Olfactory acuity based on Brief Smell Identification Test (BSITⓇ) in migraine patients with and without aura: A cross-sectional, controlled study

A Pilot Study of the Computerized Brief Smell Identification Test

Objectives: A self-administered Computerized Brief Smell Identification Test (cB-SIT) was developed recently to perform the olfactory identification test under computer control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability of the cB-SIT as compared with the traditional Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT). Methods: Sixty healthy volunteers with self-reported normal olfactory function, 30 hyposmic patients, and 30 anosmic patients were enrolled from June 2023 to May 2024. All enrolled participants received both B-SIT and cB-SIT in a random order to measure their odor identification ability. Thirty healthy volunteers took the second B-SIT and cB-SIT at least one week later. Results: The score was significantly different in both B-SIT and cB-SIT among healthy volunteers, hyposmic, and anosmic patients. The correct answer rate was significantly different in 10 items of the B-SIT and in 7 items of the cB-SIT among the three groups, but the post hoc test showed significant differences in correct answer rates between healthy volunteers and hyposmic patients in 7 items of both the B-SIT and cB-SIT. Test-retest results showed the score of the second B-SIT test was significantly higher than that of the first test, but the scores of the two tests of the cB-SIT were not significantly different. In the B-SIT, the lemon odorant had a higher correct answer rate in the second test than in the first test, but in the cB-SIT, the correct answer rate was not significantly different between the first and second tests in all 12 items. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the cB-SIT was similar to the B-SIT and can be administered in the diagnosis of patients with olfactory dysfunction.

Multisensory hallucinations and other unusual sensory experiences in the context of migraine: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND

Visual auras in migraine have been extensively studied, but less is known about multisensory hallucinations or other unusual sensory experiences, including whether these should be diagnostically considered as part of aura symptoms. The current study aimed to conduct a systematic review and synthesis to bring together existing empirical evidence on these non-visual perceptual experiences, focusing on their phenomenological descriptions and clinical correlates.

METHODS

Forty-eight relevant studies were included based on a systematic search across PsycINFO APA and Web of Science, for peer-reviewed publications in the English language, from 1980 to the present. These comprised a mix of case reports/series (n = 19) and group design studies (n = 29).

RESULTS

Reports of complex multisensory hallucinations, beyond typical established aura symptoms, were numerous and varied in nature. Yet there were limited data on how this related to patient distress and functional interference. Other sensory distortions or hypersensitivities across non-visual domains were also evident, and generally more common in those with established aura symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide preliminary evidence that multisensory hallucinations and other unusual perceptual experiences in migraine are likely more common than previously believed. Further investigations are needed to appropriately account for these symptoms within current nosological systems. Increased clinician-patient awareness is important for managing distress (where necessary), and potentially for offering a holistic therapeutic approach to migraine management.

Migraine with aura: less control over pain and fragrances?

BACKGROUND

Accumulating data emphasizes the importance of olfaction in migraine pathophysiology. However, there are only a few studies evaluating how the migraine brain processes olfactory stimulation, and virtually no studies comparing patients with and without aura in this context.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study recorded event-related potentials from 64 electrodes during a pure olfactory or pure trigeminal stimulus in females with episodic migraine with aura (n = 13) and without aura (n = 15), to characterize the central nervous processing of these intranasal stimuli. Patients were tested in interictal state only. Data were analyzed in the time domain and in the time-frequency domain. Source reconstruction analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Patients with aura had higher event-related potentials amplitudes for left-sided trigeminal and left-sided olfactory stimulations, and higher neural activity for right-sided trigeminal stimulation in brain areas related to trigeminal and visual processing. Following olfactory stimulations patients with aura displayed decreased neural activity in secondary olfactory structures compared to patients without aura. Oscillations in the low frequency bands (< 8 Hz) differed between patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether this may reflect hypersensitivity to nociceptive stimuli in patients with aura relative to patients without aura. Patients with aura have a bigger deficit in engaging secondary olfactory-related structures, possibly leading to distorted attention and judgements towards odors. The cerebral overlap between trigeminal nociception and olfaction might explain these deficits.

Pathophysiology and Therapy of Associated Features of Migraine

Migraine is a complex and debilitating disorder that is broadly recognised by its characteristic headache. However, given the wide array of clinical presentations in migraineurs, the headache might not represent the main troublesome symptom and it can even go unnoticed. Understanding migraines exclusively as a pain process is simplistic and certainly hinders management. We describe the mechanisms behind some of the most disabling associated symptoms of migraine, including the relationship between the central and peripheral processes that take part in nausea, osmophobia, phonophobia, vertigo and allodynia. The rationale for the efficacy of the current therapeutic arsenal is also depicted in this article. The associated symptoms to migraine, apart from the painful component, are frequent, under-recognised and can be more deleterious than the headache itself. The clinical anamnesis of a headache patient should enquire about the associated symptoms, and treatment should be considered and individualised. Acknowledging the associated symptoms as a fundamental part of migraine has permitted a deeper and more coherent comprehension of the pathophysiology of migraine.