The aim of our study is to investigate the benefit of PORT in OSCC patients with PNI in terms of survival and disease control.

DATA SOURCES

The Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Patients with PNI + OSCC treated with primary surgery were extracted from the included studies. The pooled logHR was calculated by comparing patients who underwent PORT to those who underwent only observation for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control (LRC).

RESULTS

About 690 patients with primary OSCC and PNI were included from nine studies. 374 (54.2%) patients underwent PORT, while 316 (45.8%) underwent observation. Analyses showed non-significant difference between the two groups for OS (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.38-2.69), DSS (HR: 2.03; 95% CI: 0.54-7.56), and LRC (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.53-1.50). They showed a significant difference in terms of DFS (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97).

CONCLUSION

The real benefit of PORT in OSCC patients with PNI is still unclear, although it may have a positive impact on DFS. Clinicians should consider individual patient's characteristics, tumor factors, and treatment goals when deciding whether to recommend PORT. Further studies are needed to clarify which entity of PNI really benefits from PORT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:2019-2027, 2024.

Contralateral Nodal Relapse in Well-lateralised Oral Cavity Cancers Treated Uniformly with Ipsilateral Surgery and Adjuvant Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy: a Retrospective Study

AIMS

To evaluate the incidence and pattern of contralateral nodal relapse (CLNR), contralateral nodal relapse-free survival (CLNRFS) and risk factors predicting CLNR in well-lateralised oral cavity cancers (OCC) treated with unilateral surgery and adjuvant ipsilateral radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients of well-lateralised OCC treated between 2012 and 2017 were included. The primary endpoint was incidence of CLNR and CLNRFS. Univariable and multivariable analyses were carried out to identify potential factors predicting CLNR.

RESULTS

Of the 208 eligible patients, 21 (10%) developed isolated CLNR at a median follow-up of 45 months. The incidence of CLNR was 21.3% in node-positive patients. CLNR was most common at level IB (61.9%) followed by level II. The 5-year CLNRFS and overall survival were 82.5% and 57.7%, respectively. Any positive ipsilateral lymph node (P = 0.001), two or more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001), involvement of ipsilateral level IB (P = 0.002) or level II lymph node (P < 0.001), presence of extranodal extension (P < 0.001), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.015) and perineural invasion (P = 0.021) were significant factors for CLNR on univariable analysis. The presence of two or more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for CLNR on multivariable analysis. CLNR increased significantly with each increasing lymph node number beyond two compared with node-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of isolated CLNR is low in well-lateralised OCC. Patients with two or more positive lymph nodes have a higher risk of CLNR and may be considered for elective treatment of contralateral neck.

Association of ipsilateral radiation therapy with contralateral lymph node failure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (INRT) is controversial in some patients with oral cavity cancer due to concern for contralateral neck failure (CNF).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed and data were extracted following PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes were the rate of CNF following INRT and the rates of CNF by AJCC 7th ed. tumor and nodal staging.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies consisting of 1825 patients were identified. Among the 805 patients treated with INRT, the rate of CNF was 5.7%. Patients with T4 tumors constituted 56% of all CNF cases. The rate of CNF increased by N stage (N0: 1.2%; N1: 3.8%; N2-N3: 17.4%) and was significantly higher for patients with N2-N3 than N0-N1 disease (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

INRT is associated with an overall low risk of CNF in well-selected patients with N0-N1 disease. Patients with N2-3 and/or T4 disease should receive bilateral RT due to increased risk of CNF following INRT.

Pattern of locoregional failure in postoperative cases of locally advanced carcinoma of buccal mucosa treated with unilateral versus bilateral neck radiation: lesson learned from a basic practice setup

Background

Carcinoma of buccal mucosa forms a sizeable percentage of the diagnosed oral cavity cancers in India. There is limited data on elective treatment of the contralateral neck for well-lateralized carcinoma with no involved nodes in the contralateral neck. We conducted this study to compare locoregional control in patients treated with unilateral vs. bilateral neck irradiation.

Materials and methods

48 patients with carcinoma of buccal mucosa were selected. Patients were divided into unilateral and bilateral arms based on radiation treatment of the ipsilateral or bilateral neck. All patients received adjuvant radiation with Cobalt 60 unit. Patient-specific and follow-up data were collected from records and dosimetric data from treatment planning system (TPS). Chi-square and unpaired t-test was used to compare data between arms and Kaplan Meier plot; Cox regression was used for survival analysis.

Results

After a median follow-up of 23 months, 15 (31.3%) patients had developed disease recurrence, 8 and 7 in the unilateral and bilateral arms, respectively (p = 0.591). There was no contralateral neck failure during the follow-up period. The 2-year disease-free survival was 68.2% and 72.2% in the unilateral and bilateral arms, respectively. Among risk factors for disease recurrence, depth of invasion (DOI), delay in starting radiation and planning target volume (PTV) coverage were significant contributing factors. Cox multivariate regression suggested DOI and delay in starting radiation to be significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS).

Conclusion

Bilateral neck radiation does not provide any advantage over ipsilateral neck radiation for properly selected well lateralized buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Ipsilateral neck radiation facilitates better sparing of organs at risk.

Midline involvement and perineural invasion predict contralateral neck metastasis that affects overall and disease-free survival in locally advanced oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Although patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who develop contralateral neck metastasis (CLNM) have worse survival outcomes than those without CLNM, accurate prediction of occult CLNM in clinically negative contralateral neck (contralateral cN0) remains difficult. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors that could reliably predict CLNM in patients with locally advanced (clinical T3 and T4a) tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC).

Patients and methods

The medical data of 32 patients with cT3–4a TSCC who underwent curative surgery between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation of clinicopathological variables with CLNM was examined using logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of significant variables was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

CLNM was eventually confirmed in 11 patients (34.4%). Multivariate logistic regression showed that midline involvement [odds ratio (OR) = 23.10, P = 0.017] and perineural invasion (PNI, OR = 14.96, P = 0.014) were independent predictors of CLNM. Notably, the prediction model comprising a combination of midline involvement and PNI exhibited superior diagnostic performance with an even higher OR of 80.00 (P &lt; 0.001), accuracy of 90.3%, and AUC of 0.876. The multivariate Cox hazards model revealed independent significance of CLNM as an unfavorable prognostic factor for both OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.154, P = 0.031] and DFS (HR = 3.359, P = 0.038), as well as that of PNI for OS (HR = 5.623, P = 0.033).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that coexisting midline involvement and PNI of the primary tumor is highly predictive of CLNM development, which independently affects both OS and DFS in patients with locally advanced TSCC. Such reliable prediction enables efficient control of CLNM by optimizing management of the contralateral cN0 neck, which will likely contribute to improved prognosis of those patients without unnecessarily compromising their quality of life.