Packaging Patients and Handing Them Over: Communication Context and Persuasion in the Emergency Department

Emergency care under the magnifying glass: a review of ethnographic studies in the scientific literature on hospital emergency services

The article presents a review of ethnographic studies in the scientific literature on hospital emergency services, with the objective of systematizing the studies and their principal findings, referring to the health-disease-healthcare process in hospital emergency services from an ethnographic perspective. An integrative literature review was performed of studies published in Argentine and international indexed journals and in the following electronic databases: PubMed, VHL, Scopus, Redalyc, and SciELO. The corpus of the analysis consisted of a total of 69 articles, which were submitted to content analysis, having identified the following analytical dimensions: quality of care, communication and bonds, subjectivity, application of information technologies, methodological reflection, patients' experiences and practices, decision-making, and violence. The results allowed identifying a process that differs from guidelines and protocols, in which healthcare workers' subjective aspects, communication and interpersonal relations, and working conditions shape, orient, and condition the treatment and care provided in the hospital. The article thus highlights the approach to subjective aspects in health studies, to understand not only health workers' perspectives and experiences but also the persistent barriers to providing better quality of care, complexifying a problem ignored by a large share of the analyses.

Interprofessional barriers in patient flow management: an interview study of the views of emergency department staff involved in patient admissions

Patient flow in emergency departments (EDs) is notoriously difficult to manage efficiently. While much of the attention has focused on the procedures, protocols and pathways in which patients receive their first hours of care, less attention has been paid to the relational factors that make it happen. Our study is the first, to our knowledge, to consider the role of interprofessional barriers, defined as suboptimal ways of working, as perceived by ED staff in patient flow management. Drawing on 19 interviews with hospital staff in an acute tertiary trauma center hospital in England, we established three flow-related types of interprofessional barriers: ED teamwork barriers, performance-driven coordination barriers, and referral-related collaborative barriers. Knotworking was recognized as a form of interactions and asset to teamworking, coordination, and collaboration. Identifying processes such as chasing, escalating, and advocating enabled our investigation to highlight a very complex set of interprofessional interactions, and signpost what the suboptimal practices of flow management are. Our analysis holds promise for hospitals beyond the National Health Service in England.

Advantages and disadvantages of between unit hand-off policies in Iranian hospitals: a qualitative study

Introduction: Currently in emergency department (ED) of educational medical centers of Iran there are generally two models for between unit hand-off process based on the time of transferring the responsibility (during stay vs. while departure). There is no comprehensive study available to compare the policies. Thus, the present qualitative study was designed to compare these two methods of hand-off via performing interviews by specialist physicians who involving the process in the hospitals to express the advantages and disadvantages of the two policies from their point of view. Methods: This qualitative study was done by using opinions of experts throughout 2015 and 2016. Interviews were performed using a one-on-one and in-depth semi-structured approach. Before asking the questions, the definitions of the two models of hand-off as well as the aims of the study were briefly explained to the interviewee. Thematic and content analysis strategies were used to identify core concepts and to develop categories. Qualitative content analytical approaches focus on analyzing both the explicit content of a text and the latent content that can be extrapolated from the text. Results: In the present study, a total of 25 individuals were interviewed. The mean age of the participants was 34 years and their mean working experience was 7 years. By analyzing the interviews performed, the results were categorized in four main themes including 'resident training', 'patient management in ED', 'quality and process of diagnosis and treatment of patients' and finally, 'satisfaction with the process among specialist'. Conclusion: Although the two methods have advantages and disadvantages, it is likely that during stay, model was more favorable than while departure model from the viewpoints of interviewees. However, it seems that choosing any of the methods depends on various situations such as workload, academic matters, availability of resources, etc.